High and low performers in internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biplane fluoroscopic study.

BACKGROUND: Internal rotation in adduction is often limited after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the origins of this functional deficit are unclear. Few studies have directly compared individuals who can and cannot perform internal rotation in adduction. Little data on underlying 3D humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral joint relationships in these patients are available. METHODS: Individuals >1-year postoperative to rTSA were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy in resting neutral and internal rotation in adduction poses. Subjects could either perform internal rotation in adduction with their hand at T12 or higher (high, N = 7), or below the hip pocket (low, N = 8). Demographics, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and scapular notching grade were recorded. Joint orientation angles were derived from model-based markerless tracking of the scapula and humerus relative to the torso. The 3D implant models were aligned to preoperative computed tomography models to evaluate bone-implant impingement. RESULTS: The Simple Shoulder Test was highest in the high group (11 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 2, P = .019). Two subjects per group had scapular notching (grades 1 and 2), and 3 high group and 4 low group subjects had impingement below the glenoid. In the neutral pose, the scapula had 7° more upward rotation in the high group (P = .100), and the low group demonstrated 9° more posterior tilt (P = .017) and 14° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .047). In the internal rotation pose, axial rotation was >45° higher in the high group (P ≤ .008) and the low group again had 11° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .058). Large rotational differences within subject groups arose from a combination of differences in the resting neutral and maximum internal rotation in adduction poses, not only the terminal arm position. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who were able to perform high internal rotation in adduction after rTSA demonstrated differences in joint orientation and anatomic biases versus patients with low internal rotation. The high rotation group had 7° more resting scapular upward rotation and used a 15°-30° change in scapular tilt to perform internal rotation in adduction versus patients in the low group. The combination of altered resting scapular posture and restricted scapulothoracic range of motion could prohibit glenohumeral rotation required to reach internal rotation in adduction. In addition, inter-patient variation in humeral torsion may contribute substantially to postoperative internal rotation differences. These data point toward modifiable implant design and placement factors, as well as foci for physical therapy to strengthen and mobilize the scapula and glenohumeral joint in response to rTSA surgery.

