Binding of proteolytically processed phospholipase D from Streptomyces chromofuscus to phosphatidylcholine membranes facilitates vesicle aggregation and fusion.

Ca(2+)-dependent phospholipase D is secreted from Streptomyces chromofuscus as an intact enzyme of 57 kDa (PLD(57)). Under certain growth conditions, PLD is proteolytically cleaved and activated to form PLD(42/20) (named for the apparent size of the peptides). The PLD(42) catalytic core and 20 kDa C-terminal domain remain tightly associated through noncovalent interactions. In the presence of Ba(2+) (to enhance protein binding to zwitterionic vesicles without hydrolysis of substrate), PLD(42/20), but not PLD(57), induces POPC vesicle leakiness as measured by entrapped CF leakage. PLD(42/20) also induces vesicle fusion (as measured by light scattering, fluorescence quenching, and cryo-TEM) under these conditions (1 mM POPC, 5 mM Ba(2+)); neither PLD(42) nor PLD(20) alone can act as a fusogen. For intact PLD(57) to cause CF leakiness, the soluble activator diC(4)PA must be present. However, even with diC(4)PA, PLD(57) does not induce significant vesicle fusion. In the absence of metal ions, all PLD forms bind to PC vesicles doped with 10 mol % PA. Again, only PLD(42/20) is fusogenic and causes aggregation and fusion on a rapid time scale. Taken together, these data suggest that activated PLD(42/20) inserts more readily into the lipid bilayer than other PLD forms and creates structures that allow bilayers to fuse. Cleavage of the PLD(57) by a secreted protease to generate PLD(42/20) occurs in the late stages of S. chromofuscus cell cultures. Production of this more active and fusogenic enzyme may play a role in nutrient scavenging in stationary phase cultures.

The consent process and children.

Traditionally, recommendations and procedures for obtaining consent and assent from children to participate in research have varied somewhat from institution to institution. At least some of this inconsistency can be attributed to a lack of consensus on what consent means when applied to individuals less than 18 years of age. Developmental theories provide some rationale for reconsidering the arbitrary age limit of 18 years for informed consent. In this article, the concepts of consent and assent are discussed relative to developmental characteristics of children and adolescents and implications for consent and assent procedures are discussed.