Nucleated red blood cells are a predictor of mortality in patients under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: The presence of Nucleated Red Blood Cells (NRBCs) in critically ill patients is associated with higher mortality and poor prognosis. Although patients on extracorporeal support such as veno-venous or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV/VA-ECMO) are severely ill, NRBCs have rarely been investigated regarding their predictive value so far. METHODS: As part of a retrospective study, we examined all cardiothoracic surgery patients from July 2019 to September 2020 who received ECMO treatment during their inpatient stay. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of NRBCs during ECMO support in terms of their predictive value for mortality. RESULTS: In total 30 patients (age at admission: 62.7 ± 14.3 year; 26 male; ECMO duration: 8.5 ± 5.1 days; ICU duration: 18.0 ± 14.5 days) were included. 16 patients (53.3%) died during their inpatient stay. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between VA- or VV- ECMO patients. NRBCs occurred in all patients while under ECMO support. NRBC value was significant higher in those who died (2299.6 ± 4356.6 µl) compared to the surviving patients (133.6 ± 218.8 µl, p < 0.001). Univariate analysis found that patients with a cutoff value of ≥ 270 NRBCs/µl during ECMO support were 39 times more likely to die (OR 39.0, 95% CI 1.5-997.5, p < 0.001). 12 out of 13 patients (92.3%) with ≥ 270 NRBCs/µl died. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% CI 0.69-0.96) with a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 92.9%. CONCLUSION: NRBCs appear to be an accurate biomarker for mortality in patients with ECMO support. They may be helpful in deciding if therapy becomes futile. Trial registration DRKS00023626 (December 20th 2020).

Outcomes in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block after Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Increased rates of postoperative left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) frequently occur after implantation of rapid deployment valves. The impact of LBBB on follow-up outcomes remains controversial. So far, no data regarding long-term outcomes exist. AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of LBBB on postoperative outcomes after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR). METHODS: A total of 620 consecutive patients without preexisting LBBB or PPI who underwent rapid deployment AVR between March 2012 and September 2019 were included. New-onset LBBB was defined as any new LBBB that persisted at hospital discharge. The median follow-up time for clinical data was 1.7 years post-RDAVR. RESULTS: At discharge, new-onset LBBB was seen in 109 patients (17.5%). There were no differences between the LBBB groups and no-LBBB groups regarding baseline characteristics. At a median follow-up of 1.7 years, no difference was found between LBBB groups and no-LBBB groups concerning all-cause mortality (12.8 vs. 11.7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.53; p = 0.54). Nevertheless, new-onset LBBB was associated with significant higher pacemaker implantation rates at follow-up (10.1 vs. 6.3%; HR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.89-6.81 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: After a median follow-up of 1.7 years, new-onset LBBB was not associated with increased mortality. Nevertheless, higher pacemaker implantation rates were observed in patients with new-onset LBBB after RDAVR.

Efficacy of Auricular Acupuncture and Lavender Oil Aromatherapy in Reducing Preinterventional Anxiety in Cardiovascular Patients: A Randomized Single-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Auricular acupuncture at the "relaxation point" and lavender oil aromatherapy can reduce preoperative anxiety associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Data on the effect of combined auricular acupuncture and lavender oil aromatherapy in patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions with the use of local anesthesia or under conscious sedation are sparse. The authors sought to evaluate the efficacy of auricular acupuncture and lavender oil aromatherapy in reducing preinterventional anxiety in cardiovascular patients. Materials and Methods: Data of 80 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (n = 56) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 9) and right heart catheterization (n = 6), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n = 17) and percutaneous mitral valve repair (MitraClip; n = 2) were analyzed. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either preinterventional auricular acupuncture and lavender oil (Lavandula angustifolia) aromatherapy (verum group, n = 39) or combined sham auricular acupuncture and placebo oil aromatherapy (placebo group, n = 41). For the verum group bilateral auricular acupuncture was performed at the "relaxation point." State anxiety and blood pressure were assessed before and at 30 min after acupuncture and presternal oil application. State anxiety was defined as primary outcome measure and assessed using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for Adults form Y6. Intervention-specific anxiety was assessed by a 10-point numerical rating scale, and perceived treatment success by a single dichotomous question. Clinical blood pressure was further assessed. Results: After the intervention, the verum group had significantly decreased anxiety on the STAI compared with the placebo group (Δ = -4.18; 95% confidence interval = -8.31 to -0.05; p = 0.047). Significantly more patients reported subjective treatment success in the verum group (87.2%) than in the placebo group (65.9%, p = 0.035). No significant differences were observed regarding intervention-specific anxiety and blood pressure between the two groups. No serious adverse events occurred in any group. Conclusions: Combined auricular acupuncture and lavender oil aromatherapy can decrease preinterventional anxiety in cardiovascular patients and requires further investigation. German Clinical Trials Register (registration no. DRKS00023686).

