Selective modulation of estrogen receptor in obese men with androgen deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although selective estrogen receptor modulators have been proposed as a treatment for men with central functional hypogonadism, only a few data have been produced in men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether and to what extent selective estrogen receptor modulators are an effective and safe therapy in men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify studies comparing testosterone levels before and after treatment. Mean differences with 95% coefficient intervals were combined using random effects models. Funnel plot, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill analysis were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria providing information on 292 men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency treated with clomiphene citrate (12.5-50 mg daily) or enclomiphene citrate (12.5-25 mg daily) for 1.5-4 months. The pooled estimates indicated a significant increase in testosterone levels both with clomiphene (mean difference: 11.56 nmol/L; 95% coefficient interval: 9.68, 13.43; I2  = 69%, pfor heterogeneity  = 0.01) and enclomiphene citrate (mean difference: 7.50 nmol/L; 95% coefficient interval: 6.52, 8.48; I2  = 4%, pfor heterogeneity  = 0.37). After the exclusion of one study on severely obese men, who exhibited the highest response rate to clomiphene citrate, the heterogeneity disappeared (mean difference: 10.27 nmol/L; 95% coefficient interval: 9.39, 11.16; I2  = 0%, pfor heterogeneity  = 0.66). No publication bias was revealed by Egger's test and trim-and-fill analysis. No treatment-related unexpected findings regarding safety profile were registered. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Treatment with clomiphene citrate and enclomiphene citrate may be an effective and safe alternative to testosterone replacement therapy in men with obesity-related functional androgen deficiency. Further long-term studies are warranted to define clinical reflections of the selective estrogen receptor modulators-induced increase in testosterone levels and to better clarify the safety profile.

Coenzyme Q10 + alpha lipoic acid for chronic COVID syndrome.

Chronic COVID syndrome is characterized by chronic fatigue, myalgia, depression and sleep disturbances, similar to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia syndrome. Implementations of mitochondrial nutrients (MNs) with diet are important for the clinical effects antioxidant. We examined if use of an association of coenzyme Q10 and alpha lipoic acid (Requpero®) could reduce chronic covid symptoms. The Requpero study is a prospective observational study in which 174 patients, who had developed chronic-covid syndrome, were divided in two groups: The first one (116 patients) received coenzyme Q10 + alpha lipoic acid, and the second one (58 patients) did not receive any treatment. Primary outcome was reduction in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in treatment group compared with control group. complete FSS response was reached most frequently in treatment group than in control group. A FSS complete response was reached in 62 (53.5%) patients in treatment group and in two (3.5%) patients in control group. A reduction in FSS core < 20% from baseline at T1 (non-response) was observed in 11 patients in the treatment group (9.5%) and in 15 patients in the control group (25.9%) (p < 0.0001). To date, this is the first study that tests the efficacy of coenzyme Q10 and alpha lipoic acid in chronic Covid syndrome. Primary and secondary outcomes were met. These results have to be confirmed through a double blind placebo controlled trial of longer duration.

Infection rate of penile prosthesis implants in men with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of available evidence.

The risk of penile prosthesis implants (PPIs) infection in men with spinal cord injury (SCI), empirically theorized to be high, is widely variable among the studies. We performed a meta-analysis to define the pooled PPI infection rate and its possible risk factors in men with SCI. A thorough search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed. The eighteen included studies provided information on 1079 implantation procedures, determining a pooled PPI infection rate of 8.0% (95% CI: 5.0-11.0%), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 67.0%). Trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias had a small effect on the pooled estimate (adjusted odds ratio: 6.3%, 95% CI: 2.5-10.0%) with a substantial reduction in heterogeneity (I2 = 32.4%). The PPI infection rate was higher for inflatable PPIs than for malleable PPIs (16.4% vs 8.9%, p = 0.027). No differences were found between the different levels of SCI. In conclusion, the risk of PPI infection in SCI would be higher than that reported in the general population. However, the results were produced from dated and low/moderate quality studies that may not fully reflect the outcomes of modern PPIs and implantation protocols. There is an urgent need to gather more information on this topic through studies relevant to contemporary practice.