Improving Skin Cancer Diagnostics Through a Mobile App With a Large Interactive Image Repository: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer diagnostics is challenging, and mastery requires extended periods of dedicated practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if self-paced pattern recognition training in skin cancer diagnostics with clinical and dermoscopic images of skin lesions using a large-scale interactive image repository (LIIR) with patient cases improves primary care physicians' (PCPs') diagnostic skills and confidence. METHODS: A total of 115 PCPs were randomized (allocation ratio 3:1) to receive or not receive self-paced pattern recognition training in skin cancer diagnostics using an LIIR with patient cases through a quiz-based smartphone app during an 8-day period. The participants' ability to diagnose skin cancer was evaluated using a 12-item multiple-choice questionnaire prior to and 8 days after the educational intervention period. Their thoughts on the use of dermoscopy were assessed using a study-specific questionnaire. A learning curve was calculated through the analysis of data from the mobile app. RESULTS: On average, participants in the intervention group spent 2 hours 26 minutes quizzing digital patient cases and 41 minutes reading the educational material. They had an average preintervention multiple choice questionnaire score of 52.0% of correct answers, which increased to 66.4% on the postintervention test; a statistically significant improvement of 14.3 percentage points (P<.001; 95% CI 9.8-18.9) with intention-to-treat analysis. Analysis of participants who received the intervention as per protocol (500 patient cases in 8 days) showed an average increase of 16.7 percentage points (P<.001; 95% CI 11.3-22.0) from 53.9% to 70.5%. Their overall ability to correctly recognize malignant lesions in the LIIR patient cases improved over the intervention period by 6.6 percentage points from 67.1% (95% CI 65.2-69.3) to 73.7% (95% CI 72.5-75.0) and their ability to set the correct diagnosis improved by 10.5 percentage points from 42.5% (95% CI 40.2%-44.8%) to 53.0% (95% CI 51.3-54.9). The diagnostic confidence of participants in the intervention group increased on a scale from 1 to 4 by 32.9% from 1.6 to 2.1 (P<.001). Participants in the control group did not increase their postintervention score or their diagnostic confidence during the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Self-paced pattern recognition training in skin cancer diagnostics through the use of a digital LIIR with patient cases delivered by a quiz-based mobile app improves the diagnostic accuracy of PCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05661370; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05661370.

The Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database.

AIM OF DATABASE: The Danish Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Dermatology Database was established in 2008. The aim of this database was to collect data on nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatment and improve its treatment in Denmark. NMSC is the most common malignancy in the western countries and represents a significant challenge in terms of public health management and health care costs. However, high-quality epidemiological and treatment data on NMSC are sparse. STUDY POPULATION: The NMSC database includes patients with the following skin tumors: basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma, Bowen's disease, and keratoacanthoma diagnosed by the participating office-based dermatologists in Denmark. MAIN VARIABLES: Clinical and histological diagnoses, BCC subtype, localization, size, skin cancer history, skin phototype, and evidence of metastases and treatment modality are the main variables in the NMSC database. Information on recurrence, cosmetic results, and complications are registered at two follow-up visits at 3 months (between 0 and 6 months) and 12 months (between 6 and 15 months) after treatment. DESCRIPTIVE DATA: In 2014, 11,522 patients with 17,575 tumors were registered in the database. Of tumors with a histological diagnosis, 13,571 were BCCs, 840 squamous cell carcinomas, 504 Bowen's disease, and 173 keratoakanthomas. CONCLUSION: The NMSC database encompasses detailed information on the type of tumor, a variety of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and outcomes after treatment. The database has revealed that overall, the quality of care of NMSC in Danish dermatological clinics is high, and the database provides the necessary data for continuous quality assurance.

Evaluation of recurrence after photodynamic therapy with topical methylaminolaevulinate for 157 basal cell carcinomas in 90 patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy with topical methylaminolevulinate for the treatment of basal cell carcinomas in a single dermatological department. Ninety patients (34.4% men and 65.6% women) with a total of 157 basal cell carcinomas (111 superficial, 40 nodular, 6 unknown) were treated. Primary endpoint was clinically observed recurrence verified by biopsy 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, then once a year. Estimated patient recurrence rates were 7% at 3 months, 19% at 6 months, 27% at 12 months and 31% at 24 months. Patients aged over 60 years had significantly higher estimated recurrence rates compared with patients aged 60 years or under (at 12 months, 35% vs. 19%, p?=?0.01). Estimated recurrence rates for tumours was 4% at 3 months, 11% at 6 months, 16% at 12 months and 19% at 24 months. There were significantly higher estimated recurrence rates for nodular basal cell carcinomas compared with superficial basal cell carcinomas (at 12 months, 28% vs. 13%, p?=?0.008). In conclusion, photodynamic therapy is only appropriate for treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma, and, age above 60 years and histology showing nodular basal cell carcinoma are independent risk factors for developing a recurrent basal cell carcinoma.

Frequency of sensitization to methyl aminolaevulinate after photodynamic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis to methyl aminolaevulinate (Metvix) after topical application in photodynamic therapy (PDT) has previously been described in case reports. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of sensitization to Metvix cream in a group of patients previously treated at least five times with Metvix-PDT with the frequency observed in an unexposed control group. METHODS: Twenty patients treated five times or more with Metvix-PDT and 60 controls with no prior exposure to Metvix were patch tested with Metvix cream and Metvix placebo cream. Subsequently, the patients were interviewed to determine the relevance of a positive patch test reaction to Metvix. RESULTS: Of 20 patients treated with Metvix-PDT, 7 were sensitized to Metvix cream, giving a sensation risk of 35%. In the control group, 1 of 60 became sensitized after a single exposure to Metvix cream (1.7%). There was no reaction to the placebo cream. The positive patch tests to Metvix were considered relevant in four of seven patients (57%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a considerable risk of sensitization after Metvix-PDT. We suggest that the patients are interviewed to detect late or persistent local reactions after PDT. These reactions are often considered to be local infections but may represent allergic contact dermatitis, and therefore, patients should be offered patch testing with Metvix cream.

Photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate for prevention of new skin lesions in transplant recipients: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients on long-term immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of non-melanoma skin lesions. Repeated field photodynamic therapy using topical methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) may have potential as a preventive treatment. METHODS: This open randomized, intrapatient, comparative, multicenter study included 81 transplant recipients with 889 lesions (90% actinic keratoses (AK)]. In each patient, the study treatment was initially administered to one 50 cm area on the face, scalp, neck, trunk, or extremities (n=476 lesions) twice (1 week apart), with additional single treatments at 3, 9, and 15 months. On each occasion, the area was debrided gently and MAL cream (160 mg/g) applied for 3 hr, before illumination with noncoherent red light (630 nm, 37 J/cm2). The control, 50 cm2 area (n=413 lesions) received lesion-specific treatment (83% cryotherapy) at baseline and 3, 9, and 15 months. Additionally, all visible lesions were given lesion-specific treatment 21 and 27 months in both treatment and control areas. RESULTS: At 3 months, MAL photodynamic therapy significantly reduced the occurrence of new lesions (65 vs. 103 lesions in the control area; P=0.01), mainly AK (46% reduction; 43 vs. 80; P=0.006). This effect was not significant at 27 months (253 vs. 312; P=0.06). Hypopigmentation, as assessed by the investigator, was less evident in the treatment than control areas (16% vs. 51% of patients; P<0.001) at 27 months. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that repeated field photodynamic therapy using topical MAL may prevent new AK in transplant recipients although further studies are needed.

Allergic contact dermatitis to methyl aminolevulinate after photodynamic therapy in 9 patients.

This report describes 9 patients who developed allergic contact dermatitis to methyl aminolevulinate used for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The risk of developing contact allergy to methyl aminolevulinate in PDT treated patients was calculated to 1% after an average of 7 treatments (range 2-21).

HuMax-CD4: a fully human monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is characterized by infiltration with mononuclear cells. Especially activated memory CD4+ T cells are critical in the pathogenesis. Interaction between the CD4 receptor and the major histocompatibility complex class II molecule is important for T-cell activation. OBJECTIVE: To test safety and efficacy of a fully human monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody (HuMax-CD4) in the treatment of psoriasis. DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Patients Eighty-five patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. INTERVENTIONS: Subcutaneous infusions of placebo or HuMax-CD4 at doses of 20, 80, 160, or 280 mg once weekly for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), investigators' and patients' overall response assessment, adverse events, laboratory assessment including total T-cell and subtype counts, CD4 receptor occupancy, and interleukin 2 receptor levels. RESULTS: At week 7, mean PASI was reduced in all treatment groups (95% confidence intervals are in parentheses): placebo, 8% (-3% to 19%); 20 mg, 12% (-6% to 27%); 80 mg, 14% (-14% to 35%); 160 mg, 16% (-4% to 33%); and 280 mg, 24% (-10% to 48%). At the highest dose level, 6 (38%) of 16 patients obtained more than 25% reduction of PASI and 3 (19%) obtained more than 50% reduction of PASI. A dose-dependent decrease in total lymphocyte count was seen and was parallel to a dose-dependent decrease in CD4+ T cells. This decrease was due to a decrease in the memory subset, whereas the naive subset was affected to a minor degree. Four weeks of treatment with HuMax-CD4 was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with HuMax-CD4 led to a moderate, not statistically significant reduction in PASI. The efficacy results obtained after only 4 weeks of treatment suggest that longer treatment would lead to even further reduction of PASI.