Quantitative Anatomic Analysis of the Transcallosal-Transchoroidal Approach and the Transcallosal-Subchoroidal Approach to the Floor of the Third Ventricle: An Anatomic Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare transcallosal-transchoroidal and transcallosal-subchoroidal approaches to the ipsilateral and contralateral edges of the floor of the third ventricle using quantitative analyses. METHODS: Five formalin-fixed cadaveric human heads (10 sides) were examined under the operating microscope. Quantitative measurements (area of surgical freedom and angle of attack) were obtained using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and a StealthStation image guidance system. The limits of the surgical approaches were shown by touching a probe to 6 designated points on the floor of the third ventricle. RESULTS: The transchoroidal approach provided greater surgical freedom than the subchoroidal approach to access ipsilateral and contralateral middle landmarks at the edges of the floor of the third ventricle in both longitudinal and horizontal planes (P ≤ 0.03). No significant difference between the 2 approaches was found in accessing the anterior and posterior landmarks of the third ventricle in each plane. The surgical freedom to the contralateral anterior, middle, and posterior landmarks was greater than to the ipsilateral landmarks in both the transchoroidal and subchoroidal approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The transcallosal-transchoroidal approach, compared with the transcallosal-subchoroidal approach, may provide better exposure and require less retraction for removal of ipsilateral or contralateral lesions located in the midbrain or hypothalamus and situated near the floor of the third ventricle. The contralateral transcallosal approach with either the transchoroidal or subchoroidal approach may provide good surgical freedom for removal of lesions located near the floor of the third ventricle, such as lesions in the midbrain.

Microvascular Anastomosis Training in Neurosurgery: A Review.

Cerebrovascular diseases are among the most widespread diseases in the world, which largely determine the structure of morbidity and mortality rates. Microvascular anastomosis techniques are important for revascularization surgeries on brachiocephalic and carotid arteries and complex cerebral aneurysms and even during resection of brain tumors that obstruct major cerebral arteries. Training in microvascular surgery became even more difficult with less case exposure and growth of the use of endovascular techniques. In this text we will briefly discuss the history of microvascular surgery, review current literature on simulation models with the emphasis on their merits and shortcomings, and describe the views and opinions on the future of the microvascular training in neurosurgery. In "dry" microsurgical training, various models created from artificial materials that simulate biological tissues are used. The next stage in training more experienced surgeons is to work with nonliving tissue models. Microvascular training using live models is considered to be the most relevant due to presence of the blood flow. Training on laboratory animals has high indicators of face and constructive validity. One of the future directions in the development of microsurgical techniques is the use of robotic systems. Robotic systems may play a role in teaching future generations of microsurgeons. Modern technologies allow access to highly accurate learning environments that are extremely similar to real environment. Additionally, assessment of microsurgical skills should become a fundamental part of the current evaluation of competence within a microneurosurgical training program. Such an assessment tool could be utilized to ensure a constant level of surgical competence within the recertification process. It is important that this evaluation be based on validated models.

A morphometric and analytical cadaver dissection study of a tumor-simulation balloon model.

We quantified the effects on anatomical cadaver dissection of a balloon-inflation tumor model positioned in the parasellar region and approached through an orbitozygomatic (OZ) craniotomy. A modified supraorbital OZ was performed bilaterally on 5 silicon-injected cadaver heads. Ten predetermined anatomical points assigned using a frameless stereotactic device were used to measure the working area of exposure, degree of surgical freedom, and horizontal and vertical angles of attack to specific target points before and after inflation of a balloon catheter mimicking a parasellar tumor. Balloon inflation displaced the central anatomical structures (pituitary stalk, lamina terminalis, anterior chiasm, and internal carotid artery [ICA]-posterior communicating artery and ICA-A1 junctions) by 14-51% (p ≤ .05). With tumor simulation, the vertical angle of attack increased by 67% (p < .01), while the area of exposure increased by 83% (p < .01) and surgical freedom increased by 58% (p < .01). This tumor model also significantly displaced central anatomical sella-associated structures. Compared to a normal anatomical configuration, the tumor simulation (balloon) opened surgical corridors (especially vertical) and acted as a natural retractor, widening the angle of access to the infundibular apex-hypothalamic junction. Although this model cannot exactly mimic a tumor mass in a patient, the effects of tumor compression and sequential displacement of important structures can be combined into and then assessed in a cadaveric neurosurgical anatomical scenario for training and research.