Socio-economic status, functioning and cognition in young versus adult patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their unaffected relatives; results from a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorders (BD) figures on top of the World Health Organization classification of disabling disorders. It is unclear if there are socioeconomic, functioning, and cognition differences in young patients newly diagnosed with BD and whether these are different for young and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD. Understanding these differences is important for tailored treatment and support. METHODS: Participant groups included 401 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 145 of their unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) and 209 healthy control individuals (HC). First, we compared socio-economic status, functioning and cognition between young patients newly diagnosed with BD (150), UR (61) and HC (92) (15-25 years) and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD (251), UR (84) and HC (117) (>25 years), respectively. Second, within patients, we compared functioning and cognition between young and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD. RESULTS: In both participant groups, patients newly diagnosed with BD, and to a lesser degree UR, had lower socio-economic status and impaired functioning and cognition compared with HC. Further, young patients newly diagnosed with BD were less functionally impaired, than adults newly diagnosed with BD, whereas cognition did not differ between groups. LIMITATIONS: Applied tools for assessments of functioning and cognition are not validated below age 18. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lower socio-economic status and impaired functioning and cognition were found both in young and adult patients newly diagnosed with BD and their UR compared with young and adult HC, respectively. Young patients were less functionally impaired than adults, but cognition was similarly impaired.

Assessment of functional ability in affective disorders.

This review investigates that up to 50% of patients with affective disorders present with impaired overall functioning, also in remitted phases. Nevertheless, functioning is often overlooked in clinical settings and not incorporated as an essential outcome in research. It is recommended clinically and in research to use the International Classification of Functioning (ICF), e.g. the semi-structured interview Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) to ensure a common language and coordination cross-sectionally, interdisciplinarily and across mental and physical diseases.

Personality disorders in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder, their unaffected first-degree relatives and healthy control individuals.

OBJECTIVE: Bipolar disorder (BD) is often a progressive mood disorder with a high prevalence of comorbid personality disorder (PD) ranging from 25 to 73 %. Previous studies have included patients with various illness duration of BD. Longer illness duration may be associated with increased prevalence of comorbid PD. This study investigated the prevalence of comorbid personality disorders in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) compared with healthy control individuals (HC). METHODS: We included 204 patients with newly diagnosed BD, 109 of their UR and 188 HC. To assess comorbid PD according to DSM-IV, the SCID-II-interview was performed in full or partial remission. Subthreshold PD was defined as scores above cut-off in the SCID-II self-report questionnaires. Functioning was assessed using the Functioning Assessment Short Test. RESULTS: In total 52 (25.5 %) of the patients with newly diagnosed BD fulfilled criteria for a comorbid PD. Regarding UR, 7 (6.4 %) fulfilled the criteria for a PD. Subthreshold PD were more prevalent in BD (82.8 %) and UR (53.0 %) than in HC (35.1 %), p-values < 0.003). Patients with comorbid PD presented with impaired functioning compared with patients without PD. LIMITATIONS: Clinical diagnostic distinction between PD and BD is challenged by overlapping symptoms. CONCLUSION: A quarter of patients with newly diagnosed BD fulfill criteria for a comorbid PD, already at the time of the diagnosis with BD. A comorbid PD is associated with larger functional impairments. This emphasizes the need for early assessment of comorbid PD at time of BD diagnosis.

Socio-economic functioning in patients with bipolar disorder and their unaffected siblings - results from a nation-wide population-based longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported real-life data on socio-economic functioning in patients with bipolar disorder and their unaffected first-degree relatives. METHODS: We used Danish nation-wide population-based longitudinal register linkage to investigate socio-economic functioning in 19 955 patients with bipolar disorder, their 13 923 siblings and 20 sex, age and calendar-matched control individuals from the general population. Follow-up was from 1995 to 2017. RESULTS: Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder had lower odds of having achieved the highest educational level [OR 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.77)], being employed [OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.159-0.168)], having achieved the 80% highest quartile of income [OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.32-0.35)], cohabitating [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.43-0.46)] and being married [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.52-0.55)] at first contact to hospital psychiatry as inpatient or outpatient compared with control individuals from the general population. Similarly, siblings to patients with bipolar disorder had a lower functioning within all five socio-economic areas than control individuals. Furthermore, patients and partly siblings showed substantially decreased ability to enhance their socio-economic functioning during the 23 years follow-up compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic functioning is substantially decreased in patients with bipolar disorder and their siblings and does not improve during long-term follow-up after the initial hospital contact, highlighting a severe and overlooked treatment gap.

Familial load of psychiatric disorders and overall functioning in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their unaffected first-degree relatives.

BACKGROUND: Overall functioning is already impaired in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) and, to a lesser degree, also in their unaffected first-degree relatives (UR). Further, aggregation of psychiatric disorders among the patients' first-degree relatives seems to be associated with higher illness burden and poorer prognosis. However, whether this aggregation of psychiatric disorders among first-degree relatives, the familial load (FL), impacts overall functioning in patients newly diagnosed with BD and their UR remains unresolved. METHODS: In total, 388 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 144 of their UR and 201 healthy control individuals were included. Overall functioning was assessed using three different assessment methods: The interviewer based "Functioning Assessment Short Test" (FAST), the questionnaire "Work and Social Adjustment Scale" (WSAS) and six outcome measures covering the participants' socio-economic status (SES); educational achievement, employment, work ability, relationship, cohabitation and marital status. Familial load of psychiatric disorder was assessed using the "Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria" interview. Associations between FL and overall functioning in patients and UR were investigated categorically using logistic and continuously in linear regression models. RESULTS: Contrasting with the hypotheses, the FL of psychiatric disorders was not associated with impaired overall functioning, neither in patients newly diagnosed with BD nor in their UR. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that impaired functioning in the early phase of BD is not associated with aggregation of psychiatric disorders among first-degree relatives. The observed functional impairment in patients newly diagnosed with BD seems driven by the personal impact of the disorder rather than the impact of having first-degree relatives with psychiatric disorders.

Associations between levels of oxidative nucleoside damage and cardiovascular risk in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their unaffected relatives.

Enhanced oxidative stress-generated nucleoside damage may contribute to the increased cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) but the association has never been investigated. We investigated the associations between oxidative stress-generated damage to DNA (8-oxodG) and RNA (8-oxoGuo), respectively, and three measures reflecting cardiovascular risk; namely, the Framingham 30-year risk score of cardiovascular diseases, the metabolic syndrome, and the insulin resistance index in 360 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 102 of their unaffected relatives (UR) and 197 healthy control individuals (HC). In sex- and age-adjusted models, the 30-year cardiovascular risk score increased by 20.8% (CI = 7.4-35.9%, p = 0.002) for every one nM/mM creatinine increase in 8-oxoGuo and by 15.6% (95% CI = 5.8-26.4%, p = 0.001) for every one nM/mM creatinine increase in 8-oxodG, respectively. Further, insulin resistance index increased by 24.1% (95% CI = 6.7-43%, p = 0.005) when 8-oxoGuo increased one nM/mM creatinine. The associations between cardiovascular measures and oxidative nucleoside damage were more pronounced in patients with BD compared with UR, and HC. Metabolic syndrome was not associated with nucleoside damage. Overall, higher oxidative stress-generated nucleoside damage was associated with a higher cardiovascular risk score and a higher degree of insulin resistance index, and having BD impacted the associations. Further, within patients, treatment with psychotropics seemed to enhance the associations between 30-year CVD risk score and insulin resistance index, respectively, and oxidatively stress-generated nucleoside damage. Our findings support enhanced oxidative stress-generated nucleoside damage as a putative pathophysiological mechanism that may mediate the higher cardiovascular risk observed in patients with BD already at the time of diagnosis.

Associations between childhood maltreatment and oxidative nucleoside damage in affective disorders.

BACKGROUND: Childhood maltreatment is an established risk factor for incident unipolar disorder and bipolar disorder. It is separately observed that affective disorders (AD) are also associated with higher nucleoside damage by oxidation. Childhood maltreatment may induce higher levels of nucleoside damage by oxidation and thus contribute to the development of AD; however, this relation is only sparsely investigated. METHODS: In total, 860 participants (468 patients with AD, 151 unaffected first-degree relatives, and 241 healthy control persons) completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). The association between CTQ scores and markers of systemic DNA and RNA damage by oxidation as measured by urinary excretion of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine (8-oxoGuo) levels, respectively, was investigated. RESULTS: In multiple regression models adjusted for sex- and age, 8-oxodG and 8-oxoGuo levels were found to be higher in individuals who had experienced more childhood maltreatment. These associations persisted in models additionally adjusted for body mass index, alcohol, and current smoking status. Emotional abuse, sexual abuse, and emotional neglect were principally responsible for the foregoing associations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of an association between childhood maltreatment and oxidative stress markers suggest that childhood maltreatment overall, notably emotional abuse and emotional neglect, is associated with enhanced systemic damage to DNA and RNA in adulthood. Further, individuals with AD reported a higher prevalence of childhood maltreatment, which may induce higher levels of nucleoside damage by oxidation in adulthood, possibly leading to increased risk of developing AD. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify this relationship further.

