Restarting LDLT During COVID-19: Early Results After Restructuring.

INTRODUCTION: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been mostly suspended and deceased-donor living transplantation activity has been considerably reduced because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We modified our protocols and procedures in line with COVID-19 guidelines. Since the restructuring, we have performed 20 LDLTs. Our study reports the outcomes of these cases and demonstrates the feasibility of LDLT during this pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The changes were influenced by experiences and communications from across the globe. A month-long self-imposed moratorium was spent in restructuring the program and implementing new protocols. Twenty LDLTs were performed between April 18 and September 15 using the new protocols. Our experience includes 2 simultaneous liver-kidney transplants, 1 ABO-incompatible LDLT, and 1 pediatric case (age 11 months). RESULTS: Nineteen patients recovered and 1 patient died. We maintained our postoperative immunosuppression protocol without many changes. Major complications were observed in 30% of recipients but none of the donors. One recipient was infected with COVID-19 during the postoperative period. A donor-recipient couple contracted COVID-19 after discharge from the hospital. All patients recovered from COVID-19 and liver enzymes were unaffected. CONCLUSION: This study represents a microcosm of experience in LDLT during the COVID-19 era. Outcomes of LDLT are not affected by COVID-19 per se, provided that we make necessary changes.

Long-Term Functional Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Carcinoma With Morphological Correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcome (exocrine and endocrine) and morphological changes in remnant pancreas after pancreatoduodenectomy and its clinical impact. METHODS: Periampullary carcinoma patients with minimum follow-up of 2 years and without recurrence were included (N = 102). Exocrine insufficiency includes clinical steatorrhea and fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) levels; endocrine insufficiency, glucose levels and glycated hemoglobin; and morphological changes, main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter and thickness of remnant pancreas. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) follow-up period was 59 (26) months. Of the 102 patients, 81 (80%) had severely deficient FE-1 (0-100 µg/g). The preoperative MPD was significantly more and thickness of remnant pancreas was significantly less in patients with severely deficient FE-1. Overall, 15.6% (16/102) developed steatorrhea and improved on enzyme replacement therapy. The presence of MPD stricture (P = 0.008) and weight loss (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with steatorrhea. New-onset diabetes was seen in 17% (15/90) patients, of whom 3 of 5 developed it after 4 years (range, 4-7 years). The blood glucose was controlled on oral hypoglycemics in 2 (10/15) of 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment by FE-1 indicates loss of exocrine function in more than 90%, whereas only 1 of 6 developed steatorrhea and new-onset diabetes. Morphological changes especially MPD stricture affect the functional status of remnant pancreas.

The technique of laparoscopic hepatic bisegmentectomy with regional lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatic bisegmentectomy (s4b and s5) with regional lymphadenectomy (LHBRL) for patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rarely reported. AIMS: The aim of the study was to describe the technique of LHBRL in patients with GBC and to present our initial experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on twenty patients with GBC who were considered for LHBRL by the described technique. These patients either had a suspicion of GBC (SGBC) or had an incidental diagnosis of GBC (IGBC). Appropriate statistical methods were applied. RESULTS: Twelve patients (60%) had SGBC and eight patients (40%) had IGBC. Eighteen patients (90%) were females and median age was 50 (range: 28-70) years. Median (range) surgical blood loss was 120 ml (80-400), operation time was 300 (200-480) min and hospital stay was 5.5 (2-10) days. No patient had iatrogenic complication during LHBRL. Five (25%) patients required conversion to open method. Four patients (20%) who developed complications were managed conservatively. All but three patients (25%) with SGBC had a benign disease on final biopsy. TNM stage of 17 patients (85%) with adenocarcinoma was T1bN0 in 3 (17.6%), T2N0 in 6 (35.3%), T3N0 in 2 (11.7%) and T1-3N1 in 6 (35.3%). The median lymph node count was 10 (range: 4-24) and resection margins were negative (R0) in all. The overall survival was 82.3%. During a median follow-up of 22 months, two patients died due to disease recurrence and one patient died due to myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: The described technique of LHBRL is safe and feasible for patients with GBC without extrahepatic involvement.

Utilization of Gastric Conduit in the Management of Combined Corrosive Esophageal and Stomach Stricture.

BACKGROUND: Corrosive stricture of esophagus may be associated with variable involvement of stomach. We analyzed the outcome of gastric conduit used in the management of corrosive esophageal stricture with concomitant antro-pyloric stricture. STUDY DESIGN: Among 101 esophageal replacements performed, 53 patients had combined esophagus and stomach strictures. Colon was used as a conduit in 43 patients, while stomach was used in ten patients. Indications, perioperative complications and early/late outcomes of patients with gastric pull-up were reviewed and compared with those undergone colon pull-up. RESULTS: The indications of using gastric conduit were impromptu in four patients [colonic conduit ischemia (n = 2) and an oversight of antro-pyloric stricture after forming the gastric conduit (n = 2)]. Six patients had preconceived gastric conduit (distal antro-pyloric stricture with distended stomach). The median age was 29 years (range 16-50), and median BMI was 15.4 kg/m2 (range 14.5-20.1). The stomach was drained using loop gastrojejunostomy (n = 7) or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (n = 3). One patient died due to sepsis secondary to anastomotic leak. Median hospital stay was 9 days (range 7-22). At median follow-up of 25 months (range 14-80), the remaining nine patients are able to have solid diet and have gained weight. The level of esophageal stricture was low (p = 0.01), and duration of surgery (p = 0.02) and median hospital stay (p = 0.04) were significantly less in patients with gastric conduit plus drainage as compared to patients undergone colonic pull-up. CONCLUSION: Gastric conduit in a subject with distal antro-pyloric stricture can be used safely along with gastrojejunostomy in selected patients of corrosive esophageal stricture.

Laparoscopic excision of the choledochal cyst in adult patients: An experience.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision (LCCE) in adult patients is not common. AIMS: The aim is to report our experience of LCCE in adult patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study includes a retrospective review of twenty adult patients (age >18 years) with choledochal cyst (CC) who underwent LCCE by a single surgical team from February 2011 to April 2016. RESULTS: The mean age was 45.5 years. Nineteen (95%) patients had Type-I CC, and one patient (5%) had Type-IV CC (Todani's classification). Fifteen patients (75%) presented with pain in the abdomen, and five patients (25%) presented with jaundice and/or cholangitis. LCCE was successful in 16 (80%) patients, whereas four patients (20%) required conversion to open method. The reason for conversion was technical difficulty due to the initial learning curve, adhesion and inflammation. The mean blood loss, operation time and post-operative stay were 117.5 ml, 299.5 min and 8.15 days, respectively. Bilioenteric anastomosis leak and formation of pseudoaneurysm occurred in one patient (5%); this patient later died due to uncontrolled intra-abdominal haemorrhage. There were no remote complications during a mean follow-up of 17.2 months. CONCLUSION: LCCE in adult patients is safe and feasible, but bilioenteric anastomosis leak may have fatal consequences.