Protocol of a phase II study investigating the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus ramucirumab as a third-line or later treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

In Japan, systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric cancer. However, numerous patients with gastric cancer do not receive late-line treatment because of the rapid progression of gastric cancer. Additionally, late-line treatments, such as nivolumab, trifluridine tipiracil (FTD/TPI), or irinotecan, have limited effects on improving clinical symptoms and delaying the onset of symptoms associated with cancer progression. Recently, a combination of FTD/TPI and ramucirumab was reported to have a high response rate in late-line treatment; however, owing to patient selection bias and a high rate of hematologic toxicity in that previous study, this regimen may not be feasible in real-world clinical applications. Our objective is to conduct a single-arm phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab combination therapy for gastric cancer after third-line treatment under real-world clinical conditions. This study will recruit 32 patients according to eligibility criteria and administer FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2) and intravenous ramucirumab (8 mg/kg). The primary endpoint will be the time to treatment failure. The secondary endpoints will include the overall survival time, progression-free survival time, overall response rate, disease control rate, relative dose intensity, and incidence of adverse events. The results will add new insights for improving the late-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with pegfilgrastim on day 3 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: A high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) for esophageal cancer has been reported. The optimal timing of prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim remains to be elucidated. To evaluate the effect of pegfilgrastim administered on day 3, we conducted a feasibility study. METHODS: Chemotherapy consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1-5. Pegfilgrastim was given as a single subcutaneous injection at a dose of 3.6 mg on day 3 during each treatment course. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for up to a maximum of three courses. Prophylactic antibiotics were not needed but were allowed to be given at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FN. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were administered DCF in combination with pegfilgrastim on day 3. After the first course of DCF, 10 out of 26 patients (38.5%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia, and two patients (7.7%) experienced FN. Of the 14 patients who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics, four had grade 4 neutropenia, including two who developed FN. On the contrary, of the 12 patients who received prophylactic levofloxacin, six had grade 4 neutropenia, but no cases of FN were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of pegfilgrastim on day 3 was not sufficient to prevent FN due to DCF treatment, and prophylactic administration of both pegfilgrastim and antibiotics could be a solution.

Genetic polymorphisms as predictive biomarkers of adverse events during preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore associations between genetic polymorphisms and adverse effects due to preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) for esophageal cancer. METHODS: Preoperative DCF (docetaxel, 70 mg/m2/day, day 1; cisplatin, 70 mg/m2/day, day 1; fluorouracil, 750 mg/m2/day, days 1-5) was repeated every 3 weeks for up to three cycles. Genotyping of nine candidate genetic polymorphisms was conducted using blood samples from the enrolled patients. RESULTS: According to a multivariable analysis evaluating 50 patients, grade 3 or worse neutropenia was more likely to occur in those with the ABCC2-24C/T or T/T genotype (rs717620) (OR, 5.30, P = 0.013). Additionally, patients with the TYMS 3'-UTR 0 bp/0 bp genotype (rs151264360) showed a trend toward grade 3 or worse hyponatremia (OR, 0.16, P = 0.005). Grade 2 or worse thrombocytopenia was more likely to occur in patients with the TNF-α-1031C/T or T/T genotype (rs1799964) (OR, 6.30, P = 0.016) and IL-6-634C/C genotype (rs1800796) (OR, 0.18, P = 0.034), and grade 2 or worse anemia was more likely to occur in patients with the MCP-1-2518G/G genotype (rs1024611) (OR, 0.19, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: ABCC2-24C > T (rs717620), TYMS 3'-UTR 6-bp indel (rs151264360), TNF-α-1031T > C (rs1799964) as well as IL-6-634G > C (rs1800796), and MCP-1-2518A > G (rs1024611) polymorphisms might serve as independent and predictive biomarkers for neutropenia, hyponatremia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, respectively, during preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for patients with esophageal cancer.