Reverse total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal implant placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) remains controversial. Specifically, the optimal glenoid inclination is unknown. Therefore, a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimentional human motion specific to rTSA was used to study joint contact and muscle forces as a function of glenoid component inclination. METHODS: Eight human cadaver shoulders were tested before and after rTSA implantation. Scapular plane abduction kinematics from control subjects and those with rTSA drove a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimentional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion. Glenoid inclination varied from -20° to +20°. Outputs included compression, superior-inferior (S/I) shear, and anterior-posterior shear forces from a 6° of freedom load cell in the joint, and deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces. Data were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping and t-tests. RESULTS: Inferior glenoid inclination (-) reduced S/I shear by up to 125% relative to superior inclination, with similar compression to the neutral condition (0°). Superior inclinations (+) increased the S/I shear force by approximately the same magnitude, yet decreased compression by 25% in the most superior inclination (+20°). There were few differences in deltoid or rotator cuff forces due to inclination. Only the middle deltoid decreased by approximately 7% for the most inferior inclination (-20°). Compared with native shoulders, the neutral (0°) rTSA inclination showed reduced forces of 30%-75% in the anterior deltoid and a trend toward decreased forces in the middle deltoid. Force demands on the rotator cuff varied as a function of elevation, with a trend toward increased forces in rTSA at peak glenohumeral elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Inferior inclination reduces superior shear forces, without influencing compression. Superior inclination increased S/I shear, while decreasing compression, which may be a source of component loosening and joint instability after rTSA. Inferior inclination of the rTSA glenoid may reduce the likelihood of glenoid loosening by reducing the magnitude of cyclic shear and compressive loading during arm elevation activities, although this may be altered by specific-subject body habitus and motion. These factors are especially important in revision rTSA or glenoid bone grafting where there is already a 3-fold increase in glenoid baseplate loosening vs. primary rTSA.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Alters Humerothoracic, Scapulothoracic, and Glenohumeral Motion During Weighted Scaption.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) typically restores active arm elevation. Prior studies in patients with rTSA during tasks that load the arm had limitations that obscured underlying three-dimensional (3D) kinematic changes and the origins of motion restrictions. Understanding the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to loaded arm elevation will uncover where functional deficits arise and inform strategies to improve rTSA outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a cohort of patients who had undergone rTSA and a control cohort, we asked: (1) Is there a difference in maximum humerothoracic elevation when scapular plane elevation (scaption) is performed with and without a handheld weight? (2) Is maximum humerothoracic elevation related to factors like demographics, patient-reported outcome scores, isometric strength, and scapular notching (in the rTSA group only)? (3) Are there differences in underlying 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion during scaption with and without a handheld weight? METHODS: Ten participants who underwent rTSA (six males, four females; age 73 ± 8 years) were recruited at follow-up visits if they were more than 1 year postoperative (24 ± 11 months), had a BMI less than 35 kg/m 2 (29 ± 4 kg/m 2 ), had a preoperative CT scan, and could perform pain-free scaption. Data from 10 participants with a nonpathologic shoulder, collected previously (five males, five females; age 58 ± 7 years; BMI 26 ± 3 kg/m 2 ), were a control group with the same high-resolution quantitative metrics available for comparison. Participants in both groups performed scaption with and without a 2.2-kg handheld weight while being imaged with biplane fluoroscopy. Maximum humerothoracic elevation and 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics across their achievable ROM were collected via dynamic imaging. In the same session the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and isometric strength were collected. Data were compared between weighted and unweighted scaption using paired t-tests and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: When compared with unweighted scaption, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption for patients who underwent rTSA (-25° ± 30°; p = 0.03) but not for the control group (-2° ± 5°; p = 0.35). In the rTSA group, maximum elevation correlated with the ASES score (r = 0.72; p = 0.02), and weighted scaption correlated with BMI (r = 0.72; p = 0.02) and the SST (r = 0.76; p = 0.01). Scapular notching was observed in three patients after rTSA (Grades 1 and 2). Four of 10 patients who underwent rTSA performed weighted scaption to less than 90° humerothoracic elevation using almost exclusively scapulothoracic motion, with little glenohumeral contribution. This manifested as changes in the estimated coefficient representing mean differences in slopes in the humerothoracic plane of elevation (-12° ± 2°; p < 0.001) and true axial rotation (-16° ± 2°; p < 0.001), scapulothoracic upward rotation (7° ± 1°; p < 0.001), and glenohumeral elevation (-12° ± 1°; p < 0.001), plane of elevation (-8° ± 3°; p = 0.002), and true axial rotation (-11° ± 2°; p < 0.001). The control group demonstrated small differences between scaption activities (< |2°|), but a 10° increase in humerothoracic and glenohumeral axial rotation (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: After rTSA surgery, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption by up to 88° compared with unweighted scaption, whereas 4 of 10 patients could not achieve more than 90° of elevation. These patients exhibited appreciable changes in nearly all scapulothoracic and glenohumeral degrees of freedom, most notably a near absence of glenohumeral elevation during weighted scaption. Patients with rTSA have unique strategies to elevate their arms, often with decreased glenohumeral motion and resultant compensation in scapulothoracic motion. In contrast, the control group showed few differences when lifting a handheld weight. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Functional deficiency in activities that load the shoulder after rTSA surgery can affect patient independence, and they may be prevalent but not captured in clinical studies. Pre- or postoperative rehabilitation to strengthen scapular stabilizers and the deltoid should be evaluated against postoperative shoulder function. Further study is required to determine the etiology of deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA, and the most effective surgical and/or rehabilitative strategies to restore deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA.

Anatomic total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Although typically favorable in outcome, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can require long-term revision. The most common cause for revision is glenoid loosening, which may result from eccentric cyclic forces and joint translations. "Rocking" of the glenoid component may be exacerbated by the joint geometry, such as glenoid inclination and version. Restoration of premorbid glenoid inclination may be preferable, although laboratory and computational models indicate that both superior inclination and inferior inclination have benefits. This discrepancy may arise because previous studies were limited by a lack of physiological conditions to test inclination. Therefore, a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimensional human motion was used to study joint contact and muscle forces with isolated changes in glenoid inclination. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric shoulders were tested before and after aTSA. Scapular-plane abduction kinematics from human subjects were used to drive a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion. Glenoid inclination was varied from -10° to +20°, whereas compressive, superior-inferior shear, and anterior-posterior shear forces were collected with a 6-df load cell during motion. Outputs also included muscle forces of the deltoid and rotator cuff. Data were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping repeated-measures analysis of variance and t tests. RESULTS: Inferior glenoid inclination (-10°) reduced both compressive and superior-inferior shear forces vs. neutral 0° inclination by up to 40%, and even more when compared with superior inclination (P < .001). Superior inclinations (+10° and +20°) tended to increase deltoid and rotator cuff forces vs. neutral 0° inclination or inferior inclination, on the order of 20%-40% (P ≤ .045). All force metrics except anterior-posterior shear were lowest for inferior inclination. Most aTSA muscle forces for neutral 0° inclination were not significantly different from native shoulders and decreased 45% and 15% in the posterior deltoid and supraspinatus, respectively (P ≤ .003). Joint translations were similar to prior reports in aTSA patients and did not differ between any inclinations or compared with native shoulders. Joint reaction forces were similar to those observed in human subjects with instrumented aTSA implants, providing confidence in the relative magnitude of our results. CONCLUSIONS: Inferior inclination reduces overall forces in the shoulder. Superior inclinations increase the muscle effort required for the shoulder to achieve similar motion, thus increasing the forces exerted on the glenoid component. These results suggest that a preference toward aTSA glenoid components in inferior inclination may reduce the likelihood of glenoid loosening by reducing excessive muscle and joint contact forces.

