Associations between a history of breast feeding, malocclusion and parafunctional habits in Puerto Rican children

Studies relating breast-feeding, malocclusion and parafunctional habits in young children are scarce. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the associations of a history of breast-feeding, incidence of malocclusion and parafunctional habits. METHODS: The dental records of a sample of 540 children aged 6 to 72 months screened for oral conditions and behavioral risk factors were evaluated for variables such as a history of breastfeeding, malocclusion and parafunctional habits. Descriptive statistics using the EPI-INFO Program and Chi-square test at the 0.05 level of probability were performed. RESULTS: The results showed that the mean age of the children was 28 months +/- 14. The mothers' mean age was 26.4 years +/- 6. The prevalence of breast-feeding was 34with a mean breast-feeding time period of 3 m +/- 3.7. About 95of the children had a history of bottle-feeding and 90showed some evidence of malocclusion at the time of dental examination. The main malocclusion problems were space deficiency (closed contacts among incisors) (31), open bites (6) and crossbites (5). A habit of thumb sucking was reported in 32of the cases and pacifier use in 21. there were significant differences for the following variables: mother's age and breast-feeding time period; number of children in family and breast-feeding time period; breast-feeding history and breast-feeding time with bottle use, malocclusion and thumb sucking habit; and gender and thumb-sucking habit. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that breast-feeding practices and time period are behavioral factors that contribute in the prevention of malocclusion in addition to decreasing the practice of parafunctional habits in preschool children.

Longitudinal craniofacial growth patterns in patients with orofacial clefts: geometric morphometrics.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate craniofacial developmental patterns in repaired cleft lip and cleft palate (CLP). DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal. SETTING: Center for Craniofacial Disorders, San Juan, Puerto Rico. SAMPLE: Males aged 9 to 17 years: 13 noncleft (NC) Class I occlusion (NCC1); 13 NC Class III malocclusion (NCC3); 12 CLP Class I occlusion (CLPC1); and 15 CLP Class III malocclusion (CLPC3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Form changes (ages 10, 13, and 16 years), using finite-element scaling analysis. RESULTS: NCC1, 10 to 13 interval: 30% size increase in upper midface (p <.05), mental region (p <.01), mandibular body (p <.05); 13 to 16 interval: 10% to 35% size increase in bimaxillary region and ramus (p <.01). NCC3, 10 to 13 interval: 10% to 40% size increase in posterior cranial base, upper midface, and mandible (p <.05); 13 to 16 interval: 10% to 30% size increase in bimaxillary region (p <.01), especially ramus. CLPC1, 10 to 13 interval: 10% to 15% size increase in posterior cranial base (p <.01), midface (p <.05), and mandibular ramus (p <.05); 13 to 16 interval: 8% to 20% size increase in upper midface (p <.01), lower midface (p <.05), and mandible (p <.05). CLPC3, 10 to 13 interval: no significant changes; 13 to 16 interval: upper midface and cranial base show nonsignificant size decreases, but ramus showed size increase. CONCLUSIONS: Noncleft and CLP Class 1 occlusion groups show similar craniofacial growth patterns. Noncleft Class III groups show excessive cranial and mandibular growth. Class III malocclusion in CLP patients is associated with clinically deficient craniomaxillary growth. Growth guidance may be indicated in children with CLP with unfavorable craniofacial growth patterns.

Deformations of the midfacial complex in twins with orofacial clefts.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the craniofacial morphology in twins with cleft lip and/or palate (OFC) and localize differences, compared with noncleft (NC) twins. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: School of Dentistry, University of Michigan. SAMPLE: Posteroanterior cephalographs of 32 pairs of dizygotic, concordant, like-sexed twins. The NC group consisted of 20 pairs of noncleft twins. The cleft twin (CT) group consisted of 12 pairs of concordant twins (both exhibited OFC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in linear distances, differences in form difference matrices, and visualization of deformations of thin-plate spline (TPS) transformation grids. RESULTS: Linear analysis indicated significant reductions in interorbital distance ( approximately 12%; p <.01) and reduced maxillary heights ( approximately 27%; p <.001) in CTs. Euclidean distance matrix analysis strongly supported these findings, confirmed that the form matrices were significantly different (p <.05), and indicated relative decreases in internasal width ( approximately 12%) and maxillary base width ( approximately 10%). The TPS analysis produced a transformation grid that showed superoinferior compression, suggesting that OFC is associated with a downward displacement of the nasomaxillary complex as well as distortion in the region of the maxillary base. CONCLUSIONS: Twins with orofacial clefts differ from their unaffected counterparts by a midfacial skeletal morphology characterized by decreases in interorbital and internasal widths and relatively shorter maxillary basal heights and widths. Although most of these differences appear to be due to compression and regionalized deformation, the resultant inferior displacement of the medial region of the midface concomitant with horizontal widening in the presumptive palatal region may be a development model associated with OFC.