Pancreas Transplantation: An Alarming Crisis in Confidence.

In the past decade, the annual number of pancreas transplantations performed in the United States has steadily declined. From 2004 to 2011, the overall number of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations in the United States declined by 10%, whereas the decreases in pancreas after kidney (PAK) and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) procedures were 55% and 34%, respectively. Paradoxically, this has occurred in the setting of improvements in graft and patient survival outcomes and transplanting higher-risk patients. Only 11 centers in the United States currently perform ≥20 pancreas transplantations per year, and most centers perform <5 pancreas transplantations annually; many do not perform PAKs or PTAs. This national trend in decreasing numbers of pancreas transplantations is related to a number of factors including lack of a primary referral source, improvements in diabetes care and management, changing donor and recipient considerations, inadequate training opportunities, and increasing risk aversion because of regulatory scrutiny. A national initiative is needed to "reinvigorate" SPK and PAK procedures as preferred transplantation options for appropriately selected uremic patients taking insulin regardless of C-peptide levels or "type" of diabetes. Moreover, many patients may benefit from PTAs because all categories of pancreas transplantation are not only life enhancing but also life extending procedures.

Apolipoprotein L1 gene variants in deceased organ donors are associated with renal allograft failure.

Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) nephropathy variants in African American deceased kidney donors were associated with shorter renal allograft survival in a prior single-center report. APOL1 G1 and G2 variants were genotyped in newly accrued DNA samples from African American deceased donors of kidneys recovered and/or transplanted in Alabama and North Carolina. APOL1 genotypes and allograft outcomes in subsequent transplants from 55 U.S. centers were linked, adjusting for age, sex and race/ethnicity of recipients, HLA match, cold ischemia time, panel reactive antibody levels, and donor type. For 221 transplantations from kidneys recovered in Alabama, there was a statistical trend toward shorter allograft survival in recipients of two-APOL1-nephropathy-variant kidneys (hazard ratio [HR] 2.71; p = 0.06). For all 675 kidneys transplanted from donors at both centers, APOL1 genotype (HR 2.26; p = 0.001) and African American recipient race/ethnicity (HR 1.60; p = 0.03) were associated with allograft failure. Kidneys from African American deceased donors with two APOL1 nephropathy variants reproducibly associate with higher risk for allograft failure after transplantation. These findings warrant consideration of rapidly genotyping deceased African American kidney donors for APOL1 risk variants at organ recovery and incorporation of results into allocation and informed-consent processes.

Similar results with solitary pancreas transplantation compared with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the new millennium.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze our single-center outcomes according to pancreas transplant (PT) category in the new millennium by using standardized management protocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 202 consecutive PTs (179 with portal-enteric drainage) in 192 patients; all received either rabbit antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and tapered corticosteroids or early steroid withdrawal. Unlike simultaneous pancreas/kidney (SPK) transplant, solitary PT (SPT) recipients were managed with routine perioperative anticoagulation and surveillance pancreas biopsies. RESULTS: From November 2001 to March 2013, we performed 162 SPK transplants, 35 pancreas after kidney transplants, and 5 pancreas-alone transplants (40 SPTs). Demographic characteristics were mostly comparable; however, the SPT group had younger donors, shorter waiting time, fewer HLA mismatches, and fewer African-American recipients but more retransplants (all, P < .05). With a mean follow-up of 5.5 versus 7.5 years, overall patient (86.4% SPK vs 86.8% SPT), kidney graft (74% SPK vs 80% SPT), and pancreas graft (both 65%) survival rates were comparable. Although mortality rates were similar, mortality patterns differed because no SPT recipients died early, whereas the 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality rates after SPK transplant were 4%, 9% and 12%, respectively (P < .05). The most common causes of pancreas graft loss were death with functioning grafts in SPK recipients and acute/chronic rejection in SPT recipients. Rates of early thrombosis were 8.6% in SPK patients and 5% in SPT patients. Cumulative clinical acute rejection rates were similar between groups (SPK 29% vs SPT 27.5%; P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of depleting antibody induction and tacrolimus-based therapy, HLA matching, careful donor and recipient selection, portal-enteric drainage, selective perioperative anticoagulation, and surveillance SPT biopsy monitoring, similar medium-term outcomes can be achieved in SPK transplants and SPTs in the new millennium.

5-year results of a prospective, randomized, single-center study of alemtuzumab compared with rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The study purpose was to analyze 5-year outcomes in a prospective, randomized trial of alemtuzumab (ALEM) versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2005 through October 2008, a total of 46 SKPTs (45 portal-enteric drainage) were prospectively randomized to receive either single-dose ALEM (30 mg intraoperatively) or multiple-dose rATG antibody induction (starting intraoperatively, minimum of 3 doses administered) with tacrolimus/mycophenolate and/or steroids. RESULTS: Of 222 kidney transplant patients enrolled in the study, 46 received SKPTs; 28 (61%) received ALEM and 18 (39%) received rATG induction. Follow-up ranged from 54 to 98 months (mean, 69 months). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in 5-year patient (82% ALEM vs 89% rATG), kidney graft (79% ALEM vs 72% rATG), or pancreas graft (64% ALEM vs 56% rATG) survival rates. Death-censored kidney (90% ALEM vs 75% rATG) and pancreas (71% ALEM vs 56% rATG) graft survival rates were likewise comparable (both, P = NS). Acute rejection (21% ALEM vs 44% rATG; P = .11) and major infection (39% ALEM vs 67% rATG; P = .13) rates were slightly lower in the ALEM group; cytomegalovirus infections were significantly lower (0% ALEM vs 17% rATG; P = .05). The incidence of late acute rejection was low in both groups. There were no differences in early pancreas thromboses (3.6% ALEM vs 11% rATG), postoperative bleeding (11% ALEM vs 0% rATG), other surgical complications, or readmissions between groups. In patients with functioning grafts, 5-year mean serum creatinine (1.4 ALEM vs 1.6 mg/dL rATG), calculated abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease glomerular filtration rate (55 ALEM vs 52 mL/min/1.73 m(2) rATG), glycosylated hemoglobin (both 5.4%), and C-peptide (2.2 ALEM vs 2.3 ng/mL rATG) levels were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose ALEM and multiple dose rATG induction provided similar medium-term patient, kidney, and pancreas graft function and survival rates. ALEM induction may be associated with less acute rejection and major infection over the long term.

Guidelines for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in pancreas allografts-updated Banff grading schema.

The first Banff proposal for the diagnosis of pancreas rejection (Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 237) dealt primarily with the diagnosis of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ACMR), while only tentatively addressing issues pertaining to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This document presents comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of AMR, first proposed at the 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology and refined by a broad-based multidisciplinary panel. Pancreatic AMR is best identified by a combination of serological and immunohistopathological findings consisting of (i) identification of circulating donor-specific antibodies, and histopathological data including (ii) morphological evidence of microvascular tissue injury and (iii) C4d staining in interacinar capillaries. Acute AMR is diagnosed conclusively if these three elements are present, whereas a diagnosis of suspicious for AMR is rendered if only two elements are identified. The identification of only one diagnostic element is not sufficient for the diagnosis of AMR but should prompt heightened clinical vigilance. AMR and ACMR may coexist, and should be recognized and graded independently. This proposal is based on our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of pancreas rejection and currently available tools for diagnosis. A systematized clinicopathological approach to AMR is essential for the development and assessment of much needed therapeutic interventions.

The APOL1 gene and allograft survival after kidney transplantation.

Coding variants in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) are strongly associated with nephropathy in African Americans (AAs). The effect of transplanting kidneys from AA donors with two APOL1 nephropathy risk variants is unknown. APOL1 risk variants were genotyped in 106 AA deceased organ donors and graft survival assessed in 136 resultant kidney transplants. Cox-proportional hazard models tested for association between time to graft failure and donor APOL1 genotypes. The mean follow-up was 26.4 ± 21.8 months. Twenty-two of 136 transplanted kidneys (16%) were from donors with two APOL1 nephropathy risk variants. Twenty-five grafts failed; eight (32%) had two APOL1 risk variants. A multivariate model accounting for donor APOL1 genotype, overall African ancestry, expanded criteria donation, recipient age and gender, HLA mismatch, CIT and PRA revealed that graft survival was significantly shorter in donor kidneys with two APOL1 risk variants (hazard ratio [HR] 3.84; p = 0.008) and higher HLA mismatch (HR 1.52; p = 0.03), but not for overall African ancestry excluding APOL1. Kidneys from AA deceased donors harboring two APOL1 risk variants failed more rapidly after renal transplantation than those with zero or one risk variants. If replicated, APOL1 genotyping could improve the donor selection process and maximize long-term renal allograft survival.

Donor-recipient relationships in African American vs. Caucasian live kidney donors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to characterize differences in donor and recipient relationships between African American (AA) and Caucasian living kidney donors. METHODS: Data from all successful living kidney donors at a single institution between 1991 and 2009 were reviewed. Relationships between donor and recipient were categorized and between-group comparisons performed. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 73 (18%) AA and 324 Caucasian living kidney donors. The distribution of donor-recipient relationships differed significantly between AA and Caucasians. AA donors were more likely to be related to the recipient (88% vs. 74%, p = 0.007) than Caucasians. AA donors were more likely to participate in child to parent donation and were less likely to participate in parent to child donation or to donate to unrelated individuals. Sibling and spousal donations were similar in both groups. Caucasian donors were more likely to be unrelated to the recipient than AA donors. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in donor-recipient relationships between AA and Caucasian living kidney donors. Future studies exploring cultural differences and family dynamics may provide targeted recruitment strategies for AA and Caucasian living kidney donors. Living unrelated kidney transplantation appears to be a potential growth area for living kidney donation in AA.

Renal allograft failure due to emphysematous pyelonephritis: successful non-operative management and proposed new classification scheme based on literature review.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a rare necrotizing infection of the kidney caused by gas-forming organisms, usually occurs in diabetic patients, and often requires nephrectomy for effective therapy. EPN is rarely reported in renal allografts, with only 20 cases found in the English literature. We report herein a case of EPN in a transplanted kidney resulting in acute renal failure and sepsis. The patient was managed non-operatively with subsequent recovery of renal allograft function. Based on this experience and a review of the literature, we suggest an amended classification system for EPN in kidney transplantation to plan and guide treatment options accordingly. However, the scarcity of this disease process, coupled with the lack of prospective validation of the new classification scheme, prevents drawing definitive conclusions regarding optimal management strategies including the role and timing of allograft nephrectomy.

Short-term renal outcomes in African American and Caucasian donors following live kidney donation.

INTRODUCTION: Although African Americans (AA) are considered higher risk kidney donors than Caucasians, limited data are available regarding outcomes of AA donors. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all kidney donors from 1993 to 2007 and evaluated race/ethnic differences in post-donation changes in renal function, incident proteinuria, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 336 kidney donors (63 AA, 263 Caucasian, 10 other) were evaluated. Before donation, AA had higher serum creatinine concentrations, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values, and SBP levels than Caucasians. No significant changes in SBP or renal function were observed between the two groups within the first year after donation, although results were limited by incomplete follow-up. CONCLUSION: AA had higher pre-donation serum creatinine, GFR, and SBP values compared to Caucasians; however, the degree of change in renal function and blood pressure did not differ between groups following kidney donation. Although long-term studies are needed, our study suggests that AA and Caucasians experience similar short-term consequences after donation. The incomplete data available on donor outcomes in our center and in prior publications also indicates a global need to implement systems for structured follow-up of live kidney donors.

Potential donor-recipient MYH9 genotype interactions in posttransplant nephrotic syndrome after pediatric kidney transplantation.

Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) with nephrotic syndrome is relatively common after kidney transplantation in young recipients whose predialysis course consists of heavy proteinuria, hypertension and subacute loss of kidney function. The gene(s) mediating this effect remain unknown. We report an unusual circumstance where kidneys recovered from a deceased African American male donor with MYH9-related occult FSGS (risk variants in seven of eight MYH9 E1 haplotype single nucleotide polymorphisms) were transplanted into an African American male child with risk variants in four MYH9 E1 risk variants and a European American female teenager with two MYH9 E1 risk variants. Fulminant nephrotic syndrome rapidly developed in the African American recipient, whereas the European American had an uneventful posttransplant course. The kidney donor lacked significant proteinuria at the time of organ procurement. This scenario suggests that donor-recipient interactions in MYH9, as well as other gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, may lead to recurrent nephrotic syndrome after renal transplantation. The impact of transplanting kidneys from donors with multiple MYH9 risk alleles into recipients with similar genetic background at high risk for recurrent kidney disease needs to be determined.

Impact of race and gender on live kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: African Americans (AA) and women are less likely to receive a live kidney donor (LKD) transplant than Caucasians or men. Reasons for non-donation are poorly understood. METHODS: A retrospective review of 541 unsuccessful LKD was performed to explore reasons for non-donation and to assess for racial and/or gender differences. RESULTS: We identified 138 AA and 385 Caucasian subjects who volunteered but did not successfully donate. Females (58.2%) were more likely to be excluded than males due to reduced renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 85 mL/min, 7.9% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.0001) or failure to complete the evaluation (6.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.01). AA were more commonly excluded due to obesity (body mass index >or= 32 kg/m(2); 30.4% AA vs. 16.6% Caucasian, p = 0.0005) or failure to complete the evaluation (12.3% AA vs. 1.8% Caucasian, p < 0.0001) whereas Caucasians were more often excluded due to kidney stones (1.5% AA vs. 7.3% Caucasian, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly different reasons for exclusion of LKD exist between potential Caucasian and AA LKD, particularly among women. Among the differences that we observed are potentially modifiable barriers to donation including obesity and failure to complete the donor evaluation. A further understanding of these barriers may help point to strategies for more effective recruitment and successful LKD.

Banff schema for grading pancreas allograft rejection: working proposal by a multi-disciplinary international consensus panel.

Accurate diagnosis and grading of rejection and other pathological processes are of paramount importance to guide therapeutic interventions in patients with pancreas allograft dysfunction. A multi-disciplinary panel of pathologists, surgeons and nephrologists was convened for the purpose of developing a consensus document delineating the histopathological features for diagnosis and grading of rejection in pancreas transplant biopsies. Based on the available published data and the collective experience, criteria for the diagnosis of acute cell-mediated allograft rejection (ACMR) were established. Three severity grades (I/mild, II/moderate and III/severe) were defined based on lesions known to be more or less responsive to treatment and associated with better- or worse-graft outcomes, respectively. The features of chronic rejection/graft sclerosis were reassessed, and three histological stages were established. Tentative criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection were also characterized, in anticipation of future studies that ought to provide more information on this process. Criteria for needle core biopsy adequacy and guidelines for pathology reporting were also defined. The availability of a simple, reproducible, clinically relevant and internationally accepted schema for grading rejection should improve the level of diagnostic accuracy and facilitate communication between all parties involved in the care of pancreas transplant recipients.

Outcomes of extended donors in pancreatic transplantation with portal-enteric drainage.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available on extended (EX) donor criteria in pancreatic transplantation (PTX). METHODS: This retrospective study from February 2007 through April 2007 compared 2 cohorts of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations (SKPT): the first from EX donors, which were defined as age <10 years or > or =45 years, or donation after cardiac death [DCD]), and the second from conventional (CONV) donors. RESULTS: Among 79 SKPT, 19 (24%) were from EX donors (12 older than age 45 [mean age, 50.2 years], 3 pediatric donors <10, and 4 DCD donors) and the remaining 60 SKPT from CONV donors. The mean donor age was higher in EX than CONV donors (38 vs 25 years, P < .05). There were no other differences between the 2 cohorts. With a similar median follow-up of 29 months, patient, kidney and pancreatic graft survival rates were 89%, 89%, and 79%, for the EX, whereas corresponding outcomes for CONV donors were 93%, 87%, and 80%, respectively (all P = NS). The incidences were similar for delayed kidney graft function (5% in each group), early pancreatic graft loss due to thrombosis (5% EX vs 8% CONV donors), acute rejection (16% EX vs 18% CONV donors), surgical complications, and infections. There were no significant differences in 1-year mean serum creatinine (1.4 mg/dL in each group) or glycohemoglobin (5.2% vs 5.5%) levels between the EX and CONV donor groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes among SKPT from selected EX donors were comparable to CONV donors. Donors at the extremes of age and DCD donors may represent underused resources in SKPT.

