Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Toxicology ; 458: 152839, 2021 06 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153374

RESUMEN

Toxicological effects of chemicals are mostly tested individually. However, consumers encounter exposure to complex mixtures, for example multiple pesticide residues, by consuming food such as crops, fruits or vegetables. Currently, more than 450 active substances are approved in the European Union, and there is little data on effects after combined exposure to several pesticides. Toxicological animal studies would increase enormously, if pesticide combinations had to be analyzed in vivo. Therefore, in vitro methods addressing this issue are needed. We have developed 32 immunoaffinity-based mass spectrometry assays to investigate the impact of hepatotoxic active substances on liver proteins in human HepaRG cells. Five compounds were selected based on their (dis)similar capability to modulate protein levels, and on their combined use in commercially available formulations. Four binary mixtures were prepared from these five substances and tested in different concentrations over three time points. We applied a novel statistical method to describe deviations from additivity and to detect antagonistic and synergistic effects. The results regarding the abundance of hepatotoxicity-related proteins showed additive behavior for 1323 out of 1427 endpoints tested, while 104 combinatorial effects deviating from additivity, such as antagonism or synergism were observed.


Asunto(s)
Hígado/metabolismo , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Proteínas/metabolismo , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Biomarcadores , Línea Celular , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/genética , Mezclas Complejas , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos
2.
Anal Chem ; 91(6): 3902-3911, 2019 03 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30768891

RESUMEN

Processed Animal Proteins (PAPs) are considered as a sustainable protein source to improve the nutritional profile of feed for livestock and aquaculture. However, the use of these proteins is strongly regulated since the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis. The reintroduction of nonruminant PAPs for use in aquaculture in 2013 has driven the need for alternative analytical methods to determine the species origin as well as the tissue source (legal or not). The current official methods, light microscopy and polymerase chain reaction, do not fulfill these requirements. Furthermore, future methods need to be quantitative, because the pending zero-tolerance-concept is planned to be replaced by accurate thresholds. Here, we developed a 7-plex mass spectrometry-based immunoassay that is capable of quantifying 0.1% (w/w) ruminant PAP in feed in a tissue- and species-specific way. The workflow comprises a 2 h tryptic digestion of PAPs in suspension, an immunoaffinity enrichment of peptides, and LC-MS/MS-based quantification. In combination with a previously published assay for species identification, we were able to confirm the species and tissue origin of six ring trial samples obtained in former PCR and microscopy proficiency tests. The sensitive, quantitative, species- and tissue-specific character of the developed assays meets the requirements for new methods for PAP detection and can be used in future feed authentication studies.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Proteínas en la Dieta/análisis , Manipulación de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas , Animales , Bovinos , Carne/análisis , Especificidad de Órganos , Especificidad de la Especie
3.
J Agric Food Chem ; 66(39): 10327-10335, 2018 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30222351

RESUMEN

With the reintroduction of nonruminant processed animal proteins (PAPs) for use in aquaculture in 2013, there is a suitable alternative to replace expensive fish meal in fish feed. Nevertheless, since the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis, the use of PAPs in feed is strictly regulated. To date, light microscopy and polymerase chain reaction are the official methods for proving the absence of illegal PAPs in feed. Due to their limitations, alternative methods for the quantitative species differentiation are needed. To address this issue, we developed and validated an 8-plex mass spectrometry-based immunoassay. The workflow comprises a tryptic digestion of PAPs and blood products in suspension, a cross-species immunoaffinity enrichment of 8 species-specific alpha-2-macroglobulin peptides using a group-specific antibody, and a subsequent analysis by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for species identification and quantification. This workflow can be used to quantitatively determine the species origin in future feed authentication studies.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Proteínas Sanguíneas/química , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Proteínas/química , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Animales , Bovinos , Pollos , Análisis Discriminante , Patos , Peces , Caballos , Porcinos
4.
Anal Chem ; 90(6): 4135-4143, 2018 03 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470057

RESUMEN

The ban of processed animal proteins (PAPs) in feed for farmed animals introduced in 2001 was one of the main EU measures to control the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis. Currently, microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the official methods for the detection of illegal PAPs in feed. However, the progressive release of the feed ban, recently with the legalization of nonruminant PAPs for the use in aquaculture, requires the development of alternative methods to determine the species origin and the source (legal or not). Additionally, discussions about the need for quantitative tests came up, particularly if the zero-tolerance-concept is replaced by introducing PAP thresholds. To address this issue, we developed and partially validated a multiplex mass spectrometry-based immunoassay to quantify ruminant specific peptides in vegetal cattle feed. The workflow comprises a new sample preparation procedure based on a tryptic digestion of PAPs in suspension, a subsequent immunoaffinity enrichment of the released peptides, and a LC-MS/MS-based analysis for peptide quantification using isotope labeled standard peptides. For the very first time, a mass spectrometry-based method is capable of detecting and quantifying illegal PAPs in animal feed over a concentration range of 4 orders of magnitude with a detection limit in the range of 0.1% to 1% (w/w).


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Péptidos/análisis , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Animales , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Bovinos , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Carne/análisis , Proteínas de la Carne/análisis , Proteínas de la Leche/análisis , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA