Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Tipo de estudio
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 2024 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235656

RESUMEN

Esophageal stenosis after ESD has been recorded high for large-scale esophageal lesion. Risk factors for increasing the occurrence of stenosis includes long type lesions, lesions infiltrating into the muscularis mucosa and muscular layer injury. In this case, postoperative stricture of the patient was highly likely occurred. Smectite is a mucosal protective agent that can resist external stimuli, promote wound healing, and reduce inflammatory factors. Therefore, it can effectively prevent the formation of scars on wounds. This study was carried out in humans for the first time and was successful. In conclusion, endoscopic spraying of smectite may be effective and safe in preventing esophageal stenosis after ESD with large non-circumferential lesions.

2.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 76: e2942, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34669873

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the protective effect of calcium dobesilate against contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A total of 130 patients with diabetes and CKD estimated glomerular filtration rate: 30-90 mL/min/1.73m2 were enrolled and included in the analysis. They were divided into experimental (n=65) and control groups (n=65). Patients in the experimental group were administered oral calcium dobesilate (500 mg) three times daily for 2 days before and 3 days after the procedure. The serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (Cys C), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean SCr level at 24h after the procedure was found to be significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (79.1±19.6 µmol/L vs. 87.0±19.3 µmol/L, p=0.023). However, the Cys C and NGAL levels were not significantly different between the two groups at all measurement time points (all p>0.05). The incidence of CIN defined by the SCr level was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (3 [4.6%] vs. 13 [20.0%], p=0.017). However, the incidence of CIN defined by the Cys C level was not statistically different between the two groups (7 [10.8%] vs. 7 [10.8%], p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that calcium dobesilate has no preventive effect against CIN in patients with diabetes and CKD.


Asunto(s)
Dobesilato de Calcio , Diabetes Mellitus , Enfermedades Renales , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Biomarcadores , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Creatinina , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones
3.
Clinics ; 76: e2942, 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345813

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the protective effect of calcium dobesilate against contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A total of 130 patients with diabetes and CKD estimated glomerular filtration rate: 30-90 mL/min/1.73m2 were enrolled and included in the analysis. They were divided into experimental (n=65) and control groups (n=65). Patients in the experimental group were administered oral calcium dobesilate (500 mg) three times daily for 2 days before and 3 days after the procedure. The serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (Cys C), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean SCr level at 24h after the procedure was found to be significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (79.1±19.6 μmol/L vs. 87.0±19.3 μmol/L, p=0.023). However, the Cys C and NGAL levels were not significantly different between the two groups at all measurement time points (all p>0.05). The incidence of CIN defined by the SCr level was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (3 [4.6%] vs. 13 [20.0%], p=0.017). However, the incidence of CIN defined by the Cys C level was not statistically different between the two groups (7 [10.8%] vs. 7 [10.8%], p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that calcium dobesilate has no preventive effect against CIN in patients with diabetes and CKD.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Dobesilato de Calcio , Diabetes Mellitus , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Enfermedades Renales , Biomarcadores , Angiografía Coronaria , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Creatinina , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA