Assessing the Feasibility of a Multimodal Approach to Pain Evaluation in Early Stages after Spinal Cord Injury.

This research evaluates the feasibility of a multimodal pain assessment protocol during rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI). The protocol amalgamates clinical workup (CW), quantitative sensory testing (QST), and psychosocial factors (PSF) administered at 4 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 (T3) weeks post injury and at discharge (T4). Molecular blood biomarkers (BB) were evaluated via gene expression and proteomic assays at T1 and T4. Different pain trajectories and temporal changes were identified using QST, with inflammation and pain-related biomarkers recorded. Higher concentrations of osteopontin and cystatin-C were found in SCI patients compared to healthy controls, indicating their potential as biomarkers. We observed altered inflammatory responses and a slight increase in ICAM-1 and CCL3 were noted, pointing towards changes in cellular adhesion linked with spinal injury and a possible connection with neuropathic pain. Despite a small patient sample hindering the correlation of feasibility data, descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on stress, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and pain interferences. The SCI Pain Instrument (SCIPI) was efficient in distinguishing between nociceptive and neuropathic pain, showing a progressive increase in severity over time. The findings emphasize the need for the careful consideration of recruitment setting and protocol adjustments to enhance the feasibility of multimodal pain evaluation studies post SCI. They also shed light on potential early adaptive mechanisms in SCI pathophysiology, warranting the further exploration of prognostic and preventive strategies for chronic pain in the SCI population.

Local hyperexcitability of C-nociceptors may predict responsiveness to topical lidocaine in neuropathic pain.

We explored whether increased C-nociceptor excitability predicts analgesic effects of topical lidocaine in 33 patients with mono- (n = 15) or poly-neuropathy (n = 18). Excitability of C-nociceptors was tested by transcutaneous electrical sinusoidal (4 Hz) and half sine wave (single 500 ms pulse) stimulation delivered to affected and non-affected sites. Analgesic effects of 24 hrs topical lidocaine were recorded. About 50% of patients reported increased pain from symptomatic skin upon continuous 4 Hz sinusoidal and about 25% upon 500 ms half sine wave stimulation. Electrically-evoked half sine wave pain correlated to their clinical pain level (r = 0.37, p < 0.05). Lidocaine-patches reduced spontaneous pain by >1-point NRS in 8 of 28 patients (p < 0.0001, ANOVA). Patients with increased pain to 2.5 sec sinusoidal stimulation at 0.2 and 0.4 mA intensity had significantly stronger analgesic effects of lidocaine and in reverse, patients with a pain reduction of >1 NRS had significantly higher pain ratings to continuous 1 min supra-threshold sinusoidal stimulation. In the assessed control skin areas of the patients, enhanced pain upon 1 min 4 Hz stimulation correlated to increased depression scores (HADS). Electrically assessed C-nociceptor excitability identified by slowly depolarizing electrical stimuli might reflect the source of neuropathic pain in some patients and can be useful for patient stratification to predict potential success of topical analgesics. Central neuronal circuitry assessment reflected by increased pain in control skin associated with higher HADS scores suggest central sensitization phenomena in a sub-population of neuropathic pain patients.

Variability in clinical and neurophysiological evaluation of pain development following acute spinal cord injury: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain (NeP) often develops following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). This case report explores variability in clinical and neurophysiological aspects of pain evaluation in early post-trauma stages. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year old female presenting with acute incomplete sensorimotor tetraplegia C4 AIS D was examined by neurological examination and pain assessment at three time points after acute trauma T1 (8 weeks), T2 (11 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks). Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were measured above (control area), at (area of NeP), and below (foot) the neurological level of injury (NLI). Musculo-skeletal and neuropathic pain were clinically present already during T1 but showed variations in localization and occurrence over time. Neuropathic pain classification varied between time points due to shifting of NLI. Above-level QST revealed minor, less pronounced abnormalities similar to at-level site. At-level QST (site of NeP) showed loss for thermal and mechanical detection thresholds but also gain of function for mechanical pain thresholds with a tendency of amelioration over time. QST below-level did not reveal remarkable changes over time. LEPs above- and below-level were within normal limits. At-level LEPs abolished after T1. DISCUSSION: In early stages post injury (up to 6 month) variations in pain presentation for both, musculo-skeletal and neuropathic pain as well as QST and LEP could be demonstrated. These findings suggest ongoing adaption mechanisms in sensory pathways, which require further exploration and may be relevant for prognostic and preventive strategies against the development of chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain.

Multimodal sensory evaluation of neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: an experimental study.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the changes in somatosensory functions using the combined application of quantitative sensory testing (QST), contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) studies in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in relation to neuropathic pain (NeP). SETTING: Centre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland. METHODS: Individuals with SCI were compared: 12 with NeP (SCI NeP) and 12 without NeP (SCI no NeP). Tools used were QST, CHEPs, LEPs and self-reported questionnaires. Tests were applied to the control (hand) and test (dermatome of altered sensation) sites, and compared to the able-bodied group. RESULTS: QST, LEPs and CHEPs assessments showed abnormalities both on the test and control sites, which did not differ between the groups with SCI. QST showed higher prevalence of allodynia in SCI NeP. CHEPs and LEPs demonstrated diminished amplitudes in both groups with SCI in comparison to able-bodied individuals. Only reaction time (RT) analysis revealed the difference of SCI NeP from the other two groups, expressed in partially preserved responses to the laser C-fibre stimulations. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of assessments in our study allowed to examine spinothalamic and dorsal column functions in individuals with SCI. Changes in QST, CHEPs and LEPs were detected below the level of injury independent of NeP and at the control site indicating modifications in sensory processing rostral to the spinal lesion. Analysis of RT during laser stimulation could be an essential component when evaluating the somatosensory functions related to NeP in persons with SCI.

Somatosensory profiles in patients with non-specific neck-arm pain with and without positive neurodynamic tests.

Despite normal neurological integrity tests, some patients with non-specific neck-arm pain (NSNAP) have heightened nerve mechanosensitivity upon neurodynamic testing. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not a nerve dysfunction is present in patients with positive neurodynamic tests compared to those with negative neurodynamic tests or healthy controls. Somatosensory profiling using quantitative sensory testing (QST) was established in 40 consecutive patients with unilateral NSNAP; 23 had positive upper limb neurodynamic tests (ULNTPOS) and 17 had negative neurodynamic tests (ULNTNEG) and in 26 healthy controls. QST included measurement of thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds in the maximal pain area on the symptomatic side as well as the corresponding contralateral area. Fifty-seven percent of patients with NSNAP had positive neurodynamic tests. Somatosensory profiling revealed a loss of function phenotype in NSNAP patients compared to healthy controls both in the maximal pain area and asymptomatic side. Hyperalgesia (cold, heat and pressure) was present bilaterally in both NSNAP groups. Direct comparison between the patient groups revealed no significant differences in somatosensory profiles. However, the ULNTPOS group demonstrated sensory loss compared to healthy controls in more parameters than the ULNTNEG group. The ULNTNEG subgroup represented an intermediate phenotype between ULNTPOS patients and healthy controls in most detection thresholds as well as thermal and pressure pain thresholds. Even though patients with NSNAP present as a spectrum, it remains unclear whether the sensory changes are indicative of a nerve dysfunction/lesion or rather a marker of altered central pain processing.

Tuning in C-nociceptors to reveal mechanisms in chronic neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: Develop and validate a low-intensity sinusoidal electrical stimulation paradigm to preferentially activate C-fibers in human skin. METHODS: Sinusoidal transcutaneous stimulation (4Hz) was assessed psychophysically in healthy volunteers (n = 14) and neuropathic pain patients (n = 9). Pursuing laser Doppler imaging and single nociceptor recordings in vivo in humans (microneurography) and pigs confirmed the activation of "silent" C-nociceptors. Synchronized C-fiber compound action potentials were evoked in isolated human nerve fascicles in vitro. Live cell imaging of L4 dorsal root ganglia in anesthetized mice verified the recruitment of small-diameter neurons during transcutaneous 4-Hz stimulation of the hindpaw (0.4mA). RESULTS: Transcutaneous sinusoidal current (0.05-0.4mA, 4Hz) activated "polymodal" C-fibers (50% at ∼0.03mA) and "silent" nociceptors (50% at ∼0.04mA), intensities substantially lower than that required with transcutaneous 1-ms rectangular pulses ("polymodal" ∼3mA, "silent" ∼50mA). The stimulation induced delayed burning (nonpulsating) pain and a pronounced axon-reflex erythema, both indicative of C-nociceptor activation. Pain ratings to repetitive stimulation (1 minute, 4Hz) adapted in healthy volunteers by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) -3 and nonpainful skin sites of neuropathic pain patients by NRS -0.5, whereas pain even increased in painful neuropathic skin by approximately NRS +2. INTERPRETATION: Sinusoidal electrical stimulation at 4Hz enables preferential activation of C-nociceptors in pig and human skin that accommodates during ongoing (1-minute) stimulation. Absence of such accommodation in neuropathic pain patients suggest axonal hyperexcitability that could be predictive of alterations in peripheral nociceptor encoding and offer a potential therapeutic entry point for topical analgesic treatment. Ann Neurol 2018;83:945-957.

Nondermatomal somatosensory deficits in chronic pain are associated with cerebral grey matter changes.

OBJECTIVES: Widespread sensory deficits occur in 20-40% of chronic pain patients on the side of pain, independent of pain aetiology, and are known as nondermatomal sensory deficits (NDSDs). NDSDs can occur in absence of central or peripheral nervous system lesions. We hypothesised that NDSDs were associated with cerebral grey matter changes in the sensory system and in pain processing regions, detectable with voxel-based morphometry. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with NDSDs, 23 patients without NDSDs ("pain-only"), and 29 healthy controls were studied with high resolution structural MRI of the brain. A comprehensive clinical and psychiatric evaluation based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Patients with NDSDs and "pain-only" did not differ concerning demographic data and psychiatric diagnoses, although anxiety scores (HADS-A) were higher in patients with NDSDs. In patients with NDSDs, grey matter increases were found in the right primary sensory cortex, thalamus, and bilaterally in lateral temporal regions and the hippocampus/fusiform gyrus. "Pain-only" patients showed a bilateral grey matter increase in the posterior insula and less pronounced changes in sensorimotor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Dysfunctional sensory processing in patients with NDSDs is associated with complex changes in grey matter volume, involving the somatosensory system and temporal regions.

Bilateral Sensory Changes and High Burden of Disease in Patients With Chronic Pain and Unilateral Nondermatomal Somatosensory Deficits: A Quantitative Sensory Testing and Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVES: Widespread sensory deficits resembling hemihypoesthesia occur in 20% to 40% of chronic pain patients on the side of pain, independent of pain etiology, and have been termed nondermatomal sensory deficits (NDSDs). Sensory profiles have rarely been investigated in NDSDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) was performed in the face, hand, and foot of the painful body side and in contralateral regions in chronic pain patients. Twenty-five patients with NDSDs and 23 without NDSDs (termed the pain-only group) were included after exclusion of neuropathic pain. Comprehensive clinical and psychiatric evaluations were carried out. RESULTS: NDSD in chronic pain was associated with high burden of disease and more widespread pain. Only in the NDSD group were significantly higher thresholds for mechanical and painful stimuli found in at least 2 of 3 regions ipsilateral to pain. In addition, we found a bilateral loss of function for temperature and vibration detection, and a gain of function for pressure pain in certain regions in patients with NDSD. Sensory loss and gain of function for pressure pain correlated with pain intensity in several regions. DISCUSSION: This may indicate a distinct sensory profile in chronic non-neuropathic pain and NDSD, probably attributable to altered central pain processing and sensitization. The presence of NDSD in chronic non-neuropathic pain may be regarded as a marker for higher burden of pain disease.

Functional Characterization of At-Level Hypersensitivity in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.

At-level and above-level hypersensitivity was assessed in patients with chronic complete thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI). Patients were classified using somatosensory mapping (brush, cold, pinprick) and assigned into 2 groups (ie, patients with at-level hypersensitivity [SCIHs, n = 8] and without at-level hypersensitivity [SCINHs, n = 7]). Gender and age-matched healthy subjects served as controls. Quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrically- and histamine-induced pain and itch, laser Doppler imaging, and laser-evoked potentials (LEP) were recorded at-level and above-level in SCI-patients. Six of 8 SCIHs, but 0 of 7 SCINHs patients suffered from neuropathic below-level pain. Clinical sensory mapping revealed spreading of hypersensitivity to more cranial areas (above-level) in 3 SCIHs. Cold pain threshold measures confirmed clinical hypersensitivity at-level in SCIHs. At-level and above-level hypersensitivity to electrical stimulation did not differ significantly between SCIHs and SCINHs. Mechanical allodynia, cold, and pin-prick hypersensitivity did not relate to impaired sensory function (QST), axon reflex flare, or LEPs. Clinically assessed at-level hypersensitivity was linked to below-level neuropathic pain, suggesting neuronal hyperexcitability contributes to the development of neuropathic pain. However, electrically evoked pain was not significantly different between SCI patients. Thus, SCI-induced enhanced excitability of nociceptive processing does not necessarily lead to neuropathic pain. QST and LEP revealed no crucial role of deafferentation for hypersensitivity development after SCI. PERSPECTIVE: At-level hypersensitivity after complete thoracic SCI is associated with neuropathic below-level pain if evoked by clinical sensory stimuli. QST, LEP, and electrically-induced axon reflex flare sizes did not indicate somatosensory deafferentation in SCIHs.

Effects of Current Density on Nociceptor Activation Upon Electrical Stimulation in Humans.

OBJECTIVES: Mechano-insensitive ("silent") nociceptors contribute to neuropathic pain. Their activation causes an axon-reflex erythema, but their high electrical excitation thresholds complicate their assessment, particularly in painful neuropathy. We therefore developed electrical stimulation paradigms for brief nociceptor activation and explored their sensitivity for clinical trials. METHOD: The local ethics committee approved the study protocol, and 14 healthy subjects were enrolled. Electrical stimuli were administered to ventral forearm and dorsum of the foot via self-adhesive 3 × 10 mm electrodes and a pair of blunted 0.4-mm-diameter platinum/iridium pin electrodes. Pain thresholds were determined and nociceptors activated at 1.5-fold pain threshold by 5 blocks delivering 10 pulses each and at randomized frequencies of 5 to 10 to 20 to 50 to 100 Hz, respectively. Axon reflex erythema and pain were recorded. RESULTS: Increased frequencies dose-dependently increased pain (P < 0.0001). Pin electrode stimulation was more painful than adhesive electrode stimulation (P < 0.04) particularly at the feet. Axon reflex erythema was significantly smaller at the feet than at the forearm (P < 0.0001). At both skin sites, pin electrode stimuli evoked significantly larger erythema (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation at high current density using pin electrodes is a sensitive method for investigating "silent" nociceptors, which might therefore preferably be applied in neuropathic pain conditions.