The impact of the location, incidence and distribution of lung metastases in primary colorectal and renal cell cancer patients on prognosis: a retrospective observational study.

Background: Patients with distant metastases have an unfavourable prognosis, but patients with isolated pulmonary metastases should generally not be considered hopeless. Complete resection of metachronous and solitary metastases leads to prolonged survival; however, the influence of the location, distribution and bilaterality of pulmonary metastases needs to be investigated further. This article aimed to investigate the role of the distribution of lung metastases in primary colorectal and renal cell cancer patients on prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the prognosis of patients with pulmonary metastases and colorectal or renal cell carcinoma, defined as the survival time of patients with different metastases. The types of metastases were unilobar, multilobar, unilateral, bilateral, diffuse, synchronous, or metachronous. The secondary outcome of this study was differences in prognosis according to additional criteria. Results: Patients with metachronous metastases had significantly greater median survival than patients with synchronous metastases. There was a statistically significant difference in median survival between patients with unilateral (better survival) and patients with bilateral (worse survival) lung metastases. In patients with renal cell carcinoma, a statistically significant difference in median survival time was detected for patients with unilateral metastases. A significantly longer median survival time was observed in patients without diffuse metastases. A significantly greater median survival time was detected in patients with no thoracic nodal involvement. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference in the median survival time for patients with colorectal versus renal cell carcinoma in general or for those with lung metastases. No statistically significant difference in median survival time was detected for patients according to single or multiple lung metastases, additional tumours or metastases during disease, the distance of residence from a specialized clinic in Coburg, sex, smoking or adipocytes, multimorbidity, immunosuppression or different cancer treatments. Conclusions: For a minority of patients, pulmonary resection is a chance for prolonged survival. The perioperative mortality rate after metastasectomy is less than five percent. Patients with metachronous and unilateral lung metastases should be evaluated for surgery. Patients with diffuse metastases or lymph node involvement have a significantly shorter median survival time. Decision-making should be interdisciplinary.

Closing the RCT Gap-A Large Meta-Analysis on the Role of Surgery in Stage I-III Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Despite clear guideline recommendations, surgery is not consistently carried out as part of multimodal therapy in stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The role of surgery in stages II and III is even more controversial. In the absence of current randomized control trials (RCT), we performed a meta-analysis comparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment in stage I to III SCLC patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1 July 2023, focusing on studies pertaining to the impact of surgery on small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analyses, including I² tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests, and Egger regression, were performed to assess the data. In addition, 5-year survival rates were analyzed. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA standards. RESULTS: Among the 6826 records identified, 10 original studies encompassing a collective cohort of 95,323 patients were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was observed across the included studies, with no discernible indication of publication bias. Analysis of patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in a combined analysis of patients in stages I-III were 39.6 ± 15.3% for the 'surgery group' and 16.7 ± 12.7% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value < 0.0001). SCLC patients in stages II and III treated outside the guideline with surgery had a significantly better 5-year survival compared to non-surgery controls (36.3 ± 20.2% vs. 20.2 ± 17.0%; p-value = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of current RCTs, this meta-analysis provides robust suggestions that surgery might significantly improve survival in all SCLC stages. Non-surgical therapy could lead to a shortening of life. The feasibility of surgery in non-metastatic SCLC should always be evaluated as part of a multimodal treatment.

Comparison of outcomes of surgical and other invasive treatment modalities for malignant pleural effusion in patients with pleural carcinomatosis.

Background: Treatment modalities for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) are diverse. The objectives were to analyze actual clinical data from patients with MPE and pleural carcinomatosis and to compare the outcomes of different treatment modalities with regard to effectiveness, survival, morbidity, and mortality as well as the duration of hospitalization. Methods: Patients with pathologically proven pleural carcinomatosis or MPE from 2018 to 2020 were included in this retrospective-observational study with additional questionnaires. We identified four treatment modalities: (I) video-assisted thoracic surgery with pleurodesis (VATS, mechanical/chemical); (II) VATS with pleurodesis combined with indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) placement; (III) VATS (without pleurodesis) combined with IPC placement; and (IV) management with IPC placement alone. Results: We enrolled 91 patients aged 38-90 years who were treated by either VATS-pleurodesis (N=22), VATS-IPC placement (N=21), a combination of VATS with pleurodesis and IPC placement (N=22), or IPC placement alone (N=26). The mean survival time was 138.3 days. No significant differences were detected among treatment groups regarding the outcome of pleurodesis failure, either initially or later. Patients in the VATS-pleurodesis with IPC group experienced significantly more complications than those in the other treatment modality groups [odds ratio (OR): 3.288, P=0.026]. However, no statistically significant differences were observed regarding the type of adverse event and survival. Hypoalbuminemia, systemic therapy, and successful pleurodesis (P=0.008; P=0.011; P=0.044, respectively) were significantly correlated with survival. In multiple linear regression, hypoalbuminemia persisted as an independent predictor of survival (P=0.031). The type of intervention showed significant differences regarding the duration of hospitalization (P=0.017). IPC placement alone shortened the mean total hospitalization time by 7.9, 5.9, and 7.0 days compared to VATS-pleurodesis (P≤0.001), VATS-IPC placement (P=0.004), and VATS-pleurodesis with IPC placement (P≤0.001), respectively. Conclusions: The survival time was very short, and each treatment group had pros and cons. Therefore, decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis. The use of an IPC, even if the lung is not trapped, can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay. VATS is needed when histology is needed. The ideal method for treating recurrent MPE should be simple, effective, and inexpensive, with minimal disturbance to the patient.