Socio-economic status and functioning in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their unaffected siblings - Results from a cross-sectional clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported socio-economic status and functioning in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) and their unaffected siblings (US). METHODS: Socio-economic status and functioning were compared in a cross-sectional clinical study including 382 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 129 of their US, and 200 healthy control individuals (HC). RESULTS: Socio-economic status was lower in patients newly diagnosed with BD compared with HC within educational achievement, employment status, workability and relationship status (p < 0.001, OR between 0.02 and 0.53). Regarding US and HC, US had lower educational achievement (p < 0.001, OR = 0.27 [0.16; 0.46]), as the only affected socio-economic outcome. Functioning was substantially impaired according to the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 2.12) and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 2.76) in patients newly diagnosed with BD compared with HC. US expressed the same pattern with impaired overall functioning. Within patients, the impaired functioning was associated with a longer illness duration. LIMITATIONS: Patients had an illness duration of 10.5 [IQR: 6.1; 16.2] years, even though they were included shortly after a diagnosis of BD (0.3 [IQR: 0.1; 0.7] years), highlighting the obstacles of research in illness onset of BD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients newly diagnosed with BD, and to a lesser degree their US, exhibit lower socio-economic status and impaired overall functioning. These findings emphasise the importance of early diagnosis, treatment and focus on functional recovery and stress that intervention strategies and further research in high-risk individuals are needed.

Physical health status in first-degree relatives of patients with bipolar disorder, a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic literature search aimed to investigate the physical health status of first-degree relatives to patients with bipolar disorder. There is abundant evidence for familial aggregation of both bipolar disorders, cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases. However, a review gathering data on the physical health status in first-degree relatives to patients with bipolar disorder is missing. We hypothesized that first-degree relatives of bipolar probands would express higher rates of physical diseases and somatic morbidity. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature search in three different databases PubMed, Embase and PsychInfo. The search identified 10 studies comparing 24,277 unaffected first-degree relatives with 318.933 controls persons. RESULTS: Seven out of 10 studies showed that first-degree relatives had statistically significantly higher rates of one or more physical diseases or increased morbidity, including cardiovascular diseases, infections, autoimmune thyroiditis, pernicious anaemia, and higher mortality compared with control persons. CONCLUSION: Findings from this systematic literature review did not unambiguously confirm a possible link between bipolar disorder and overall increased risk of physical diseases in first-degree relatives of probands with bipolar disorder. However, these results could suggest that first-degree relatives of probands with bipolar disorder could have a predisposition to poorer physical health than the general population and that this aspect warrants further investigation.

Prevalences of comorbid anxiety disorder and daily smartphone-based self-reported anxiety in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Around 40% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) additionally have anxiety disorder. The prevalence of anxiety in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their first-degree relatives (UR) has not been investigated.ObjectiveTo investigate (1) the prevalence of a comorbid anxiety diagnosis in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their UR, (2) sociodemographic and clinical differences between patients with and without a comorbid anxiety diagnosis and (3) the association between smartphone-based patient-reported anxiety and observer-based ratings of anxiety and functioning, respectively. METHODS: We recruited 372 patients with BD and 116 of their UR. Daily smartphone-based data were provided from 125 patients. SCAN was used to assess comorbid anxiety diagnoses. FINDINGS: In patients with BD, the prevalence of a comorbid anxiety disorder was 11.3% (N=42) and 10.3% and 5.9% in partial and full remission, respectively. In UR, the prevalence was 6.9%. Patients with a comorbid anxiety disorder had longer illness duration (p=0.016) and higher number of affective episodes (p=0.011). Smartphone-based patient-reported anxiety symptoms were associated with ratings of anxiety and impaired functioning (p<0.001). LIMITATIONS: The SCAN interviews to diagnose comorbid anxiety disorder were carried out regardless of the participants' mood state.Clinical implicationsThe lower prevalence of anxiety in newly diagnosed BD than in later stages of BD indicates that anxiety increases with progression of BD. Comorbid anxiety seems associated with poorer clinical outcomes and functioning and smartphones are clinically useful for monitoring anxiety symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02888262).

Impact of modification to DSM-5 criterion A for hypomania/mania in newly diagnosed bipolar patients: findings from the prospective BIO study.

