Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 15(7): 1387-1402, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35756740

RESUMEN

Background: We sought to develop a novel non-contrast multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) protocol employing several complementary techniques in a single scan session for a comprehensive functional and structural evaluation of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods: In the cross-sectional part of this prospective observational study, 38 subjects ages 18‒79 years with type 2 diabetes and DKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15‒60 mL/min/1.73 m2] and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers (HVs) underwent mpMRI. Repeat mpMRI was performed on 23 DKD subjects and 10 HVs. By measured GFR (mGFR), 2 DKD subjects had GFR stage G2, 16 stage G3 and 20 stage G4/G5. A wide range of MRI biomarkers associated with kidney haemodynamics, oxygenation and macro/microstructure were evaluated. Their optimal sensitivity, specificity and repeatability to differentiate diabetic versus healthy kidneys and categorize various stages of disease as well as their correlation with mGFR/albuminuria was assessed. Results: Several MRI biomarkers differentiated diabetic from healthy kidneys and distinct GFR stages (G3 versus G4/G5); mean arterial flow (MAF) was the strongest predictor (sensitivity 0.94 and 1.0, specificity 1.00 and 0.69; P = .04 and .004, respectively). Parameters significantly correlating with mGFR were specific measures of kidney haemodynamics, oxygenation, microstructure and macrostructure, with MAF being the strongest univariate predictor (r = 0.92; P < .0001). Conclusions: A comprehensive and repeatable non-contrast mpMRI protocol was developed that, as a single, non-invasive tool, allows functional and structural assessment of DKD, which has the potential to provide valuable insights into underlying pathophysiology, disease progression and analysis of efficacy/mode of action of therapeutic interventions in DKD.

2.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 662642, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34025424

RESUMEN

Aim: This study aimed to identify from different stakeholders the benefits and obstacles of implementing precision medicine in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and to build consensus about a way forward in order to treat, prevent, or even reverse this disease. Methods: As part of an ongoing effort of moving implementation of precision medicine in DKD forward, a two-day consensus-building meeting was organized with different stakeholders involved in drug development and patient care in DKD, including patients, patient representatives, pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies representatives, health technology assessors, healthcare professionals, basic scientists, and clinical academic researchers. The meeting consisted of plenary presentations and discussions, and small group break-out sessions. Discussion topics were based on a symposium, focus groups and literature search. Benefits, obstacles and potential solutions toward implementing precision medicine were discussed. Results from the break-out sessions were presented in plenary and formed the basis of a broad consensus discussion to reach final conclusions. Throughout the meeting, participants answered several statement and open-ended questions on their mobile device, using a real-time online survey tool. Answers to the statement questions were analyzed descriptively. Results of the open-ended survey questions, the break-out sessions and the consensus discussion were analyzed qualitatively. Results and conclusion: Seventy-one participants from 26 countries attended the consensus-building meeting in Amsterdam, April 2019. During the opening plenary on the first day, the participants agreed with the statement that precision medicine is the way forward in DKD (n = 57, median 90, IQR [75-100]). Lack of efficient tools for implementation in practice and generating robust data were identified as significant obstacles. The identified benefits, e.g., improvement of the benefit-risk ratio of treatment, offer substantive incentives to find solutions for the identified obstacles. Earlier and increased multi-stakeholder collaboration and specific training may provide solutions to alter clinical and regulatory guidelines that lie at the basis of both obstacles and solutions. At the end of the second day, the opinion of the participants toward precision medicine in DKD was somewhat more nuanced (n = 45, median 83, IQR [70-92]) and they concluded that precision medicine is an important way forward in improving the treatment of patients with DKD.

3.
BMJ Open ; 10(9): e033923, 2020 09 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32912939

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide and a major cause of premature mortality in diabetes mellitus (DM). While improvements in care have reduced the incidence of kidney disease among those with DM, the increasing prevalence of DM means that the number of patients worldwide with DKD is increasing. Improved understanding of the biology of DKD and identification of novel therapeutic targets may lead to new treatments. A major challenge to progress has been the heterogeneity of the DKD phenotype and renal progression. To investigate the heterogeneity of DKD we have set up The East and North London Diabetes Cohort (HEROIC) Study, a secondary care-based, multiethnic observational study of patients with biopsy-proven DKD. Our primary objective is to identify histological features of DKD associated with kidney endpoints in a cohort of patients diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 DM, proteinuria and kidney impairment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: HEROIC is a longitudinal observational study that aims to recruit 500 patients with DKD at high-risk of renal and cardiovascular events. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data will be collected and assessed annually for 5 years. Renal biopsy tissue will be collected and archived at recruitment. Blood and urine samples will be collected at baseline and during annual follow-up visits. Measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR), echocardiography, retinal optical coherence tomography angiography and kidney and cardiac MRI will be performed at baseline and twice more during follow-up. The study is 90% powered to detect an association between key histological and imaging parameters and a composite of death, renal replacement therapy or a 30% decline in estimated GFR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee (REC 18-LO-1921). Any patient identifiable data will be stored on a password-protected National Health Services N3 network with full audit trail. Anonymised imaging data will be stored in a ISO27001-certificated data warehouse.Results will be reported through peer-reviewed manuscripts and conferences and disseminated to participants, patients and the public using web-based and social media engagement tools as well as through public events.


Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Londres/epidemiología
4.
Eur J Pain ; 23(10): 1767-1779, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Three TRPV1 (Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Receptor 1) antagonists were developed for testing in situ in human skin (Sjögren et al., 2016; Sjögren et al., 2018; Sjögren et al., 2018). The first human study using these compounds and capsaicin, was performed to determine the required local antagonist concentrations needed for target engagement (Proof of Mechanism, PoM) (Sjögren et al., 2018). In this paper, the aim was to address a TRPV1 antagonist's ability to inhibit a more complex pain signal and to define translational endpoints that could be used in further drug development, when progressing orally bioavailable TRPV1 antagonists as novel analgesic medications. METHOD: This was a single centre, placebo-controlled, clinical proof of principle (PoP) study in 25 healthy volunteers. The subjects were exposed to UV irradiation, causing a local tissue inflammation. Three different doses of AZ12048189 were administered to assess pain perception through quantitative sensory testing (QST) and erythema using Laser Doppler scanning. RESULTS: AZ12048189 increased the warmth detection threshold (WDT) and the heat pain threshold (HPT) and decreased the intensity of supra threshold heat pain (STHP). AZ12048189 did not, however, have any significant effects as assessed using mechanical stimulation or Laser Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated translational tools to confirm target engagement for TRPV1 antagonists; WDT, HPT and STHP have utility in this respect, after oral administration of a TRPV1 antagonist. This study also proved that TRPV1 antagonists can inhibit a more complex, non-capsaicin dependent thermally induced pain signal.


Asunto(s)
Percepción del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Umbral del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sensación Térmica/efectos de los fármacos , Rayos Ultravioleta , Administración Oral , Adulto , Analgésicos , Animales , Método Doble Ciego , Eritema/diagnóstico por imagen , Voluntarios Sanos , Calor , Humanos , Inflamación , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA