Categorizing asthma severity.

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Expert Panel II recommended a stepped care pharmacotherapy approach to asthma treatment based on an objective assessment of asthma severity using daytime symptoms, nocturnal symptoms, and physiologic lung function. The worst grade of the individual variables determines overall asthma severity. With this approach, patterns of asthma severity categorization might vary among individual variables; one variable might have a predominant effect on overall categorization. During the run-in, pretreatment phase of five controlled clinical trials, data from 744 inhaled steroid nonusers and 685 inhaled steroid users on asthma control were collected and asthma severity categorized. In inhaled steroid nonusers nocturnal symptoms classified the majority of patients as severe, persistent, but wheeze classified 27.3% of patients as mild, intermittent and 25.7% as mild, persistent. If the worst grade from the four asthma symptoms was used for severity grading, most patients were categorized as severe, persistent. beta-Agonist use and FEV(1) classified most as moderate, persistent. There was poor correlation between variables in severity categorization. Severity grading for European patients was similar to that for U.S. patients. Applying the Expert Panel II recommended method for asthma severity categorization to a large data set illustrates that a single variable, nocturnal symptoms, determined to a large extent overall categorization. Development of a validated method for asthma severity categorization is essential for using a stepped care approach to asthma pharmacotherapy.

Acute safety of beclomethasone dipropionate in a new CFC-free propellant system in asthmatic patients.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a) is a new chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propellant for use in metered dose inhalers. It provides a more environmentally friendly alternative to CFC propellants because it does not contain chlorine which is responsible for ozone depletion by CFCs. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is widely used for inhalation asthma therapy and is most commonly delivered by a CFC propellant system. The present study evaluated the acute safety of BDP formulated with the new propellant (HFA-134a BDP) compared with BDP in a CFC-11/12 formulation by measuring the acute bronchial response in asthmatic patients. The study was conducted as a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period cross-over trial. Asthmatic patients received eight inhalations of four treatment regimens (HFA-134a BDP, 1600 mg total dose; CFC-11/12 BDP, 2000 mg total dose; HFA-134a placebo and CFC-11/12 placebo) in random order over four study days. Forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured before and 2, 10, 20, 40 and 60 min after inhalation of the study treatments. The number of coughs was counted from the start of the first inhalation to 60 s after the last inhalation. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for changes in FEV1, for the number of coughs or for the occurrence or severity of bronchoconstriction. In asthmatic patients withholding bronchodilators, the new HFA-134a BDP propellant system proved as safe and was as well tolerated as the current CFC-11/12 BDP system. The two propellant systems without active drug were also equally well tolerated.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control to chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate at approximately half the total daily dose.

The mandatory requirement to eliminate chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as propellants in pharmaceutical aerosols has provided the opportunity to enhance significantly the delivery of aerosol drugs to the respiratory tract. This randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study was undertaken to assess whether beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) provided equivalent control of moderately severe asthma to BDP in CFC but at approximately half the total daily dose, as might be expected from the improved lung deposition of the HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol. The novel study design included a 10-12 day run-in period to confirm that patients met established criteria of moderately severe asthma and were symptomatic on current therapy (inhaled beta-agonist plus CFC-BDP 400-800 micrograms day-1). This run-in period was followed by a short course of oral steroid therapy (prednisolone 30 mg day-1 for 7-13 days) to demonstrate steroid responsiveness [> or = 15% improvement in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF)] and to provide a within-study baseline of improved asthma control. A total of 233 patients were randomized to treatment for 12 weeks with HFA-BDP 800 micrograms day-1 (116 patients) or CFC-BDP 1500 micrograms day-1 (117 patients). The mean change from oral steroid treatment in morning PEF with HFA-BDP was equivalent to that seen with CFC-BDP at all time intervals. Changes in other measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores and beta-agonist use were equivalent in the two treatment groups throughout the 12 week treatment period. The safety profile of HFA-BDP compared favourably with that of CFC-BDP with no unexpected adverse events reported. Fewer patients on HFA-BDP than on CFC-BDP had plasma cortisol levels below the normal reference range after 12 weeks of therapy (5.1% vs. 17.3%, respectively). In conclusion, HFA-BDP extrafine aerosol was found to provide equivalent control of moderately severe asthma to CFC-BDP at approximately half the daily dose with a favourable safety profile, suggesting an improved therapeutic ratio.

Beclomethasone relative availability of oral versus inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate from an HFA-134A metered dose inhaler.

3M has formulated a new chlorofluorocarbon-free (CFC-free) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with the use of the propellant HFA-134a (HFA). Lung deposition studies demonstrated that the HFA BDP MDI delivers to the lungs approximately 56% of the BDP dose (ex-adaptor), a substantially higher percentage than the 5-30% delivered by conventional CFC BDP MDIs. As new sensitive bioanalytical methods are becoming available to quantitate systemic levels of inhaled corticosteroids, pharmacokinetic evaluations are emerging as sensitive and reproducible methods that can be used as a complement to the data obtained from lung deposition studies to assess and compare the performance of MDIs. The present study was designed to determine the beclomethasone (BOH) availability of oral BDP relative to inhaled HFA BDP as a first step to alloy MDI product comparisons in the future. Forty mild asthmatic patients completed this open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period crossover study. Each patient received an oral dose of BDP (0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 or 5 mg) in one period and an inhaled dose of BDP (0.2 or 0.8 mg) in the other period, with four patients allocated to each of ten different treatment sequences. The BOH availability of orally administered BDP was approximately 40% relative to inhaled HFA BDP. In addition, the fraction of an oral dose that reaches the systemic circulation was estimated from the 40% relative availability and previous lung deposition data to be 0.26. These estimated pharmacokinetic parameters will be used in the future to further characterize the pharmacokinetics of inhaled BDP and to compare the performance of different MDI products.

Equivalence of asthma control with new CFC-free formulation HFA-134a beclomethasone dipropionate and CFC-beclomethasone dipropionate.

The study was designed to test for equivalence of asthma control between a new aerosol formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) incorporating a chlorofluorocarbon-(CFC) free, hydrofluoroalkane propellant (HFA-134a) and the conventional beclomethasone aerosol formulated in CFC propellants. Sixty-eight asthmatic patients entered an eight-week, randomised, double-blind crossover study. All patients, previously stabilised on BDP, were randomised to receive the same dose of BDP from each of the study treatments. Statistically significant equivalence was demonstrated between HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP for asthma control parameters: FEV1, morning and evening PEF, sleep disturbance, wheeze and cough, morning breathlessness and bronchodilator use. Such equivalence was also demonstrated for safety parameters. To conclude, it has been demonstrated that HFA-BDP achieves a level of asthma control that is clinically and statistically equivalent to CFC-BDP in terms of efficacy and safety, at total daily doses ranging from 200 micrograms to 600 micrograms in asthma patients previously stabilised on inhaled CFC-BDP.

Safety and efficacy of thymopentin in zidovudine (AZT)-treated asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects with 200-500 CD4 cells/mm3: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Thymopentin, 50 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) 3 times per week, was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zidovudine (AZT)-treated asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects with 200-500 CD4 cells/mm3 at entry. The 352 subjects were prestratified by prior AZT use into stratum I (235 subjects, > 6 months AZT at entry) and stratum II (117 subjects, < or = 6 months AZT at entry). Clinical end points, CD4 cell counts, serum p24, serum immune complex dissociated (ICD) p24, and safety variables were evaluated through 48 weeks, using an intent-to-treat analysis. The two strata were analyzed individually because they yielded different clinical outcomes, with a statistically significant treatment-by-stratum interaction. In stratum I (mean, 16 months AZT at entry) two AIDS or death events occurred in thymopentin and 10 in placebo recipients (p = 0.024; relative risk (RR) estimate, 4.9 [95% confidence limit (CI), 1.1 to 22.2]). There were three AIDS-related complex (ARC), AIDS, or death events in thymopentin and 18 in placebo recipients [p = 0.001; RR estimate, 5.9 (95% CI, 1.7 to 20.0)]. In stratum II (mean, 3 months AZT at entry), four AIDS or death events occurred in thymopentin and none in placebo recipients (p = 0.11), and four ARC, AIDS, or death events occurred in thymopentin and two in placebo recipients (p = 0.79). The treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to changes in CD4 counts or p24 antigen levels or with respect to clinical adverse experiences or laboratory abnormalities. Thus, AZT-experienced placebo-treated subjects had relatively high progression rates to AIDS or death and to ARC, AIDS, or death, and these rates were reduced by thymopentin treatment. In contrast, placebo-treated subjects with little prior AZT experience had low progression rates; these were not significantly changed by thymopentin treatment. There was no increase in the incidence of adverse reactions with thymopentin.