Incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with vulvar carcinoma undergoing vulvectomy with or without lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following radical surgery for vulvar carcinoma remains poorly characterized, and recommendations for postoperative chemoprophylaxis are varied. Our objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing surgery for vulvar carcinoma and to determine if VTE incidence differs by radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients with a diagnosis of vulvar cancer undergoing radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment from 2012 to 2020. Clinical characteristics and 30-day incidence of VTE as well as other postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Variables were compared using Chi-square test and Fischer's exact test, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1672 patients underwent radical vulvectomy for vulvar carcinoma. 11 patients (0.7%) experienced postoperative VTE within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of VTE was similar when radical vulvectomy was performed alone or with lymph node dissection by any method (p = 0.116). Longer operative times (p = 0.033) and greater postoperative length of stay (p = 0.001) were associated with increased risk of postoperative VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative VTE is low in patients undergoing radical vulvar surgery in this national cohort. Inguinofemoral lymph node dissection by any method does not appear to be a risk factor for VTE when compared to radical vulvectomy alone. Further research is needed to determine if extended VTE prophylaxis is beneficial in this population.

Risk Factors Associated With Distress Among Postoperative Patients in an Academic Gynecologic Oncology Practice.

BACKGROUND: Distress among gynecologic oncology patients correlates with poor clinical outcomes and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for elevated NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) results among postoperative gynecologic oncology patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all postoperative visits over a 5-year period. NCCN DT results were analyzed as both discretized values (DT ≤3 = low distress; DT 4-8 = moderate distress; DT ≥9 = high distress) and continuous variables. Patients with a DT score ≥4 were referred to social work. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to compare NCCN DT results with clinical and sociodemographic variables. Statistical significance was P<.05. RESULTS: In total, 1,795 NCCN DT results were included, with uterine (37.72%) being the most common disease site. Benign pathology was known prior to completion of the NCCN DT in 13.15% of patients. Most patients (71.75%) endorsed low levels of distress. Moderate/High levels of distress were reported by 28.25% of patients. Increasing levels of distress were significantly associated with younger age (P=.006), history of depression (P≤.001), status as a current smoker (P=.028), and history of asthma (P=.041). Knowledge of benign pathology was associated with low levels of distress (P=.002). Procedure type and disease site were not associated with distress. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of postoperative patients in a gynecologic oncology practice reported moderate or high distress. Distress was highest among those with malignancy regardless of disease site or surgical intervention. Benign pathology correlated with decreased distress. Identified associations with distress provide opportunities for prevention, early intervention, and tailored counseling.

Patient reported improvement in sexual health outcomes following care in a sexual health clinic for women with cancer.

PURPOSE: Sexual health concerns are common among female cancer survivors. Few data exist regarding patient-reported outcomes following interventions in this population. We aimed to determine patient-reported adherence and impact of interventions provided in an academic specialty clinic for treatment of sexual health problems. METHODS: A cross-sectional quality improvement survey regarding sexual problems, adherence with recommended therapies, and improvement following intervention was administered to all women seen at the Women's Integrative Sexual Health (WISH) program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison between November 2013 and July 2019. Descriptive and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore differences between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty women (median age at first visit = 50 years, 53.1% breast cancer) were identified; N =113 surveys were completed (response rate = 49.6%). The most common presenting complaints were pain with intercourse (87.2%), vaginal dryness (85.3%), and low libido (82.6%). Menopausal women were more likely than premenopausal women to present with vaginal dryness (93.4% vs. 69.7%, p = .001) and pain with intercourse (93.4% vs. 76.5%, p = .02). Nearly all women adhered to recommendations for vaginal moisturizers/lubricants (96.9-100%) and vibrating vaginal wands (82.4-92.3%). A majority found recommended interventions helpful regardless of menopausal status or cancer type and reported persistent improvement. Nearly all women had improvement in understanding sexual health (92%) and would recommend the WISH program to others (91%). CONCLUSION: Women with cancer report integrative sexual health care to address sexual problems that are helpful and result in long-term improvement. Patients are overall highly adherent to recommended therapies, and nearly all would recommend the program to others. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Dedicated care to address sexual health in women after cancer treatment improves patient-reported sexual health outcomes across all cancer types.

Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using routine computed tomography images to identify bone loss in gynecologic cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a known side effect of cancer therapy. Computed tomography (CT) bone mineral density screening is a novel tool for identifying bone loss. This study aims to use routine CT images to determine long-term bone mineral density changes and osteoporosis risk among women with gynecologic cancers. METHODS: Bone loss was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of women ≤65 years old with gynecologic cancer who underwent oophorectomy from January 2010 to December 2014. Opportunistic CT-based bone mineral density measurements (Hounsfield units, HU) were performed at baseline and intervals up to 5 years after cancer diagnosis. Osteoporosis risk was categorized by HU. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare baseline to follow-up bone mineral density at 1, 3, and 5 years and to identify predictors of bone loss following diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients (median age 53 years, range 23-65 years, 78.1% ovarian cancer) were included. Bone mineral density significantly decreased between baseline and 1 year (p<0.001), 3 years (p<0.001), and 5 years (p<0.001). Half with normal bone mineral density at baseline had risk for osteopenia or osteoporosis at 5 years. Four percent had osteoporosis risk at baseline compared with 1 year (7.4%), 3 years (15.7%), and 5 years (18.0%). Pre-treatment bone mineral density was a significant predictor at 1 and 5 years (1 year: p<0.01; 5 years: p<0.01). History of chemotherapy predicted bone loss at 1 year (p=0.03). More lifetime chemotherapy cycles were associated with increased risk of osteoporosis at 1 year (p=0.03) and 5 years (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Women with gynecologic cancers may experience accelerated cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Routine CT imaging is a convenient screening modality to identify those at highest risk for osteoporosis who warrant further evaluation with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Routine bone mineral density assessments 1 year following oophorectomy for cancer treatment may be warranted in this population.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: Does modality matter?

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly utilized for gynecologic cancers. While incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after MIS is low, some guidelines recommend extended chemoprophylaxis for these patients undergoing MIS. Our objectives were to determine incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing MIS, evaluate differences in the incidence by MIS modality and assess the need for extended chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing MIS (robot-assisted, multi-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy) for gynecologic cancers between January 2014 and December 2018 at our institution. Demographic and perioperative variables were collected. Patients <18 years, with benign pathology, or on preoperative anticoagulation were excluded. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and one-way ANOVA were performed to determine risk factors related to VTE occurrence. RESULTS: We identified 806 patients who underwent MIS with median age 61. Most had Stage I disease (81.5%) and uterine cancer (81.5%). Five VTE events occurred within 90 days following surgery (0.6%). Incidence of 90-day VTE did not differ between MIS modalities (p = 0.6). Patients with longer OR times (p = 0.004) were more likely to experience VTE. Age, smoking status, BMI, type of cancer and stage were not significant risk factors for VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative VTE in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing MIS is low and does not appear to differ by MIS modality. Given the very low incidence of postoperative VTE, extended chemoprophylaxis is unlikely to benefit patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing MIS procedures.

Development, Implementation, and Patient Perspectives of the Women's Integrative Sexual Health Program: A Program Designed to Address the Sexual Side Effects of Cancer Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Advanced practitioners (APs) are a growing demographic in survivorship care. One goal of survivorship care is to manage consequences of cancer treatments. Sexual dysfunction from prior therapies can impact quality of life. Advanced practitioners are perfectly poised to provide care for sexual problems. This article will describe the development and implementation of the Women's Integrative Sexual Health (WISH) program by APs within a comprehensive cancer center and describe patient perspectives of care provided. METHODS: Two physician assistants working in gynecologic oncology at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center implemented a program to address sexual side effects of cancer treatment. An online survey was sent out to all patients seen in the WISH program since inception. RESULTS: Between November 2013 and July 2019, 228 patients were seen in the WISH program. A total of 113 women responded (median age: 53 years, range: 31-77; 68% postmenopausal; response rate: 53.8%). Most had breast (57%) or gynecologic (32%) cancers. When asked how helpful the WISH program was, 88% reported that it was at least somewhat helpful. Almost all (95%) reported they would recommend the WISH program to other women. CONCLUSION: The WISH program enhances comprehensive survivorship care of female cancer survivors. Women report they benefit from care for sexual issues after cancer treatments. Advanced practitioners working in oncology are uniquely positioned to educate themselves, take leadership roles in the development and implementation of programs, and provide care to women affected by sexual side effects after cancer.

BRCA-2 (+) high-grade serous fallopian tube cancer diagnosed as an isolated breast mass by mammography.

Ovarian cancer typically presents at advanced stage with intra-abdominal metastases. Rarely, ovarian cancer presents with distant metastases with little to no intra-abdominal disease burden. The patient was a BRCA-2 germline mutation carrier diagnosed with a Stage IVB high-grade carcinoma of the fallopian tube following discovery of a right axillary breast mass on screening mammography. Pre-operative imaging was without evidence of metastatic disease in the abdomen or pelvis. She underwent surgical staging followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and maintenance poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition. She is without evidence of disease 24 months following her surgical staging procedure. An isolated oligo metastasis in the axilla is a rare presentation of ovarian carcinoma. Extra-abdominal metastases can present a diagnostic challenge in ovarian cancer necessitating thorough pathologic and radiologic work-up, particularly in the absence of intra-abdominal disease.

Bone health and osteoporosis screening in gynecologic cancer survivors.

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a known side effect of cancer therapy that increases the risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture. Women with gynecologic cancer are at increased risk of bone loss secondary to the combined effect of oophorectomy and adjuvant therapies. Data regarding bone loss in women with gynecologic cancers are overall lacking compared to other cancer populations. Consequently, guidelines for osteoporosis screening in women with cancer are largely based on data generated among non-gynecologic cancer survivors. This article reviews current available data of bone health in women with gynecologic cancer, summarizes best-available guidelines for screening for osteoporosis in women with cancer, and provides guidance for osteoporosis screening in women with gynecologic cancers based on best available evidence.

What we don't talk about when we don't talk about sex: results of a national survey of U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists.

INTRODUCTION: Sexuality is a key aspect of women's physical and psychological health. Research shows both patients and physicians face barriers to communication about sexuality. Given their expertise and training in addressing conditions of the female genital tract across the female life course, obstetrician/gynecologists (ob/gyns) are well positioned among all physicians to address sexuality issues with female patients. New practice guidelines for management of female sexual dysfunction and the importance of female sexual behavior and function to virtually all aspects of ob/gyn care, and to women's health more broadly, warrant up-to-date information regarding ob/gyns' sexual-history-taking routine. AIMS: To determine ob/gyns' practices of communication with patients about sexuality, and to examine the individual and practice-level correlates of such communication. METHOD: A population-based sample of 1,154 practicing U.S. ob/gyns (53% male; mean age 48 years) was surveyed regarding their practices of communication with patients about sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported frequency measures of ob/gyns' communication practices with patients including whether or not ob/gyns discuss patients' sexual activities, sexual orientation, satisfaction with sexual life, pleasure with sexual activity, and sexual problems or dysfunction, as well as whether or not one ever expresses disapproval of or disagreement with patients' sexual practices. Multivariable analysis was used to correlate physicians' personal and practice characteristics with these communication practices. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 65.6%. Sixty-three percent of ob/gyns reported routinely assessing patients' sexual activities; 40% routinely asked about sexual problems. Fewer asked about sexual satisfaction (28.5%), sexual orientation/identity (27.7%), or pleasure with sexual activity (13.8%). A quarter of ob/gyns reported they had expressed disapproval of patients' sexual practices. Ob/gyns practicing predominately gynecology were significantly more likely than other ob/gyns to routinely ask about each of the five outcomes investigated. CONCLUSION: The majority of U.S. ob/gyns report routinely asking patients about their sexual activities, but most other areas of patients' sexuality are not routinely discussed.