Hyperextension following two different designs of fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Hyperextension after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is related to worse functional outcomes. Among the reported predictive factors, it is unclear whether prosthesis design affects postoperative hyperextension. Hence, our objectives were to (1) compare time-dependent changes of the extension angle following multi-radius (MR) and single-radius (SR) TKA and (2) assess predictive factors for the hyperextension. METHODS: In this study, consecutive 136 MR TKAs and consecutive 71 SR TKAs performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. The extension angle was evaluated by digitized full-extension lateral radiographs at preoperative, 3 months and at 1 and 2 years after TKA. A positive value was defined as hyperextension. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine predictive factors for the extension angle and the risk of hyperextension > 5°. RESULTS: The postoperative extension angle of both groups gradually increased during the first 2 years and the SR group finally progressed with 4.04° greater extension than the MR group (p < 0.01). The incidence of hyperextension > 5° in the SR group was 18.3% and for the MR group, 7.4% (p = 0.02). However, the Oxford knee scores was nonsignificant different between the groups (p = 0.15). Preoperative extension angle, sagittal femoral component angle (SFA) and SR prosthesis were predictive factors for the extension angle at 2 years after TKA and were also associated with hyperextension > 5°. CONCLUSIONS: The extension angle of the SR group became significantly more extended than that of the MR group during the first two years after TKA. Hence, ideal extension position immediately after SR TKA may be different from that of the MR TKA prosthesis. The preoperative extension angle, SFA and SR prosthesis were factors that were associated with postoperative hyperextension.

Pediatric elbow measurement parameters: Evaluation of the six angles in inter- and intra-observer reliability.

BACKGROUND: Several radiographic measurements of the humerus can be used to evaluate the treatment outcome of supracondylar fractures in children. Because of the cartilaginous nature of the immature elbow, interpretation of radiographs around this area is sometimes challenging and can be unreliable. This study was conducted to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the six commonly used radiographic measurements of the distal humerus. METHOD: The Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle and lateral capitellohumeral angle of the humerus were measured by two observers on the radiographs of uninjured elbows from 58 children. The values between each measurement were compared and correlated using a Pearson coefficient of correlation to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: All of the radiographic parameters showed excellent intra-observer reliability with the correlation coefficient values of the Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, lateral capitellohumeral angle as 0.945, 0.95, 0.909, 0.888, 0.961 and 0.975 (p < 0.001), respectively. The inter-observer reliability of the Baumann and humero-ulna angles were also found to be highly correlated at r = 0.843 (p < 0.001) and 0.878 (p < 0.001), respectively. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle had poor reliability with r = 0.136 (p = 0.291) while the radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, and lateral capitellohumeral angle demonstrated good reliability with r = 0.675 (p < 0.001), 0.747 (p < 0.001), and 0.686 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Baumann angle and humero-ulna angle measurements of distal humerus showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability. Both parameters represent repeatable and reliable methods for determining the outcome of supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric population.

Posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head assesses instability of posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip.

PURPOSE: Unstable posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip is determined by the wall defect or acetabular fracture index. The unstable hip is a result of inadequate posterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head from the posterior acetabular wall fracture. In order to measure total posterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head and avoid using the contralateral acetabulum as a calculation reference, the posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head was measured to assess stability of posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip. METHODS: Using coronal computed tomography (CT) scan of the normal contralateral acetabulum at the level of the widest acetabular diameter and thinnest medial wall of 60 acetabular fractures, posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head in intact, 20 % and 50 % defects of posterior acetabular walls were measured. The angles were measured from the acetabular centre to the thinnest medial wall and to the top, inner cortex of 80 % and 50 % posterior acetabular walls. RESULTS: Average intact, 80 % and 50 % posterior acetabular walls were 33.82 ± 4.30, 26.88 ± 3.33 and 16.91 ± 2.15 mm which corresponded to 92.25 ± 11.34, 77.42 ± 10.04 and 50.63 ± 6.58° of posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the measurements including correlation of conversion of posterior acetabular wall depths to posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head were more than 0.82 and 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement technique of posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head has strong reliability. Therefore, stable or unstable posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip can be determined in terms of more than 77 degrees or less than 50 degrees of posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head instead of less than 20 % or more than 50 % posterior acetabular wall defect.