The Invisible Impact of a Visible Disease: Psychosocial Impact of Alopecia Areata.

INTRODUCTION: The physical impact of alopecia areata (AA) is visible, but the psychological and social consequences and emotional burden are often underrecognized. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 547 participants recruited via the National Alopecia Areata Foundation completed a survey encompassing demographics; AA illness characteristics; and five patient-reported outcome measures on anxiety and depression, perceived stress, psychological illness impact, stigma, and quality of life (QoL). Differences in disease severity subgroups were assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t tests. RESULTS: Mean age was 44.6 years, and 76.6% were female. Participants with more severe hair loss tended to report longer duration of experiencing AA symptoms (P < 0.001). Overall, participants reported negative psychological impact, emotional burden, and poor QoL due to AA. Participants with 21-49% or 50-94% scalp hair loss reported greater psychological impact and poorer QoL than those with 95-100% scalp hair loss (most parameters P < 0.05). Similar results were observed for eyebrow/eyelash involvement subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that participants with AA experience emotional burden, negative self-perception, and stigma, but the impact of AA is not dependent solely on the amount of hair loss. Lower impact among participants with 95-100% scalp hair loss may indicate that they have adapted to living with AA.

Comparing the burden of illness in patients with alopecia areata vs atopic dermatitis in the US population from a payer perspective.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by nonscarring hair loss. AA frequently co-occurs with other inflammatory autoimmune conditions, presenting a significant clinical burden. OBJECTIVE: To compare the burden of illness, direct and indirect costs in adult patients with AA vs atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used US administrative claims data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database to compare commercially insured adults with AA to those with AD. Patients with an AA diagnosis between January 2017 and September 2019 were propensity score matched to patients with AD. Comorbidity burden, medication use, health care resource utilization, health care costs, and indirect costs during a 12-month follow-up period were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 25,446 adult patients with AA were selected for the matched analysis with the AD cohort. Patients with AA generally had lower comorbidity burden than patients with AD; mean Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were 0.36 (SD = 0.99) and 0.39 (SD = 0.92), for AA and AD, respectively (P = 0.007). Patients with AA had significantly lower proportions of allergic rhinitis, asthma, pruritus, skin infections, and urticaria, but higher proportions of thyroid disease, when compared with patients with AD (all P < 0.001). A smaller proportion of patients with AA had prescriptions for topical (45.3% vs 64.8%; P < 0.001) and oral (20.3% vs 29.6%; P < 0.001) corticosteroids and antianxiety and/or antidepressants (24.7% vs 29.7%; P < 0.001), but a significantly larger proportion for intralesional corticosteroids (triamcinolone) (49.6% vs 21.7%; P < 0.001), compared with patients with AD. Despite a lower comorbidity burden and generally less medication usage in patients with AA, total all-cause health care costs did not significantly differ between the AA and AD cohorts ($10,705 vs $10,816; P = 0.712), and outpatient costs were higher in patients with AA ($6,297 vs $5,859; P = 0.014). Female patients with AA had significantly greater costs for both outpatient and outpatient pharmacy when compared with female patients with AD. Patients with AA were more likely to have a claim for long-term disability (0.6% vs 0.3%; P = 0.001) and higher long-term disability-associated indirect costs ($73 [SD = $1,442] vs $25 [SD = $774]; P = 0.004) compared with patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar total health care costs in patients with AA and AD, despite a lower proportion of comorbidities and prescription use in patients with AA. Outpatient costs were also significantly higher overall in patients with AA. Although often dismissed as a cosmetic condition, AA, an autoimmune disease, has a similar level of medical expenditure as AD. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Mr Fenske and Drs Ding, Morrow, and Smith are employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Drs Manjelievskaia, Moynihan, and Silver are employed by Merative. Drs Manjelievskaia, Moynihan, and Silver were employed by IBM Watson Health at the time of study completion. IBM Watson Health received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study.

Evaluation of benazepril in cats with heart disease in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Heart disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cats, but there is limited evidence of the benefit of any medication. HYPOTHESIS: The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril would delay the time to treatment failure in cats with heart disease of various etiologies. ANIMALS: One hundred fifty-one client-owned cats. METHODS: Cats with heart disease, confirmed by echocardiography, with or without clinical signs of congestive heart failure, were recruited between 2002 and 2005 and randomized to benazepril or placebo in a prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, blinded clinical trial. Benazepril (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) or placebo was administered PO once daily for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was treatment failure. Analyses were conducted separately for all-cause treatment failure (main analysis) and heart disease-related treatment failure (supportive analysis). RESULTS: No benefit of benazepril versus placebo was detected for time to all-cause treatment failure (P = .42) or time to treatment failure related to heart disease (P = .21). Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) from multivariate analysis for benazepril compared with placebo were 1.00 (0.57-1.74) for all-cause failure, and 0.99 (0.50-1.94) for forward selection and 0.93 (0.48-1.81) for bidirectional selection models for heart disease-related failure. There were no significant differences between groups over time after administration of the test articles in left atrium diameter, left ventricle wall thickness, quality of life scores, adverse events, or plasma biochemistry or hematology variables. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Benazepril was tolerated well in cats with heart disease, but no evidence of benefit was detected.

Herpes simplex virus type 2 of the palm as an AIDS-defining complex.

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HHV-2) is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the world. In the immunocompromised host, including patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), herpes simplex virus is at high risk for reactivation. We present a woman with HIV and a large ulcer of the palm determined to be HHV-2. Not only was the location of her ulcer unusual, but her CD4 lymphocyte count continued to drop despite improvement of the palmar ulceration with treatment. As a result, her palmar HHV-2 ulcer became an AIDS-defining complex.

Pulmonary infection due to the dassie bacillus (Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex sp.) in a free-living dassie (rock hyrax-Procavia capensis) from South Africa.

We report a case of extensive necrogranulomatous pneumonia due to infection with the dassie bacillus (Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex sp.) in a free-living pregnant adult female dassie (rock hyrax-Procavia capensis). A juvenile female dassie from the same colony also showed a focal lesion in the lungs suggestive of mycobacterial pneumonia. Our findings indicate the widespread occurrence of the dassie bacillus in free-living dassies and suggest very high infection rates in some populations. The introduction of South African dassies into novel environments should be considered in this light.