Nocardia Infection in Patients With Anti-Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Autoantibodies: A Prospective Multicenter French Study.

Background: Nocardiosis, a bacterial opportunistic infection caused by Nocardia spp, has recently been reported in patients with anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibodies, but insufficient data are available about disease presentation, outcomes, and occurrence of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) in this population. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter, nationwide study in France and included patients with a Nocardia infection who had anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies. We describe their clinical, microbiological, and radiological characteristics, and their outcome at 1 year of follow-up. Results: Twenty patients (18 [90%] male) were included, with a median age of 69 (interquartile range, 44-75) years. The organs most frequently involved were the brain (14/20 [70%]) and the lung (12/20 [60%]). Half of the infections were disseminated (10/20 [50%]). Nocardia identification was predominantly made in abscess fluid (17/20 [85%]), among which 10 (59%) were brain abscesses. The 1-year all-cause mortality was 5% (1/20), and only 1 case of aPAP (1/20 [5%]) occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Nocardiosis with anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies is associated with a low mortality rate despite a high incidence of brain involvement. Although the occurrence of aPAP was infrequent during the 1-year follow-up period, long-term clinical data are needed to fully understand the potential relationship between nocardiosis, anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies, and aPAP.

Amoxicillin and Ceftriaxone: A Synergistic Association Against Listeria monocytogenes.

Among 15 strains of Listeria monocytogenes tested, a synergy between amoxicillin and ceftriaxone was observed in 14 (93%) according to minimal inhibitory concentration strips and 12 (80%) per the checkerboard methods, as well as for 2 of the 3 strains tested by the time-killing curve. This association may be an alternative treatment for listeriosis in the future.

The evolution of lung computed tomography findings in COVID-19 from 2020 to 2023: more signs of co-infection.

Significant changes were observed in the lung imaging of hospitalised COVID-19 patients from 2020 to 2023, with the emergence of more signs of co-infection https://bit.ly/3TaQlJ2.

Healing Treatments in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review.

Since December 2019, many drugs have been evaluated or advocated as potential treatments of SARS-CoV-2 induced disease (COVID-19), including many repositioned drugs and some others specifically developed for these diseases. They can be roughly classified into three categories according to their main mechanism of action (passive immunization, direct antivirals, and anti-inflammatory treatments), and their use depends on the stage of the disease. Despite often promising preclinical data, most of the treatments evaluated failed to show a significant clinical benefit. In addition, a few others have seen their effectiveness affected by the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and sub-variants. Herein, the aim of this article is to take stock of the data available as of the 14th of July 2022, concerning the specific healing options evaluated for patients suffering from COVID-19. We focus particularly on healing treatments of COVID-19 and do not deal with preventive treatments such as vaccine. Associated therapies such as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis are not detailed since they are covered in a specific chapter of this issue. Passive immunization, especially through monoclonal antibodies, showed a positive impact on the clinical evolution, whether in outpatients or inpatients without oxygen supply. However, their effectiveness strongly depends on the type of SARS-CoV-2 variant, and often decreases or even vanishes with the most recent variants. Among direct antiviral treatments, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir appears to currently be the cornerstone in the management of early infections, but its use may be limited by drug interactions. Remdesivir remains as an alternative in this situation, even though it is potentially less convenient. Anti-inflammatory treatments have often been shown to be the most effective in inpatients with oxygen supply. Dexamethasone is now a cornerstone of management of these patients. Added tocilizumab seems beneficial in the case of hyper inflammation. JAK inhibitors and anakinra have also gained an interest in some studies. As a conclusion of this narrative review, the best treatment strategy has yet to be defined and is likely to evolve in the future, not only because many other drugs are still under development and evaluation, but also because of the viral epidemics and epidemiology evolution.

Addition of daptomycin for the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis: protocol for the AddaMAP study.

BACKGROUND: The leading cause of acute bacterial meningitis in adults is Streptococcus pneumoniae. This infection is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity related, among other factors, to the excessive host response to the pneumococcal lysis. Experimental in vitro and in vivo data show that the combination of corticosteroids/third-generation cephalosporins and the non-lytic antibiotic, daptomycin, has synergistic effects with (1) a rapid cerebrospinal fluid sterilisation, (2) less brain damages and (3) less loss of cognitive performances. Despite these encouraging results, daptomycin has never been evaluated in adult patients with pneumococcal meningitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The AddaMAP trial is a phase II, open-label, Simon's two-stage, multicentre trial that has been designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d for 8 days) to the recommended treatment (corticosteroids+third generation cephalosporin) in adults with confirmed pneumococcal meningitis. The main endpoint is the disability-free survival (defined as modified Rankin Scale mRS≤2) at day 30. Secondary outcomes are overall mortality, disability at D30 and D90 (mRS, Glasgow Coma Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scales, mini-mental score), hearing loss (Hearing Handicap Inventory Test at D30 and D90, routine audiometric test and Hearing-it test at D30), and quality of life (12-item Short Form Survey and WHO QOL BREF). Seventy-two analysable patients are required. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the IDF 1 of the ethics committee on 16 January 2018, and authorisation was obtained from the Agence Nationale de Securité des Médicaments et des Produits de Santé on 22 September 2017. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03480191.