In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

In vitro simulation of three-dimensional (3D) shoulder motion using in vivo kinematics obtained from human subjects allows investigation of clinical conditions in the context of physiologically relevant biomechanics. Herein, we present a framework for laboratory simulation of subject-specific kinematics that combines individual 3D scapular and humeral control in cadavers. The objectives were to: (1) robotically simulate seven healthy subject-specific 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematic trajectories in six cadavers, (2) characterize system performance using kinematic orientation accuracy and repeatability, and muscle force repeatability metrics, and (3) analyze effects of input kinematics and cadaver specimen variability. Using an industrial robot to orient the scapula range of motion (ROM), errors with repeatability of ±0.1 mm and <0.5 deg were achieved. Using a custom robot and a trajectory prediction algorithm to orient the humerus relative to the scapula, orientation accuracy for glenohumeral elevation, plane of elevation, and axial rotation of <3 deg mean absolute error (MAE) was achieved. Kinematic accuracy was not affected by varying input kinematics or cadaver specimens. Muscle forces over five repeated setups showed variability typically <33% relative to the overall simulations. Varying cadaver specimens and subject-specific human motions showed effects on muscle forces, illustrating that the system was capable of differentiating changes in forces due to input conditions. The anterior and middle deltoid, specifically, showed notable variations in patterns across the ROM that were affected by subject-specific motion. This machine provides a platform for future laboratory studies to investigate shoulder biomechanics and consider the impacts of variable input kinematics from populations of interest, as they can significantly impact study outputs and resultant conclusions.

Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system.

BACKGROUND: Clinical imaging often excludes the distal humerus, confounding definition of common whole-bone coordinate systems. While proximal anatomy coordinate systems exist, no simple method transforms them to whole-bone systems. Their influence on humeral kinematics is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do humeral kinematics vary based on proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems, and can average rotation matrices accurately convert kinematics between them? METHODS: Three proximal coordinate systems were defined by the lesser and greater tuberosities (LT, GT), Crest of the greater tuberosity, and humeral shaft. Average rotation matrices derived from anatomic landmarks on cadaver humeri were generated between the proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems. Absolute angle of rotation was used to determine if anatomical variability within the cadaver population influenced the matrices. The matrices were applied to humerothoracic and glenohumeral motion (collected previously) and analyzed using the proximal coordinate systems, then expressed in the whole-bone system. RMSE was used to compare kinematics from the proximal and whole-bone systems. RESULTS: A single average rotation matrix between a given proximal and whole-bone coordinate system achieved consistent error, regardless of landmarks. Elevation and plane of elevation had <2° mean error when proximal coordinate systems were transformed to whole-bone kinematics. Axial rotation had a mean 7° error, primarily due to variable humeral head retroversion. Absolute angles of rotation did not statistically differ between subgroups. The average rotation matrices were independent of sex, side, and motion. SIGNIFICANCE: Proximal humerus coordinate systems can accurately predict whole-bone kinematics, with most error concentrated in axial rotation due to anatomic twist along the bone. These results enhance interpretability and reproducibility in expressing humerothoracic and glenohumeral motion data between laboratories by providing a simple means to convert data between common coordinate systems. This is necessitated by the lack of distal humerus anatomy present in most clinical imaging.

Age-related differences in humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral kinematics during elevation and rotation motions.

Age affects gross shoulder range of motion (ROM), but biomechanical changes over a lifetime are typically only characterized for the humerothoracic joint. Suitable age-related baselines for the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to humerothoracic motion are needed to advance understanding of shoulder injuries and pathology. Notably, biomechanical comparisons between younger or older populations may obscure detected differences in underlying shoulder motion. Herein, biplane fluoroscopy and skin-marker motion analysis quantified humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral motion during 3 static poses (resting neutral, internal rotation to L4-L5, and internal rotation to maximum reach) and 2 dynamic activities (scapular plane abduction and external rotation in adduction). Orientations during static poses and rotations during active ROM were compared between subjects <35 years and >45 years of age (N = 10 subjects per group). Numerous age-related kinematic differences were measured, ranging 5-22°, where variations in scapular orientation and motion were consistently observed. These disparities are on par with or exceed mean clinically important differences and standard error of measurement of clinical ROM, which indicates that high resolution techniques and appropriately matched controls are required to avoid confounding results of studies that investigate shoulder kinematics. Understanding these dissimilarities will help clinicians manage expectations and treatment protocols where indications and prevalence between age groups tend to differ. Where possible, it is advised to select age-matched control cohorts when studying the kinematics of shoulder injury, pathology, or surgical/physical therapy interventions to ensure clinically important differences are not overlooked.

Reliable interpretation of scapular kinematics depends on coordinate system definition.

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of shoulder motion across studies has been complicated due to the use of numerous scapular coordinate systems in the literature. Currently, there are no simple means by which to compare scapular kinematics between coordinate system definitions when data from only one coordinate system is known. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do scapular kinematics vary based on the choice of coordinate system and can average rotation matrices be used to accurately convert kinematics between scapular local coordinate systems? METHODS: Average rotation matrices derived from anatomic landmarks of 51 cadaver scapulae (29 M/22 F; 59 ±â€¯13 yrs; 26R/25 L; 171 ±â€¯11 cm; 70 ±â€¯19 kg; 23.7 ±â€¯5.5 kg/m2) were generated between three common scapular coordinate systems. Absolute angle of rotation was used to determine if anatomical variability within the cadaver population influenced the matrices. To quantify the predictive capability to convert kinematics between the three coordinate systems, the average rotation matrices were applied to scapulothoracic motion data collected from 19 human subjects (10 M/9 F; 43 ±â€¯17 yrs; 19R; 173 ±â€¯9 cm; 71 ±â€¯16 kg; 23.6 ±â€¯4.5 kg/m2) using biplane fluoroscopy. Root mean squared error (RMSE) was used to compare kinematics from an original coordinate system to the kinematics expressed in each alternative coordinate system. RESULTS: The choice of scapular coordinate system resulted in mean differences in scapulothoracic rotation of up to 23°, with overall different shapes and/or magnitudes of the curves. A single average rotation matrix between any two coordinate systems achieved accurate conversion of scapulothoracic kinematics to within 4° of RMSE of the known solution. The average rotation matrices were independent of sex, side, decomposition sequence, and motion. SIGNIFICANCE: Scapulothoracic kinematic representations vary in shape and magnitude based solely on the choice of local coordinate system. The results of this study enhance interpretability and reproducibility in expressing scapulothoracic motion data between laboratories by providing a simple means to convert data between common coordinate systems. This is necessitated by the variety of available motion analysis techniques and their respective scapular landmark definitions.

Mechanical testing of scapular neck fracture fixation using a synthetic bone model.

BACKGROUND: Trauma can fracture the scapular neck. Typically, a single plate along the lateral scapula border affixes the glenoid fragment to the scapula. This method is limited by difficulty in screw placement, frequent excessive soft tissue dissection, and risk for neurovascular injury. Substituting 2 smaller plates bridging the scapular neck mitigates these limitations, but no comparative mechanical data between techniques exists. Therefore, we compared the mechanical properties of two constructs securing a simulated scapular neck fracture. METHODS: Twenty synthetic human scapulae underwent a templated scapular neck fracture. Repairs were performed with a single plate on the lateral scapular border (Column method), or two small plates parallel to the lateral border (Neck method). Measures of displacement, force, and stiffness were quantified during cyclic testing (20-150 N, 1 Hz, 1000 cycles) and loading to failure. Statistical comparisons were made with t-tests (p ≤ 0.050). FINDINGS: The column constructs had higher displacements than neck constructs after 1000 cycles, but differences were small (mean) 0.18 (SD 0.01) vs. 0.15 (0.02) mm (p ≤ 0.004). Cyclic stiffness was 655 (43) and 790 (88) N/mm for the column and neck constructs, respectively (p ≤ 0.003). Both techniques performed comparably in failure loading: at 1 mm of gap reduction the compressive loads were 426 (61) N and 428 (48) N and stiffness was 354 (129) and 334 (80) N/mm for the column and neck constructs, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Given the surgical advantages, the neck fixation may be more suitable without biomechanical compromise compared to traditional lateral column fixation.