The direct posterior gluteal muscle splitting approach for posterior access to acetabular fractures: Surgical technique and case series.

We present a minimally invasive direct posterior, gluteal muscle splitting approach (PMS) as an alternative to the traditional Kocher-Langenbeck (KL) approach for posterior access to acetabular fractures. We believe it offers significant advantages and provides improved access while maximizing the range of fracture patterns that can be addressed through a posterior approach. One hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients treated with this approach by the senior author (RMS) between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. The most common individual fracture pattern addressed was a posterior wall (66/36%) but more complex combination fracture types were the dominant group (106/58%), and included transverse with posterior wall, posterior wall / posterior column, and T types. A radiographically congruent reduction was consistently obtained at surgery, without any operative sciatic nerve palsies and a comparable heterotopic bone formation rate to previous reports. We have reviewed all 120 patients who were followed beyond 6 months and noted the hip replacement conversion rates to be different with each fracture type. The rate was highest with Transverse/ posterior wall injuries (36%), 16% of the posterior wall injuries were converted, a history of dislocation was not specifically associated with conversion. We believe this approach improves the posterior access to the acetabulum, but this study also confirms the poor prognosis of specific groups of higher energy multi-fragmentary, posterior acetabular injuries and suggests the need for a classification system that better predicts the prognosis for the hip joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The principles and practice of open fracture care, 2018.

The principles of open fracture management are to manage the overall injury and specifically prevent primary contamination becoming frank infection. The surgical management of these complex injuries includes debridement & lavage of the open wound with combined bony and soft tissue reconstruction. Good results depend on early high quality definitive surgery usually with early stable internal fixation and associated soft tissue repair. While all elements of the surgical principles are very important and depend on each other for overall success the most critical element appears to be achieving very early healthy soft tissue cover. As the injuries become more complex this involves progressively more complex soft tissue reconstruction and may even requiring urgent free tissue transfer requiring close co-operative care between orthopaedic and plastic surgeons. Data suggests that the best results are obtained when the whole surgical reconstruction is completed within 48-72 h.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Risk of Secondary Surgery Following the Treatment of Displaced Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly Compared to Open Reduction Internal Fixation? A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is to anatomically reduce the facture and maintain a congruent hip joint. However, ORIF in the elderly is technically challenging. Therefore, there are advocates for acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this patient population. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of revision surgery in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with ORIF or THA. The secondary purpose was to compare patient's self-reported functional outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Two American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three patients were treated with ORIF and 37 were treated with THA. The mean follow-up was 22 months (range 6-89 months). Patients were interviewed, and radiographs were examined. INTERVENTION: Treatment of displaced acetabular fractures with either ORIF or THA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Need for reoperation. Harris Hip Score and SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: Those treated with ORIF had a higher rate of reoperation (10/33, 30%) compared with those treated with THA (5/37, 14%); however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Patients reported better bodily pain scores as measured by SF-36 (48 vs. 39, P = 0.04), and a trend toward improved function as measured by patient reported Harris Hip Scores (82 vs. 63, P = 0.06) in those treated with THA compared with ORIF. CONCLUSIONS: Acute reconstruction of acetabular fractures with THA in the geriatric population seems to compare favorably with ORIF, with a similar rate of complications, but with improved pain scores. In addition, there was a high rate of conversion to THA within 2 years of injury when patients were treated with ORIF. Acute THA as primary treatment in this patient population merits further, more controlled, comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors predicting failure of patella fixation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical fixation of patella fractures is frequently indicated due to disruption of the quadriceps mechanism. Operative technique varies; however, failure rates can be high. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various techniques for the fixation of patella fractures and the etiology of fixation failure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 173 patella fractures treated operatively at two Level I trauma centers. Patients with less than 90 days of follow-up, inadequate radiographic studies, and partial or total excision were excluded. Failure was defined as hardware breakage, nonunion, or displacement of fragments from their initial reduced position. Twelve factors were examined independently for predictive value using both univariate and multivariate analyses. A comparison between groups based on reoperation and hardware removal was also performed. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients met the inclusion criteria, and 13 were found to have failed (12%). Both older patient age (p < 0.02) and use of K-wires, with or without tension-band wires (p < 0.04), were found to be significant predictors of failure. Increasing follow-up time was the only significant predictor of reoperation (p < 0.001) and hardware removal (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As anticipated, increasing age was found to correlate with higher failure rates. Use of K-wires with or without tension-band wires correlated with higher failure rates, compared with the use of screws, both K-wires and screws, or other fixation. Increasing follow-up time predicted both reoperation and hardware removal, with patients having symptomatic hardware and other complications naturally returning to clinic for evaluation and treatment.

The role of stem cells in fracture healing and nonunion.

Nonunion and large bone defects present a therapeutic challenge to the surgeon and are often associated with significant morbidity. These defects are expensive to both the health care system and society. However, several surgical procedures have been developed to maximise patient satisfaction and minimise health-care-associated and socioeconomic costs. Integrating recent evidence into the diamond concept leads to one simple conclusion that not only provides us with answers to the "open questions" but also simplifies our entire understanding of bone healing. It has been shown that a combination of neo-osteogenesis and neovascularisation will restore tissue deficits, and that the optimal approach includes a biomaterial scaffold, cell biology techniques, a growth factor and optimisation of the mechanical environment. Further prospective, controlled, randomised clinical studies will determine the effectiveness and economic benefits of treatment with mesenchymal stem cells, not in comparison to other conventional surgical approaches but in direct conjunction with them.

Eponyms: errors in clinical practice and scientific writing.

Eponymous terms are in daily use in medicine. This system of nomenclature which simply commemorates a person is inconvenient, poses difficulties to students and leads to frequent mistakes in scientific writings. Nevertheless it can be helpful in completely describing a multi-symptomatic medical condition or a complex surgical procedure which otherwise would not be neatly encapsulated in a reasonably convenient word or phrase. We used Finkelstein's test as an example to demonstrate that the use of such nomenclature in clinical practice and scientific writing creates inaccuracies. We contacted 62 consultant orthopaedic surgeons and 47 specialist orthopaedic registrars of whom 53 consultant and 39 registrars responded. Three different descriptions of Finkelstein's test were used as described in current literature. Only 10 (10.7%) surgeons recognised the correct method as described by Finkelstein and 83 (89.3%) were unable to do so. The results shows that a statistically significant proportion of surgeons uses the test (p < 0.0001) but fails to identify the correct method (p < 0.0001). We also found that Finkelstein's test was inaccurately described in literature since Leao's incorrect description in 1958 (quoting Eichhoff's manoeuvre) and the mistake persisted for over 50 years before it could be accredited. Such mistakes are frequent not only in hand surgery but in other sections of medicine as well. We conclude that in the modern era of evidence based medicine, use of such trivial nomenclature should be avoided. Efforts should be made to introduce proper descriptive nomenclature, by devising criteria systems which would be easy to use and not fictitious.