Incidence and Impact of Routine Inflammatory Parameters on Outcome after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Previous research reported adverse clinical outcomes in association with systemic inflammation (SI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, data characterizing the impact of SI, as reflected by postprocedural routine inflammatory parameters (pRIP), on clinical outcome of patients undergoing TAVR are sparse. OBJECTIVES: In light of this, the present work aimed to analyze incidence and clinical significance of pRIP after transapical (TA) and transfemoral (TF)-TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 81 high-risk consecutive patients undergoing TAVR in our center from 2017 to 2018 were analyzed in a retrospective manner. 40 out of 81 patients (49, 4%) were treated via TF access (group A) and 41 patients via TA access (group B). Incidence, cause, and amplitude of pRIP were analyzed in relation to pre- and peri-interventional data. Assessment of outcomes was conducted according to the valve academic research consortium (VARC-2). Postprocedural C-reactive protein (pCRP) and leucocytes (pL) were significantly increased in patients undergoing TA-TAVR (group B) vs. TF-TAVR (group A; 12.1 ± 9.7 vs. 22.1 ± 7.9 mg/dl, p < 0.001 and 12.8 ± 4.0 vs. 14.2 ± 3.8/nl, p = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference regarding incidence of postprocedural fever (pF) ≥38.0°C (12.5% vs. 22%, p = 0.37). Furthermore, we observed a vast (though insignificant) trend towards a longer fever duration in group B vs. group A (9.9 ± 14.9 vs. 3.2 ± 5.9 hours, p = 0.06). Further analysis identified pCRP >30 mg/dl (hazard ratio (HR) 3.15, confidence interval (CI) 1.22-8.14, p = 0.018) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (logistic EuroSCORE I (ES)) >20% (HR 2.95, CI 1.17-7.47, p = 0.02) as predictors of mortality; in this context, we also discovered a marginally significant trend for pL > 14/nl (HR 2.44, CI 0.97-6.14, p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis by use of the fisher`s exact test revealed a significant association between pCRP >30 mg/dl and ES >20% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: pRIP are significantly increased in patients undergoing TA-TAVR. pCRP >30 mg/dl, ES>20%, and pL > 14/nl are hallmark of adverse prognosis and require further investigation.

Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of aortic valve stenosis is increasing due to the continuously growing geriatric population. Data on procedural success and mortality of very old patients are sparse, raising the question of when this population may be deemed as "too old even for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)." We, therefore, sought to evaluate the influence of age on outcome after TAVR and the impact of direct implantation. METHODS: The data of 394 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVR were analyzed. Patients were divided into four age groups: ≤75 (group 1, n = 28), 76-80 (group 2, n = 107), 81-85 (group 3, n = 148), and >85 (group 4, n = 111) years. Direct implantation was performed when possible according to current recommendations. Survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Mortality at 30 days and 1 year was not significantly different between the four age groups (3.6 vs. 6.7 vs. 5.4 vs. 2.7% and 7.6 vs. 17 vs. 14.5 vs. 13%m respectively, log-rank p = 0.59). Direct implantation without balloon aortic valvuloplasty was more frequently performed on patients aged >85 vs. ≤85 years (33.3 vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001). the incidence of procedural complications frequently associated with advanced age (stroke, vascular complications) was not significantly increased in group 4. CONCLUSION: Outcome after TF-TAVR is comparable among different age cohorts, even in very old patients. Direct implantation simplifies the procedure and could therefore play a role in reducing the incidence of peri-interventional complications in patients of advanced age.

Undersizing but overfilling eliminates the gray zones of sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the balloon-expandable bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for valve size selection are based on multidimensional annular measurements, yet the overlap between two different transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizes remains. We sought to evaluate whether undersizing but overfilling eliminates the gray zones of valve sizing. METHODS: Data of 246 consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the balloon-expandable bioprosthesis with either conventional sizing and nominal filling (group 1 (NF-TAVR), n = 154) or undersizing but overfilling under a Less Is More (LIM)-Principle (group 2 (LIM-TAVR), n = 92) were compared. Paravalvular leakage (PVL) was graded angiographically and quantitatively using invasive hemodynamics. RESULTS: Annulus rupture (AR) occurred only in group 1 (n = 3). Due to AR adequate evaluation of PVL was possible in 152 patients of group 1. More than mild PVL was found in 13 (8.6%) patients of group 1 and 1 (1.1%) patient of group 2 (p = 0.019). Postdilatation was performed in 31 (20.1%) patients of group 1 and 6 patients (6.5%) of group 2 (p = 0.003). For patients with borderline annulus size in group 1 (n = 35, 22.7%) valve size selection was left to the physicians choice resulting in selection of the larger prosthesis in 10 (28.6%). In group 2 all patients with borderline annulus (n = 36, 39.1%) received the smaller prosthesis (LIM-TAVR). The postprocedural mean transvalvular pressure gradient was significantly higher in the NF-TAVR-group (11.7 ± 4 vs. 10.1 ± 3.6 mmHg, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LIM-TAVR eliminates the gray zones of sizing and associated PVL, can improve THV-performance, reduce incidence of annular rupture and simplify the procedure especially in borderline cases.

Feasibility of Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Aortic Disease and Simultaneous or Sequential Endovascular Aortic Repair.

OBJECTIVES: The transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) is associated with a significant survival benefit for intermediate and high-risk patients. Due to the increased procedural risk, many operators avoid TF-TAVI in patients with aortic disease. Moreover, significant peri-interventional device interaction may occur in patients with previous endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). We evaluated the feasibility of TF-TAVI in patients with aortic disease in combination with simultaneous or sequential EVAR. METHODS: Data from 15 TF-TAVI patients with concomitant aortic disease treated between 2009 and 2019 in three German heart centers representing 4410 TAVI procedures were analyzed. RESULTS: Two patients with progressive penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAUs) in the descending thoracic aorta underwent sequential and simultaneous thoracic EVAR (TEVAR), respectively. One patient with stable PAU and 4 patients with not yet relevant abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) underwent isolated TF-TAVI. One patient with relevant AAA underwent TF-TAVI and sequential EVAR. Seven patients with previous EVAR due to an AAA underwent TF-TAVI (5 with a bifurcated graft and 2 with a straight graft). TF-TAVI and sequential or simultaneous TEVAR were technically successful in all patients. Vascular complications occurred in 1 patient. One patient died within 30 days and 2 patients died within 12 months. CONCLUSION: TF-TAVI can be performed successfully in patients with aortic disease or previous endovascular aortoiliac intervention. Simultaneous and sequential (T)EVAR is feasible.

Two-stage weaning strategy using veno-veno-arterial perfusion for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVES: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation represents the last therapy option in refractory cardiogenic shock. Successful weaning becomes difficult if the myocardial function recovers but pulmonary impairment persists. We present our experience with a new weaning strategy, using a stepwise mode-switch from veno-arterial to veno-veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation setting for patients with primary cardiogenic shock and subsequent respiratory failure. METHODS: From 81 patients treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following acute cardiogenic shock between January 2014 and April 2018, eight patients with cardiac and pulmonary failure were identified to be treated using the following protocol: patients were put on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a second inflow cannula was inserted via the right jugular vein and cardiac weaning was performed via veno-veno-arterial support. Finally, patients were pulmonary weaned via veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mode. RESULTS: In the mode-switch group, etiologies of cardiogenic shock were cardiac arrest (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12.5%) and post-cardiotomic heart failure (75%). Mean time between onset of cardiogenic shock and start of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 76 ± 117 min. At implantation, lactate and pH values were 9.5 ± 5.0 mmol/L and 7.2 ± 0.2. Total extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-time was 9.3 ± 4.7 days, with a mode-switch from veno-arterial to veno-veno-arterial after 3.9 ± 2.7 days. The weaning rate in the mode-switch group was 75% (vs. 41% in the entire cohort) and the 30-day survival was 50% (vs 32% in the cohort). 38% of the patients presented a favorable neurological outcome. CONCLUSION: Mode-switch from veno-arterial to veno-veno-arterial and weaning via veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mode is feasible for combined cardiac and pulmonary failure, with promising results due to an optimized pre-pulmonary oxygenation.

Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in a minimal access setting: intermediate clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter procedures have overtaken conventional operations in Germany. Considering that this is a highly competitive field, a rate of 25% for minimal access aortic valve replacement seems to be disappointingly low. One way to promote minimal access techniques is through the systematic use of rapid deployment valves. METHODS: A total of 143 patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via upper right hemisternotomy between March 2012 and September 2015. All patients were followed up annually. Echocardiographic assessment of the valve was performed after 12 months. The cumulative follow-up time was 275.2 patient-years. The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. RESULTS: The mean age was 76.4 ± 6.2 years, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 11.0 ± 4.3%. Early all-cause mortality was 2.8% (n = 4). Actuarial survival after 1 year was 91.6 ± 2.4%, and after 3 years, it was 84.4 ± 3.6%. Mean transprosthetic gradient after 12 months was 10.3 ± 3.8 mmHg. New onset of higher grade paravalvular leakage did not occur during the follow-up period. Perioperatively, higher grade paravalvular leakage (aortic insufficiency >1+) occurred in 2 cases (1.4%) . CONCLUSIONS: Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement can be performed safely in a minimal access setting with low complication rates and good haemodynamic results. Therefore, rapid deployment valves are a relevant option in minimal access surgery.

The Use of Rapid Deployment Valves in Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery: One-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing multiple valve surgery represent a high-risk group who could potentially benefit from a reduction of cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times because prolonged bypass and cross-clamp times are considered independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between July 2013 and November 2014, 16 patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system in the setting of concomitant mitral disease. Fifteen patients showed mitral regurgitation, whereas one patient had severe mitral stenosis. Fourteen patients received mitral valve repair and two patients received biological mitral valve replacement. Tricuspid valve repair was performed additionally in two patients. The mean ± SD age was 72.8 ± 8.4 years, and the mean ± SD logistic EuroSCORE II is 8.7% ± 3.4%. RESULTS: Within a 30-day perioperative period, no patient was lost (n = 0). The mean ± SD follow-up time was 11 ± 2 months. At 1 year, the overall survival was 81% (n = 13). A mean ± SD transaortic gradient of 10.7 ± 2.3 mm Hg and a mean ± SD effective orifice area of 1.7 ± 0.3 cm were measured echocardiographically. No higher-grade paravalvular leak (aortic insufficiency > 1+) occurred. Eight patients (61%) had no residual mitral regurgitation, four patients (30%) showed trivial regurgitation (1/4), and one patient (7.3%) had moderate mitral regurgitation (2/4). No interference of the subannular stent frame with the reconstructed valve or the biological mitral prosthesis was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system in combined aortic and mitral valve surgery can be performed safely with reproducible results. One-year follow-up data of this small series shows encouraging results potentially justifying the extension of the indication for rapid deployment valves to patients with concomitant mitral disease. Especially elderly patients undergoing multiple valve surgery may benefit from a reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemic times.

Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in the setting of concomitant mitral valve procedures.

The technique of rapid deployment aortic valve implantation in patients with concomitant mitral valve surgery is described and the outcome of our first 25 patients reported.

Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Mechanical Valve Implantation.

Recent studies report a reproducible reduction of myocardial ischemic and cardiopulmonary bypass times along with excellent hemodynamics and low rates of paravalvular leakage for rapid-deployment valves. A 68-year-old female patient with aortic stenosis and a mechanical mitral valve which was implanted in 2006 received rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. The procedure could be performed with a cross-clamp time of 45 minutes and a cardiopulmonary bypass time of 60 minutes. Postoperative course was uncomplicated and the patient was discharged to the referring hospital on postoperative day 8.

Low-flow lower body perfusion for spinal protection in a frozen elephant trunk simulation model.

OBJECTIVES: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure using isolated selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) at moderate hypothermia is associated with an increased risk for spinal cord ischaemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of a combined selective cerebral and low-flow lower body perfusion (CLBP) in a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty pigs (46 ± 5 kg) were cooled on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to 28°C. After aortic clamping and occlusion of the thoracic segmental arteries (TSAT4-T13), a pressure-controlled SCP (50 mmHg) was established for 90 min. Randomly, in n = 10 animals, an additional lower body perfusion (LBP) was performed with 15 ml/kg/min (CLBP). Regional spinal cord blood flow (SCBF), cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were registered at six time points. The animals were sacrificed after 120 min of weaning from CPB, and the spinal cord was analysed histologically using a schematic scoring system (0 = normal, 8 = total necrosis). RESULTS: Isolated SCP led to an SCBF decrease from 18.5 ± 9.4 to 0.9 ± 1.4 ml/min/100 g in the L1-L5 region (P = 0.005). CLBP preserved an almost physiological lumbar SCBF of 11.3 ± 5.3 ml/min/100 g. CSFP decreased in both groups during cooling and SCP/CLBP to 70-80% and increased during reperfusion to 150%, without showing significant differences between groups. The MEP amplitude decreased in both groups, with certain regional differences: T7-T11. MEP recording revealed a more pronounced amplitude decrease in the CLBP group (52.5 ± 2.0 vs 71.3 ± 0.9%), but MEP amplitudes recovered in both groups (SCP: 73.7 ± 0.5 vs CLBP: 82.6 ± 0.1%). During selective hypothermic perfusion, SCP-treated animals showed significant lower MEP amplitudes, when compared with CLBP-treated animals: 60 ± 9 vs 90 ± 3% (P < 0.001). After weaning, CLBP animals showed a better MEP recovery, especially in the L1-L5 region (99 ± 7 vs 70 ± 13%; P < 0.001). The histological analysis did not show significant differences in the necrosis extension in the thoracic spinal cord. A different situation was seen in the L1-L5 area: all animals with isolated SCP, but only 50% of the CLBP animals presented a score of >5. A higher grade of lumbar ischaemia could be seen after isolated SCP (score: 5.9 ± 0.6 vs 3.6 ± 2.9). CONCLUSION: The prolonged SCP provides an insufficient lumbar spinal cord protection during the FET procedure at 28°C. The use of a low-flow LBP in addition to SCP may reduce functional and structural spinal damage.

Simultaneous double valve-in-valve TAVI procedure for failed bioprostheses.

