Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
1.
Climacteric ; : 1-7, 2024 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39077780

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Among postmenopausal women, oral, ultra-low-dose continuous combined estradiol (E0.5 mg) plus dydrogesterone (D2.5 mg) reduces vasomotor symptoms (VMS). METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of data from two phase 3, double-blind studies. Postmenopausal women were randomized 2:1:2 to receive E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, E1 mg/D5 mg (not included in this analysis) or placebo for 13 weeks (European study), or randomized 1:1 to receive E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (Chinese study). Endpoints assessed in ethnicity subgroups (European and Chinese) included changes from baseline in number of hot flushes, number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes and Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score. RESULTS: Overall, 579 women were included in the analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 288; placebo, n = 291). European and Chinese women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg experienced greater reductions from baseline in mean daily number of hot flushes and mean daily number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes at week 4, week 8 and end of treatment versus those receiving placebo. Significant improvements in the 'hot flushes, sweating' MRS item score were reported in both European and Chinese women. CONCLUSION: Oral, ultra-low-dose continuous combined 0.5 mg 17ß-estradiol and 2.5 mg dydrogesterone improved VMS compared with placebo in European and Chinese postmenopausal women, with a positive impact on health-related quality of life.

2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 40(1): 2375577, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976762

RESUMEN

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. Methods: This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Results: Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 736; placebo, n = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. Conclusions: Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.


Asunto(s)
Didrogesterona , Estradiol , Posmenopausia , Humanos , Didrogesterona/administración & dosificación , Didrogesterona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estradiol/administración & dosificación , Estradiol/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , Anciano , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/métodos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Progestinas/administración & dosificación , Progestinas/efectos adversos , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 38(1): 101781, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37183085

RESUMEN

Estrogen depletion following menopause predisposes to increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), mainly due to ischemic heart disease. This is mostly evident in cases with premature menopause. The pathophysiological basis for this atherosclerotic process is the accumulation of several risk factors, such as abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and arterial hypertension. The presence of vasomotor symptoms may further augment this risk, especially in women younger than 60 years. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) exerts many beneficial effects on lipid profile and glucose homeostasis as well as direct arterial effects, and may reduce CVD risk if initiated promptly (i.e.,<60 years or within ten years of the final menstrual period). Transdermal estradiol and micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone are the safest regimens in terms of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and breast cancer risk. In any case, an individualized approach, taking into account the patient's total CVD, VTE and breast cancer risk, is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Tromboembolia Venosa , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Menopausia , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control
5.
Endocr Connect ; 11(4)2022 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35258483

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is of major concern in women entering menopause. The changing hormonal milieu predisposes them to increased CVD risk, due to a constellation of risk factors, such as visceral obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, dysregulation in glucose homeostasis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and arterial hypertension. However, an independent association of menopause per se with increased risk of CVD events has only been proven for early menopause (<45 years). Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) ameliorates most of the CVD risk factors mentioned above. Transdermal estrogens are the preferable regimen, since they do not increase triglyceride concentrations and they are not associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). Although administration of MHT should be considered on an individual basis, MHT may reduce CVD morbidity and mortality, if commenced during the early postmenopausal period (<60 years or within ten years since the last menstrual period). In women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), MHT should be administered at least until the average age of menopause (50-52 years). MHT is contraindicated in women with a history of VTE and is not currently recommended for the sole purpose of CVD prevention. The risk of breast cancer associated with MHT is generally low and is mainly conferred by the progestogen. Micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone are associated with lower risk compared to other progestogens.

6.
Climacteric ; 24(4): 421, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34240670
7.
Post Reprod Health ; 27(2): 126-127, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078156
8.
Eur Heart J ; 42(10): 967-984, 2021 03 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495787

RESUMEN

Women undergo important changes in sex hormones throughout their lifetime that can impact cardiovascular disease risk. Whereas the traditional cardiovascular risk factors dominate in older age, there are several female-specific risk factors and inflammatory risk variables that influence a woman's risk at younger and middle age. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and gestational diabetes are associated with a higher risk in younger women. Menopause transition has an additional adverse effect to ageing that may demand specific attention to ensure optimal cardiovascular risk profile and quality of life. In this position paper, we provide an update of gynaecological and obstetric conditions that interact with cardiovascular risk in women. Practice points for clinical use are given according to the latest standards from various related disciplines (Figure 1).


Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Consenso , Endocrinólogos , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33312219

RESUMEN

Optimizing menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) requires an awareness of the benefits and risks associated with the available treatments. This narrative review, which is based on the proceedings of an Advisory Board meeting and supplemented by relevant articles identified in literature searches, examines the role of progestogens in MHT, with the aim of providing practical recommendations for prescribing physicians. Progestogens are an essential component of MHT in menopausal women with a uterus to prevent endometrial hyperplasia and reduce the risk of cancer associated with using unopposed estrogen. Progestogens include natural progesterone, dydrogesterone (a stereoisomer of progesterone), and a range of synthetic compounds. Structural differences and varying affinities for other steroid receptors (androgen, glucocorticoid, and mineralocorticoid) confer a unique biological and clinical profile to each progestogen that must be considered during treatment selection. MHT, including the progestogen component, should be tailored to each woman, starting with an estrogen and a progestogen that has the safest profile with respect to breast cancer and cardiovascular effects, while addressing patient-specific needs, risk factors, and treatment goals. Micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone appear to be the safest options, with lower associated cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and breast cancer risks compared with other progestogens, and are the first-choice options for use in 'special situations,' such as in women with high-density breast tissue, diabetes, obesity, smoking, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism, among others.

10.
Maturitas ; 139: 20-26, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32747036

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Various combinations of estrogens and progestogens are available for menopausal hormone therapy that differ in their efficacy and safety profile. We evaluated the efficacy and long-term safety of low-dose estradiol (0.5 mg) / dydrogesterone (2.5 mg) in subgroups of postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. ANALYSIS: Efficacy analysis was performed on data from 2 previously published studies for subgroups defined by age, duration of menopause, and body mass index at baseline. The primary efficacy variable was the number of moderate to severe hot flushes from baseline to week 13. Long-term safety was evaluated in relation to age and duration of menopause. Safety variables included adverse events to week 52 and change from baseline to endpoint in laboratory and vital sign values. RESULTS: The treatment difference seen in the overall population in favour of low-dose estradiol/dydrogesterone was also observed in the subgroups of patients aged 45 to < 55 years (p < 0.01) and ≥55 years (p < 0.05), with menopause duration of >12 months to <60 months (p < 0.05) and ≥ 60 months (p < 0.005), and with a BMI at baseline of <25 kg/m2 (p < 0.05) and 25 to <30 kg/m2 (p < 0.01). Low-dose estradilol/dydrogesterone was well tolerated across the different subgroups. The incidence of breast-related adverse events was very low. No breast malignancy was reported. Only one adverse endometrial outcome of simple hyperplasia was observed. CONCLUSION: The results of our analyses confirmed the consistent treatment effect on vasomotor symptoms and the favourable safety profile of 0.5 mg 17ß estradiol and 2.5 mg dydrogesterone in different patient subgroups.


Asunto(s)
Didrogesterona/uso terapéutico , Estradiol/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia/efectos de los fármacos
11.
Curr Pharm Des ; 26(43): 5650-5659, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32473616

RESUMEN

Turner's or Turner syndrome (TS) is the most prevalent chromosomal abnormality in live female births. Patients with TS are predisposed to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), mainly due to the frequently observed congenital structural cardiovascular defects, such as valvular and aortic abnormalities (coarctation, dilatation, and dissection). The increased prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, central obesity, and increased carotid intima-media thickness, also contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in TS patients. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the treatment of choice, combined with growth hormone (GH). Although MHT may, in general, ameliorate CVD risk factors, its effect on CVD mortality in TS has not yet been established. The exact effect of GH on these parameters has not been clarified. Specific considerations should be provided in TS cases during pregnancy, due to the higher risk of CVD complications, such as aortic dissection. Optimal cardiovascular monitoring, including physical examination, electrocardiogram, CVD risk factor assessment, and transthoracic echocardiography, is recommended. Moreover, the cardiac magnetic resonance from the age of 12 years is recommended due to the high risk of aortic aneurysm and other anatomical vascular complications.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Disección Aórtica , Síndrome de Turner , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Aorta , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Síndrome de Turner/complicaciones , Síndrome de Turner/tratamiento farmacológico
12.
Maturitas ; 135: 74-79, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32252968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Menopausal transition has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), mainly attributed to atherogenic dyslipidaemia, central obesity and insulin resistance. Whether arterial hypertension (AH) also contributes to menopause-associated CVD is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate and meta-analyze the best available evidence regarding the association between early menopause (EM) and AH risk. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus databases, up to January 20th, 2020. Data were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The I2 index was employed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the quantitative analysis (273,994 postmenopausal women, 76853 cases with AH). Women with EM (age at menopause <45 years) were at higher AH risk compared with those of normal age at menopause (>45 years) (OR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.01-1.19, p = 0.03; I2 79 %). The direction or the magnitude of this association remained significant when the analysis was restricted to studies including groups matched for potential confounders, such as age, BMI, smoking or the use of menopausal hormone therapy or oral contraceptives. CONCLUSIONS: Women with EM have an increased risk for AH compared with those of normal age at menopause.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/epidemiología , Menopausia Prematura , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 92(4): 303-311, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31925799