Redefining the role of surgery in early small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Resection is guideline recommended in stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) but not in stage II. In this stage, patients are treated with a non-surgical approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of surgery in both SCLC stages. Surgically treated patients were compared to non-surgical controls. Five-year survival rates were analysed. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on December 01, 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Studies published since 2004 on the effect of surgery in SCLC were considered and assessed using ROBINS-I. We preformed I2-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA. RESULTS: Out of 6826 records, we identified seven original studies with a total of 15,170 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found heterogeneity between these studies and ruled out any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in stage I were 47.4 ± 11.6% for the 'surgery group' and 21.7 ± 11.3% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value = 0.0006). Our analysis of stage II SCLC revealed a significant survival benefit after surgery (40.2 ± 21.6% versus 21.2 ± 17.3%; p-value = 0.0474). CONCLUSION: Based on our data, the role of surgery in stage I and II SCLC is robust, since it improves the long-term survival in both stages significantly. Hence, feasibility of surgery as a priority treatment should always be evaluated not only in stage I SCLC but also in stage II, for which guideline recommendations might have to be reassessed.

Stage I and II Small-Cell Lung Cancer-New Challenge for Surgery.

PURPOSE: The recommended treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) currently is surgery in stage I disease. We wondered about stage II SCLC and present a meta-analysis on mean-survival of patients that underwent surgery for stage I and II compared to controls. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on December 01st 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We considered studies published on the effect of surgery in SCLC since 2004 and assessed them using ROBINS-I. We preformed I2-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA. RESULTS: Out of 6826 records, seven studies with a total of 11,241 patients ('surgery group': 3911 patients; 'non-surgery group': 7330; treatment period: 1984-2015) were included. Heterogeneity between the studies was revealed in absence of any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups (p-value > 0.05). The mean-survival in an analysis of patients in stage I was 36.7 ± 10.8 months for the 'surgery group' and 20.3 ± 5.7 months for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value = 0.0084). A combined analysis of patients in stage I and II revealed a mean-survival of 32.0 ± 16.7 months for the 'surgery group' and 19.1 ± 6.1 months for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value = 0.0391). In a separate analysis of stage II, we were able to demonstrate a significant survival benefit after surgery (21.4 ± 3.6 versus 16.2 ± 3.9 months; p-value = 0.0493). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows a significant survival benefit after surgery not only in the recommended stage I but also in stage II SCLC. Our data suggests that both stages should be considered for surgery of early SCLC.

[Modern Treatment Options for Postoperative Chylothorax: a Systematic Review]. / Systematische Übersichtsarbeit: moderne Behandlungsverfahren beim postoperativen Chylothorax.

BACKGROUND: Chylothorax is a multifactorial complication, usually caused by surgery or traumatic injury, and more rarely by malignant disease. Because of the lack of prospective, randomised trials, the evidence-based treatment rests upon personal experience, but ideally taking into account retrospective analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the currently available modern treatment options. Another aspect is to show their advantages and disadvantages. For this purpose, a literature search was performed using the "PubMed" database. Publications older than ten years were excluded from this review. The literature search employed the keyword "chylothorax". The priority was set on publications including a comparative assessment of treatment approaches. The authors relied on many years of clinical experience to critically analyse and evaluate the treatment options and the given recommendations. RESULTS: The success rate of the conservative treatment methods ranges widely, depending on the underlying cause of the disease (3 - 90%). Non-invasive or semi-invasive procedures are successful in 50 to 100% of the cases, also depending on the aetiology. After unsuccessful conservative treatment of operable patients, the standard surgical therapy consists of thoracic duct ligature, which is usually performed thoracoscopically. Alternatively, pleurodesis or the placement of a permanent chest drain (PleurX) or a pleuroperitoneal shunt may be performed. The success rate of these procedures is between 64 and 100%. The morbidity and mortality rate can reach values up to 25%. CONCLUSION: Treatment of a chylothorax should be started conservatively. Subsequently, a more aggressive therapy may be gradually considered, based on the patient's health and the amount of the secretion. Interventional radiological procedures are safe, successful, and have a legitimate place alongside conservative or surgical treatment. However, they are currently only available in some larger centres.

Preoperative statin therapy in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of 90,000 patients.

The objective of this systematic literature review with meta-analysis was to determine the strength of evidence for a preoperative statin on the reduction of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled (RCT) and observational trials were searched in online databases that reported about the effects of preoperative statin therapy on major adverse clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. Analysed outcomes included early all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke and renal failure using a priori-defined criteria. Effect estimates were calculated and are given as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using fixed- or random-effect models. Literature search of all major databases retrieved 2371 studies. After screening, a total of 54 trials were identified (12 RCT, 42 observational) that reported outcomes of 91 491 cardiac surgery patients with (n = 46 614; 51%) or without (n = 44 877; 49%) preoperative statin therapy. Preoperative statin use resulted in a 0.9% absolute risk (2.6 vs 3.5%) and a 31% odds reduction for early all-cause mortality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.81; P < 0.0001). In addition, statin treatment before surgery was associated with a substantial reduction (P < 0.01) in the postoperative end-points AF (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.61-0.82), new-onset AF (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.85), stroke (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.93), stay on intensive care unit (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.14; 95% CI -0.23 to -0.03; P < 0.01) and in-hospital stay (WMD -0.57; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.38; P < 0.01). No statistical differences were found between groups with regard to myocardial infarction or renal failure. In conclusion, the current systematic review strengthens the evidence that preoperative statin therapy extends substantial clinical benefit to early postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.

Meta-analysis of patients taking statins before revascularization and aortic valve surgery.

Statin intake before cardiac surgery is associated with favorable outcomes. We sought to analyze the evidence for statin pretreatment before isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery and aortic valve replacement surgery. In this meta-analysis, we demonstrate beneficial results for the endpoints mortality, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and length of stay in hospital in 36,053 statin-pretreated coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients compared with control subjects retrieved from 32 studies, but fail to detect relevant advantages through preoperative statin therapy for 3,091 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from four trials. Strict adherence to guidelines recommending statin treatment before CABG surgery is therefore mandatory.

Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 27,789 patients.

BACKGROUND: To determine the current strength of evidence for or against endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational trials (OT) was performed that reported the impact of EVH on adverse clinical outcomes after CABG. Analyzed postoperative outcomes included wound infection, postoperative pain, myocardial infarction (MI), vein graft failure, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Pooled treatment effects (OR or weighted mean difference (WMD), 95%CI) were assessed using a fixed or random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 27,789 patients from 43 studies (16 RCT, 27 OT) were identified who underwent saphenectomy by endoscopic (46%; n = 12,822) or conventional technique (54%; n = 14,967). Pooled effect estimates revealed a reduced incidence (P < 0.001) for wound infections (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.32), pain (WMD -1.26, 95% CI -2.07 to -0.44; P = 0.0026), and length of hospital stay (WMD -0.6 d, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.12; P = 0.0152). EVH was associated to an increase of the odds for vein graft failure (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.88; P = 0.0433), a finding that lost statistical difference after pooled analysis of RCT and studies with high methodological quality. Similarly, graft-related endpoints, including mortality and MI, did not differ between the harvesting techniques. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review underscores the safety of EVH in patients undergoing CABG. EVH reduces leg wound infections without increasing the midterm risk for vein graft failure, MI, or mortality.

Expression of HIF-1 alpha in irradiated tissue is altered by topical negative-pressure therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the enormous therapeutic potential of modern radiotherapy, common side effects such as radiation-induced wound healing disorders remain a well-known clinical phenomenon. Topical negative pressure therapy (TNP) is a novel tool to alleviate intraoperative, percutaneous irradiation or brachytherapy. Since TNP has been shown to positively influence the perfusion of chronic, poorly vascularized wounds, the authors applied this therapeutic method to irradiated wounds and investigated the effect on tissue oxygenation in irradiated tissue in five patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With informed patients' consent, samples prior to and 4 and 8 days after continuous TNP with -125 mmHg were obtained during routine wound debridements. Granulation tissue was stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and additionally with CD31, HIF-1 alpha (hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha), and D2-40 to detect blood vessels, measure indirect signs of hypoxia, and lymph vessel distribution within the pre- and post-TNP samples. RESULTS: In this first series of experiments, a positive influence of TNP onto tissue oxygenation in radiation-induced wounds could be demonstrated. TNP led to a significant decrease of 53% HIF-1 alpha-positive cell nuclei. At the same time, a slight reduction of CD31-stained capillaries was seen in comparison to samples before TNP. Immunostaining with D2-40 revealed an increased number of lymphatic vessels with distended lumina and an alteration of the parallel orientation within the post-TNP samples. CONCLUSION: This study is, to the authors' knowledge, the first report on a novel previously not described histological marker to demonstrate the effects of TNP on HIF-1 alpha expression as an indirect marker of tissue oxygenation in irradiated wounds, as demonstrated by a reduction of HIF-1 alpha concentration after TNP. Since this observation may be of significant value to develop possible new strategies to treat radiation-induced tissue injury, further investigations of HIF-1 alpha regulation under TNP are warranted.