RESUMEN
Drawing on long-term ethnographic fieldwork in maternity settings in Tanzania and Pakistan, we argue that 'bodywork' condenses all politically and practically at stake for maternal healthcare providers. Our research confronts how global health programmes expect paramedical providers working on the frontlines of obstetrics to implement interventions without also attending to violent everyday realities of providing care amidst structural constraint and precarity. We demonstrate this approach's dire aftermaths. Healthcare workers' bodies evidence risks and injuries not only attendant on care in lower-resource settings, but which unfold specifically from their efforts to meet the onerous demands of global health systems. Toxic hospital environments represent a paradox of care - medicine exposes patients and providers to greater risks than if medicine were not involved - but this inherent riskiness barely registers. Elisions of healthcare providers' experiences of harm are telling; they reveal global health's neglect of occupational risk and a racialised under-attention and under-valuing of the risks carried by bodies of colour, and women especially. We trace and corroborate providers' experiences of threats to their wellbeing while enacting global health agendas. We conclude with a provocation that social scientists' bedside witnessing must result in actionable evidence if a more sustainable global health is to prevail.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Salud Materna , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Salud Global , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
Globally, the widespread occurrence of disrespect and abuse (D&A) on maternity wards is well-documented. Using ethnography and cultural consensus analysis we explore how the practice of midwives hitting women who are in the second stage of labor (pushing) has become a locally accepted form of care in Tanzania if a baby's life appears to be at risk. This analysis interrogates the deep uncertainty of birth outcomes in this setting that may motivate abuse during this time. Seriously engaging with local discourses on abuse and care sheds light on hegemonic norms and power dynamics and is critical for improving maternity services.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud/etnología , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto/etnología , Servicios de Salud Materna , Abuso Físico/etnología , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Adulto , Antropología Médica , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Tanzanía/etnologíaRESUMEN
Cultural consensus analysis (CCA) is a quantitative method for determining cohesion in a specified cultural domain and cultural modelling (CM) is a method for designing and testing connections within a cultural domain based on qualitative data collection. After a description of the methods, and examples of their application, we provide a description of three main points in the programme planning, implementation and evaluation cycle at which the method can best be utilized to plan, contextualize or evaluate programmes and policies. In addition, the use of CCA and CM is not constrained to one point in time though, in order to maximize its ability to help with programme design or evaluation, it ought to be done as early as possible in the process. Through examples from research, and a broader description of the methods of CM and analysis, we provide another tool for global public health practitioners, planners and policymakers. We argue these tools can be used to great effect in a short period of time to maximize the local suitability, acceptability and quality of proposed and implemented interventions, building on existing local strengths, not just in maternal health but, more broadly.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Cultura , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antropología Cultural/métodos , Femenino , Identidad de Género , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería , Parto/etnología , Embarazo/etnología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , TanzaníaRESUMEN
Based on mixed-methods, ethnographic research in government health facilities conducted in Rukwa, Tanzania over 23 months between 2012 and 2015, this paper explores the social implications of budget shortfalls in the healthcare system at the level of a regional hospital. Budget crises resulted from the late disbursal of funds and the failure of outside donors to meet aid commitments needed to subsidize healthcare at the national level. Healthcare administrators recounted specific donors who pulled out of commitments as a direct result of foreign government austerity measures enacted after the global financial crisis of 2008. In this environment of scarcity, partially due to years of reduced donor funds in the region, regional healthcare administrators circumvented bureaucratic fiscal procedures to ensure the continued functioning of facilities, and healthcare personnel struggled to provide pregnant women with high quality care in times of emergencies. Providers cited low morale and demotivation due to deteriorating physical infrastructure, lack of supplies, and poor relations with the community as key factors inhibiting their ability to care for the women who came to their facilities.