Establishing surgical volume benchmarks for Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA)-accredited fellowship training.

INTRODUCTION: Case volumes of trauma centers and surgeons influence clinical outcomes following orthopaedic trauma surgery. This study quantifies surgical volume benchmarks for Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA)-accredited fellowship training in the United States. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of orthopaedic trauma fellows graduating between 2018 and 2019 to 2022-2023. Case volume percentiles were calculated across categories and variability defined as the fold-difference between 90th and 10th percentiles. Temporal trends were assessed with linear regression. RESULTS: 446 orthopaedic trauma fellows were included in this study. Mean reported case volume increased from 898 ± 245 in 2018-2019 to 974 ± 329 in 2022-2023 (P = 0.066). Mean case volume was 924 over the study period and mostly consisted of other (418 cases, 45 %), subtrochanteric/intertrochanteric femoral neck (84 cases, 9 %), open fracture debridement (72 cases, 8 %), pelvic ring disruption / fracture (55 cases, 6 %), acetabular fracture (41 cases, 4 %), tibial shaft fracture (39 cases, 4 %), and femoral shaft fracture (38 cases, 4 %) cases. Overall variability in total reported case volume was 2.0. Variability was greatest in distal radius fracture (14.8), amputation (9.5), fasciotomy (8.0), and proximal humerus repair (5.0). CONCLUSION: Graduates from OTA-accredited fellowship training perform 924 cases on average, which exceeds the current minimum requirement of 600 cases. Case volume benchmarks can assist trainees and faculty align training goals with fellowship program strengths. More research is needed to determine evidence-based case minimum requirements for core competency training in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Analysis of the diversity pipeline for the orthopedic trauma surgeon workforce in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of research on the state of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity in the emerging orthopedic trauma workforce. The purpose of this study was to analyze the training pathway for diverse candidates in orthopedic trauma as it relates to race, ethnicity, and sex. METHODS: Self-reported demographic data were compared among allopathic medical students, orthopedic surgery residents, orthopedic trauma fellows, and the general population in the United States (2013-2022). Race categories consisted of White, Asian, Black, and Native American/Alaskan Native (NA/AN), and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI). Ethnicity categories were Hispanic/Latino or non-Hispanic/Latino. Sex categories were male and female. Representation was calculated at each stage of accredited training. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) quantified the equitable representation of demographic groups in the emerging orthopedic trauma workforce relative to the US population. PPR thresholds were used to classify representation as overrepresented (PPR > 1.2), equitable (PPR = 0.8-1.2), and underrepresented (PPR < 0.8). RESULTS: Relative to medical school and orthopedic surgery residency, fewer female (48.5 % vs 16.7 % vs 18.7 %, P < 0.001), Hispanic (6.1 % vs 4.5 % vs 2.6 %, P < 0.001), Black (6.9 % vs 5.0 % vs 3.1 %, P < 0.001), and Asian (24.0 % vs 14.3 % vs 12.2 %, P < 0.001) trainees existed in orthopedic trauma fellowship training. In contrast, more male (51.5 % vs 83.3 % vs 81.3 %, P < 0.001) and White (62.8 % vs 79.1 % vs 84.0 %, P < 0.001) trainees existed in orthopedic trauma fellowship relative to earlier training stages. There were zero NA/AN or NH/PI trainees in orthopedic trauma (PPR = 0). Relative to the US population, Hispanic (PPR = 0.14), Black (PPR = 0.25), and female (PPR = 0.37) trainees were underrepresented in orthopedic trauma. In contrast, Asian (PPR = 2.04), male (PPR = 1.64), and White (PPR = 1.36) trainees were overrepresented in orthopedic trauma. CONCLUSION: Women, racial, and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the emerging orthopedic trauma workforce relative to the US population, and earlier stages of training. Targeted recruitment and guided mentorship of these groups may lead to greater interest, engagement, and diversity in orthopedic trauma.

Benchmarking Accomplishments of Presidents Elected to Hand Surgery Societies in the United States.

