Comparison of analytical methods to detect instability of etanercept during thermal stress testing.

The aim was comparing the capability of a set of analytical methods to detect physical instability (focus on aggregation and structural changes) of etanercept during thermal stress testing as early as possible. Pre-filled syringes of Enbrel® 50mg from three batches were thermally stressed for one week at 50°C. Samples were taken at days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7, and analyzed with high-performance liquid size exclusion chromatography (HP-SEC), SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis, dynamic light scattering (DLS), light obscuration, extrinsic fluorescence (Bis-ANS), far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, second derivative UV spectroscopy (UV), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Thermal stress resulted in the formation of small soluble aggregates (HP-SEC, DLS) which were in part covalent (SDS-PAGE), and conformationally changed (Bis-ANS, CD, UV). No significant increase in subvisible particles was detected by light obscuration. An apparent increase in TNF-α binding to etancercept in the stressed formulations was found by ELISA. The three batches were comparable when unstressed, but showed slight differences in aggregation tendency. Bis-ANS fluorescence was most sensitive with respect to early-stage detection of heat-induced instability of etanercept (significant changes already at day 1), followed by HP-SEC (day 2) and DLS (day 3). This points towards a degradation mechanism involving exposure of hydrophobic patches due to partial unfolding followed by aggregation.

The presence or absence of antibodies to infliximab or adalimumab determines the outcome of switching to etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the reason for non-response (caused by immunogenicity or not) to a first tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor defines whether a second TNF inhibitor will be effective. METHODS: This cohort study consisted of 292 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), all treated with etanercept. A total of 89 patients (30%) were treated previously with infliximab or adalimumab ('switchers'), and the remaining 203 (70%) were anti-TNF naive. All switchers were divided into two groups: with and without antibodies against the previous biological. Differences in clinical response to etanercept between switchers with and without antibodies and patients who were anti-TNF naive were assessed after 28 weeks of treatment using changes in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). RESULTS: After 28 weeks of treatment, response to etanercept did not differ between patients who were anti-TNF naive and switchers with anti-drug antibodies (ΔDAS28=2.1 ± 1.3 vs ΔDAS28=2.0 ± 1.3; p = 0.743). In contrast, switchers without anti-drug antibodies had a diminished response to etanercept treatment compared to patients who were TNF naive (ΔDAS28 =1.2±1.3 vs ΔDAS28 = 2.1 ± 1.3; p = 0.001) and switchers with antibodies (ΔDAS28 =1.2±1.3 vs ΔDAS28 = 2.0 ± 1.3; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Patients with RA with an immunogenic response against a first TNF-blocking agent had a better clinical response to a subsequent TNF blocker compared to patients with RA without anti-drug antibodies. Hence, determining immunogenicity can be helpful in deciding in which patient switching could be beneficial and can be part of a personalised treatment regimen.

Extent and clinical consequences of antibody formation against adalimumab in patients with plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent antibodies to adalimumab are formed in patients with plaque psoriasis and whether these antibodies have clinical consequences. Also, to examine the relationship between antibodies to adalimumab and adalimumab trough titers. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two Dutch dermatology departments in university hospitals. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients starting a regimen of adalimumab for chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients were screened and fulfilled the Dutch reimbursement criteria for adalimumab to treat psoriasis. INTERVENTION: Adalimumab treatment (per label). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The titer of antibodies to adalimumab, the adalimumab trough concentration, and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at weeks 12 and 24. RESULTS: Antibodies to adalimumab were detected in 13 of 29 patients (45%) during 24 weeks of treatment. Differences in response rates among patients with low, high, and no titers of antibodies to adalimumab were significant at weeks 12 and 24 (P = .04 and P < .001, respectively). The median adalimumab trough concentrations varied significantly among patients with low, high, and no titers of antibodies to adalimumab (1.30 [range, 0.01-5.50], 0.0 [range, 0.0-0.0], and 9.6 [range, 0.0-22.6] mg/L, respectively; P < .001). At week 24, the median adalimumab trough concentrations also differed significantly among good responders, moderate responders, and nonresponders (9.7 [range, 0.0-22.6], 8.9 [range, 3.2-12.6], and 0.0 [range, 0.0-13.3] mg/L, respectively; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Antibodies to adalimumab are associated with lower serum adalimumab trough concentrations and with nonresponse or loss of response to adalimumab in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Testing for IgG4 against foods is not recommended as a diagnostic tool: EAACI Task Force Report.

Serological tests for immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) against foods are persistently promoted for the diagnosis of food-induced hypersensitivity. Since many patients believe that their symptoms are related to food ingestion without diagnostic confirmation of a causal relationship, tests for food-specific IgG4 represent a growing market. Testing for blood IgG4 against different foods is performed with large-scale screening for hundreds of food items by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-type and radioallergosorbent-type assays in young children, adolescents and adults. However, many serum samples show positive IgG4 results without corresponding clinical symptoms. These findings, combined with the lack of convincing evidence for histamine-releasing properties of IgG4 in humans, and lack of any controlled studies on the diagnostic value of IgG4 testing in food allergy, do not provide any basis for the hypothesis that food-specific IgG4 should be attributed with an effector role in food hypersensitivity. In contrast to the disputed beliefs, IgG4 against foods indicates that the organism has been repeatedly exposed to food components, recognized as foreign proteins by the immune system. Its presence should not be considered as a factor which induces hypersensitivity, but rather as an indicator for immunological tolerance, linked to the activity of regulatory T cells. In conclusion, food-specific IgG4 does not indicate (imminent) food allergy or intolerance, but rather a physiological response of the immune system after exposition to food components. Therefore, testing of IgG4 to foods is considered as irrelevant for the laboratory work-up of food allergy or intolerance and should not be performed in case of food-related complaints.

Decreased clinical response to infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis is correlated with anti-infliximab formation.

OBJECTIVES: Correlation of serum trough infliximab levels and antibodies to infliximab (anti-infliximab) with clinical response in ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: In accordance with the international ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) consensus statement, patients were treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg) every 6 weeks after a starting regimen. Preinfusion sera were collected at baseline, 24 and 54 weeks. At every visit, the 20% improvement response (ASAS-20) was assessed and laboratory tests performed. RESULTS: 24 of the 38 (63%) patients fulfilled ASAS-20 response criteria after 24 weeks of treatment and 21 (53%) after 54 weeks. After 54 weeks, 11 (29%) patients showed undetectable serum trough infliximab levels and detectable anti-infliximab; six of these patients developed an infusion reaction. Anti-infliximab was found significantly more often (p = 0.04) in ASAS-20 non-responders compared with responders at week 54. Serum trough infliximab levels were significantly (p<0.0001) lower in patients with (mean 0.02 mg/l) than in those without (12.7 mg/l) anti-infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: In ankylosing spondylitis, high levels of serum trough infliximab correlated with a good clinical response. Detection of anti-infliximab within 54 weeks is associated with undetectable serum trough infliximab levels, reduced response to treatment and increased risk of developing an infusion reaction.

Coughing in pre-school children in general practice: when are RAST's for inhalation allergy indicated?

To identify patterns of clinical history associated with extreme (high or low) probabilities of allergic sensitization in coughing children so as to restrict allergy testing to those with an intermediate probability of sensitization. A total of 752 children, aged 1-4, visiting their GPs for coughing (>or=5 days), were tested for IgE-antibodies to house dust mite, cat and dog [RadioAllergoSorbent Test (RAST)]. Parents completed a questionnaire on family history of atopy, breastfeeding, smoking, pets, and floor covering. Data of 640 children could be analyzed, 83 (13%) were IgE-positive. In a logistic regression analysis, a scoring formula for the prediction of being IgE-positive was constructed using variables from the patient's history. Significant contributors for sensitization were: age (3-4 yr), infantile eczema, positive family history of mite-allergy, sibling(s) with pollen-allergy, and smoking by parents. If only one of these characteristics is present, the probability of sensitization is < 25%. In such cases watchful waiting may be preferred over allergy testing. In other cases, a negative RAST may help to exclude sensitization, whereas a positive RAST helps to establish the diagnosis. Thus, acting on clinical history alone may save approximately 80% of RAST's. Patient history-derived information contributes to distinguishing children who are at low risk for sensitization to house dust mite, cat, and dog. The scoring formula may help GPs to identify children with a low probability of being sensitized. This may form the basis for watchful waiting. In others, allergy testing may be useful to gain more diagnostic certainty.

IgE testing in capillary blood.

Serologic IgE testing is generally performed using serum, obtained by venepuncture. We tested whether paper-absorbed and eluted capillary blood, obtained by a less invasive method (finger prick) could be used for allergy testing in young children. This was performed by comparative IgE testing, using paper-absorbed blood/serum and serum. Practical applicability of the procedure was tested by assaying paper-absorbed and eluted blood, obtained from 640 children with complaints of prolonged coughing, for IgE to airborne allergens. We found that IgE testing, using paper-absorbed/eluted material and serum yields virtually identical results (mean ratio for positive samples: 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-1.75). Blood spot testing revealed that sensitization to inhalant allergens is not uncommon in preschool children (13% positive radioallergosorbent test [RAST] tests), which means that this procedure is a useful method for assaying allergic sensitization in children.

IgE to Bet v 1 and profilin: cross-reactivity patterns and clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with pollen allergy often have IgE against plant-derived foods. This can be due to cross-reactive IgE against Bet v 1 and homologues, profilins, and/or cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to correlate sensitization to Bet v 1 and profilin with individual recognition patterns to plant foods and clinical relevance. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with pollen allergy and IgE against at least one plant-derived food were included in the study. Adverse reactions to plant-derived foods were documented by using standardized interviews. Skin prick tests were performed for pollen (grass, birch, and mugwort) and 14 plant-derived foods. In addition, recombinant (r) Bet v 1 and rBet v 2 (profilin) were tested intracutaneously. Specific IgE against the abovementioned allergens were determined by means of RAST. Cross-reactivity was studied by means of RAST inhibition. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of patients were sensitized to Bet v 1, and 71% were sensitized to profilin. Profilin was associated with a higher number of positive RAST results to plant-derived foods than Bet v 1. In contrast, Bet v 1 was associated with more positive skin prick test responses and more food-related symptoms. Sensitization to Bet v 1 was associated with IgE against apple, hazelnut, and peach, whereas sensitization to profilin was associated with positive RAST results to all investigated plant-derived foods except apple, peach, and melon. CONCLUSIONS: IgE antibodies against Bet v 1 have a more limited spectrum of cross-reactivity than those against profilin, but they frequently give rise to clinically relevant cross-reactivities to food. In analogy to anticarbohydrate IgE, cross-reactive IgE against food profilins have no or very limited clinical relevance.