[Effect of a 1-day "REBOA course" on the theoretical and practical skills for the prehospital REBOA setting : Experiences from the RIBCAP-HEMS project]. / Effekt eines eintägigen "REBOA-Kurses" auf die theoretischen und praktischen Fähigkeiten zur prähospitalen REBOA-Anlage : Erfahrungen aus dem RIBCAP-HEMS-Projekt.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) represents an endovascular procedure for aortic occlusion. The procedure can be used for temporary hemorrhage control as a bridge until surgical treatment for noncompressible abdominal or pelvic bleeding and to improve coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The prehospital administration is challenging and currently hardly possible in Germany. In the REBOA in bleeding and cardiac arrest in the prehospital care by helicopter emergency medical service (RIBCAP-HEMS) project, the prehospital use of REBOA will be tested in a feasibility study. This article describes the training course on the procedure in preparation for prehospital use, which was conducted before the start of the aforementioned feasibility study for the emergency physicians and paramedics (HEMS-TC) of the DRF Air Rescue Base in Halle (Saale). The course provided the necessary theoretical and practical skills to apply REBOA in the prehospital setting to patients in extremis in a safe, indications-conform and time-critical manner. The fact that all emergency physicians of the two air ambulances Christoph 84 and Christoph 85 in Halle are specialists in anesthesiology with corresponding experience in the placement of invasive arterial catheters proved to be advantageous. The training course was able to significantly improve the theoretical and practical abilities of the participants. The results of the currently ongoing study must show whether the procedure can be usefully integrated into the prehospital care of patients in extremis.

Do we need pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the civilian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS)?

Pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can be a life-saving procedure for patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage. We aimed to evaluate the potential eligibility for REBOA in trauma patients of a civilian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) using a stepwise approach. A retrospective analysis using the electronic database (HEMSDER) of "DRF Luftrettung" HEMS covering the period from January 2015 to June 2021 was performed. Trauma patients aged ≥ 16 years and with a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score of ≥ 4 were assessed for potential REBOA eligibility using two different decision trees based on assumed severe bleeding due to injuries of the abdomen, pelvis, and/or lower extremities and different vital signs on the scene and at hospital handover. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for comparison. A total of 22.426 patients met the inclusion criteria for data analysis. Of these, 0.15-2.24% were possible candidates for pre-hospital REBOA. No significant differences between groups on scene and at hospital handover regarding demographics, assumed injuries, and pre-hospital interventions were found. In the on-scene group, 21.1% of the patients remained unstable even at hospital handover despite pre-hospital care. In the handover group, 42.8% of the patients seemed initially stable but then deteriorated during the pre-hospital course. The number of potential pre-hospital REBOA in severely injured patients with a NACA score of ≥ 4 is < 3% or can be even < 1% if more strict criteria are used. There are some patients who may benefit from pre-hospital REBOA as a life-saving procedure. Further research on earlier diagnosis of life-threatening bleeding and proper indications of REBOA in trauma patients is needed.

[Safe position check of gastric tubes: an often underestimated topic to prevent possible severe complications]. / Sichere Lagekontrolle von Magensonden: ein oft unterschätztes Thema zur Vermeidung potenziell schwerwiegender Komplikationen.

The insertion of a gastric tube in the operating room (OR) or in an intensive care unit (ICU) is a routine procedure. Although the tube is often inserted by nursing staff, the indications and selection of the procedure for position control remain the physician's responsibility. For immediate position control, the injection of air through the inserted tube with simultaneous auscultation of the epigastrium is probably the most simple and common clinical method. A typical "bubbling" is often regarded as a sufficiently reliable sign of correct gastric tube position. This procedure can be described as a routine standard both in the OR and the ICU; however, numerous examples from clinical practice and quality reviews show gastric tube mispositioning in esophageal, bronchial, pulmonary or even pleural positions in individual cases. Since auscultation findings are misinterpreted as tracheal, bronchial, or pleural secretions, mispositioning may remain undetected. In addition, adequate documentation of the procedure is lacking. In the worst case, hyperosmolar tube feeding occurs via the malpositioned tube into the lungs or pleural space causing subsequent severe pneumonia or pleuritis, which is often fatal for the patient outcome. In contrast to many other similar procedures in intensive care medicine, such as the installation of central venous catheters or endotracheal intubation, to our knowledge there is no uniform standard for forensic verification of the correct position after gastric tube positioning. The present work provides an overview of existing practices and the scientific background for confirmation of gastric tube positioning without ionizing radiation.

[Intraoperative Ventilation in Adults]. / Intraoperative Beatmung bei Erwachsenen.

Avoiding postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) is an important goal for anesthesiologists during general anesthesia, and ventilation strategies may play a role. It seems reasonable to apply knowledge from lessons we learned from ventilation of intensive care unit patients aiming at avoiding ventilator associated lung injury. Ventilation associated lung injuries occur frequently and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Strategies of lung protective ventilation, like lower tidal volumes and the use of positive end-expiatory pressure (PEEP), can usually be transferred safely to perioperative ventilation, although some issues such as hemodynamic side effects must be considered. For some reasons, however, current evidence is conflicting and there is no consensus on ventilatory perioperative management to avoid PPCs so far. This paper briefly summarizes physiological backgrounds in a functional context, current evidence, and provides some recommendations at "expert" opinion level for perioperative ventilation procedures.Especially in patients at risk and/or during surgery with higher surgical trauma and inflammation, we recommend limiting tidal volume to 6 - 8 ml/kg predicted body weight and the use of PEEP, which should be individualized e.g. by minimizing driving pressure. Recruitment maneuvers may be considered and should be carried out by using the ventilator.Obese patients are an increasing entity and can be challenging during anesthesia and ventilation. From a physiological point of view, these patients require much higher ventilation pressures as currently used, although recent evidence is not in favor of using moderately higher PEEP, which is matter of discussion.