Delayed diagnosis of pneumonia in the emergency department: factors associated and prognosis.

Introduction: Whether a delayed diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the emergency department (ED) is associated with worse outcome is uncertain. We sought factors associated with a delayed diagnosis of CAP in the ED and those associated with in-hospital mortality. Methods: Retrospective study including all inpatients admitted to an ED (Dijon University Hospital, France) from 1 January to 31 December 2019, and hospitalized with a diagnosis of CAP. Patients diagnosed with CAP in the ED (n = 361, early diagnosis) were compared with those diagnosed later, in the hospital ward, after the ED visit (n = 74, delayed diagnosis). Demographic, clinical, biological and radiological data were collected upon admission to the ED, as well as administered therapies and outcomes including in-hospital mortality. Results: 435 inpatients were included: 361 (83%) with an early and 74 (17%) with a delayed diagnosis. The latter less frequently required oxygen (54 vs. 77%; p < 0.001) and were less likely to have a quick-SOFA score ≥ 2 (20 vs. 32%; p = 0.056). Absence of chronic neurocognitive disorders, of dyspnea, and of radiological signs of pneumonia were independently associated with a delayed diagnosis. Patients with a delayed diagnosis less frequently received antibiotics in the ED (34 vs. 75%; p < 0.001). However, a delayed diagnosis was not associated with in-hospital mortality after adjusting on initial severity. Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis of pneumonia was associated with a less severe clinical presentation, lack of obvious signs of pneumonia on chest X-ray, and delayed antibiotics initiation, but was not associated with worse outcome.

Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of prosthetic joint infections according to time of occurrence, a 10-year study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the microorganisms responsible for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and their antimicrobial susceptibilities, and to propose appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatments (EATs) according to time of occurrence METHODS: This 10-year retrospective study presents the bacterial etiology of 282 consecutive PJIs in a French hospital according to time of occurrence (adapted from Zimmerli's classification: early, <3 months; delayed, 3-12 months; late acute, >12 months with hematogenous seeding or contiguous spread; late chronic, >12 months without hematogenous seeding). The expected efficacy of various EATs was analyzed for each PJI. RESULTS: Staphylococci were the most commonly found bacteria (S. aureus (44.3%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (25.2%) with 15.2% and 49.3% methicillin resistance, respectively), followed by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (17.7%) and streptococci (14.9%). The distribution of species varied between categories, but antibiotics targeting GNBs were required in all categories. Imipenem-vancomycin was the most effective combination (99.3%) but should be reserved for patients with suspected resistant GNB. Cefotaxime-vancomycin was less effective in early/delayed and late PJIs (91.1% and 86.1%, respectively), due to resistant GNB and polymicrobial infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam-vancomycin appeared to be appropriate in all situations (>96% efficacy). CONCLUSION: Proposing universal recommendations remains challenging, but a good understanding of the local epidemiology is important for optimizing EATs.

Long-term Prognosis Following Vascular Graft Infection: A 10-Year Cohort Study.

Background: Vascular graft infection (VGI) remains a severe disease with high mortality and relapse rates. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to highlight factors associated with long-term all-cause mortality in patients with vascular graft infection. Methods: All patients hospitalized in our facility over 10 years for VGI were included. VGI was defined by the presence of a vascular graft or an aortic stent graft (stent or fabric), associated with 2 criteria among clinical, biological, imaging, or microbiological elements in favor of VGI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Empirical antibiotic therapy was considered as appropriate when all involved pathogens were susceptible in vitro to the antibiotics used. The surgical strategy was defined as nonoptimal when the graft was not removed in a late-onset surgery (>3 months) or no surgery was performed. Results: One hundred forty-six patients were included. Empirical antibiotic therapy was administered in 98 (67%) patients and considered appropriate in 55 (56%) patients. Surgery was performed in 136 patients (96%) and considered as optimal in 106 (73%) patients. In multivariable analysis, appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was associated with a lower probability of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.47 [95% confidence interval, .30-.79]; P = .002). Long-term survival did not differ according to whether the surgical strategy was considered optimal or not (log-rank = 0.66). Conclusions: Appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy is a cornerstone of the management of VGI. Whenever possible, antibiotics must be associated with optimal surgical management. However, surgery could potentially be avoided in comorbid patients who are treated with appropriate antibiotics.

COVID-19 or not COVID-19? Compared characteristics of patients hospitalized for suspected COVID-19.

During an epidemic period, we compared patients hospitalized for initial suspicion of COVID-19 but for whom an alternative diagnosis was finally retained (n = 152) with those who had COVID-19 (n = 222). Most common diagnoses were another infectious disease and heart failure. COVID-19-negative patients were more often active smokers had less often cough, fever, and digestive symptoms, as compared to the 222 COVID-19-positive patients. They had higher median neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and lower CRP level. In multivariate analysis, no current smoking, neurocognitive disorder, myalgia, and fibrinogen ≥4g/L were independently associated with a final diagnosis of COVID-19.