The effect of donor-recipient sex matches on lung transplant survival: An analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.

Objective: To investigate the impact of donor-recipient (DR) sex matches on survival after lung transplantation while controlling for size difference in the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 27,423 lung transplant recipients who were reported in the UNOS database (January 2005-March 2020). Patients were divided into groups based on their respective DR sex match: male to male (MM), male to female (MF), female to female, (FF), and female to male (FM). Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression with log-rank tests were used to assess 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival. We also modeled survival for each group after controlling for size-related variables via the Cox regression. Results: Kaplan-Meier curves showed overall significance at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year end points (P < .0001). Estimated median survival time based on Kaplan-Meier analysis were 6.41 ± 0.15, 6.13 ± 0.18, 5.86 ± 0.10, and 5.37 ± 0.17 years for FF, MF, MM, and FM, respectively (P < .0001). After we controlled for size differences, FF had statistically significantly longer 5- and 10-year survival than all other cohorts. MF also had statistically significantly longer 5- and 10-year survival than FM. Conclusions: When variables associated with size were controlled for, FF had improved survival than other DR groups. A female recipient may experience longer survival with a female donor's lungs versus a male donor's lungs of similar size.

An Anthropometric Study of Lung Donors.

PURPOSE: A difference in the lower body to upper body ratio between similarly heighted individuals could lead to inadequately matched transplants. There has been a perception in clinical circles that body ratio varies between people of different races, and investigating this supposition would prove useful in increasing transplant match accuracy. The investigation's purpose was to derive an equation with a greater correlation to lung length than height alone. METHODS: Lung transplantation donor data for 480 adult patients was obtained and divided by ethnicity-Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic. Height, weight, age, sex, right and left lung length were evaluated for significance. The R2 value of the multiple linear regression with these variables vs. lung length was determined and tested in a separate dataset of 100 patients. RESULTS: Only the distribution of height was significant between the 3 ethnicities (P = 0.041). None of the ANCOVAs were significant (P < 0.05) or near significant (P < 0.10). For the strongest correlation model with lung length, height had a linear fit, weight had a cubic fit, and age had a logistic fit. Multiple regression models were successfully created for right lung (R2 = 0.202) and left lung (R2 = 0.213). Independent testing showed a correlation of 0.131 and 0.136, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using demographic information from the donor and recipient as proxies for estimating lung size should only serve as a rough guide due to their weak correlation with lung length. As a result, for greater accuracy, donor-recipient matching should be individualized by taking donor and recipient chest X-Rays and/or TLC into consideration.

Comparing outcomes in patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: single versus bilateral lung transplants.

OBJECTIVES: Debate continues on whether a bilateral (BLT) or a single lung transplantation (SLT) is preferred for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this study is to examine the interplay between patient age and transplant type on survival outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of lung transplants for COPD at our centre from February 2012 to March 2020 (n = 186). Demographics and clinical parameters were compared between patients based on their age (≤65 vs >65 years old) and type of transplant (single vs bilateral). Cox proportional hazards regression was also performed. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 186 patients with COPD who received lung transplants, 71 (38.2%) received BLTs and 115 (61.8%) received SLTs. There was no significant difference in survival outcomes when looking at patients with single versus BLTs (P = 0.870). There was also no difference in survival between the 2 age groups ≤65 versus > 65 years (P = 0.723). The Cox model itself also did not show a statistically significant improvement in survival outcomes (P = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplant outcomes in patients with end-stage COPD demonstrated non-inferior results in patients with an SLT compared to patients with a BLT. When we compared the age groups, neither transplant type showed superior survival benefits, suggesting there may be some utility in an SLT in younger recipients.

Prior and Perioperative Revascularization Does Not Affect Survival in Lung Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is common in lung transplant patients and has historically been viewed as a contraindication to the procedure. Although this mindset is changing, the effect of prior or perioperative revascularization on lung transplant survival outcomes is not adequately established. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all single and double lung transplant patients from 2012 to 2018 (n = 468). Patients were split into 4 groups: (1) patients who received a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 34), (2) those who received coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) before transplantation (n = 25), (3) those that received concomitant CABG during transplantation (n = 29), and (4) those who had lung transplantation with no need for revascularization (n = 380). Groups were compared for demographics, surgical procedure, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: The no-revascularization group was statistically younger than the rest (P = .001). The lung allocation score trended toward being higher in the concomitant coronary artery bypass group (P = .03). All groups were predominantly diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was greatest in the group not requiring revascularization (P = .001). Patients with previous CABG were more likely to receive a single lung transplant than a double one (21 versus 4; P = .054). Length of stay, posttransplant survival, and postoperative adverse events were similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that preoperative or intraoperative revascularization does not negatively affect survival in lung transplant patients; lung recipients with coronary artery disease have comparable survival when adequately revascularized.