Analysis of bacteremia after pancreatic transplantation with enteric drainage.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review the incidence, risk factors, and impact of bacteremia after pancreas transplantation (PTX). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations (SKPTs) and solitary PTXs from January 2002 through April 2007. Positive blood cultures were correlated with other coexisting infections and parameters. RESULTS: One hundred ten PTXs with enteric drainage included 80 SKPTs and 30 solitary PTXs. Mean follow-up was 32 months. Bacteremia occurred in 29 (26%) patients with 5 (17%) being recurrent; it was seen during the first month after transplantation in 13 (12%), between 1 and 3 months in 12 (11%), between 3 and 12 months in 3 (3%), and after the first year in 3 cases (3%). Typical organisms were as follows: MRSE, MSSE, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and Acinetobacteri. Bacteremia was associated with coexisting site infection in 20 cases (69%): deep abdominal wound (31%); line (31%); urinary tract (34%); and pulmonary (7%). Similar bacterial species in blood and a coexisting site occurred in 15 cases (52%). No correlation was seen with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. In the first year, bacteremia was associated with more acute rejection episodes (32% vs 17%; P = .09), surgical complications (54% vs 42%; P = .267), mortality (11% vs 4%; P = .15), and death-censored pancreatic (14% vs 9%; P = .39) and kidney (4% vs 0; P = .08) graft loss. Fewer patients with bacteremia received alemtuzumab compared with rATG induction (14% vs 39%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Bacteremias were common within 3 months of PTX. A significant number (39%) were multidrug resistant. The majority were accompanied by abdominal, urinary, or line infections. Bacteremias were associated with slightly higher incidences of rejection, mortality, and graft loss.

Do pretransplant C-peptide levels influence outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) recipients who retain C-peptide production at the time of SKPT. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of SKPTs from January 2002 through January 2007 compared outcomes between patients with absent or low C-peptide levels (<2.0 ng/mL, group A) with those having levels > or =2.0 ng/mL (group B). RESULTS: Among 74 SKPTs, 67 were in group A and seven in group B (mean C-peptide level 5.7 ng/mL). During transplantation, group B subjects were older (mean age 51 vs 41 years, P = .006); showed a later age of onset of diabetes (median 35 vs 13 years, P = .0001); weighed more (median 77 vs 66 kg, P = .24); had a greater proportion of African-Americans (57% vs 13%, P = .004); and had a longer pretransplant duration of dialysis (median 40 vs 14 months, P = .14). With similar median follow-up of 40 months, death-censored kidney (95% group A vs 100% group B, P = NS) and pancreas (87% group A vs 100% group B, P = NS) graft survival rates were similar, but patient survival (94% group A vs 71% group B, P = .03) was greater in group A. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in rejection episodes, surgical complications, infections, readmissions, hemoglobin A1C or C-peptide levels, serum creatinine, or MDRD GFR levels. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients with measurable C-peptide levels before transplant were older, overweight, more frequently African-American and had a later age of onset of diabetes, longer duration of pretransplant dialysis, and reduced patient survival compared to insulinopenic patients undergoing SKPT. The other outcomes were similar.