Objective: Qualifications needed to achieve national leadership positions in hand surgery are poorly defined. This study compares the academic accomplishments, demographics, and training backgrounds of presidents elected to serve the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) and the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS). Methods: The ASSH and AAHS provided names of elected Presidents (1990-2022, n = 64). Curriculum vitae and academic web sites were used to collect demographic, training, bibliometric, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding data of presidents. Results: Presidents were predominately male (95%), Caucasian (90%), and orthopaedic surgery residency-trained (66%). Only 9% were racial minorities (8% Asian, 2% Hispanic, and 0% African American). The average age at appointment was 59 ± 7 years old, which was an average of 23 years from completion of hand surgery fellowship. More presidents received plastic surgery residency training in AAHS than ASSH (50 vs. 19%). The most represented hand surgery fellowships were Mayo Clinic (14%), University of Louisville (11%), and Duke University (9%). Twenty-one presidents participated in a travel fellowship (33%). Thirty presidents served as Department Chair or Division Chief at time of election (47%). The average h-index was 34 ± 18 resulting from 164 ± 160 peer-reviewed manuscripts and was similar between the two organizations. Eleven presidents had NIH grant funding (18%) and there were no differences in procurement or funding totals between the two organizations. Conclusion: Presidents of American hand surgery societies obtain high levels of scholarly activity regardless of training specialty. Women and racial minorities remain underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership.

Impact of Orthopedic Hand Surgery Fellowship Training on Hand Surgery Cases Performed by Plastic Surgeons in the United States.

Objective: Multiple pathways exist for hand surgery training in the United States. Plastic surgeons often select Orthopedic Hand Surgery Fellowships to complement their skills and bridge perceived deficiencies in bone and joint cases. This study aims to quantify the impact of this approach on operative hand experience. Materials and methods: Case logs were analyzed for plastic surgery residents and orthopaedic hand surgery fellows (2016-2017 to 2019-2020). Reported hand surgery cases were compared between residency and fellowship using Student's t-tests. In total, 606 plastic surgery residents and 393 orthopaedic hand surgery fellows were included in this study. One year of Orthopedic Hand Surgery Fellowship training afforded more than twice the volume of hand surgery cases than Plastic Surgery Residency training (886.1 ± 234.7 vs. 428.1 ± 147.2, p < 0.001). Results: Case categories with the greatest positive fold difference in case volume encountered during Orthopedic Surgery Hand Fellowship were tumor (138.2 ± 63.2 vs. 22.1 ± 11.8, p < 0.001), joint reconstruction (108.7 ± 21.6 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001), nerve decompression (158.4 ± 63.1 vs. 53.0 ± 32.6, p < 0.001), Dupuytren's (18.4 ± 10.5 vs. 7.6 ± 6.4, p < 0.001), and fracture management (132.8 ± 21.7 vs. 59.6 ± 24.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Orthopedic Hand Surgery Fellowship training doubles the operative hand case volume encountered during Plastic Surgery Residency. Significant increases are especially encountered for select case categories including bone and joint cases.

Differences in Academic Qualifications for Leadership at Hand Surgery Fellowships in the United States.

Objective: In the United States, orthopaedic, general, and plastic surgery hand fellowship programs train hand surgeons. Currently, differences in the academic qualifications of hand surgery fellowship directors (HSFDs) are unknown. This study compares the academic qualifications of HSFDs by specialty. Methods: American Medical Association's Residency and Fellowship Database was queried for hand surgery fellowship training programs. Scholarly activity, academic characteristics, and training pedigrees were collected for each HSFD. Results: Ninety-two HSFDs (73 orthopaedic surgeons, 17 plastic surgeons, 2 general surgeons) were identified. Most were male (87%) and Caucasian (82%). Mean age was 55 ± 11 years and most were trained in orthopaedic surgery (80%). Ten percent of orthopaedic hand surgery fellowship programs were run by a plastic surgeon HSFD, which was greater than 0% of plastic surgery hand fellowship programs run by an orthopaedic surgeon HSFD (p < 0.05). Mean H-index was 15 ± 9 from an average of 57 ± 47 publications. Orthopaedic and plastic surgeon HSFDs had similar levels of scholarly activity (p > 0.05). Age correlated with higher H-index values (r = 0.38, p < 0.001). More plastic surgeon HSFDs were trained by their top five fellowship programs than orthopaedic surgeon HSFDs (65 vs. 27%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Ultimately, HSFDs have strong research backgrounds and similar characteristics despite disparate training pathways. Women and racial minority groups are largely underrepresented among leadership positions at hand surgery fellowships. These benchmarks can help inform future diversity initiatives.

The relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status and short-term outcomes following colon resection.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status, measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), and short-term outcomes following colon resection. METHODS: Utilizing the Maryland State Inpatient Sample database (SID 2018-2020), we determined the association between DCI and post-op outcomes following colon resection including length of stay, readmissions, 30-day in-hospital mortality, and non-routine discharges. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of the 13,839 patients studied, median age was 63, with 54.3 â€‹% female and 64.5 â€‹% elective admissions. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 36.9 â€‹% cases, with a median hospital stay of 5 days. Patients in distressed communities faced higher risks of emergency admission (OR: 1.31), prolonged hospitalization (OR: 1.29), non-routine discharges (OR: 1.36), and readmission (OR: 1.33). Black patients had longer stays than White patients (OR: 1.3). Despite adjustments, in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ among neighborhoods. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that patients residing in distressed neighborhoods face a higher risk of prolonged hospitalization, non-routine discharges, and readmission rate after colon resection.

Variability in Surgical Case Volume Performed During ACGME-Accredited Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Fellowship Training.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between case volume and outcomes in foot and ankle surgery. This study elucidates surgical case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic foot and ankle fellowship training in the United States. METHODS: The ACGME provided case logs for orthopaedic residents and foot and ankle fellows (2018-2021). Variabilities in reported fellowship case volumes were defined as the fold-difference between 90th and 10th percentiles. Reported case volumes were compared between training cohorts with parametric tests. RESULTS: Case logs from 65 orthopaedic foot and ankle fellows and 3146 orthopaedic residents were included. Fellows reported 1.3- to 1.5-fold more foot and ankle cases during fellowship training than during residency training (P < .001). On average, orthopaedic foot and ankle fellows reported 405.4 cases and most were arthrodesis (17%), forefoot reconstruction (17%), mid/hindfoot reconstruction (13%), tendon repair/transfer (12%), and trauma ankle hindfoot (11%). Case categories with the highest variabilities were amputation (14.8-fold difference), infection/tumor (11.6-fold difference), arthroscopy (9.2-fold difference), and calcaneus (8.7-fold difference). DISCUSSION: Case volume benchmarks can assist trainees and faculty during orthopaedic foot and ankle training. More research is needed to determine case minimum requirements needed for autonomous practice in foot and ankle surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A 10-year analysis of application and match rates for pain medicine training in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed application and match rates for pain medicine training in the United States and hypothesized that there would be (1) greater growth in the number of training positions than applicants, (2) higher match rates among US allopathic graduates relative to non-US allopathic graduates, and (3) greater number of unfilled training positions over time. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of all applicants for pain medicine training in the United States. METHOD: National Resident Matching Program data were obtained over a ten-year period (2014-2023). Match rates and applicant-to-position ratios were calculated and compared over time with linear regression. Comparisons were made with chi-square tests. RESULTS: Growth in the number of annual training positions (261-377, 44% increase) exceeded growth in the number of interested applicants (398-415, 4% increase) (P < .001). Annual applicant-to-training position ratios decreased (1.5-1.1, P < .001). The representation of US allopathic graduates among incoming pain medicine fellows decreased over the study period (73%-58%, P < .001) while US osteopathic graduates increased (9%-28%, P < .001).Match rates increased for both US allopathic graduates (71%-91%, P < .001) and non-US allopathic graduates (51%-81%, P < .001). From 2018 to 2023, US allopathic graduates (79%) had higher match rates than US osteopathic graduates (60%, P < .001) and international medical graduates (57%, P < .001). More available annual training positions went unfilled over the study period (2%-5%, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Stagnant annual applicant volume and increasing number of available training positions have led to increasing match rates for pain medicine fellowship training. Fewer US allopathic graduates are pursuing pain medicine training. The increasing percentage of unfilled training positions warrants ongoing surveillance.

Establishing case volume benchmarks for ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery of the spine fellowship training.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There has been increasing scrutiny on the standardization of surgical training in the US. PURPOSE: This study provides case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowship training. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of fellows at ACGME-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowships (2017-2022). PATIENT SAMPLE: N/A. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported case volume during fellowship training. METHODS: Case volume percentiles were calculated across ACGME-defined case categories and temporal changes assessed via linear regression. Variability between the highest and lowest deciles by case volume was calculated as fold-differences (90th percentile/10th percentile). Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential targets for case minimum requirements. RESULTS: A total of 163 spine surgery fellows were included in this study. Total mean reported spine surgery case volume increased from 313.2±122 in 2017 to 382.0±164 in 2022 (p=.19). Most cases were classified as adult (range, 97.2%-98.0%) over pediatric cases (range, 2.0%-2.8%). An average of 322.0 cases were reported and most were classified as laminectomy (32%), posterior arthrodesis (29%), and anterior arthrodesis (20%). Overall variability in total case volume was 2.4 and the greatest variability existed for posterior instrumentation (38.1), application of cage (34.6), anterior instrumentation (20.8), and fractures and dislocations (17.3). If case minimum requirements for total reported cases was assumed at 200 cases, then all spine fellows included in this study would achieve this requirement. However, if case minimum requirements were assumed at 250 total cases, then approximately thirty percent of fellows (n=49) would not achieve this requirement for graduation. CONCLUSIONS: Increasingly, national societies and accrediting bodies for surgical education recognize the need for standardized training. This study provides benchmarks to inform potential case minimum requirements and help reduce variability during spine fellowship training. Future studies are needed to establish case minimum requirements for spine surgery fellowship training across comprehensive and granular case categories that cover the full gamut of orthopedic spine surgery.

Sex Disparities Among Fellowship Program Directors in Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Women are underrepresented in the orthopaedic surgery workforce in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the representation of women among fellowship program directors (PDs) in orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of fellowship PDs in orthopaedic surgery during the 2022 to 2023 academic year. Academic, training, and demographic characteristics were collected from internet-based resources. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for both men and women. A PPR of <0.8 indicated underrepresentation and a PPR of >1.2 indicated overrepresentation. Bivariate analyses were utilized to assess the correlation between sex diversity and geographic region and between sex diversity and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accreditation status. The relationship between the median annual salary and the sex diversity of each orthopaedic subspecialty was analyzed with use of the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: This study included 600 fellowship PDs, 40 (6.7%) of whom were women. In total, 24.5% of the fellowship PDs were assistant professors (8.8% women versus 91.2% men, p < 0.001); 26.2% were associate professors (9.6% women versus 90.4% men, p < 0.001); 36.8% were full professors (4.5% women versus 95.5% men, p < 0.001); and 12.5% were unranked (2.7% women versus 97.3% men, p < 0.001). The representation of women increased with academic rank, as reflected in their prevalence at the assistant (PPR = 0.67), associate (PPR = 0.77), and full professor (PPR = 0.80) levels. Among the orthopaedic subspecialties, musculoskeletal oncology (19.0%), pediatric orthopaedics (14.6%), and hand surgery (12.6%) had the highest proportions of women fellowship PDs. PPRs were lowest for orthopaedic sports medicine (PPR = 0.35), shoulder and elbow (PPR = 0.45), and adult reconstruction (PPR = 0.52). Women PDs had equitable representation in musculoskeletal oncology (PPR = 1.17), hand surgery (PPR = 1.02), foot and ankle (PPR = 0.84), and orthopaedic trauma (PPR = 0.80). Median subspecialty compensation was negatively correlated with the prevalence of women among fellowship PDs (r = -0.70, p = 0.036). Geographic region was not associated with sex diversity (p = 0.434), but programs with ACGME accreditation had significantly more women fellowship PDs than those without (11.0% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women are underrepresented among orthopaedic fellowship PDs, especially in certain subspecialties (orthopaedic sports medicine, shoulder and elbow, and adult reconstruction). More research is needed to understand the barriers that impact the representation of women among leadership positions in orthopaedic surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Greater sex diversity among fellowship PDs may help to increase the recruitment of women into orthopaedic subspecialties. The equitable consideration of orthopaedic surgeons from all backgrounds for leadership positions can increase workforce diversity, which may improve the vitality of the orthopaedic community.

Diversity of Backgrounds and Academic Accomplishments for Presidents Elected to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Societies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Academic accomplishments and demographics for presidents of hip and knee arthroplasty societies are poorly understood. This study compares the characteristics of presidents nominated to serve the Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of arthroplasty presidents in the United States (1990 to 2022). Curriculum vitae and academic websites were analyzed for demographic, training, bibliometric, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding data. Comparisons were made between organizations and time periods (1990 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2022). RESULTS: There were 97 appointments of 78 unique arthroplasty presidents (80%). Most presidents were male (99%) and Caucasian (95%). There was 1 woman (1%) and 5 non-Caucasian presidents (2% Asian, 3% Hispanic). There were no differences in demographics between the 3 arthroplasty organizations and the 2 time periods (P > .05). Presidents were appointed at 55 ± 10 years old, which was on average 24 years after completion of residency training. Most presidents had arthroplasty fellowship training (68%), and the most common were the Hospital for Special Surgery (21%) and Massachusetts General Hospital (8%). The median h-index was 53 resulting from 191 peer-reviewed publications, which was similar between the 3 organizations (P > .05). There were 2 presidents who had NIH funding (2%), and there were no differences in NIH funding between the 3 organizations (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty society presidents have diverse training pedigrees, high levels of scholarly output, and similar demographics. There may be future opportunities to promote diversity and inclusion among the highest levels of leadership in total joint arthroplasty.

A 15-Year Analysis of Supply and Demand for Hematology and Oncology Training in the United States.

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of research on the supply of the hematology and oncology workforce despite projected shortages in the United States Over the past 15 years of the hematology and oncology match (HOM), we hypothesized that there would be more growth in the number of training positions relative to applicants, higher match rates for US allopathic graduates relative to non-US allopathic graduates, and fewer applicants matching at their top fellowship choices. METHODS: This was a national, retrospective cohort study of all applicants in the HOM (2009-2023). Match rates and applicant-to-training position ratios were calculated and compared over time with Pearson tests. RESULTS: Growth in the number of annual training positions (426-708; 66% increase) exceeded growth in the number of interested applicants (706-945; 34% increase; P < .001). Annual applicant-to-training position ratios decreased from 1.7 to 1.3 (r = -0.813; P < .001). Match rates increased over the study period for both US allopathic graduates (79%-88%; r = 0.761; P = .001) and non-US allopathic graduates (45%-63%; r = 0.801; P < .001). During each year, match rates for US allopathic graduates exceeded those for non-US allopathic graduates (P < .001). From 2018 to 2023, US allopathic graduates (83%) had higher match rates than US osteopathic graduates (60%) and international medical graduates (50%; P < .001). The percentage of applicants that matched at one of their top three fellowship choices increased from 53% to 60% (r = 0.480; P = .070). Fewer available annual training positions went unfilled over the study period (3%-0.3%; r = - 0.870; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Match rates have increased in the HOM but remain competitive especially for non-US allopathic graduates. Future investigation is needed to understand disparities in match outcomes by additional applicant and fellowship program characteristics. Ongoing surveillance of HOM outcomes remains critical given the projected shortages in the US hematology and oncology workforce.

Analysis of Academic Accomplishments and Demographics for Elected Presidents of National Orthopedic Surgery Organizations in the United States.

This study analyzed the academic accomplishments and demographics of elected presidents of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), American Orthopaedic Association (AOA), and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS). Curriculum vitae and internet-based resources were reviewed to collect demographics, training characteristics, bibliometrics, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding of contemporary presidents (1990-2020). Eighty presidents were included. Most presidents were men (97%), and 4% of presidents were non-White (3% Black and 1% Hispanic). Few had an additional graduate degree (4% MBA, 3% MS, 1% MPH, 1% PhD). Ten orthopedic surgery residency programs trained 47% of these presidents. Most had fellowship training (59%), and the top three were hand surgery (11%), pediatric orthopedics (11%), and adult reconstruction (10%). Twenty-nine presidents (36%) participated in a traveling fellowship. The mean age at appointment was 58±5 years, which was 27 years since residency graduation. The mean h-index was 36±23, resulting from 150±126 peer-reviewed manuscripts. Orthopedic surgery presidents had more peer-reviewed manuscripts (150±126) than chairs (73±81) and program directors (27±32) (P<.001). AOA presidents had the highest mean h-index (42±21) compared with AAOS (38±27) and ABOS (25±16) presidents (P=.035). Nineteen presidents had NIH funding (24%). More presidents had NIH funding in the AOA (39%) and AAOS (25%) than the ABOS (0%) (P=.007). Orthopedic surgery presidents possess high levels of scholarly output. AOA presidents had the highest h-index values and prevalence of NIH funding. Females and racial minorities remain underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):e45-e51.].