BACKGROUND: DSM-IV states that criterion A for diagnosing hypomania/mania is mood change. The revised DSM-5 now states that increased energy or activity must be present alongside mood changes to diagnose hypomania/mania, thus raising energy/activity to criterion A. We set out to investigate how the change in criterion A affects the diagnosis of hypomanic/manic visits in patients with a newly diagnosed bipolar disorder. RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, 373 patients were included (median age = 32; IQR, 27-40). Women constituted 66% (n = 245) of the cohort and 68% of the cohort (n = 253) met criteria for bipolar type II, the remaining patients were diagnosed bipolar type I. Median number of contributed visits was 2 per subject (IQR, 1-3) and median follow-up time was 3 years (IQR, 2-4). During follow-up, 127 patients had at least one visit with fulfilled DSM-IV criterion A. Applying DSM-5 criterion A reduced the number of patients experiencing a hypomanic/manic visit by 62% at baseline and by 50% during longitudinal follow-up, compared with DSM-IV criterion A. Fulfilling DSM-5 criterion A during follow-up was associated with higher modified young mania rating scale score (OR = 1.51, CL [1.34, 1.71], p < 0.0001) and increased number of visits contributed (OR = 1.86, CL [1.52, 2.29], p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Applying the stricter DSM-5 criterion A in a cohort of newly diagnosed bipolar patients reduced the number of patients experiencing a hypomanic/manic visit substantially, and was associated with higher overall young mania rating scale scores, compared with DSM-IV criterion A. Consequently, fewer hypomanic/manic visits may be detected in newly diagnosed bipolar patients with applied DSM-5 criterion A, and the upcoming ICD-11, which may possibly result in longer diagnostic delay of BD as compared with the DSM-IV.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in newly diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder, their unaffected first-degree relatives and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which facilitates neuroplasticity and synaptogenesis, may be decreased in bipolar disorder, but has not been systematically investigated in people with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder and unaffected first-degree relatives. AIMS: To compare BDNF levels in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder, their unaffected first-degree relatives and healthy controls. METHOD: The study investigated plasma BDNF levels in patients (n = 371) with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder, their unaffected first-degree relatives (n = 98) and healthy controls (n = 200) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We further investigated associations between BDNF levels and illness-related variables and medication status. RESULTS: BDNF levels were found to be 22.0% (95% CI 1.107-1.343) higher in patients with bipolar disorder compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001) and 15.6% higher in unaffected first-degree relatives compared with healthy controls (95% CI 1.007-1.327, P = 0.04), when adjusting for age and gender. Further, BDNF levels were positively associated with duration of illness at a trend level (P = 0.05), age (P = 0.001) and use of anti-epileptic medication (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that BDNF levels are not decreased in the early stages of bipolar disorder and in unaffected first-degree relatives contrasting with prior findings during later stages of the illness.

High-sensitive C-reactive protein and homocysteine levels in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder, their first-degree relatives, and healthy control persons-Results from a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Changes in inflammatory and metabolic markers are implicated in the pathogenesis in both the development and progression of bipolar disorder (BD). Notwithstanding, these markers have not been investigated in newly diagnosed BD. METHODS: We compared high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and homocysteine (Hcy) levels in 372 patients with newly diagnosed BD, 106 unaffected first-degree relatives (URs), and 201 healthy control persons (HCs). Within the patient group, we also investigated possible associations between hs-CRP and Hcy, respectively, with illness-related characteristics and psychotropic medication. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in Hcy and hs-CRP levels were found when comparing BD and URs with HCs. Similarly, there were no differences when comparing only patients in remission or patients with affective symptoms, respectively, with HCs. Hcy levels were found to be 11.9% (95% CI: 1.030-1.219) higher in patients with BD when compared with their URs (p = 0.008), when adjusting for folate and cobalamin status, age, sex, and self-reported activity levels. Hcy levels were significantly associated with folate, cobalamin, gender, and age in all models (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support hs-CRP or Hcy as markers in newly diagnosed BD.

Sleep and physical activity in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder in remission, their first-degree unaffected relatives and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are a central feature in bipolar disorder (BD) that often persist in remission and seem to be present also in unaffected first-degree relatives (UR) of patients with BD, presenting a possible risk factor for later onset of BD. However, it is unknown if these disturbances are associated with unhealthy life-style as reflected in low levels of physical activity. We investigated sleep disturbances and physical activity levels in patients with newly diagnosed BD in full or partial remission, their UR and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Sleep patterns and physical activity were compared in 227 patients with newly diagnosed BD, 76 UR and 148 HC. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were used to assess sleep disturbances and physical activity, respectively. RESULTS: In sex- and age-adjusted analyses, patients with BD exhibited more sleep disturbances and lower physical activity compared with UR and HC, respectively. Unaffected relatives reported significantly longer sleep latency and a non-significant trend towards more overall sleep disturbances compared with HC. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbances and less physical activity are present in patients with newly diagnosed BD in partial or full remission. Individuals at familiar risk of BD reported longer sleep latency and similar physical activity compared with HC. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify whether these discrete sleep disturbances act as risk factor for later onset of BD and whether increased physical activity in high-risk individuals may act as a protective factor against development of psychiatric illness.