Low Expectancy of Conversion Surgery with R0 Resection in Patients with CEA > 5.0 ng/mL at the Initial RECIST Evaluation for Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

This retrospective study examined early the predictive factors for successful conversion surgery (CS) with R0 resection in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) who underwent systemic chemotherapy. This study included 204 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, who received chemotherapy between 2009 and 2019. Of these patients, 31 (15%) underwent CS with R0 resection. The incidence of CS with R0 resection was not affected by the volume of metastatic lesions or the presence of peritoneal metastasis. The overall survival time of the CS with R0 resection group was significantly longer than that of the non-CS group (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.23; p < 0.0001), with a 5 year overall survival rate of 50.2%. Multivariate analysis of 150 patients, excluding those with disease progression until the initial Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) evaluation, showed that carcinoembryonic antigen > 5.0 ng/mL at the initial RECIST evaluation was an independent, significant, and unfavorable predictor of CS with R0 resection (odds ratio, 0.21; p = 0.0108), whereas systemic chemotherapy with trastuzumab for HER2-positive cancer was a favorable factor (odds ratio, 4.20; p = 0.0119). Monitoring serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels during chemotherapy may be a useful predictor of the CS implementation in patients with MGC.

A risk scoring system for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most critical postoperative complications after subtotal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. This study attempted to develop an optimal scoring system for stratifying the risk for AL. METHODS: The study included 171 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer followed by esophagogastrostomy in the cervical region from January 2011 to April 2021 at Nagoya University Hospital. AL was defined by radiologic or endoscopic evidence of anastomotic breakdown using some modalities. A risk scoring system for an early diagnosis of AL was established using factors determined in the multivariate analysis. A score was calculated for each patient, and the patients were classified into three categories according to the risk for AL: low-, intermediate- and high-risk. The trend of the risk for AL among the categories was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (17%) developed AL. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sinistrous gross features of drain fluid (P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR), 10.2), radiologic air bubble sign (P < 0.001; OR, 15.0) and the level of drain amylase ≥280 U/L on postoperative Day 7 (P < 0.001; OR, 9.0) were significantly associated with AL. According to the matching number of the above three risk factors and categorization into three risk groups, the incidence of AL was 6.1% (8/131) in the low-risk group, 45.5% (15/33) in the intermediate-risk group and 85.7% (6/7) in the high-risk group (area under curve, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The present AL-risk scoring system may be useful in postoperative patient care after subtotal esophagectomy.

Feasibility assessment of global standard chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.

The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of global standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. A prospective study was conducted at Nagoya University Hospital (Nagoya, Japan) to evaluate global standard CRT followed by surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. The CRT regimen consisted of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1,000 mg/m2 fluorouracil daily on days 1-4 given twice 4 weeks apart together with concurrent esophageal irradiation starting on day 1 (group A). For comparison, 17 patients with esophageal cancer who had received the same chemotherapy regimen but with lower drug doses were retrospectively reviewed: 70 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 700 mg/m2 fluorouracil daily on days 1-4 given twice 4 weeks apart together with concurrent esophageal irradiation starting on day 1 (group B). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed in 9 of the 12 patients (75%) in group A and in 5 of the 17 patients (29%) in group B. The patients in group A were more likely to experience grade 3 or worse neutropenia (50%) than those in group B (6%). No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. A total of 11 patients (92%) in group A and 16 patients (94%) in group B subsequently underwent an esophagectomy, and 9 (82%) and 14 (88%) of these patients, respectively, achieved microscopically margin-negative resection (R0 resection). In conclusion, global standard CRT was more likely to cause severe but manageable adverse events. There was no apparent difference in the R0 resection rate or postoperative complications between the two treatments. This clinical trial was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (trial registration number: jRCT1041180004) on September 11, 2018.

Risk Factors for Muscle Loss During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In patients with esophageal cancer, muscle loss induced by neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy is correlated with poor prognosis. However, little is known about the causes of muscle loss. Thus, the purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify the risk factors for muscle loss during neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy between 2009 and 2020 were investigated (n=132). The patients received either cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF); docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF); or CF with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. The cross-sectional areas of the bilateral psoas muscles were measured at the level of the third lumbar vertebra using CT, before and after neoadjuvant therapy, and psoas muscle loss was calculated. The patients were divided into the high muscle loss group with 5% or more muscle loss or the low muscle loss group with less than 5% loss. Correlations between muscle loss and clinical factors were evaluated. RESULTS: The median value of psoas muscle loss was 5.30%. Psoas muscle loss was significantly correlated with a poor 3-year overall survival rate (p=0.034). Multivariate analysis showed that the independent factors associated with muscle loss were age ≥70 years [odds ratio (OR)=2.43, p=0.022], treatment with DCF (OR=3.47, p=0.034), and a poor response to neoadjuvant therapy (OR=2.68, p=0.028). CONCLUSION: A regimen of DCF was a major trigger of muscle loss during neoadjuvant therapy.

Molecular and pathological analyses of gastric stump cancer by next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

Gastric stump cancer (GSC) has distinct clinicopathological characteristics from primary gastric cancer. However, the detailed molecular and pathological characteristics of GSC remain to be clarified because of its rarity. In this study, a set of tissue microarrays from 89 GSC patients was analysed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was expressed in 98.9% of tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and 6.7% of tumour cells (TCs). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was detected in 18 patients (20.2%). Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and deficiency of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were observed in 5.6% and 1.1% of cases, respectively. Moreover, we used next-generation sequencing to determine the gene mutation profiles of a subset of the 50 most recent patients. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (42.0%) followed by SMAD4 (18.0%) and PTEN (16.0%), all of which are tumour suppressor genes. A high frequency of PD-L1 expression in TIICs and a high EBV infection rate suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of GSC despite a relatively low frequency of deficient MMR gene expression. Other molecular characteristics such as PTEN and SMAD4 mutations might be considered to develop new treatment strategies.

Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient information is available about the long-term outcomes of patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) who undergo laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LTH). Here we evaluated the oncological safety of LTH for patients with Siewert type II AEG compared with the open transhiatal approach (OTH). METHODS: Subjects included 79 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent gastrectomy combined with lower esophagectomy from 2008 to 2018 at our institution. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), status of adjuvant chemotherapy, late-phase complications, and recurrence patterns were compared between the OTH (n = 29) and LTH groups (n = 43). RESULTS: The median observation periods were 60 months (6-120 months) and 36 months (1-88) for the OTH and LTH groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were significantly different: 74% (95% CI 71-77%) and 98% (95% CI 97-99) in the OTH and LTH groups (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.83), respectively, though the OTH group included more patients with advanced disease. After stratification, according to pathological stage to adjust for selection bias, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were longer, but not significantly different among patients in the LTH group with pStage III (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.05-3.47; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.10-2.12, respectively). Recurrence patterns were similar in the both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes of the LTH group were not inferior to those of the OTH group, suggesting the possibility of LTH as a treatment option for selected patients with Siewert type II AEG.

Clinical significance of lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The lymphatic flow around the esophagogastric junction is complicated. Therefore, it is unclear whether lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region (eLI) and in the gastric region (gLI) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) equally affect the incidence of lymph node metastases (LNM), and consequently, survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data of 175 patients with AEG between January 2008 and July 2017. Risk factors for LNM and impacts of eLI or gLI on survival outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: eLI was identified in 34% of the patients (59/175). By multivariate analysis, eLI was associated with an increased risk of both mediastinal LNM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-7.05) and abdominal LNM (OR = 5.44, 95% CI: 1.95-15.20). The 5-year overall survival for patients with eLI (53%) was significantly worse than for patients without eLI (76%) (hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.37-10.01). gLI was not selected in either of these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Positive eLI was strongly associated with mediastinal and abdominal LNM and worse survival in patients with AEG compared with gLI. In the histopathological examination, it seems to make sense to assess eLI and gLI separately.

Intramucosal-lymphatic invasion has a slight impact on lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Lymphatic invasion (LI) is associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and a poor prognosis in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Although the impact of the LI volume on LNM has been described, no reports have assessed the impact of its depth on LNM. METHODS: A total of 360 EGC patients with pathologically proven LI who underwent radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between January 2005 and June 2018 at our institution were extracted from our database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the mLI group, in which LI was limited to the muscularis mucosae (n = 34); and the smLI group, in which LI reached the submucosal region (n = 326). Clinicopathological features, including the LNM incidence, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: LNM was recognized in 3 patients (9%) in the mLI group and 101 (31%) in the smLI group (P = 0.005). In the mLI group, LNM was not recorded in any patients who met the curative criteria of ESD other than mLI. CONCLUSIONS: LI limited to the mucosal region does not seem to be a strong indicator for LNM. When pathological findings of an endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen show only mLI as a non-curative criterion, the probability of LNM may be very low.

Extra-perigastric Extranodal Metastasis is a Significant Prognostic Factor in Node-Positive Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Extranodal metastasis is an isolated tumor nodule without a residual lymph node structure and has been reported as a poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic value of extranodal metastasis, especially from the viewpoint of its anatomical distribution. METHODS: A total of 139 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery with lymph node metastasis between 2008 and 2009 were included. Clinicopathological features and patient survival outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Patients with extranodal metastasis were subdivided into two groups: perigastric extranodal metastasis, located near the perigastric area (#1-#7 according to the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma 15th edition), and extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis, located alongside the major vessels (#8-#12). RESULTS: Extranodal metastasis was found in 51 patients (37%), and it was more frequent in those with bulky, ≥pT3, and pStage III tumors. All patients with extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis had recurrence, resulting in a 0% 5-year overall survival rate, which was significantly worse than that of patients with perigastric extranodal metastasis (59%), or those without extranodal metastasis (84%; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the presence of extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis as an independent poor prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Extranodal metastasis, especially extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis, was a pivotal poor prognostic factor in node-positive gastric cancer. Recognizing extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis would help provide optimal therapeutic options to these high-risk patients.

Complications and their correlation with prognosis in patients undergoing total gastrectomy with splenectomy for treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Spleen-preserving surgery is a mainstay in the treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer according to the results of several clinical studies. However, total gastrectomy with splenectomy (TGS) still plays a role in the treatment of aggressive tumors invading the greater curvature line or adjacent structures, in spite of its high morbidity. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for morbidity and the association between the occurrence of postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 430 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative TGS from 1992 to 2010. In total, 134 patients encountered grade ≥III postoperative complications (C group), and risk factors for morbidity were analyzed. Patients in the C group were matched 1:1 with patients selected from among 296 patients without complications (matched non-C group, n = 134) using propensity score estimation, to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) between the two groups. RESULTS: The overall grade ≥III complication rate was 31.2%. Multivariable analysis identified pancreatic resection (odds ratio [OR], 5.65), male sex (OR, 1.77), and an operation time of ≥240 min (OR, 1.69) as independent predictors of postoperative complications after TGS. The RFS was not significantly different between the C-group and matched non-C group (46.9% vs. 45.0%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection, male sex, and a longer operation time are risk factors for morbidity after TGS, and a precise surgical technique is required for such patients. However, postoperative complications of TGS may have little impact on long-term outcomes.

Evaluation of the prognostic factors in patients with pT3N0 or pT1N2-3 gastric cancer: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with the pT3N0/pT1N2-3 subset of Stage II gastric cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of pT3N0/pT1N2-3 patients who were treated by surgery alone and to identify a high-risk group within this cohort. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with pT3N0/pT1N2-3 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy alone in our hospital between January 1992 and December 2012 were enrolled in the present study. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the survival rates and investigate prognostic factors. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of this cohort were 84 and 80%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 89 and 83%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that pathological venous infiltration was an independent prognostic factor. The survival of patients with pathological venous infiltration was significantly worse than that of those without (5-year recurrence-free survival, 75 vs. 90%, p = 0.0005; 5-year overall survival, 78 vs. 91%, p = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of pT3N0/pT1N2-3 gastric cancer patients treated by surgery alone was relatively good; however, patients with pathological vessel infiltration may be at high risk of recurrence and could be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: The potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery (LS) compared with open surgery (OS) for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) have not been fully clarified. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic transhiatal approach for Siewert type II AEG, and compare the short-term outcomes of LS versus OS for Siewert type II AEG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 87 consecutive patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent curative surgery from January 2008 to November 2016. Surgery-related short-term variables were analyzed in LS versus OS. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent LS, and 42 underwent OS. Compared with OS, LS was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (11 vs. 408 ml, p < 0.001) and extended operation time (256 vs. 226 min, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between LS and OS in postoperative hospitalization duration (9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.193) or rate of surgical morbidity (≥grade 3) for complications such as anastomotic leakage (4.4 vs. 4.8%, p = 1.000), or pancreatic leakage (4.4 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.423), and there were no pulmonary-associated complications in either group. There was no difference between groups in total number of harvested lymph nodes (24 vs. 29, p = 0.502), but the number of harvested mediastinum LNs was larger in LS (2 vs. 1, p = 0.002). There was no difference between groups in the length of the proximal margin (9 vs. 10 mm, p = 0.246), and the margins were negative in all cases in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for Siewert type II AEG is technically challenging, but appears feasible and safe in technical or short-term oncological aspects when performed by an experienced surgical team. A large-scale prospective study is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Prognostic Factors and Recurrence Pattern of Far-advanced Gastric Cancer with Pathologically-positive Para-aortic Lymph Nodes.

BACKGROUND: The role of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection for far-advanced gastric cancer is controversial in patients with clinical PALN positivity who have responded to chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes of patients with pathologically-positive PALNs who underwent radical gastrectomy. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 65 pathologically PALN-positive patients who underwent PALN dissection (n=704) were 33.8% and 21.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed the following poor prognostic factors: nodal involvement around the celiac axis (hazard ratio (HR)=4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.55-9.63), tumor diameter of ≥120 mm (HR=3.37; 95% CI=1.18-9.63) and ≥3 PALNs involved (HR=2.24; 95% CI=1.21-4.15). Patients with none of these factors survived significantly longer than those with any of these factors (5-year OS=87.5% versus 9.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pathologically PALN-positive patients achieve long survival; however, the indications for PALN dissection should be carefully considered.

Five-year Survival Associated with Stage I Gastric Cancer after Resection of Early Recurrence at Nodal Station No. 14v: a Case Report.

The role of nodal station No. 14v (along the superior mesenteric vein) in lymphadenectomy for distal gastric cancer remains elusive. A 73-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer, and was referred to our division for additional surgery because of pathologically non-curative resection. A laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ dissection was performed, with a final diagnosis of pT1bN1M0, Stage IB (2 nodal metastases to No. 6). Four months post-surgery, abdominal computed tomography revealed a 14-mm solitary nodule along the superior mesenteric vein. The lesion was excised and pathologically identified as a lymph node metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (S-1) was administered for the metastasis. Presently the patient survives without recurrence, 5.5 years after the second operation. Our findings suggest that there is lymphatic flow from the No. 6 to the No. 14v nodal station. Some patients with a No. 6 metastasis may benefit from a No. 14v lymphadenectomy, even in early-staged disease.

Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

The number of robotic gastrectomy (RG) performed per year has been increasing, particularly in East Asia where the incidence of gastric cancer is high and approximately half of the cases are diagnosed as early gastric cancer. With articulated devices of RG, surgeons are able to perform every procedure more meticulously, which can result in less bleeding and damage to organs. There are many single arm and comparative studies, and these study showed similar trends, which included relatively less estimated blood loss and longer operation time following RG than laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), equivalent number of harvested lymph nodes and similar length of postoperative hospital stay between RG and LG. Considering the results of these retrospective comparative studies, RG seems to be as feasible as LG in terms of early surgical outcomes. However, medical expense of RG is approximately twice as much as that of LG. Lack of solid evidence in terms of long-term outcomes is another problem. Considering the higher medical expenses associated with RG, its superiority in terms of long-term survival outcomes needs to be confirmed in the future for it to be accepted more widely.