RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The current shift in site of care from community oncology practices to the hospital outpatient department to deliver oncology services may have significant implications for the economic and clinical outcomes of cancer care. Therefore, this study compares health care use and costs among patients with cancer receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in physician offices (PO) versus in hospital outpatient settings (HOP). METHODS: This retrospective study, which was based on medical and pharmacy claims data, included patients (age, 18 to 64 years) initiating IV chemotherapy/biologic treatment between January 1, 2006, and August 31, 2012, who were diagnosed with early or metastatic breast cancer, metastatic lung cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients were assigned to PO or HOP groups on the basis of where they received > 95% of their IV cancer therapy. RESULTS: The study sample included 18,740 patients (12,899 PO; 5,841 HOP) who had a mean age of 51.6 years and a Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 5.37. Overall office visits (21.8 ± 13.8 PO v 21.2 ± 12.9, P < .005) and outpatient services (50.8 ± 35.5 PO v 48.5 ± 33.6, P < .001) were higher in the PO group than in the HOP group. Cancer-related inpatient hospitalizations (0.6 ± 1.2 PO v 0.7 ± 1.4 HOP, P = .002) were lower in the PO group than in the HOP group. Although quality-of-care metrics were similar between the HOP and PO groups, follow-up all-cause costs ($82,773 PO v $122,473 HOP) and cancer-related health care costs ($69,037 PO v $108,177 HOP) were higher in the HOP group than in the PO group. CONCLUSION: Despite similar resource use, all-cause and cancer-related health care costs in HOP were significantly higher compared with those in PO settings.
Asunto(s)
Administración Intravenosa/métodos , Quimioterapia/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Hospitalización/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Consultorios Médicos/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant trastuzumab treatment is administered to early stage breast cancer patients in physician office (POV) or hospital outpatient (HOP) settings. OBJECTIVE: To identify treatment patterns, utilization, and costs by site of care (POV vs. HOP) of patients with adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with trastuzumab. METHODS: This retrospective analysis identified adult, female breast cancer patients who initiated trastuzumab treatment (index date) from a large U.S. claims database. Inclusion criteria also required ≥ 2 claims for both trastuzumab (from July 1, 2006, to July 31, 2012) and breast cancer (during 6-month pre-index baseline period), no evidence of metastatic breast cancer or other cancers in the baseline period, and continuous enrollment with commercial or Medicare Advantage coverage 6 months pre- and post-index, except that patients who died during follow-up were retained. Patients with evidence of trastuzumab receipt during the baseline period or more than 1 site of care during follow-up were excluded. Patients were stratified by site of care and were followed from index date to 30 days after the last trastuzumab infusion prior to a gap ≥ 90 days, death, disenrollment, or end-of-study period. Differences in treatment patterns between the POV and HOP cohorts were assessed by t-test and chi-square test. The relationship between site of care and health care costs was modeled with a generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link, and the number of trastuzumab infusions was modeled with negative binomial regression controlling for log follow-up time. All models were adjusted for age, baseline comorbidity score, and insurance type. RESULTS: Of the 3,439 breast cancer patients identified, 77.6% (2,669) received adjuvant trastuzumab in the POV setting. Mean age (53.7 years) and baseline comorbidity score (3.91) were similar among cohorts; a higher percentage of POV versus HOP patients had commercial insurance (91.1% vs. 86.4%, P < 0.001). Compared with the POV cohort, HOP patients had a shorter mean duration of trastuzumab treatment (324.8 vs. 343.0 days, P < 0.001); more treatment gaps (30-59 day gap: 67.4% vs. 24.1%, P < 0.001); and fewer trastuzumab infusions per month (1.37 vs. 1.98, P < 0.001) during follow-up. In multivariate analysis, the monthly count of trastuzumab infusions in the HOP cohort was lower than the POV cohort (incidence rate ratio = 0.693; 95% CI = 0.672-0.715). Adjusted per patient per month total health care costs were 53.6 % higher in the HOP setting (cost ratio = 1.536, 95% CI = 1.472-1.604). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab in the HOP setting had a shorter duration of trastuzumab treatment and fewer trastuzumab infusions but incurred higher monthly total costs than patients treated in the POV setting.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Visita a Consultorio Médico/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Esquema de Medicación , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Trastuzumab , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A series of studies had demonstrated that deficient clearance of the large neutral amino acid phenylalanine was associated with tardive dyskinesia (TD), that the administration of the branched chain amino acids (BCAA) significantly decreased TD symptoms over placebo, and that the observed TD symptom reduction was significantly correlated with a diminished availability of phenylalanine to the brain of adult men with psychosis. As part of an initiative by the National Institute of Mental Health to expand the testing of treatments that were successful in adults to children and adolescents, the present pilot study was undertaken to test whether the BCAA would also reduce TD symptoms in children and adolescents. A 2-week trial of the BCAA was thus conducted in 6 children and adolescents (age range, 10.5-16.5 years) for the treatment of TD symptoms. METHOD: A clinical diagnosis of TD was made in all subjects on the basis of a global score derived from the Simpson Abbreviated Dyskinesia Rating Scale. Subjects were videotaped for TD evaluation at baseline and after 1 and 2 weeks of BCAA treatment given in the form of a drink administered 3 times daily. TD symptom change over the trial period was evaluated by researchers blinded to the treatment status of the evaluation. RESULTS: TD symptom decreases were substantial in 5 of the 6 participants, ranging from 40% to 65%. Two of the subjects received an additional course of treatment, and further reductions in TD symptoms over those seen in the 2-week trial were observed. CONCLUSION: The substantial symptom decrease and tolerability observed suggest the use of the BCAA formulation for the treatment of TD in children and adolescents and warrant further large-scale studies.