Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
J Public Health Dent ; 2024 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078227

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Dentists' Medicaid participation is a critical factor affecting dental care access for Medicaid beneficiaries. An important gap in existing literature is the variation in participation across Medicaid dental Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) in states with more than one. This study examined the variation in participation overall and in predictors of dentist participation between two MCOs in Iowa's Dental Medicaid program. METHODS: Data were obtained from a survey of Iowa private practice dentists (n = 1256). Responding general dentists (n = 497) were included in the final analytic sample. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine demographic and practice characteristics associated with dentist participation (acceptance of new Medicaid patients) between MCOs and by age category. RESULTS: Among respondents, the proportions accepting new adults with Medicaid were 26% (MCO 1) and 7% (MCO 2); for children, they were 40% (MCO 1) and 11% (MCO 2). For adults, dentists who were too busy (MCO1) and solo practice dentists (MCO2) were positively significantly associated with the acceptance of new patients. For children, group and rural practice dentists, as well as dentists who worked <32 h/week were positively significantly associated with acceptance of new patients with MCO1. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable variation in dentist-reported acceptance of new adult and child Medicaid patients, and in the factors affecting acceptance of new patients between MCOs in Iowa dental Medicaid. Future studies of Medicaid participation should consider variations by MCO in states with more than one dental MCO so as not to miss important factors affecting Medicaid participation.

2.
J Public Health Dent ; 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886024

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the impact of introducing dental therapists (DTs) into Children's Dental Services (CDS), a large non-profit organization in Minnesota. The aim is to assess the effect of DTs in improving access and reducing dental care costs in Minnesota by analyzing the trends in dental care delivery and procedures performed by CDS dentists and therapists. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2021 data from CDS, the study compares trends in patient volume, types of procedures, salary data and payments by dentists, DTs, and registered dental hygienists (RDH). Return on investment (ROI) trends are calculated using salary and revenues for each provider type. RESULTS: After introducing DTs at CDS and implementing mobile clinics, the number of patients served and volume increased steadily, demonstrating increased access. DTs provided an increasing proportion of fluorides, sealants, and extractions through 2020. Interestingly 2021, there was a decrease for DTs, possibly due to Covid related workforce shortages. ROI analysis showed that DTs' ROI dramatically rose, eventually surpassing dentists, while RDHs maintained a constant ROI. Dentists' ROI also initially increased after adopting DTs in the practice. CONCLUSION: Integrating DTs at CDS improved access by expanding mobile clinics, increasing patient volume, and redistributing procedures, while demonstrating a positive return on investment. Results suggest that adopting the DT model may be a promising practice for other organizations seeking to improve access to dental care, increase operational efficiency, and boost the dental care team's ROI.

3.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 154(7): 620-627.e6, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity can increase a person's risk of developing periodontal disease, and patients with obesity have greater health care costs. However, the effect of obesity on periodontal treatment costs has not been examined. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the electronic dental records of adult patients examined from July 1, 2010, through July 31, 2019 at a US dental school. Primary exposure was body mass index, which was categorized as obese, overweight, or normal. Periodontal disease was categorized using clinical probing measures. Fee schedules and procedure codes were used to compute the primary outcome, which was total periodontal treatment costs. A generalized linear model with gamma distribution was used to examine the relationship between body mass index and periodontal costs after controlling for initial periodontal disease severity and other confounding variables. Parameter coefficients and mean ratios with 95% CIs were estimated. RESULTS: The study sample included 3,443 adults, of whom 39% were normal weight, 37% were overweight, and 24% were obese. Mean (SD) total periodontal treatment costs for patients who were obese were considerably higher ($420 [$719]) than those for patients who were overweight ($402 [$761]) and patients who were normal weight ($268 [$601]). After controlling for covariates and disease severity, patients who were obese had 27% higher periodontal treatment costs than patients who were normal weight. The additional periodontal treatment costs attributable to obesity were greater than those attributable to either diabetes or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that among patients at a dental school, those who were obese incurred substantially higher periodontal treatment costs than patients who were normal weight, independent of initial periodontal disease severity. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study findings have important implications for clinical guidelines and dental benefit design and coverage policies.


