Evaluating Safety and Clinical Activity of Front-line Treatment with Cadonilimab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced/Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Harboring STK11 Genetic Aberration: A Protocol of Phase II Study.

BACKGROUND: Cadonilimab is a first-in-class bispecific PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody. Serine/threonine kinase (STK11) mutation was shown to be related to low PD-L1 expression and objective response rate (ORR) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we hypothesized that combining cadonilimab with chemotherapy could enhance antitumor immunity and extend survival in these patients. Consequently, we designed this study to explore the clinical activity and safety of cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC harboring STK11 alteration. TRIAL DESIGN: This single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial is conducted at the first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients harboring STK11 mutation will be enrolled in this study. Eligible patients will receive either cadonilimab (10mg/kg on Day 1) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5) for nonsquamous NSCLC or abraxane (100 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5) for squamous NSCLC for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy (cadonilimab plus pemetrexed or abraxane). The treatment will be discontinued when disease progression, intolerability to cadonilimab, and/or chemotherapy occurs. Measurable lesions were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (1.1). The main endpoint is ORR and safety. Subordinate endpoints include PFS, disease control rate, and duration of response. RESULTS: The study commenced enrolment in September 2023, with preliminary findings regarding the primary endpoint anticipated by January 2025.

The prognostic impact of severe grade immune checkpoint inhibitor related pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Objective: To compare the prognostic differences between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mild and severe checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis (CIP), and explore the causes of death and prognostic risk factors in NSCLC patients with severe CIP. Methods: A retrospective study of a cohort of 116 patients with unresectable stage III or IV NSCLC with any grade CIP from April 2016 to August 2022 were conducted. To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with different CIP grades, patients were divided into mild CIP group (grade 1-2, n=49) and severe CIP group (grade 3-5, n=67) according to the grade of CIP. To explore the OS-related risk factors in the severe CIP group, the patients were divided into a good prognosis (GP) group (≥ median OS, n=30) and a poor prognosis (PP) group (< median OS, n=37) based on whether their overall survival (OS) were greater than median OS. Baseline clinical and laboratory data were collected for analysis. Results: The median OS of all NSCLC patients combined with CIP was 11.4 months (95%CI, 8.070-16.100), The median OS for mild CIP and severe CIP was 22.1 months and 4.4 months respectively (HR=3.076, 95%CI, 1.904-4.970, P<0.0001). The results showed that the most common cause of death among severe CIP patients in the PP group was CIP and the most common cause in the GP group was tumor. The univariate regression analysis showed that suspension of antitumor therapy was a risk factor for poor prognosis (OR=3.598, 95%CI, 1.307-9.905, p=0.013). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that suspension of anti-tumor therapy (OR=4.24, 95%CI, 1.067-16.915, p=0.040) and elevated KL-6 (OR=1.002, 95%CI, 1.001-1.002, p<0.001) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with severe CIP had a poor prognosis, especially those with elevated KL-6, and the main cause of death is immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis complicated with infection. In addition, anti-tumor therapy for severe CIP patients should be resumed in time and should not be delayed for too long.

Injectable Double Crosslinked Hydrogel-Polypropylene Composite Mesh for Repairing Full-Thickness Abdominal Wall Defects.

Abdominal wall defects are common clinical diseases, and mesh repair is the standard treatment method. The most commonly used polypropylene (PP) mesh in clinical practice has the advantages of good mechanical properties, stable performance, and effective tissue integration effect. However, direct contact between abdominal viscera and PP mesh can lead to severe abdominal adhesions. To prevent this, the development of a hydrogel-PP composite mesh with anti-adhesive properties may be an effective measure. Herein, biofunctional hydrogel loaded with rosmarinic acid is developed by modifying chitosan and Pluronic F127, which possesses suitable physical and chemical properties and commendable in vitro biocompatibility. In the repair of full-thickness abdominal wall defects in rats, hydrogels are injected onto the surface of PP mesh and applied to intraperitoneal repair. The results indicate that the use of hydrogel-PP composite mesh can alleviate abdominal adhesions resulting from traditional PP mesh implantation by decreasing local inflammatory response, reducing oxidative stress, and regulating the fibrinolytic system. Combined with the tissue integration ability of PP mesh, hydrogel-PP composite mesh has great potential for repairing full-thickness abdominal wall defects.

Prognostic and risk factor analysis of cancer patients after unplanned ICU admission: a real-world multicenter study.

To investigate the occurrence and 90-day mortality of cancer patients following unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as to develop a risk prediction model for their 90-day prognosis. We prospectively analyzed data from cancer patients who were admitted to the ICU without prior planning within the past 7 days, specifically between May 12, 2021, and July 12, 2021. The patients were grouped based on their 90-day survival status, and the aim was to identify the risk factors influencing their survival status. A total of 1488 cases were included in the study, with an average age of 63.2 ± 12.4 years. The most common reason for ICU admission was sepsis (n = 940, 63.2%). During their ICU stay, 29.7% of patients required vasoactive drug support (n = 442), 39.8% needed invasive mechanical ventilation support (n = 592), and 82 patients (5.5%) received renal replacement therapy. We conducted a multivariate COX proportional hazards model analysis, which revealed that BMI and a history of hypertension were protective factors. On the other hand, antitumor treatment within the 3 months prior to admission, transfer from the emergency department, general ward, or external hospital, high APACHE score, diagnosis of shock and respiratory failure, receiving invasive ventilation, and experiencing acute kidney injury (AKI) were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis within 90 days after ICU admission. The average length of stay in the ICU was 4 days, while the hospital stay duration was 18 days. A total of 415 patients died within 90 days after ICU admission, resulting in a mortality rate of 27.9%. We selected 8 indicators to construct the predictive model, which demonstrated good discrimination and calibration. The prognosis of cancer patients who are unplanned transferred to the ICU is generally poor. Assessing the risk factors and developing a risk prediction model for these patients can play a significant role in evaluating their prognosis.