RESUMEN
Background: Biomechanical tissue properties of glioblastoma tumors are heterogeneous, but the molecular mechanisms involved and the biological implications are poorly understood. Here, we combine magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measurement of tissue stiffness with RNA sequencing of tissue biopsies to explore the molecular characteristics of the stiffness signal. Methods: MRE was performed preoperatively in 13 patients with glioblastoma. Navigated biopsies were harvested during surgery and classified as "stiff" or "soft" according to MRE stiffness measurements (|G*|norm). Twenty-two biopsies from eight patients were analyzed by RNA sequencing. Results: The mean whole-tumor stiffness was lower than normal-appearing white matter. The surgeon's stiffness evaluation did not correlate with the MRE measurements, which suggests that these measures assess different physiological properties. Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed genes between "stiff" and "soft" biopsies showed that genes involved in extracellular matrix reorganization and cellular adhesion were overexpressed in "stiff" biopsies. Supervised dimensionality reduction identified a gene expression signal separating "stiff" and "soft" biopsies. Using the NIH Genomic Data Portal, 265 glioblastoma patients were divided into those with (n = 63) and without (n = 202) this gene expression signal. The median survival time of patients with tumors expressing the gene signal associated with "stiff" biopsies was 100 days shorter than that of patients not expressing it (360 versus 460 days, hazard ratio: 1.45, P < .05). Conclusion: MRE imaging of glioblastoma can provide noninvasive information on intratumoral heterogeneity. Regions of increased stiffness were associated with extracellular matrix reorganization. An expression signal associated with "stiff" biopsies correlated with shorter survival of glioblastoma patients.
RESUMEN
The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology that incorporates a more accurate assessment of tissue mechanical properties compared to current mathematical modeling by use of biomechanical data from magnetic resonance elastography. The elastography data were derived from five glioblastoma patients and a healthy subject and used in a model that simulates tumor growth, vascular changes due to mechanical stresses and delivery of therapeutic agents. The model investigates the effect of tumor-specific biomechanical properties on tumor anisotropic growth, vascular density heterogeneity and chemotherapy delivery. The results showed that including elastography data provides a more realistic distribution of the mechanical stresses in the tumor and induces anisotropic tumor growth. Solid stress distribution differs among patients, which, in turn, induces a distinct functional vascular density distribution-owing to the compression of tumor vessels-and intratumoral drug distribution for each patient. In conclusion, incorporating elastography data results in a more accurate calculation of intratumoral mechanical stresses and enables a better mathematical description of subsequent events, such as the heterogeneous development of the tumor vasculature and intrapatient variations in tumor perfusion and delivery of drugs.