Asunto(s)
Sobrepeso , Enfermedades Periodontales , Adulto , Humanos , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/terapia , Índice de Masa Corporal , Enfermedades Periodontales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Periodontales/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud
4.
J Public Health Dent ; 82 Suppl 1: 63-72, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726459

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Perceived racial discrimination has been associated with poor health outcomes, yet its impact on oral health disparities is not understood. We examine the role of perceived racial discrimination in healthcare settings in explaining racial-ethnic disparities in dental visits and tooth loss. METHODS: We used behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS) data for 2014 from four diverse states (AZ, MN, MS and NM) that included "reactions to race" module. Using Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios, we employed inverse odds ratio(IOR)-weighted estimation for mediation analyses to estimate the role of perceived discrimination, after equalizing other confounders and risk factors. RESULTS: We found that among those with similar risk factors, those who experienced racial discrimination were 15% less likely to visit a dentist, and 12% more likely to have tooth loss than those who were treated same as other races. Both Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks were 26% less likely to visit a dentist (for Hispanics, RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.69-0.78; for non-Hispanic Blacks, RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.70-0.79), and non-Hispanic Blacks were 36% more likely to have tooth loss relative to non-Hispanic Whites with similar risk factors (RR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.28-1.45). Perceived discrimination appears to contribute to racial-ethnic disparities in dental utilization among Hispanics, and disparities in tooth loss among non-Hispanic Blacks, relative to non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived racial discrimination partially explains the racial-ethnic disparities in dental utilization and tooth loss among those who otherwise share the same risk factors for these outcomes. Addressing discrimination and systemic racism can reduce the racial-ethnic disparities in oral health.


Asunto(s)
Racismo , Pérdida de Diente , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Salud Bucal , Estados Unidos
5.
Int J Dent Hyg ; 2021 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34758187

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP) is a federal programme aimed to alleviate hunger and improve food insecurity. The impact of SNAP participation on overall health has been studied. However, little is known about the effects of SNAP participation on oral health. We aimed to investigate the association between participating in SNAP and dental caries and to explore the role of food insecurity as a moderator in this relationship. METHODS: We obtained data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2011-2012 and 2013-2014.The primary outcome was untreated dental caries (none vs. one or more). Self-reported SNAP participation status in the past 12 months was the predictor, and food security was the moderator. Food security was measured as overall food security status (full food secure/ food insecure) and household-level food security (full, marginal, low and very low). Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between SNAP and dental caries, and whether food insecurity moderates this relationship. Statistical analysis was carried out in September 2020. RESULTS: Our results suggested that after adjusting for potential confounders, SNAP participants were more likely to have untreated dental caries than non-SNAP participants (odds ratio: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.0). Food security status did not alter the relationship between SNAP participation and untreated dental caries. CONCLUSIONS: Food security status did not alter the relationship between SNAP participation and untreated dental caries. SNAP participation was associated with untreated dental caries among U.S. adults, and this was not affected by their food security status.

6.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 152(8): 613-621, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147241

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the association between food insecurity and untreated caries among US children and the potential role of diet quality as a mediator in this relationship. METHODS: The authors analyzed data for 4,822 children aged 5 through 17 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles from 2011 through 2014. The authors measured food security as household-level food security status (full, marginal, low, very low) and overall food security status (full food secure, food insecure). They measured diet quality using the Healthy Eating Index. The primary outcome measure was untreated caries (none, ≥ 1). The authors used multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate the relationships among food insecurity, diet quality, and untreated caries. They conducted mediation analysis using the Baron and Kenny approach. RESULTS: Food-insecure children were more likely to have untreated caries compared with their fully food-secure counterparts, after controlling for confounding variables (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% [CI, 1.11 to 1.72). Specifically, children from marginal and very low food-secure households had significantly higher odds of untreated caries (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.01) compared with children from fully food-secure households (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.26). Diet quality was not significantly associated with untreated caries. CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity was negatively associated with untreated caries among US children. Diet quality was not associated with untreated caries. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Social factors such as food insecurity should be taken into consideration when dental clinicians perform caries risk assessment because caries risk is shown to be associated with overall health and dental health.


Asunto(s)
Susceptibilidad a Caries Dentarias , Inseguridad Alimentaria , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Humanos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Factores Socioeconómicos
7.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 152(7): 551-559.e1, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34176569

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older adults are keeping their natural teeth longer, spurring calls for dental coverage under Medicare. Although Medicare dental coverage would benefit all older adults, the poorest among them are already eligible for dental benefits through Medicaid. The authors examine the association between states' Medicaid adult dental benefits and dental care use and tooth loss among low-income older adults. METHODS: Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2014, 2016, and 2018, the authors examined adults 65 years or older. The outcomes examined included annual dental visit and partial and complete tooth loss. Poisson regressions were used to obtain risk ratios after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: States' Medicaid adult dental benefits were significantly associated with dental care use, with low-income older adults in states with no coverage having the lowest probability of visiting a dentist (risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94), followed by emergency-only coverage (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.98) and limited benefits (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98) relative to states with extensive benefits. There were no significant differences in either partial or complete tooth loss. CONCLUSIONS: States' Medicaid adult dental benefits are significantly associated with dental visits among low-income seniors. Providing comprehensive dental benefits under Medicaid can improve access to dental care among low-income older adults. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: As the older adult patient population grows, the poorest older adults may face barriers to dental care in the absence of dental coverage. Dental professionals must engage in advocating for comprehensive dental coverage, especially for vulnerable populations.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Salud Bucal , Anciano , Atención Odontológica , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 49(5): 464-470, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486800

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between food insecurity and untreated dental caries using a nationally representative sample of US adults. METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 on adults aged 18 years and older were analysed (n = 10 723). Primary predictors were overall food security (food-secure/ food-insecure) and household food security (full, marginal, low and very low). The main outcome was any untreated dental caries (none/ ≥ one). Multiple logistic regression analyses were done to estimate the adjusted odds ratio after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Food-insecure adults were more likely to have untreated dental caries than food-secure adults after adjusting for potential confounders (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.9-1.5). Adults from households with marginal (OR:1.4; 95% CI:1.5-2.2), low (OR:1.3, 95% CI:1.3-2.0) and very low food security (OR:1.3; 95% CI:0.9-1.5) had higher odds of untreated caries than adults from households with full food security. Following age stratification, marginal, low and very low food-secure adults had higher prevalence of untreated dental caries than full food-secure adults across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that food-insecure adults had higher odds of untreated dental caries than food-secure adults. These findings highlight the importance of assessing food insecurity as a risk factor for dental caries. Longitudinal cohort studies are recommended to determine causal mechanisms.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Inseguridad Alimentaria , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Caries Dental/etiología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Encuestas Nutricionales
9.
Public Health Rep ; 135(5): 571-577, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32795220

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Research examining the effect of changes in Medicaid dental benefits on emergency department (ED) use for dental conditions has had mixed results. We examined the effect of changes in Medicaid dental benefits on ED use for nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) among adults in Massachusetts before and after Medicaid dental benefits for adults were eliminated (July 2010) and partially restored (January 2013). METHODS: We used 2009-2013 data from the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The study population included Medicaid enrollees aged ≥21 who made a visit to the ED for an NTDC that was paid for by Medicaid during the study period. We used an interrupted time-series study design and segmented regression model to assess the effect of the policy changes on ED use for NTDCs. We also conducted a subanalysis by patient age, sex, and geographic location. RESULTS: During the study period, 21 731 Medicaid enrollees aged ≥21 made 35 660 NTDC ED visits. Eliminating comprehensive dental benefits led to a significant increase in the use of EDs for NTDCs. This increase occurred over time (11% increase at 15 months after elimination of comprehensive dental benefits; estimate, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.07-1.21]; P = .03) rather than immediately after the policy change took effect. The partial restoration of certain dental benefits led to a significant decrease in the rate of ED visits for NTDCs over time (15.7% decrease at 5 months after partial restoration of certain dental benefits; estimate, -0.97 [95% CI, -1.83 to -0.11]; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Strengthening dental coverage policies for adult Medicaid enrollees could decrease their reliance on EDs for NTDCs.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Odontológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/economía , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 17: E87, 2020 08 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816664

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dental visits may provide an opportunity to counsel and screen for chronic disease prevention. However, few studies have used nationally representative data to assess the potential role of dental professionals in chronic disease prevention. We examined the percentage of US adults who reported chronic disease counseling and screening by dental professionals. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016 for 5,541 participants aged 30 or older who reported seeing a dental professional in the past year and estimated the percentage who reported receiving counseling about selected chronic disease prevention during the visit. We used logistic regressions to examine associations between risk factors and counseling. RESULTS: Overall, 4.0% (standard error [SE], 0.3) of adults were told by a dental professional about the benefits of checking blood glucose, 42.4% (SE, 2.9) giving up tobacco (among tobacco users), 26.6% (SE, 1.2) about checking for oral cancer, and 43.0% (SE, 1.8) had an oral cancer examination. Groups with risk factors were more likely to receive health behavior counseling than those without (eg, those previously told they had diabetes risk factors were more likely to receive blood glucose counseling than those without [8.1% vs 3.3%, P < .05]). The pattern for oral cancer counseling and receiving an oral cancer examination was different: adults without oral cancer risk factors (no tobacco use, normal/underweight, and/or excellent/very good health) were more likely to receive oral cancer counseling or screening. Adjusted analyses did not change these associations. CONCLUSION: Most adults were not counseled about chronic disease prevention during a visit with a dental professional. Current tobacco users and those with overweight or obesity were more likely to report receiving counseling.


Asunto(s)
Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Boca/diagnóstico , Encuestas Nutricionales , Obesidad/epidemiología , Salud Bucal/educación , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar Tabaco/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Braz Oral Res ; 33: e076, 2019 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31432927

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of opioid analgesics prescribed by Brazilian dentists, potential regional differences and their association with socioeconomic and health-related factors. Data for all opioid prescriptions by dentists was obtained from the 2012 database of the National Controlled Substances Management System, regulated by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency. The number of defined daily doses (DDD) and DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day for each Brazilian state were calculated as the primary outcomes. DDDs were compared by regions and Brazilian states. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was used to determine the influence of the states' characteristics, such as the Human Development Index; poverty; education; number of dentists per 100,000 inhabitants; visit to the dentist; dental care plan; good or very good oral health; number of pharmaceutical establishments per 100,000/inhabitants; and ability to get all prescribed medications. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0. A total of 141,161 prescriptions for opioids analgesics by 36,929 dentists were recorded, corresponding to 658,855 doses of opioids dispensed in 2012. The most commonly dispensed opioids were codeine associated with paracetamol (83.2%; n = 117,493). The national DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day was 0.0093 (range: 0.0002-0.0216). DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day was positively associated to visits to dentists (rs = 0.630; P < 0.001) and inversely associated to poverty (rs = -0.624; p = 0.001). There are significant differences in opioid prescriptions in dentistry among the Brazilian states. These differences may be associated with non-clinical factors.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Codeína/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores de Referencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tramadol/uso terapéutico
12.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 150(8): 656-663, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31235066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inadequate access to oral health care and palliative care provided in the emergency department (ED) creates a pattern of repeat nontraumatic dental condition (NTDC) ED visits. The authors examined NTDC ED revisits and assessed the determinants associated with these visits in Massachusetts. METHODS: The authors examined NTDC ED revisits in Massachusetts during 2013 using the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The authors report patient characteristics of those who made a single NTDC ED visit and of those who made NTDC ED revisits within 30 days of the index NTDC ED visit. The authors used a multilevel logistic regression model to examine the determinants associated with NTDC ED repeat visits. RESULTS: In 2013, 21.5% of NTDC ED visits were revisits. Men from 26 through 35 years of age who were enrolled in Medicaid and who did not make an outpatient dental office visit within 30 days of the index NTDC ED visit had increased odds of repeat visits. CONCLUSIONS: The sizable proportion of NTDC ED repeat visits indicates that certain patients in Massachusetts experience consistent and systematic barriers in accessing appropriate and timely oral health care. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Prioritizing young adults and Medicaid enrollees for ED diversion programs and setting up a formal referral process via connecting patients to dental offices and community health centers after an NTDC ED visit may reduce NTDC ED revisits and provide appropriate oral health care to these patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Estomatognáticas , Enfermedades Dentales , Adulto , Atención Odontológica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Medicaid , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
13.
J Public Health Dent ; 79(1): 71-78, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30537185

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the determinants of emergency department (ED) utilization for non-traumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) by adults in Massachusetts. METHODS: We analyzed patient-level factors associated with ED utilization for NTDCs in Massachusetts during 2013, using the Massachusetts All Payer Claims Dataset. The primary independent variables of interest were use of preventive dental service in the year preceding the ED visit and dental insurance coverage. Key covariates included age, gender, income, day of the ED visit, payer type, and residing in a geographically designated dental health professional shortage area (DHPSA). A multilevel logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds of NTDC ED visits as compared to two other categories of ED visits. RESULTS: 1.1 percent of all ED visits in Massachusetts were for NTDCs in 2013. Preventive dental service use in the preceding year decreased the odds (OR = 0.72) of a NTDC ED visit, whereas having dental insurance coverage increased the odds (OR = 1.1) of a NTDC ED visit. Other patient-level characteristics that significantly increased odds of a NTDC ED visit included being between 26 and 35 years of age (OR = 1.2), male (OR = 1.3), uninsured (OR = 1.7) or enrolled in Medicaid (OR = 1.2), and visiting on a weekend (OR = 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Increased access to preventive dental services may lower likelihood of ED use for NTDCs. Interventions that target younger adults, Medicaid enrollees, and the uninsured, may be the most efficient way to lower NTDC ED use.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Estomatognáticas , Enfermedades Dentales , Adulto , Atención Odontológica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Medicaid , Estados Unidos
14.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 33: e076, 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019609

RESUMEN

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of opioid analgesics prescribed by Brazilian dentists, potential regional differences and their association with socioeconomic and health-related factors. Data for all opioid prescriptions by dentists was obtained from the 2012 database of the National Controlled Substances Management System, regulated by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency. The number of defined daily doses (DDD) and DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day for each Brazilian state were calculated as the primary outcomes. DDDs were compared by regions and Brazilian states. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was used to determine the influence of the states' characteristics, such as the Human Development Index; poverty; education; number of dentists per 100,000 inhabitants; visit to the dentist; dental care plan; good or very good oral health; number of pharmaceutical establishments per 100,000/inhabitants; and ability to get all prescribed medications. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0. A total of 141,161 prescriptions for opioids analgesics by 36,929 dentists were recorded, corresponding to 658,855 doses of opioids dispensed in 2012. The most commonly dispensed opioids were codeine associated with paracetamol (83.2%; n = 117,493). The national DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day was 0.0093 (range: 0.0002-0.0216). DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day was positively associated to visits to dentists (rs = 0.630; P < 0.001) and inversely associated to poverty (rs = -0.624; p = 0.001). There are significant differences in opioid prescriptions in dentistry among the Brazilian states. These differences may be associated with non-clinical factors.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores de Referencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Codeína/uso terapéutico , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico
15.
Acad Emerg Med ; 25(11): 1227-1234, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29738108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a common and ambiguous complaint that results in 3.4 million emergency department (ED) visits annually. While learners may encounter lists of differential diagnoses to consider while in training, often these lists are not empirically based. We sought to establish an evidence-based differential diagnosis for dyspnea and to determine whether normal vital signs can rule out a life-threatening diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2005 to 2014 for ED visits with a chief complaint of dyspnea and tallied the principal discharge diagnosis. We included 10,170 sampled ED visits by adults with a chief complaint of dyspnea, representing nearly 42 million visits nationally. We then calculated the most common principal discharge diagnoses by age group and the frequency of abnormal respiratory vital signs in cases with life-threatening diagnoses. RESULTS: The most represented age group was 45 to 64 years (31.6%). Most visits were discharged directly from the ED (57.5%), while 8.1% required admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). The most common diagnosis in patients aged 18 to 44 was acute asthma exacerbation (14.8%). Obstructive chronic bronchitis was the most common specified diagnosis in both patients ages 45 to 64 (11.1%) and patients ages 65 to 79 (12.4%), while congestive heart failure was the most common for patients ages 80 and over (15.9%). Respiratory vital signs were frequently normal in the 44.6% of visits that resulted in a potentially life-threatening diagnosis but corresponded to increased ICU utilization when abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with dyspnea, the high utilization of ICUs highlights the importance of an accurate differential. The frequencies established here can be used as pretest probabilities in Bayesian analysis to improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis lists.