Analysis of the National Resident Matching Program for Surgical Critical Care Training in the United States: 2008-2022.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the pipeline for surgical intensivists despite projected shortages in the United States' critical care workforce. We had 3 primary objectives in analyzing the Surgical Critical Care Match: (1) understand growth in the number of applicants relative to training positions; (2) compare match rates for United States Allopathic Graduates versus non-United States Allopathic Graduates; and (3) analyze the number of unfilled training positions over time. METHODS: This was a national cohort study of Surgical Critical Care Match applicants (2008-2022). Annual match rates and applicant-to-training position ratios were calculated. Cochrane-Armitage tests elucidated temporal trends during the study period. RESULTS: There was a greater increase in the number of annual applicants (276% increase) relative to training positions (128% increase) during the study period (P < .001). The applicant-to-training position ratio increased (0.5-0.9, P < .001). Annual match rates increased for both United States Allopathic (92%-97%, P = .015) and non-United States Allopathic (81%-96%, P < .001) Graduates. Match rates for United States Allopathic Graduates exceeded those for non-United States Allopathic Graduates (P < .05) but were similar from 2020 to 2022 (P > .05). The percentage of applicants that matched at their top fellowship choice decreased from 69%-50% (P < .001). From 2008 to 2022, fewer available training positions went unfilled (52%-13%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The pipeline for surgical intensivists in the United States appears to be increasing along with rising interest in Surgical Critical Care training. Future research is needed to understand disparities in match rates by applicant and fellowship program characteristics.

Nationwide Effect of COVID-19 on Cases Performed During Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Fellowship Training in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected surgical training in the United States. We hypothesized that reported case volume during pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowship training would decrease markedly during the 2019 to 2020 academic year, which corresponded with the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided nationwide case logs for accredited pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellows (2017 to 2021). Annual reported case volumes were extracted and summarized as means ± SD. Parametric tests were used to compare annual case volumes. RESULTS: A total of 149 pediatric orthopaedic fellows from 23 accredited fellowships were included. A 16% year-over-year (YoY) decrease was noted in the reported case volume during the 2019 to 2020 academic year (238 ± 80 vs. 255 ± 60, P < 0.001). Nonacute case categories had the most notable YoY percentage decreases: Soft Tissue: Transfer, Lengthen, Release (-42%); Clubfoot (-34%); and Foot and Ankle Deformity (-31%). Acute case categories had the most notable YoY percentage increases: Trauma Lower Limb (12%) and Trauma Upper Limb (10%). A subsequent 42% YoY increase was noted in the reported case volume during the 2020 to 2021 academic year. DISCUSSION: A 16% YoY decrease was noted in the reported case volume during the 2019 to 2020 academic year, which corresponded to widespread economic shutdowns during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Nonacute cases experienced the greatest negative effect. The results from this study may inform the orthopaedic surgery community on the effect of future national emergencies, such as viral outbreaks.

Trends in ACGME Accreditation of Orthopedic Surgery Fellowship Training.

Currently, most surgeons pursue subspecialty fellowship training. This study answers the following questions: (1) How does the rate of fellowship training in orthopedic surgery compare with that in other surgical specialties? (2) To what extent did adoption of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation change from 2013 to 2021? Orthopedic subspecialties were analyzed for total number of fellowship programs and positions in the 2013 and 2021 Match. Rates of ACGME accreditation were analyzed via chi-square tests. In 2021, orthopedic surgery had the highest rate of fellowship selection (94%) relative to general surgery (77%), ophthalmology (66%), plastic surgery (63%), and otolaryngology (55%). Across all orthopedic subspecialties, the percentage of ACGME accreditation decreased among fellowship programs (53% in 2013 to 48% in 2021, P=.166) and positions (58% in 2013 to 50% in 2021, P<.001). Orthopedic sports medicine had the highest adoption of ACGME accreditation (100%), followed by hand surgery (99%), musculoskeletal oncology (67%), and pediatric orthopedics (56%). Significant increases in the adoption of ACGME accreditation were noted for orthopedic sports medicine (93% in 2013 to 100% in 2021, P=.016) and hand surgery (81% in 2013 to 99% in 2021, P<.001). There was a significant decrease in ACGME accreditation for adult reconstructive orthopedics (40% in 2013 to 24% in 2021, P=.042), driven by the increase in unaccredited fellowship programs. Accreditation of orthopedic subspecialty fellowship training has decreased with respect to the proportion of accredited training positions. More research is needed to understand the benefits of ACGME accreditation for fellowship training in orthopedic surgery. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):57-63.].