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of (a) tibolone, (b) continuous combined oestrogen plus progestogen and (c) placebo on plasma lipid and lipoprotein markers of cardiovascular risk in healthy postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, single-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. PATIENTS: One hundred and one postmenopausal women were randomized (1:1:1) into one of three groups taking daily 2.5 mg tibolone, continuous oral oestradiol-17ß 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg daily (E2 /NETA) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fasting serum lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations measured at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment. RESULTS: Both tibolone and E2 /NETA lowered plasma total cholesterol concentrations relative to placebo. With tibolone, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was reduced (-27% at 24 months, P < .001), the greatest effect being in the cholesterol-enriched HDL2 subfraction (-40%, P < .001). Tibolone's effect on HDL concentrations was also apparent in the principal HDL protein component, apolipoprotein AI (-29% at 24 months, P < .001). However, there was no significant effect of tibolone on low-density or very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C and VLDL-C, respectively). By contrast, the greatest reduction in cholesterol with E2 /NETA was in LDL-C (-22% at 24 months, P = .008). E2 /NETA reduced HDL-C to a lesser extent than tibolone (-12% at 24 months, P < .001). Effects on HDL apolipoproteins were similarly diminished relative to tibolone. E2 /NETA had no effect on VLDL-C or on the protein component of LDL, apolipoprotein B. CONCLUSION: Tibolone reduces serum HDL. E2 /NETA reduces LDL cholesterol but not apolipoprotein B, suggesting decreased cholesterol loading of LDL. Any impact these changes may have on CVD risk needs further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Estradiol , Posmenopausia , Apolipoproteínas , HDL-Colesterol , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Estrógenos , Femenino , Humanos , Lípidos , Lipoproteínas HDL , Noretindrona , Acetato de Noretindrona , Norpregnenos
15.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 15: 1745506519864009, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378196

RESUMEN

Hormone therapy use has undergone dramatic changes over the past 20 years. Widespread use of hormone therapy in the 1980s and 1990s came to an abrupt halt in the early 2000s after initial findings of the Women's Health Initiative trial were published and the study was terminated. Since then, much has been learned about the characteristics of women most likely to benefit from hormone therapy. There is general agreement that women younger than 60 years or who initiate hormone therapy within 10 years of menopause onset gain short-term benefit in terms of symptomatic relief and long-term benefit in terms of protection from chronic diseases that affect postmenopausal women. Despite accumulating evidence in support of hormone therapy for symptomatic menopausal women, the slow response by the medical community has led to a 'large and unnecessary burden of suffering' by women worldwide. Greater efforts are clearly needed to educate physicians and medical students about the pathophysiology of menopause and the role of hormone therapy in supporting women through the transition. This article provides a brief historical perspective of events that led to the backlash against hormone therapy, explores the current position of guideline groups, and provides practical recommendations to guide first-line management of symptomatic menopausal women.