Acute sensory neuropathy associated with rabbit antithymocyte globulin.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) is indicated for the treatment of acute renal transplant rejection and has also been shown to be effective as an induction immunosuppressive agent after renal transplantation. We report a patient that developed a painful sensory neuropathy within an hour of receiving RATG. The neuropathic symptoms resolved within a month, and a careful review of his medications, exposures and comorbid conditions revealed no other causes of neuropathy. Since the administration of RATG and onset of symptoms were so closely related temporally and the symptoms resolved after the cessation of RATG, we believe it is likely this medication led to the development of neuropathy.

Risk factors and outcomes analyses at 36 months of a prospective, randomized, multicenter, trial of daclizumab induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to analyze risk factors for acute rejection (AR) and long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of daclizumab (DAC) versus no antibody induction. METHODS: A total of 298 SKPT patients were randomized into three groups and categorized based on an intent to treat analysis, and factors associated with AR and survival were identified using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient or allograft survival or rejection rates among the three groups at 36 months follow-up. Delayed (kidney) graft function (DGF) was a risk factor for subsequent kidney AR (odds ratio = 2.79, P = .002). The presence of kidney AR was also a risk factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1, P = .003) for kidney graft loss, whereas risk factors for pancreas graft loss (censored for graft loss within 30 days or death with functioning graft) included pancreas AR (HR = 1.97, P = .012), kidney AR (HR = 1.61, P = .042), CMV serostatus donor +/recipient - (HR = 1.62, P = .026), and HLA-B mismatch (HR = 1.58, P = .01). Kidney graft loss (HR = 5.5, P = .02) was the only predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: At 36 months, no significant differences in outcomes were noted in the three study groups. DGF was the major risk factor for kidney AR, kidney AR was the major risk factor for kidney graft loss, and kidney graft loss was the major determinant of mortality. Prevention of kidney DGF and AR in SKPT recipients may play a pivotal role in optimizing long-term outcomes.

Successful simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation from extreme donors.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review our experience with "extreme" pancreas donors compared to conventional (CONV) donors. METHODS: "Extreme" (EX) pancreas donors were defined as deceased donors (DDs) age >50 years, <8 years, donation after cardiac death (DCD), and targeted for organ discard. RESULTS: From January 2002 through January 2005, we performed 40 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants (SKPT) with Thymoglobulin induction, including 9 (22.5%) from EX and 31 from CONV DDs. Mean DD age was higher in EX DD (41.2 years EX vs 26.0 CONV, P < .05), but mean recipient age and cold ischemia times did not differ between groups. With a mean follow-up of 16.8 months in the EX DD group, patient and kidney graft survival rates are both 100%, and the pancreas graft survival rate is 89%. With a mean follow-up of 21.7 months in the CONV DD group, patient and kidney graft survival rates are both 93.5% and the pancreas graft survival rate is 77.4%. All patients with surviving grafts exhibited good initial (1 case of delayed kidney graft function in a CONV DD) and stable long-term kidney and pancreas graft function. Mean length of initial hospital stay and the incidences of acute rejection, readmissions, operative complications, and infections were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the limits of donor acceptability continue to evolve as excellent outcomes can be achieved in SKPTs from selected EX DDs.

A prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab compared to no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results at 3 years.

UNLABELLED: This is a report of outcomes at 36 months of a prospective, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) patients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. A total of 298 SKPT patients were randomized into one of three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 days for 5 doses (group 1, n = 107); daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose for 2 doses (group 2, n = 113); and no antibody induction (group 3, n = 78). There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups, and results were analyzed by an intent-to-treat analysis. The incidence of composite events (acute rejection [AR], any allograft lost, or death) at 3 years was 49%, 43%, and 55% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = .278). The cumulative incidences of AR were not statistically different among the three groups (P = .178). The mean time to first AR was delayed in groups 2 (288 days) and 1 (245 days) compared to group 3 (145 days, P = .07). There were no differences in patient or allograft survival rates among the three groups, and the rates of serious adverse events, infections, and hospital readmissions were also comparable. Excellent dual graft function in patients with surviving grafts was observed in all three groups at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The alternative 2-dose regimen of daclizumab was as safe and effective as the conventional 5-dose regimen compared to no antibody induction in SKPT patients, but no long-term benefits were noted.