Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 23(1): e19-e26, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396583

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ruxolitinib is widely used in myelofibrosis (MF). However, some patients do not optimally respond and require more efficacious treatment. Our analysis aimed to establish predictors of ruxolitinib response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of the efficacy of ruxolitinib treatment in patients with MF in 15 Polish hematology centers. As responses to ruxolitinib occur within the first 6 months, we used this point to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Symptoms response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the MF constitutional symptoms assessed by Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS). Spleen response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the difference between the spleen's baseline length and the upper limit norm measured by ultrasonography. RESULTS: 320 MF patients were enrolled. At 6 months of therapy, the spleen response was detected in 140 (50%) patients, and symptoms response in 241 patients (76%). Multivariable analysis identified leukocytosis <25 G/L (OR 2.06, 95%CI: 1.12-3.88, P = .0200), and reticulin fibrosis MF 1 (OR 2.22, 95%CI: 1.11-4.46, P = .0249) contributed to better spleen response. The time interval between MF diagnosis and ruxolitinib administration shorter than 3 months, and platelets ≥150 G/L (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.83, P = .0466) influenced symptoms response. CONCLUSION: Establishing predictive factors for ruxolitinib response is particularly important given the potential for new therapies in MF. In patients with a low likelihood of responding to ruxolitinib, using other JAK inhibitors or adding a drug with a different mechanism of action to ruxolitinib may be of clinical benefit.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia , Mielofibrosis Primaria , Humanos , Adulto , Mielofibrosis Primaria/diagnóstico , Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polonia , Sistema de Registros
2.
Leuk Res ; 38(7): 788-94, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24862794

RESUMEN

The observational study was aimed at evaluating response, survival and toxicity of bortezomib-based, case-adjusted regimens in real-life therapy of 708 relapsed/refractory MM patients. Bortezomib was combined with anthracyclines, steroids, thalidomide, alkylators or given in monotherapy. The ORR was 67.9% for refractory and 69.9% for relapsed MM. The median PFS was 14 months and OS 57 months. Patients responding to the therapy had the probability of a 4-year OS at 67.0%. No toxicity was noted in 33.1% of patients. Severe events (grade 3/4) were reported in 35.9% of patients: neurotoxicity (16.7%), neutropenia (9.2%), thrombocytopenia (8.5%), and infections (6.5%). Bortezomib-based, case-adjusted regimens are in real-life practice effective in salvage therapy offering reliable survival with acceptable toxicity for relapsed/refractory MM patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...