Disability, program access, empathy and burnout in US medical students: A national study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate whether self-disclosed disability and self-reported program access are associated with measures of empathy and burnout in a national sample of US medical students. METHODS: The authors obtained data from students who responded to the Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) Year 2 Questionnaire (Y2Q) in 2019 and 2020. Data included demographic characteristics, personal variables, learning environment indicators, measures of burnout (Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Medical Students), empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and disability-related questions, including self-reported disability, disability category and program access. Associations between disability status, program access, empathy and burnout were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models accounting for YQ2 demographic, personal-related and learning environment measures. RESULTS: Overall, 23 898 (54.2%) provided disability data and were included. Of those, 2438 (10.2%) self-reported a disability. Most medical students with disabilities (SWD) self-reported having program access through accommodations (1215 [49.8%]) or that accommodations were not required for access (824 [33.8%]). Multivariable models identified that compared with students without disabilities, SWD with and without program access presented higher odds of high exhaustion (1.50 [95% CI, 1.34-1.69] and 2.59 [95% CI, 1.93-3.49], respectively) and lower odds of low empathy (0.75 [95% CI, 0.67-.85] and 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52-0.90], respectively). In contrast, multivariable models for disengagement identified that SWD reporting lack of program access presented higher odds of high disengagement compared to students without disabilities (1.43 [95% CI, 1.09-1.87], whereas SWD with program access did not (1.09 [95% CI, 0.97-1.22]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher odds of high exhaustion, SWD were less likely to present low empathy regardless of program access, and SWD with program access did not differ from students without disabilities in terms of disengagement. These findings add to our understanding of the characteristics and experiences of SWD including their contributions as empathic future physicians.

Associations of dual sensory impairment with long-term depressive and anxiety symptoms in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: We explored the associations of dual sensory impairment (DSI) with long-term depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as low perceived social support (LPSS) as a modifier of these associations. METHODS: Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of DSI and single sensory impairment (hearing [pure-tone average > 25 dB] and vision [impaired visual acuity and/or contrast sensitivity]) with long-term depressive symptom (≥8 on the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale) and anxiety symptom (present on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist) latent classes from group-based trajectory models (rare/never; mild/moderate increasing; chronically high) among 2102 Health, Aging and Body Composition Study participants (mean age:74.0 ± 2.8 years; 51.9 % female) over 10 years. Models were adjusted by demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors, and LPSS. An additional model evaluated the two-way interaction between DSI and LPSS. RESULTS: DSI was associated with increased risk of being chronically depressed (Risk Ratio, RR = 1.99, 95 % Confidence Interval, CI: 1.25, 3.17), not mild/moderate increasingly depressed (RR = 1.25, 95 % CI: 0.91, 1.71). DSI had increased risk of being mild/moderate increasingly anxious (RR = 1.60, 95 % CI: 1.16, 2.19) and chronically anxious (RR = 1.86, 95 % CI: 1.05, 3.27) groups, as compared to no impairments. Hearing impairment was associated with being mild/moderate increasingly anxious (RR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.01, 1.79). No other associations were found for single sensory impairments. LPSS did not modify associations. LIMITATIONS: Sensory measures were time-fixed, and LPSS, depression and anxiety measures were self-reported. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is warranted to determine if DSI therapies may lessen long-term chronically high depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Associations of dual sensory impairment with incident mobility and ADL difficulty.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of studies examining the associations of objectively measured dual sensory impairment (DSI) with incident mobility and activities of daily life (ADL) difficulty longitudinally. METHODS: Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations of DSI and single sensory impairment (hearing, vision) with incident mobility difficulty (many problems or inability to walk » mile and/or climb 10 steps) and ADL difficulty up to six years of follow-up among 2020 participants of the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, a cohort of older adults aged 70-79 years from Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN. Vision impairment (VI) was defined as impaired visual acuity (20/50 or worse on Bailey-Lovie distance test) and contrast sensitivity (<1.3 log units on Pelli-Robson test), and hearing impairment (HI) was defined as pure-tone average in better-hearing ear >25 decibels. Models were adjusted by age, race, sex, education, diabetes, depressive symptoms, hypertension, gait speed from 20-meter walk, global cognition score, prevalent cardiovascular disease, and body mass index. RESULTS: There were 23% with DSI (n = 459). DSI was associated with increased risk of both incident report of mobility (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47, 3.43), and ADL difficulty (HR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.50, 3.40). Neither VI nor HI alone was associated with risk of either outcome. CONCLUSIONS: DSI is associated with increased risk of incident mobility and ADL difficulty. Rehabilitation and adaptive environmental changes for individuals living with DSI may be important to maximize mobility and daily function.

Association of Co-occurring Dementia and Self-reported Visual Impairment With Activity Limitations in Older Adults.

Importance: The number of older adults with visual impairment (VI) and dementia is projected to increase in the US because of the aging of the population. Dementia and VI commonly co-occur and are each independently associated with disability. To care for an aging population, it may be important to characterize the association of coexisting dementia and self-reported VI on daily functioning. Objective: To evaluate the association of co-occurring dementia and self-reported VI on daily functioning. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative cohort study used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), an annual study of US adults 65 years and older. Participants in the 2015 survey with complete data on outcomes, associated factors, and covariates were included in this study. Data analysis took place from January 2019 to November 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Poisson regression was used to model the independent associations and interaction of dementia and self-reported VI status on 3 functional activity scales (self-care, mobility, and household activities). Marginal predicted proportions were calculated. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and medical factors and accounted for the complex survey design. Results: A total of 7124 participants were included. The weighted proportion of female respondents was 55.3% (95% CI, 54.0%-56.6%), and 56.1% (95% CI, 54.1%-58.1%) were between 65 and 74 years old. Self-reported VI was present in 8.6% (95% CI, 7.8%-9.3%) of participants, while 8.3% (95% CI, 7.8%-8.9%) had possible dementia and 6.3% (95% CI, 5.7%-6.9%) had probable dementia. Self-reported VI was associated with an expected decrease in mobility score of 14.7% (functional scale scores: no VI, 10.82 vs VI, 9.23), self-care score of 9.5% (no VI, 14.54 vs VI, 13.16), and household activity score of 15.2% (no VI, 18.23 vs VI, 15.45), while probable dementia was associated with expected decreases of 27.8% (no dementia, 10.82 vs probable dementia, 7.81), 22.9% (no dementia, 14.54 vs probable dementia, 11.20), and 34.7% (no dementia, 18.23 vs probable dementia, 11.90), respectively. Among those with probable dementia and self-reported VI, there was an expected decrease in mobility score of 50.1% (functional ability scores: no VI and no dementia, 10.82 vs VI and probable dementia, 5.40), self-care score of 42.4% (no VI and no dementia, 14.54 vs VI and probable dementia, 8.38), and household activity score of 52.4% (no VI and no dementia, 18.23 vs VI and probable dementia, 8.68), suggesting that respondents with co-occurring dementia and self-reported VI had lower functional activity scores than would be associated with the independent contributions of these conditions. Conclusions and Relevance: Older adults with both dementia and self-reported VI may be at high risk for disability, and their co-occurrence may potentiate this risk. These findings suggest that the growing population of older adults with both visual impairment and dementia may benefit from interventions to maximize vision and cognition and promote functioning and independence.