Asunto(s)
Disnea/etiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Signos Vitales/fisiología , Enfermedad Aguda/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asma/epidemiología , Teorema de Bayes , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Disnea/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
16.
Dent Clin North Am ; 62(2): 155-175, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478451

RESUMEN

Dental public health is a unique specialty of dentistry that focuses on prevention of oral diseases among populations rather than individual patients. It encompasses several complementary disciplines and greatly varies in its functions and activities. Several federal, state, local, and nonpublic entities operationalize the mission of dental public health to improve population oral health through a diverse and vibrant workforce.


Asunto(s)
Odontología en Salud Pública , Recursos Humanos , Atención Odontológica/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Formulación de Políticas , Odontología en Salud Pública/métodos , Odontología en Salud Pública/organización & administración , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/prevención & control , Estados Unidos , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services/organización & administración
18.
J Evid Based Dent Pract ; 17(2): 145-147, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28501066

RESUMEN

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. Colchera MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Br Med J 2016;352:h6704. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Bloomberg Philanthropies, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública and Carolina Population Center. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Observational study.


Asunto(s)
Comercio , Azúcares , Bebidas , Humanos , México , Impuestos
19.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 36(4): 723-732, 2017 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28373339

RESUMEN

Dental coverage for adult enrollees is an optional benefit under Medicaid. Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia have expanded eligibility for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Millions of low-income adults have gained health care coverage and, in states offering dental benefits, oral health coverage as well. Using data for 2010 and 2014 from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we examined the impact of Medicaid adult dental coverage and eligibility expansions on low-income adults' use of dental care. We found that low-income adults in states that provided dental benefits beyond emergency-only coverage were more likely to have had a dental visit in the past year, compared to low-income adults in states without such benefits. Among states that provided dental benefits and expanded their Medicaid program, regression-based estimates suggest that childless adults had a significant increase (1.8 percentage points) in the likelihood of having had a dental visit, while parents had a significant decline (8.1 percentage points). One possible explanation for the disparity is that after expansion, newly enrolled childless adults might have exhausted the limited dental provider capacity that was available to parents before expansion. Additional policy-level efforts may be needed to expand the dental care delivery system's capacity.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro Odontológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , District of Columbia , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Estados Unidos
20.
Am J Prev Med ; 52(5): 645-652, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989449

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: More than one in five American adults has a disability, the most common being mobility impairment (MI). People with MI face significant barriers to healthcare access and are more likely to experience psychological distress. This study examined disparities in access to medical and dental care among people with MI and examine the mediational role of psychological distress on this relationship. METHODS: Analyses were conducted on 36,697 adults (aged ≥18 years) responding to the 2014 National Health Interview Survey (analyzed in 2015). MI was defined as needing special equipment and having difficulty walking a quarter mile without equipment. Outcomes included having lost all natural teeth (edentulous), unmet dental needs, annual dental visit, and annual medical visit. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler psychological distress (K6) scale. RESULTS: Compared with adults without MI, adults with MI had greater odds of being edentulous (OR=2.10, 95% CI=1.82, 2.43), having unmet dental needs (OR=1.99, 95% CI=1.66, 2.40), and lower odds of having annual dental visits (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.54, 0.71). However, adults with MI were significantly more likely to have annual medical visits (OR=2.31, 95% CI=1.90, 2.81) than adults without MI. Psychological distress partially, yet significantly, mediated the relationship between MI and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: People with MI have significant oral health needs and poor access to dental care, which are partially mediated by psychological distress. Results suggest that mental health services should be considered for inclusion in interventions and medical visits can be leveraged to improve oral health outcomes in this population.


Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para la Persona con Discapacidad/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Limitación de la Movilidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Necesidades , Oportunidad Relativa , Estrés Psicológico , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA