Respiratory effects of lung recruitment maneuvers depend on the recruitment-to-inflation ratio in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the response to lung recruitment maneuvers (LRMs) varies considerably from one patient to another and so is difficult to predict. The aim of the study was to determine whether or not the recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio could differentiate between patients according to the change in lung mechanics during the LRM. METHODS: We evaluated the changes in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics induced by a stepwise LRM at a constant driving pressure of 15 cmH2O during pressure-controlled ventilation. We assessed lung recruitability by measuring the R/I ratio. Patients were dichotomized with regard to the median R/I ratio. RESULTS: We included 30 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS and a median [interquartile range] R/I ratio of 0.62 [0.42-0.83]. After the LRM, patients with high recruitability (R/I ratio ≥ 0.62) presented an improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, due to significant increase in respiratory system compliance (33 [27-42] vs. 42 [35-60] mL/cmH2O; p < 0.001). In low recruitability patients (R/I < 0.62), the increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio was associated with a significant decrease in pulse pressure as a surrogate of cardiac output (70 [55-85] vs. 50 [51-67] mmHg; p = 0.01) but not with a significant change in respiratory system compliance (33 [24-47] vs. 35 [25-47] mL/cmH2O; p = 0.74). CONCLUSION: After the LRM, patients with high recruitability presented a significant increase in respiratory system compliance (indicating a gain in ventilated area), while those with low recruitability presented a decrease in pulse pressure suggesting a drop in cardiac output and therefore in intrapulmonary shunt.

Doppler Echocardiographic Indices Are Specific But Not Sensitive to Predict Pulmonary Artery Occlusion Pressure in Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the ability of transthoracic echocardiography to assess pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. DESIGN: In a prospective observational study. SETTING: Amiens University Hospital Medical ICU. PATIENTS: Fifty-three mechanically ventilated patients in sinus rhythm admitted to our ICU. INTERVENTION: Transthoracic echocardiography was performed simultaneously to pulmonary artery catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Transmitral early velocity wave recorded using pulsed wave Doppler (E), late transmitral velocity wave recorded using pulsed wave Doppler (A), and deceleration time of E wave were recorded using pulsed Doppler as well as early mitral annulus velocity wave recorded using tissue Doppler imaging (E'). Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure was measured simultaneously using pulmonary artery catheter. There was a significant correlation between pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and lateral ratio between E wave and E' (E/E' ratio) (r = 0.35; p < 0.01), ratio between E wave and A wave (E/A ratio) (r = 0.41; p < 0.002), and deceleration time of E wave (r = -0.34; p < 0.02). E/E' greater than 15 was predictive of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg with a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 95%, whereas E/E' less than 7 was predictive of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure less than 18 mm Hg with a sensitivity of 32% and a specificity of 81%. E/A greater than 1.8 yielded a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 95% to predict pulmonary artery occlusion pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg, whereas E/A less than 0.7 was predictive of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure less than 18 mm Hg with a sensitivity of 19% and a specificity of 94%. A similar predictive capacity was observed when the analysis was confined to patients with EF less than 50%. A large proportion of E/E' measurements 32 (60%) were situated between the two cut-off values obtained by the receiver operating characteristic curves: E/E' greater than 15 and E/E' less than 7. CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, Doppler transthoracic echocardiography indices are highly specific but not sensitive to estimate pulmonary artery occlusion pressure.

Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) monitoring is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of critically ill patients. In the critical care setting, few studies have evaluated the level of agreement between CO estimated by transthoracic echocardiography (CO-TTE) and that measured by the reference method, pulmonary artery catheter (CO-PAC). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the precision and accuracy of CO-TTE relative to CO-PAC and the ability of transthoracic echocardiography to track variations in CO, in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Thirty-eight mechanically ventilated patients fitted with a PAC were included in a prospective observational study performed in a 16-bed university hospital ICU. CO-PAC was measured via intermittent thermodilution. Simultaneously, a second investigator used standard-view TTE to estimate CO-TTE as the product of stroke volume and the heart rate obtained during the measurement of the subaortic velocity time integral. RESULTS: Sixty-four pairs of CO-PAC and CO-TTE measurements were compared. The two measurements were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001). The median bias was 0.2 L/min, the limits of agreement (LOAs) were -1.3 and 1.8 L/min, and the percentage error was 25%. The precision was 8% for CO-PAC and 9% for CO-TTE. Twenty-six pairs of ΔCO measurements were compared. There was a significant correlation between ΔCO-PAC and ΔCO-TTE (r = 0.92; p < 0.0001). The median bias was -0.1 L/min and the LOAs were -1.3 and +1.2 L/min. With a 15% exclusion zone, the four-quadrant plot had a concordance rate of 94%. With a 0.5 L/min exclusion zone, the polar plot had a mean polar angle of 1.0° and a percentage error LOAs of -26.8 to 28.8°. The concordance rate was 100% between 30 and -30°. When using CO-TTE to detect an increase in ΔCO-PAC of more than 10%, the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (95% CI) was 0.82 (0.62-0.94) (p < 0.001). A ΔCO-TTE of more than 8% yielded a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 66% for detecting a ΔCO-PAC of more than 10%. CONCLUSION: In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, CO-TTE is an accurate and precise method for estimating CO. Furthermore, CO-TTE can accurately track variations in CO.