A 78-year-old female patient who had undergone double valve replacement in 2010 presented in 2014 with severe New York Heart Association grade IV dyspnea. The decision was made to perform a transapical valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure in the mitral and aortic positions simultaneously. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was extubated 6 hours after the TAVI procedure.

Minimal access rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: initial single-center experience and 12-month outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: A single-center observational study was initialized to evaluate the feasibility of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement using the Edwards Intuity valve system (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) in a minimally invasive setting. A total of 60 implantations have been performed at the Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil using a minimal access technique. We present the first short-term and 12-month clinical and hemodynamic results. METHODS: Aortic valve replacement using a partial sternotomy was performed in all patients. Patients' mean age was 75.5 (±6.2) years. The mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 8.4 ± 4.2, and 39% (n = 23) of patients were female. A clinical follow-up for echocardiographic assessment was performed after 12 months. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 1.7% (n = 1). The mean postoperative transprosthetic gradient was 11.7 (±4.3) mm Hg. The mean effective orifice area was 1.8 (±0.3) cm(2). One case of higher-grade regurgitation (aortic insufficiency >+1) occurred. The late mortality rate was 5.1% (3/59). After 12 months, the mean transprosthetic gradient was 10.3 (±3.8) mm Hg. The mean effective orifice area of 1.8 (±0.3) cm(2) remained unchanged. The mean implantation time was 9 (±3) minutes. The mean crossclamp time was 26 (±7) minutes. The average bypass time was 56 (±16) minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducible short crossclamp and bypass times were achieved in a minimally invasive setting. The valve shows good hemodynamic performance comparable to other sutureless or rapid deployment valves. Nevertheless, future follow-up investigation has to be awaited to gain more data concerning durability and safety issues.

Chronic pericardial hematoma with suppression of the right ventricle: a rare complication of a coronary artery aneurysm.

We present a case of a 67-year-old patient referred to our department with a pericardial mass lesion measuring 11 × 4 × 7.5 cm as diagnosed in computed tomography scan. The patient showed a history of progredient dyspnea. Video-assisted thoracoscopy as well as an explorative full sternotomy to resect the mass lesion had been performed at the referring hospital subsequently before admission to our department. Intermittent hemodynamic instability caused the procedure to stop and a transfer to the cardiothoracic surgery department, following which a resternotomy was performed. Inspection of the surgical site and subsequent intraoperative rapid section revealed an old organized and dense pericardial hematoma adherent to the right ventricle. The suspicion of covered coronary artery perforation led to an intraoperative coronary angiography, which revealed a large proximal coronary aneurysm of the right coronary artery and a subtotal stenosis of the circumflex branch. The hematoma could be removed with decompression of the right ventricle under cardiopulmonary bypass conditions. The further postoperative course was uncomplicated with retransfer to the referring hospital on the postoperative day 8.

Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: ACTION Registry survey results.

AIMS: A variety of antithrombotic regimens have been described for the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study reviews antithrombotic practice for patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR with or without coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) amongst the centers participating in the ACTION (Anticoagulation Treatment Influence on Postoperative Patients) Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: An antithrombotic therapy questionnaire was answered by the 49 centers participating in the ACTION Registry located in Europe, Middle East, Canada and Asia. The 43% of centers prescribe vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 20% prescribe VKA and acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), 33% prescribe only ASA and 4% do not prescribe any therapy after bioprosthetic AVR. For patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR and CABG 39% of the centers prescribe VKA and ASA, 37% prescribe VKA and 24% prescribe ASA. After the first three postoperative months following bioprosthetic AVR, 61% of the centers prescribe only ASA, while 39% do not prescribe any therapy. Patients with bioprosthetic AVR and CABG receive ASA in 90% centers, in 2% centers VKA and ASA, and 8% centers do not prescribe any antithrombotic. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, despite guidelines published by several professional societies, medical practice for the prevention of thrombotic events early after bioprosthetic AVR varies widely among cardiac surgical centers.