RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: There is a dearth of knowledge regarding the status of infralesional lower motor neurons (LMNs) in individuals with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), yet there is a growing need to understand how the spinal lesion impacts LMNs caudal to the lesion epicenter, especially in the context of nerve transfer surgery to restore several key upper limb functions. Our objective was to determine the frequency of pathological spontaneous activity (PSA) at, and below, the level of spinal injury, to gain an understanding of LMN health below the spinal lesion. METHODS: Ninety-one limbs in 57 individuals (53 males, mean age = 44.4 ± 16.9 years, mean duration from injury = 3.4 ± 1.4 months, 32 with motor complete injuries), were analyzed. Analysis was stratified by injury level as (1) C4 and above, (2) C5, and (3) C6-7. Needle electromyography was performed on representative muscles innervated by the C5-6, C6-7, C7-8, and C8-T1 nerve roots. PSA was dichotomized as present or absent. Data were pooled for the most caudal infralesional segment (C8-T1). RESULTS: A high frequency of PSA was seen in all infralesional segments. The pooled frequency of PSA for all injury levels at C8-T1 was 68.7% of the limbs tested. There was also evidence of PSA at the rostral border of the neurological level of injury, with 58.3% of C5-6 muscles in those with C5-level injuries. DISCUSSION: These data support a high prevalence of infralesional LMN abnormalities following SCI, which has implications to nerve transfer candidacy, timing of the intervention, and donor nerve options.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/patología , Neuronas Motoras/fisiología , Electromiografía , Nervios Espinales , Médula Espinal/patologíaRESUMEN
We diagnosed 66 peripheral nerve injuries in 34 patients who survived severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We combine this new data with published case series re-analyzed here (117 nerve injuries; 58 patients) to provide a comprehensive accounting of lesion sites. The most common are ulnar (25.1%), common fibular (15.8%), sciatic (13.1%), median (9.8%), brachial plexus (8.7%) and radial (8.2%) nerves at sites known to be vulnerable to mechanical loading. Protection of peripheral nerves should be prioritized in the care of COVID-19 patients. To this end, we report proof of concept data of the feasibility for a wearable, wireless pressure sensor to provide real time monitoring in the intensive care unit setting.
Asunto(s)
Plexo Braquial , COVID-19 , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Plexo Braquial/lesiones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudios de Factibilidad , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) is a discipline of machine learning concerned with the analysis of language and text. Although NLP has been applied to various forms of clinical text, the applications and utility of NLP in spine surgery remain poorly characterized. Here, we systematically reviewed studies that use NLP for spine surgery applications, and analyzed applications, bias, and reporting transparency of the studies. METHODS: We performed a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Data extraction was performed after appropriate screening. The risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed using the PROBAST and TRIPOD tools. RESULTS: A total of 12 full-text articles were included. The most common diseases represented include spondylolisthesis (25%), scoliosis (17%), and lumbar disk herniation (17%). The most common procedures included spinal fusion (42%), imaging (e.g. magnetic resonance, X-ray) (25%), and scoliosis correction (17%). Reported outcomes were diverse and included incidental durotomy, venous thromboembolism, and the tone of social media posts regarding scoliosis surgery. Common sources of bias identified included the use of older methods that do not capture the nuance of a text, and not using a prespecified or standard outcome measure when evaluating NLP methods. CONCLUSIONS: Although the application of NLP to spine surgery is expanding, current studies face limitations and none are indicated as ready for clinical use. Thus, for future studies we recommend an emphasis on transparent reporting and collaboration with NLP experts to incorporate the latest developments to improve models and contribute to further innovation.
Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Escoliosis , Humanos , Radiografía , PubMed , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Entrapment neuropathies, typically carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathy, frequently occur in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Upper limb impairments due to entrapment neuropathy can be particularly debilitating in this population. Anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) neuropathy has not been previously described in the SCI population. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old left-handed man with a history of C7 ASIA Impairment Scale B spinal cord injury five years prior presented to clinic with decreased left thumb function as well as thumb flexion. Workup including nerve conduction studies, electromyogram, ultrasonographic assessment, and magnetic resonance neurography was consistent with compressive AIN neuropathy. Surgical exploration and neurolysis was performed, with improvement of symptoms. DISCUSSION: Entrapment neuropathies should be carefully considered in the evaluation of patients with SCI with new motor deficits. We report a case of AIN neuropathy in a patient with SCI successfully treated with surgical decompression, and review the literature describing upper extremity entrapment neuropathies in this population. Surgical decompression is an effective option for treatment of AIN neuropathy in the setting of SCI, though further characterization of the optimal management strategy is needed.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Neuropatías Cubitales , Adulto , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/complicaciones , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Neuropatías Cubitales/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Cubitales/etiología , Neuropatías Cubitales/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) may be used to treat degenerative spinal pathologies while reducing risks associated with open procedures. As an increasing number of lumbar fusions are performed in the aging United States population, MIS-TLIF has been widely adopted into clinical practice in recent years. However, its complication rate and functional outcomes in elderly patients remain poorly characterized. The objective of this study was to assess complication rates and functional outcomes in elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) undergoing MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant records in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed original research; English language; full text available; use of MIS-TLIF; and an elderly cohort of at least 5 patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions) tool. Pooled complication rates were calculated for elderly patients, with subgroup analyses performed for single versus multiple-level fusions. Complication rates in elderly compared to nonelderly patients were also assessed. Postoperative changes in patient-reported outcomes, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) back pain (BP) and leg pain (LP) scores, were calculated. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. Compared to nonelderly patients, MIS-TLIF in elderly patients resulted in significantly higher rates of major (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.07-4.34) and minor (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.22-3.95) complications. The pooled major complication rate in elderly patients was 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.08) and the pooled minor complication rate was 0.20 (95% CI 0.13-0.30). Single-level MIS-TLIF had lower major and minor complication rates than multilevel MIS-TLIF, although not reaching significance. At a minimum follow-up of 6 months, the postoperative change in ODI (-30.70, 95% CI -41.84 to -19.55), VAS-BP (-3.87, 95% CI -4.97 to -2.77), and VAS-LP (-5.11, 95% CI -6.69 to -3.53) in elderly patients all exceeded the respective minimum clinically important difference. The pooled rate of fusion was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: MIS-TLIF in elderly patients results in a high rate of fusion and significant improvement of patient-reported outcomes, but has significantly higher complication rates than in nonelderly patients. Limitations of this study include heterogeneity in the definition of elderly and limited reporting of risk factors among included studies. Further study of the impact of complications and the factors predisposing elderly patients to poor outcomes is needed.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In 2017, Michigan passed new legislation designed to reduce opioid abuse. This study evaluated the impact of these new restrictive laws on preoperative narcotic use, short-term outcomes, and readmission rates after spinal surgery. METHODS: Patient data from 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of the new opioid laws (beginning July 1, 2018) were queried from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database. Before and after implementation of the major elements of the new laws, 12,325 and 11,988 patients, respectively, were treated. RESULTS: Patients before and after passage of the opioid laws had generally similar demographic and surgical characteristics. Notably, after passage of the opioid laws, the number of patients taking daily narcotics preoperatively decreased from 3783 (48.7%) to 2698 (39.7%; p < 0.0001). Three months postoperatively, there were no differences in minimum clinically important difference (56.0% vs 58.0%, p = 0.1068), numeric rating scale (NRS) score of back pain (3.5 vs 3.4, p = 0.1156), NRS score of leg pain (2.7 vs 2.7, p = 0.3595), satisfaction (84.4% vs 84.7%, p = 0.6852), or 90-day readmission rate (5.8% vs 6.2%, p = 0.3202) between groups. Although there was no difference in readmission rates, pain as a reason for readmission was marginally more common (0.86% vs 1.22%, p = 0.0323). CONCLUSIONS: There was a meaningful decrease in preoperative narcotic use, but notably there was no apparent negative impact on postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction, or short-term outcomes after spinal surgery despite more restrictive opioid prescribing. Although the readmission rate did not significantly increase, pain as a reason for readmission was marginally more frequently observed.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) technique is used to treat many common spinal degenerative pathologies including kyphoscoliosis. The use of spinal navigation for LLIF has not been broadly adopted, especially in adult spinal deformity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility as well as the intraoperative and navigation-related complications of computer-assisted 3D navigation (CaN) during multiple-level LLIF for spinal deformity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and operative characteristics was performed for all patients > 18 years of age who underwent multiple-level CaN LLIF combined with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity at the University of Michigan between 2014 and 2020. Intraoperative CaN-related complications, LLIF approach-related postoperative complications, and medical postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were identified. The mean age was 66.3 years (range 42-83 years) and body mass index was 27.6 kg/m2 (range 18-43 kg/m2). The average coronal Cobb angle was 26.8° (range 3.6°-67.0°) and sagittal vertical axis was 6.3 cm (range -2.3 to 14.7 cm). The average number of LLIF and posterior instrumentation levels were 2.97 cages (range 2-5 cages) and 5.78 levels (range 3-14 levels), respectively. A total of 6 intraoperative complications related to the LLIF stage occurred in 5 patients. Three of these were CaN-related and occurred in 2 patients (3.4%), including 1 misplaced lateral interbody cage (0.6% of 175 total lateral cages placed) requiring intraoperative revision. No patient required a return to the operating room for a misplaced interbody cage. A total of 12 intraoperative complications related to the posterior stage occurred in 11 patients, with 5 being CaN-related and occurring in 4 patients (6.8%). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant risk factors for intraoperative and CaN-related complications. Transient hip weakness and numbness were found to be in 20.3% and 22.0% of patients, respectively. At the 1-month follow-up, weakness was observed in 3.4% and numbness in 11.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CaN in multiple-level LLIF in the treatment of adult spinal deformity appears to be a safe and effective technique. The incidence of approach-related complications with CaN was 3.4% and cage placement accuracy was high.
Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Fijadores Internos , Cifosis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Neuronavegación/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Fijadores Internos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Cifosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is a well-known risk factor for instrumentation failure and subsequent pseudoarthrosis after spinal fusion. In the present systematic review, we analyzed the biomechanical properties, clinical efficacy, and complications of cement augmentation via fenestrated pedicle screws in spinal fusion. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Reports appearing in the PubMed database up to March 31, 2020 were queried using the key words "cement," "pedicle screw," and "osteoporosis." We excluded non-English language studies, studies reported before 2000, studies that had involved use of cement without fenestrated pedicle screws, nonhuman studies, technical reports, and individual case reports. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies had tested the biomechanics of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws. The magnitude of improvement achieved by cement augmentation of pedicle screws increased with the degree of osteoporosis. The cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw was superior biomechanically to the alternative "solid-fill" technique. Fourteen studies had evaluated complications. Cement extravasation with fenestrated screw usage was highly variable, ranging from 0% to 79.7%. However, cement extravasation was largely asymptomatic. Thirteen studies had assessed the outcomes. The use of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicles decreased screw pull out and improved fusion rates; however, the clinical outcomes were similar to those with traditional pedicle screw placement. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws can be an effective strategy for achieving improved pedicle screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis. A potential risk is cement extravasation; however, this complication will typically be asymptomatic. Larger comparative studies are needed to better delineate the clinical efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Cementos para Huesos , Osteoporosis/cirugía , Tornillos Pediculares , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Humanos , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Superficial siderosis (SS) of the CNS is a rare and often unrecognized condition. Caused by hemosiderin deposition from chronic, repetitive hemorrhage in the subarachnoid space, it results in parenchymal damage in the subpial layers of the brain and spinal cord. T2-weighted MRI shows the characteristic hypointensity of hemosiderin deposition, classically occurring around the cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord. Patients present with progressive gait ataxia and sensorineural hearing impairment. Although there have been several studies, case reports, and review articles over the years, the clear pathophysiology of subarachnoid space hemorrhage remains to be elucidated. The proposed causes include prior intradural surgery, prior trauma, tumors, vascular abnormalities, nerve root avulsion, and dural abnormalities. Surgical repair of a dural defect associated with SS has been shown to be efficacious at preventing symptomatic progression. There have been several reports of dural defects within the spinal canal treated with surgery. Here, the authors present the first known case of a dural defect of the ventral skull base, namely a clival meningocele, presumed to be causing SS. In this case report, a 10-year-old girl with a history of head trauma at the age of 3 years was found to have a clival meningocele 3 years after her original trauma. On follow-up imaging, the patient was found to have radiographic growth of the meningocele along with evidence of SS of the CNS. The patient was treated conservatively until she began to have progressive hearing loss. It was presumed that the growing meningocele was the source of her SS. An endoscopic endonasal transclival approach with a multilayer dural reconstruction was performed to fix the dural defect and repair the meningocele in hopes of mitigating the progression of her symptoms. At her 12-month postoperative follow-up, she was doing well, with audiometry showing a slightly decreased hearing threshold in the left ear but improved speech discrimination bilaterally. Postoperative MRI showed a stable level of hemosiderin deposition and meningocele repair. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to evaluate for continued clinical stabilization or possible improvement.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Bilateral/etiología , Hemosiderosis/complicaciones , Meningocele/complicaciones , Niño , Fosa Craneal Posterior , Femenino , Hemosiderina/metabolismo , Humanos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicacionesRESUMEN
Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base provide minimally invasive corridors to intracranial lesions; however, enthusiasm for this new approach is always tempered by the recognition that this route requires passage through a nonsterile sinonasal corridor. Despite an increasing number of patients undergoing these surgeries, there remains no consensus on the use of perioperative antibiotics. A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) at Loyola University Medical Center by the same neurosurgeon and otolaryngologist team between February 2015 and October 2016 was performed. Antibiotic regimens, presence of an intraoperative or postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, dural reconstruction method, and rates of sinusitis, meningitis, and/or intracranial abscess were analyzed. 39 patients who underwent a total of 41 EESBSs with a mean age of 46â¯years were identified. A vascularized nasoseptal flap was used for dural reconstruction when high flow CSF leaks were encountered intraoperatively (nâ¯=â¯17); otherwise, reconstruction mostly consisted of allografts and/or free mucosal grafts. There were zero postoperative cases of CSF leaks, meningitis, or intracranial infection. Our current antibiotic prophylaxis protocol coupled with the use of variable dural reconstruction techniques dictated by intraoperative findings has led to low rates of postoperative CSF leaks, intracranial infections, and meningitis. A survey was also distributed to Neurological Surgery Residency Programs to gain a better understanding of the EESBS protocols that are being used nationally. The practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing EESBS is quite variable and this study should provide the impetus for multi-institutional comparison studies.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Meningitis/prevención & control , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/prevención & control , Protocolos Clínicos , HumanosRESUMEN
Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions, which cause twisting movements or abnormal postures. Deep brain stimulation has been used to improve the quality of life for secondary dystonia caused by cerebral palsy. Despite being a viable treatment option for childhood dystonic cerebral palsy, deep brain stimulation is associated with a high rate of infection in children. The authors present a small series of patients with dystonic cerebral palsy who underwent a stepwise approach for bilateral globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation placement in order to decrease the rate of infection. Four children with dystonic cerebral palsy who underwent a total of 13 surgical procedures (electrode and battery placement) were identified via a retrospective review. There were zero postoperative infections. Using a multistaged surgical plan for pediatric patients with dystonic cerebral palsy undergoing deep brain stimulation may help to reduce the risk of infection.