Asunto(s)
Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Guías como Asunto , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/tendencias , Menopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo
17.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 91(1): 63-71, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adiposity and insulin sensitivity may affect bone mineral density (BMD), but the confounding effect of weight hinders discrimination of independent associations. We explored whether regional fat masses and insulin sensitivity are independently related to BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relationships between total and regional body fat, insulin sensitivity and measures of BMD in 8 different regions were evaluated in a cross section of 590 generally healthy, white males, 274 of whom received measurement of insulin sensitivity (Si) using the intravenous glucose tolerance test. Measurements included total, android and gynoid fat and lean body mass and regional BMDs by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Linear regression analyses were combined in a mediation analysis to explore associations with each regional BMD. RESULTS: Weight correlated positively with total fat mass (R2  = 0.67, P < 0.001) and negatively with Si (R2  = 0.14, P < 0.001). Body composition measures were consistently positively related to BMD in all regions except lumbar and thoracic spine. Accounting for body weight rendered negative majority of associations between total and regional fat masses and BMDs. An independent association between android fat and spine BMD was particularly apparent. Si was positively associated with total and limb BMD (P < 0.01) specifically among exercisers. Accounting for Si diminished the associations of total fat (negative) and lean body mass (positive) with total and limb BMD. CONCLUSION: Android fat is independently negatively associated with spine BMD. Among those taking exercise, increased insulin sensitivity is associated with higher limb BMD and may underlie positive associations between lean body mass and BMD.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a la Insulina/fisiología , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Absorciometría de Fotón , Tejido Adiposo/metabolismo , Adiposidad/fisiología , Composición Corporal/fisiología , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoporosis/metabolismo
18.
Maturitas ; 123: 82-88, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31027683

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: While the associations of genetic, reproductive and environmental factors with the timing of natural menopause have been extensively investigated, few epidemiological studies have specifically examined their association with premature (<40 years) or early natural menopause (40-45 years). AIM: The aim of this position statement is to provide evidence on the predictors of premature and early natural menopause, as well as recommendations for the management of premature and early menopause and future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review and consensus of expert opinion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Strong genetic predictors of premature and early menopause include a family history of premature or early menopause, being a child of a multiple pregnancy and some specific genetic variants. Women with early menarche and nulliparity or low parity are also at a higher risk of experiencing premature or early menopause. Cigarette smoking (with a strong dose-response effect) and being underweight have been consistently associated with premature and early menopause. Current guidelines for the management of premature and early menopause mainly focus on early initiation of hormone therapy (HT) and continued treatment until the woman reaches the average age at menopause (50-52 years). We suggest that clinicians and health professionals consider the age at menopause of the relevant region or ethnic group as part of the assessment for the timing of HT cessation. In addition, there should be early monitoring of women with a family history of early menopause, who are a child of a multiple pregnancy, or who have had early menarche (especially those who have had no children). As part of preventive health strategies, women should be encouraged to quit smoking (preferably before the age of 30 years) and maintain optimal weight in order to reduce their risk of premature or early menopause.


Asunto(s)
Menopausia Prematura , Menopausia , Paridad , Fumar/epidemiología , Delgadez/epidemiología , Peso Corporal , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Femenino , Humanos , Menarquia , Menopausia/genética , Menopausia Prematura/genética , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Gemelos
19.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol ; 17(6): 604-609, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30819073

RESUMEN

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is defined as the cessation of ovarian function before the age of 40 years. The trio of amenorrhea, elevated gonadotropins and oestrogen deficiency is associated with long-term health consequences including increased cardiovascular disease (CVD), decreased bone mineral density (BMD), significantly reduced fertility, psychological distress, vulvovaginal atrophy, neurological effects and overall reduced life expectancy. There are deficits in our understanding of this condition and subsequently the long-term health consequences. The underlying aetiology of POI and the optimal management strategies are also poorly understood. Our knowledge of long-term cardiovascular consequences specifically relating to women with POI is limited as most data on the subject are derived from studies involving women who experienced menopause at the natural age (after 40 years with an average age of 51).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatología , Menopausia Prematura , Ovario/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/fisiopatología , Salud Reproductiva , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Endocrine ; 63(2): 213-224, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203119

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Early menopause (EM, age at menopause < 45 years) and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI, age at menopause < 40 years) are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. However, their association with increased fracture risk has not been established, with studies yielding conflicting results. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize studies evaluating the association between age at menopause and fracture risk. The secondary aim was to evaluate this effect concerning the site of fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus, up to 31 January 2018. Data were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The I2 index was employed for quantifying heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis (462,393 postmenopausal women, 12,130 fractures). Compared with women with age at menopause > 45 years, women with EM demonstrated higher fracture risk (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.66, p < 0.002, I² 81.5%). Women with POI did not display any difference in fracture risk compared either with women with age at menopause > 40 (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.09, p = 0.436, I² 62.5%) or >45 years (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.22-1.29, p = 0.17, I2 0%). No difference was evident when a separate analysis was performed for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis showing that EM is associated with increased fracture risk compared with normal age at menopause, without any distinct effect on the site of the fracture.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Menopausia/fisiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/etiología , Humanos , Menopausia Prematura/fisiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA