Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 7 de 7
1.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 24(4): 225-232, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602836

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, biological therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa was limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade with adalimumab (ADA). However, not all patients respond to treatment with ADA. This highlighted the need for more therapeutic options. Interleukin (IL)-17/T-helper 17 (Th17) axis may play an important role in the pathophysiology of HS. Recently, the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab, which targets IL-17A specifically and prevents it from interacting with the IL-17 receptor, has been FDA-approved for HS. AREAS COVERED: Secukinumab, represents a novel therapeutic strategy in HS management. An overview of structural and pharmacological characteristics is provided. Described efficacy in clinical trials and case reports and safety data from is presented. EXPERT OPINION: As response to anti-TNFas is lost over time, secukinumab has provided an alternative HS treatment option in clinical practice. Overall, secukinumab has shown good efficacy and a favorable side effect profile in HS clinical trials but may be avoided in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Long-term and real-life data on the use of secukinumab are essential for improving decision-making in HS therapy.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Interleukin-17 , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/immunology , Interleukin-17/antagonists & inhibitors , Interleukin-17/immunology , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Dermatology ; 239(5): 746-752, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331331

BACKGROUND: Results of randomized clinical trials show great variation in response to treatment with adalimumab (ADA) in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This varied response may be associated with genetic polymorphisms. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to study the association between carriage of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) gene and their response to ADA. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe HS who received ADA treatment for at least 12 weeks were enrolled. SNPs were analyzed with PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) score, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System 4 (IHS4) score, inflammatory lesion (AN) count, and draining tunnel (dT) count were collected at weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48. RESULTS: HiSCR response after 12 weeks of ADA treatment was 71.8% among carriers of the common GGG haplotype and 50.0% among carriers of minor frequency SNP haplotypes (p: 0.031; odds ratio: 0.39). This significant difference persisted until week 36. Carriers of minor frequency SNP haplotypes also had a lower relative decrease of the AN count at weeks 12 and 24; the dT count and IHS4 were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Carriage of at least one minor frequency SNP haplotype of the promoter of the TNF gene is associated with a decreased response to ADA. This association may have an impact on treatment decision-making.


Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Humans , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/genetics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/complications , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/genetics
4.
Dermatology ; 239(3): 362-367, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36630943

BACKGROUND: Previously, a new dichotomous outcome was developed, calculated as 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 (IHS4-55) score. It was validated in datasets of adalimumab and placebo-treated HS patients. External validation is an important aspect of clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to externally validate the novel dichotomous IHS4-55 in a non-biologic treated dataset of HS patients. METHODS: Data from a previously published European-wide prospective clinical study of antibiotic treatment of HS patients were used to assess the association of IHS4-55 achievement with individual reduction in inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels. Moreover, the associations between IHS4-55 positivity and achievement of the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain, and NRS Pruritus were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 283 individual patients, of which 36.4% (103/283) were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin and 63.6% (180/283) with tetracyclines for 12 weeks. Achievers of the IHS4-55 demonstrated a significant reduction the counts of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels (all p < 0.001). Additionally, IHS4-55 achievers had an odds ratio for achieving the MCID of DLQI, NRS Pain, and NRS Pruritus of 2.16 (95% CI 1.28-3.65, p < 0.01), 1.79 (95% CI 1.10-2.91, p < 0.05), and 1.95 (95% CI 1.18-3.22, p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the external validity of the novel IHS4-55 by demonstrating a significant association between IHS4-55 achievement and a reduction in inflammatory lesion counts as well as achievement of MCIDs for DLQI, NRS Pain, and NRS Pruritus in an antibiotic-treated cohort. These findings support the use of the IHS4-55 as a novel primary outcome measure in clinical trials.


Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Humans , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/complications , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Abscess , Severity of Illness Index , Pruritus/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 85(2): 369-378, 2021 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484766

BACKGROUND: Tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination therapy are both considered first-line therapy in current hidradenitis suppurativa guidelines. However, evidence for their efficacy is drawn from small studies, often without validated outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the 12-week efficacy of oral tetracyclines and a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin. METHODS: A prospective, international cohort study performed between October 2018 and August 2019. RESULTS: In total, 63.6% of the included 283 patients received oral tetracyclines, and 36.4% were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System from baseline (both P < .001). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in 40.1% and 48.2% of patients, respectively (P = .26). Patient characteristics or disease severity were not associated with the attainment of HiSCR or the minimal clinically important differences for the Dermatology Life Quality Index and pain. LIMITATIONS: Cohort study. Respectively, 23.9% and 19.4% of patients had to be excluded from the HiSCR analysis for the tetracycline and combination therapy group because of a low abscess and nodule count at baseline. CONCLUSION: This study shows significant efficacy of both tetracycline treatment and clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy after 12 weeks in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the 2 treatments, regardless of disease severity.


Clindamycin/administration & dosage , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Rifampin/administration & dosage , Tetracyclines/administration & dosage , Adult , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Drug Combinations , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rifampin/adverse effects , Tetracyclines/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
Dermatology ; 237(3): 372-377, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33401280

BACKGROUND: Several patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) present flare-ups during treatment with adalimumab (ADA), the cause of which is not clear. ADA is the only FDA-approved biologic for the therapy of moderate-to-severe HS. A previous study of our group has shown that Staphylococcus aureus stimulation of whole blood affects the production of human ß-defensin 2 and modulates HS severity. It is, therefore, hypothesized, that carriage of S. aureus may drive HS flare-ups. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between carriage of S. aureus and loss of response to ADA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among patients with moderate-to-severe HS without carriage of S. aureus at start of treatment with ADA, we investigated for carriage of S. aureus from the nares when flare-ups occurred. Flare-ups were pre-defined as at least 25% increase of inflammatory lesions (sum of inflammatory nodules and abscesses) from baseline. Samplings were also done after completion of 12 weeks of ADA treatment from all patients who did not present flare-ups. Clinical response to ADA was assessed by the HS Clinical Response score (HiSCR). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were studied; 24 with Hurley II stage HS and 15 with Hurley III stage HS. Twenty-nine patients achieved HiSCR after 12 weeks of treatment without any flare-ups; 10 patients had flare-ups and failed HiSCR. Three (10.3%) and 5 (50%) patients, respectively, had nasal carriage of S. aureus (odds ratio 8.67; 95% CI 1.54-48.49; p = 0.014). Among 32 patients reaching follow-up week 48, 20 patients achieved HiSCR and 12 had flare-ups leading to ADA failure; 2 (10%) and 5 (41.7%) patients, respectively, had positive culture for S. aureus (odds ratio 6.42; 95% CI 1.00-41.20; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nasal carriage of S. aureus may be associated with loss of response to ADA. Findings need confirmation in larger series of patients.


Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Carrier State/microbiology , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/microbiology , Nasal Cavity/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adult , Carrier State/epidemiology , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
7.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 19(4): 381-393, 2020 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32098513

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory skin disorder that affects regions rich in apocrine glands. Although the etiology of HS is not clear, inflammatory cytokines, like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, participate in pathogenesis. Adalimumab (ADA), a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively targets TNFα, is the only EMA/FDA-approved biologic agent available for the therapy of moderate-to-severe HS.Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to present existing studies with an emphasis on the safety profile of ADA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. ADA is prescribed for more than 15 years for varied indications and has improved the therapeutic outcomes of many diseases. Clinical trials and real-life safety data from ADA administration in HS were presented, with particular attention to special populations, such as children, elderly, and pregnant women.Expert opinion: Existing data advise for limited safety concerns with long-term ADA treatment provided that patients are thoroughly screened for infections, latent tuberculosis, and history of malignancy before the start of treatment.


Adalimumab/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Adalimumab/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/pathology , Humans , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
...