Understanding Financial Relationships Between Orthopedic Surgeons and Industry for Research.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to understand trends in industry payments for research awarded to orthopedic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database was queried for the years 2016 to 2021 for industry payments for research. Financial analyses were performed to understand temporal trends and differences by orthopedic subspecialty and principal investigator characteristics such as sex. The threshold for statistical significance was set at .05. RESULTS: A total of 2014 orthopedic surgeons were identified, among whom 542 adult reconstruction (27%) and 460 sports medicine (23%) surgeons were major beneficiaries. Seventy-one female orthopedic surgeons comprised the minority (4%). Total research payments awarded during the study period aggregated to $266,633,592, with adult reconstruction ($88,819,047; 33%) and sports medicine ($57,949,822; 22%) receiving the highest amounts. Total research payments awarded trended upward yearly except for a decline in 2020 that subsequently rebounded (P<.001). Median annual research payment per orthopedic surgeon was $13,375. Median total industry payments per orthopedic surgeon differed between specialties (P <.001), with the highest amounts for adult reconstruction ($44,063) and sports medicine ($34,567) and the lowest amounts for hand ($12,052) and foot and ankle ($19,233). Median total payments did not differ significantly when stratified by sex (P=.276) and region (P=.906). Specialties in which the respective top three companies offered the majority of the research funding were musculoskeletal oncology (90%), pediatric orthopedics (66%), and shoulder and elbow (64%). CONCLUSION: These results can be used as a primer for orthopedic surgeons seeking to leverage industry relationships to fund translational research. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):172-178.].

Hand Surgery Questions on the Plastic Surgery In-service Training Examination: Analysis of Content and References.

BACKGROUND: The Plastic Surgery In-service Training Examination (PSITE) provides residents and faculty with an objective evaluation of hand surgery knowledge during plastic surgery residency training. The purpose of this study was to understand tested hand surgery concepts and references to optimize study efforts during plastic surgery residency. METHODS: We reviewed hand surgery questions on 6 consecutive PSITEs (2016-2021). Questions were classified by taxonomy and clinical subject area. Answer references were quantified by source and year of publication. RESULTS: A total of 235 questions tested hand surgery (16% of all PSITE questions) and 60 questions had an associated image (26%). Questions required direct level I-recall (37%), level II-interpretation (28%), and level III-medical decision-making skills (35%). The most frequently tested hand surgery topics were trauma (31%), reconstruction (20%), and functional problems (17%). There were 667 references to 130 unique journals. Journal of Hand Surgery (American volume), 34% and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (17%) were the highest yield primary sources. The median lag from publication to PSITE was 7 years (interquartile range, 7 years) with a mode of 2 years. Green's Operative Hand Surgery was the most referenced textbook (54% of textbook references). CONCLUSIONS: This study creates an objective benchmark for hand surgery knowledge training during plastic surgery residency. Efforts focused on the most commonly tested topics and references can enhance resident preparation in hand surgery.

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on ACGME-accredited orthopaedic trauma fellowship training.

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak created unprecedented challenges in surgical education. Yet, its impact on reported case volume during orthopaedic trauma fellowship training remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that cases performed during orthopaedic trauma fellowship training would decrease by 8 %-17 % during the 2019-2020 academic year corresponding to the 1-2 month moratorium of non-essential cases during the initial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the United States. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study of orthopaedic trauma fellows at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited training programs (2018-2019 to 2021-2022). Mean case volumes were compared by case category across academic years. RESULTS: There was a -13 % year-over-year decrease in reported case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year (505 ± 126 vs 441 ± 94, P = 0.079, Fig. 1). Case categories with the greatest percentage declines were Treatment of Nonunion / Malunion (-31 %), Fasciotomy (-25 %), External Fixation (-21 %), Forearm / Wrist (-21 %), and Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fracture (-17 %). There was a 7 % year-over-year increase in case volume during the subsequent 2020-2021 academic year with near universal increases in case volume across case categories. CONCLUSION: There was a 13 % decrease in orthopaedic trauma case volume during the 2019-2020 academic year, corresponding to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Certain trauma case categories experienced the greatest negative impact, which subsequently recovered during the next academic year. These results may help inform accrediting bodies and surgical educators on the impact of future viral outbreaks on orthopaedic trauma fellowship training.