Identification of a gene expression signature of vascular invasion and recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma via bulk and spatial transcriptomics.

Microscopic vascular invasion (VI) is predictive of recurrence and benefit from lobectomy in stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) but is difficult to assess in resection specimens and cannot be accurately predicted prior to surgery. Thus, new biomarkers are needed to identify this aggressive subset of stage I LUAD tumors. To assess molecular and microenvironment features associated with angioinvasive LUAD we profiled 162 resected stage I tumors with and without VI by RNA-seq and explored spatial patterns of gene expression in a subset of 15 samples by high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (stRNA-seq). Despite the small size of invaded blood vessels, we identified a gene expression signature of VI from the bulk RNA-seq discovery cohort (n=103) and found that it was associated with VI foci, desmoplastic stroma, and high-grade patterns in our stRNA-seq data. We observed a stronger association with high-grade patterns from VI+ compared with VI- tumors. Using the discovery cohort, we developed a transcriptomic predictor of VI, that in an independent validation cohort (n=60) was associated with VI (AUROC=0.86; p=5.42×10-6) and predictive of recurrence-free survival (HR=1.98; p=0.024), even in VI- LUAD (HR=2.76; p=0.003). To determine our VI predictor's robustness to intra-tumor heterogeneity we used RNA-seq data from multi-region sampling of stage I LUAD cases in TRACERx, where the predictor scores showed high correlation (R=0.87, p<2.2×10-16) between two randomly sampled regions of the same tumor. Our study suggests that VI-associated gene expression changes are detectable beyond the site of intravasation and can be used to predict the presence of VI. This may enable the prediction of angioinvasive LUAD from biopsy specimens, allowing for more tailored medical and surgical management of stage I LUAD.

Vascular invasion predicts the subgroup of lung adenocarcinomas ≤2.0 cm at risk of poor outcome treated by wedge resection compared to lobectomy.

Background: Recent randomized control trials (JCOG0802 and CALGB140503) have shown sublobar resection to be noninferior to lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2.0 cm. We have previously proposed histologic criteria stratifying lung adenocarcinoma into indolent low malignant potential (LMP) and aggressive angioinvasive adenocarcinomas, resulting in better prognostication than provided by World Health Organization grade. Here we determine whether pathologic classification is reproducible and whether subsets of adenocarcinomas predict worse outcomes when treated by wedge resection compared to lobectomy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 108 recipients of wedge resection and 187 recipients of lobectomy for stage I/0 lung adenocarcinomas ≤2.0 cm was assembled from 2 institutions. All tumors were classified by a single pathologist, and interobserver reproducibility was assessed in a subset (n = 92) by 5 pathologists. Results: Angioinvasive adenocarcinoma (21%-27% of cases) was associated with worse outcomes when treated with wedge resection compared to lobectomy (5-year recurrence-free survival, 57% vs 85% [P = .007]; 5-year disease-free survival [DSS], 70% vs 90% [P = .043]; 7-year overall survival, 37% vs 58% [P = .143]). Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and LMP exhibited 100% 5-year DSS regardless of the surgical approach. Multivariable analysis showed that angioinvasion, tumor size, margin status, and extent of nodal sampling were significantly associated with recurrence but not with surgical procedure. There was substantial interobserver reproducibility among the pathologists for the diagnosis of angioinvasive adenocarcinoma (κ = 0.71) and the combined indolent AIS/MIA/LMP group (κ = 0.74). Conclusions: The majority (∼75%) of lung adenocarcinomas ≤2 cm are adequately managed with wedge resection; however, angioinvasive adenocarcinomas (∼25%) treated by wedge resection with suboptimal nodal sampling exhibit poor outcomes, with a 40% to 45% rate of recurrence within 5 years and 60% to 65% overall mortality at 7 years.