Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 10 de 10
1.
Ther Drug Monit ; 40(5): 526-548, 2018 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957667

BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Since 1989, 18 new AEDs have been licensed for clinical use and there are now 27 licensed AEDs in total for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, several AEDs are also used for the management of other medical conditions, for example, pain and bipolar disorder. This has led to an increasingly widespread application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of AEDs, making AEDs among the most common medications for which TDM is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the indications for AED TDM, to provide key information for each individual AED in terms of the drug's prescribing indications, key pharmacokinetic characteristics, associated drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions, and the value and the intricacies of TDM for each AED. The concept of the reference range is discussed as well as practical issues such as choice of sample types (total versus free concentrations in blood versus saliva) and sample collection and processing. METHODS: The present review is based on published articles and searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, last searched in March 2018, in addition to references from relevant articles. RESULTS: In total, 171 relevant references were identified and used to prepare this review. CONCLUSIONS: TDM provides a pragmatic approach to epilepsy care, in that bespoke dose adjustments are undertaken based on drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. For the older first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and valproic acid), much data have accumulated in this regard. However, this is occurring increasingly for the new AEDs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, sulthiame, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide).


Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Drug Monitoring/trends , Drug Interactions , Humans , Reference Values
2.
J Psychopharmacol ; 26(3): 398-407, 2012 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21926427

In vitro work shows CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 contribute to the metabolism of escitalopram to its primary metabolite, N-desmethylescitalopram. We report the effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes on steady state morning concentrations of escitalopram and N-desmethylescitalopram and the ratio of this metabolite to the parent drug in 196 adult patients with depression in GENDEP, a clinical pharmacogenomic trial. Subjects who had one CYP2D6 allele associated with intermediate metabolizer phenotype and one associated with poor metabolizer (i.e. IM/PM genotypic category) had a higher mean logarithm escitalopram concentration than CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) (p = 0.004). Older age was also associated with higher concentrations of escitalopram. Covarying for CYP2D6 and age, we found those homozygous for the CYP2C19*17 allele associated with ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) phenotype had a significantly lower mean escitalopram concentration (2-fold, p = 0.0001) and a higher mean metabolic ratio (p = 0.0003) than EMs, while those homozygous for alleles conferring the PM phenotype had a higher mean escitalopram concentration than EMs (1.55-fold, p = 0.008). There was a significant overall association between CYP2C19 genotypic category and escitalopram concentration (p = 0.0003; p = 0.0012 Bonferroni corrected). In conclusion, we have demonstrated an association between CYP2C19 genotype, including the CYP2C19*17 allele, and steady state escitalopram concentration.


Antidepressive Agents/blood , Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases/genetics , Citalopram/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Polymorphism, Genetic , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/blood , Adult , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases/metabolism , Biotransformation , Citalopram/analogs & derivatives , Citalopram/pharmacokinetics , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/metabolism , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , White People , Young Adult
3.
J Med Toxicol ; 6(1): 37-40, 2010 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20373066

Propafenone is an anti-arrhythmic drug used in the management of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. It is metabolised through cytochrome P450 2D6 pathways; the major metabolites possess anti-arrhythmic activity. The cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 is coded by more than 70 alleles resulting in great genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6 isoenzymes, and up to 7% of Caucasian population are poor metabolisers. This case report describes a patient with severe overdose of propafenone who presented with coma, seizures and cardiotoxicity. The patient was managed with intravenous glucagon, hypertonic sodium bicarbonate, hypertonic saline and inotropic support. The propafenone and its 5-hydroxypropafenone (5-OHP) metabolite were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (no assay was available at the time to measure N-despropyl propafenone concentrations). Toxicological screen showed propafenone concentrations at a maximum of 1.26 mg/L at 9-10 h post-presentation, falling to 0.25 mg/L at 27-28 h post-presentation. No propafenone metabolite 5-OHP was detected in any sample analysed. No antidepressant or analgesic drugs were detected in toxicological screen. Propafenone overdose has been reported to be associated with features of severe cardiovascular and CNS toxicity. Aggressive treatment, meticulous monitoring and supportive care was associated with a good outcome in this case.


Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/blood , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/poisoning , Propafenone/blood , Propafenone/poisoning , Shock, Cardiogenic/chemically induced , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Coma/blood , Coma/chemically induced , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Overdose , Electrocardiography , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poisoning/blood , Propafenone/analogs & derivatives , Seizures/blood , Seizures/chemically induced , Shock, Cardiogenic/blood , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 46(10): 1349-1356, 2007 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17885577

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is a unique atypical antipsychotic with superior efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Plasma concentration of clozapine and its major metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) as well as the ratio of NDMC to clozapine have been reported to be predictors of clozapine response. Here we evaluate these as well as other measures in an effort to find predictors of response to clozapine in our early-onset treatment-refractory population. METHOD: Fifty-four children and adolescents participated in double-blind (n = 22) or open-label (n = 32) clozapine trials. Clinical evaluations took place at baseline, week 6 on clozapine, and at 2- to 6-year follow-up. The data were analyzed in relation to demographics, age at onset, IQ, clozapine dose, and plasma concentrations of prolactin, clozapine, NDMC, and NDMC/clozapine ratio. Stepwise regression and correlation analyses were performed to find predictors of treatment response. RESULTS: Clinical improvement after 6 weeks of clozapine treatment, as measured by the percentage of improvement on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, was strongly associated with the NDMC/clozapine ratio at the 6-week time point (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.41; p < .01 for Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and r = 0.43; p < .01 for Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms). Although the rate of side effects was higher than that typically found in the adult population, it did not appear to be related to clozapine dose, clozapine or NDMC plasma concentrations, or NDMC/clozapine ratio. Outcome at long-term follow-up, as measured by Children's Global Assessment Scale, was associated with lesser illness severity at baseline and with greater improvement during the initial 6 weeks of clozapine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The NDMC/clozapine ratio may be a valuable predictor of response to clozapine and may suggest new approaches to clozapine treatment.


Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy/standards , Schizophrenia, Childhood/drug therapy , Schizophrenia, Childhood/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age of Onset , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale , Child , Clozapine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Schizophrenia, Childhood/diagnosis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Am J Psychiatry ; 164(10): 1603-9; quiz 1624, 2007 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17898353

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive models suggest that biased processing of emotional information may play a role in the genesis and maintenance of psychotic symptoms. The role of dopamine and dopamine antagonists in the processing of such information remains unclear. The authors investigated the effect of a dopamine antagonist on perception of, and memory for, emotional information in healthy volunteers. METHOD: Thirty-three healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to a single-blind intervention of either a single dose of the dopamine D(2)/D(3) antagonist amisulpride or placebo. An attentional blink task and an emotional memory task were then administered to assess the affective modulation of attention and memory, respectively. RESULTS: A significant interaction was observed between stimulus valence and drug on recognition memory accuracy; further contrasts revealed enhanced memory for aversive-arousing compared with neutral stimuli in the placebo but not the amisulpride group. No effect of amisulpride was observed on the perception of emotional stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride abolished the enhanced memory for emotionally arousing stimuli seen in the placebo group but had no effect on the perception of such stimuli. These results suggests that dopamine plays a significant role in biasing memory toward emotionally salient information and that dopamine antagonists may act by attenuating this bias.


Attention/drug effects , Attention/physiology , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Dopamine/physiology , Emotions/physiology , Memory/drug effects , Memory/physiology , Perception/drug effects , Sulpiride/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Amisulpride , Humans , Male , Perception/physiology , Placebos , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Reaction Time/drug effects , Reaction Time/physiology , Recognition, Psychology/drug effects , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Single-Blind Method , Sulpiride/pharmacology , Task Performance and Analysis , Visual Perception/drug effects , Visual Perception/physiology
6.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 193(4): 539-45, 2007 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17497139

RATIONALE: Previous work has shown 80% serotonin transporter (5-HTT) occupancy to be a consistent finding at the minimum therapeutic dose during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment. [(11)C]N,N-dimethyl-2-(2-amino-4-cyanophenylthio) benzylamine positron emission tomography ([(11)C]DASB PET) is currently the best method available to quantify 5-HTT occupancy in humans. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study is to determine 5-HTT occupancy during high dose SSRI treatment using [(11)C]DASB PET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects and 12 subjects with major depressive disorder completed the protocol. Depressed subjects received one [(11)C]DASB PET scan after a minimum of 4 weeks treatment at high doses of venlafaxine, sertraline, or citalopram. Baseline 5-HTT binding potential (BP) was taken as the average 5-HTT BP of the 12 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Mean striatal 5-HTT occupancy for each antidepressant group was approximately 85% at high therapeutic dose. This was significantly greater than 80% (one-sample t test; p < 0.04, venlafaxine group; p < 0.02, sertraline group; p < 0.01, citalopram group) for each high dose antidepressant group. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly greater 5-HTT blockade at high dose provides a rationale for raising the dose from the minimum therapeutic dose in specific clinical circumstances. It is likely that 15% unoccupied 5-HTT remains, which should be addressed in future drug development.


Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Citalopram/administration & dosage , Citalopram/pharmacology , Corpus Striatum , Cyclohexanols/administration & dosage , Cyclohexanols/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Sertraline/administration & dosage , Sertraline/pharmacology , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
7.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 185(3): 339-47, 2006 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16525858

RATIONALE: Psychotropic medication affects cognition and brain function, making it a potential confounder in functional neuroimaging studies of psychiatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sub-acute administration of an antidepressant (escitalopram) would induce differences in cognitive performance and associated brain function, which could be observed within the normal power of a functional imaging study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy adults (N=10) received a short course of escitalopram (10 mg/day for 7 days). Participants performed a parametric working memory (WM) task during BOLD fMRI, both while medication-free and after medication. To control for order effects, the medication-free examination was completed by half the subjects before starting medication and by the other half at least one week after medication. RESULTS: Escitalopram had no significant effect on WM accuracy or reaction time. Preliminary analysis of the imaging data revealed no significant (p(corrected)<0.05) differences in memory-load-dependent activation between conditions. However, small volume correction analysis of regions that were significant prior to correction for multiple comparisons highlighted between condition differences in regions likely to be susceptible to antidepressant effects (i.e. thalamus, anterior cingulate and inferior frontal gyrus). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the sub-acute administration of antidepressants in healthy controls does not affect cognitive or hemodynamic function in healthy adults to a magnitude greater than one standard deviation unit. Therefore, the confounding effect of antidepressants on signal intensity in imaging studies of medicated, depressed individuals may be limited.


Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Brain/drug effects , Citalopram/adverse effects , Cognition/drug effects , Memory/drug effects , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Brain/physiology , Brain Mapping , Citalopram/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male
8.
Am J Psychiatry ; 161(5): 826-35, 2004 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15121647

OBJECTIVE: Minimum therapeutic doses of paroxetine and citalopram produce 80% occupancy for the serotonin (5-HT) transporter (5-HTT). The authors used [(11)C]DASB positron emission tomography to measure occupancies of three other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) at minimum therapeutic doses. The relationship between dose and occupancy was also investigated. METHOD: Striatal 5-HTT binding potential was measured in 77 subjects before and after 4 weeks of medication administration. Binding potential is proportional to the density of receptors not blocked by medication. Subjects received citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, or extended-release venlafaxine. Healthy subjects received subtherapeutic doses; subjects with mood and anxiety disorders received therapeutic doses. Percent reduction in 5-HTT binding potential for each medication and dose was calculated. To obtain test-retest data, binding potential was measured before and after 4 weeks in six additional healthy subjects. RESULTS: Substantial occupancy occurred at subtherapeutic doses for all SSRIs. Compared to test-retest data, each drug at the minimum therapeutic dose had a significant effect on striatal 5-HTT binding potential. Mean occupancy at this dose was 76%-85%. At higher plasma SSRI concentrations, 5-HTT occupancy tended to increase above 80%. For each drug, as the dose (or plasma level) increased, occupancy increased nonlinearly, with a plateau for higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: At tolerable doses, SSRIs have increasing occupancy with increasing plasma concentration or dose. Occupancy of 80% across five SSRIs occurs at minimum therapeutic doses. This suggests that 80% 5-HTT blockade is important for therapeutic effect. Occupancy should be measured during development of antidepressant compounds targeting the 5-HTT.


Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Corpus Striatum/diagnostic imaging , Corpus Striatum/metabolism , Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Membrane Transport Proteins , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Serotonin/metabolism , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Adult , Benzylamines , Carbon Radioisotopes , Carrier Proteins/drug effects , Citalopram/pharmacokinetics , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Corpus Striatum/drug effects , Cyclohexanols/pharmacokinetics , Cyclohexanols/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Fluoxetine/pharmacokinetics , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Membrane Glycoproteins/drug effects , Middle Aged , Paroxetine/pharmacokinetics , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Sertraline/pharmacokinetics , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
9.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 175(3): 367-73, 2004 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14997280

RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotic drugs are classically associated with lower propensity to extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and hyperprolactinemia than typical antipsychotic drugs. It has not been clarified why some atypical antipsychotic drugs, such as amisulpride, induce prolactin plasma concentration (PRL) elevation, but little EPS. Previous studies have found an association between striatal D2/D3 receptor occupancy and PRL in typical antipsychotic treated patients suggesting that PRL is a marker of central D2/D3 receptors blockade. OBJECTIVE: We have evaluated the relationship between PRL and central (striatum, temporal cortex and thalamus) D2/D3 receptor occupancy in amisulpride treated schizophrenic patients. METHODS: Single photon emission tomography (SPET) and [123I]-epidepride were used to determine D2/D3 receptor occupancy in eight amisulpride treated patients. PRL was measured concurrently with the scans. RESULTS: The mean PRL was 1166 (range 499-1892 mIU/l) for a mean amisulpride dose of 406 mg/day (range 150-600 mg/day). Amisulpride plasma concentration and central D2/D3 receptor occupancy were positively correlated (r=0.83-0.89, df=4, P<0.05). No significant correlations were observed between PRL and amisulpride (daily dose or plasma concentration, P>0.05), or between PRL and central D2/D3 receptor occupancy (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia is uncoupled from central D2/D3 receptor occupancy. Amisulpride has poor blood-brain barrier penetration and reaches much higher concentration at the pituitary, which is outside the blood-brain barrier. Higher D2/D3 receptor occupancy at the pituitary gland than at central regions is a possible explanation for amisulpride PRL elevation with low EPS. Further studies evaluating pituitary D2/D3 receptor occupancy in vivo are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.


Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Hyperprolactinemia/chemically induced , Receptors, Dopamine D2/metabolism , Sulpiride/analogs & derivatives , Sulpiride/adverse effects , Adult , Amisulpride , Antipsychotic Agents/metabolism , Brain/metabolism , Contrast Media , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists , Drug Tolerance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/metabolism , Receptors, Dopamine D3 , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/metabolism , Sulpiride/metabolism , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
10.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 24(1): 70-8, 2004 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14709950

The measurement of plasma clozapine concentrations is useful in assessing compliance, optimizing therapy, and minimizing toxicity. We measured plasma clozapine and norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine) concentrations in samples from 3782 patients (2648 male, 1127 female). No clozapine was detected in 291 samples (227 patients, median prescribed dose 300 mg/d). In 4963 (50.2 %) samples (2222 patients); plasma clozapine concentration ranged from 10 to 350 ng/mL.Step-wise backward multiple regression analysis (37 % of the total samples) of log10 plasma clozapine concentration against log10 clozapine dose (mg/d), age (year), sex (male = 0, female = 1), cigarette smoking habit (nonsmokers = 0; smokers = 1), body weight (kg), and plasma clozapine/norclozapine ratio (clozapine metabolic ratio, MR) showed that these covariates explained 48% of the observed variation in plasma clozapine concentration (C = ng/mL x 10-3) (P < 0.001) according to the following equation: log 10 (C) = 0.811 log 10 (dose) + 0.332 (MR) + 69.42 X 10 (-3) (sex) + 2.263 x 10 (-3) (age) + 1.976 x 10(-3) (weight) - 0.171 (smoking habit) - 3.180. This model and its associated confidence intervals were used to develop nomograms of plasma clozapine concentration versus dose for male and female smokers and nonsmokers. Predicted plasma clozapine changes by +48% in nonsmokers, +17% in females, +/-8 % for every 0.1 change in MR (reference 1.32), +/-4% for every 5 years (reference 40 years), and +/-5 % for every 10 kg body weight (reference 80 kg). The nomograms can be used (i) to individualize dosage to achieve a given target plasma clozapine concentration, and (ii) for quantitative evaluation of adherence by estimating the likelihood of an observed concentration being achieved by a given dosage regimen. The model has been validated against published data.


Aging/metabolism , Clozapine/analogs & derivatives , Clozapine/blood , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Patient Compliance , Sex Factors , Smoking/metabolism , Adult , Aging/physiology , Algorithms , Body Weight/drug effects , Body Weight/physiology , Clozapine/administration & dosage , Clozapine/pharmacokinetics , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Models, Biological , Retrospective Studies , Smoking/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
...