A qualitative study to understand the barriers and facilitators in smoking cessation practices among oncology health care practitioners in one health system.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the benefits of quitting smoking for those who have cancer, including improved health outcomes and reduced therapeutic toxicities, it is unclear how many people are supported in quit attempts during this time. Variations in the availability and provision of smoking cessation (SC) services are reported, with little understanding of the challenges and solutions. This co-designed study aimed to understand the perspectives of health care professionals (HCPs) working in oncology settings to engage in SC practices and identify recommendations for developing an SC pathway. METHODS: This was a qualitative study. Eighteen HCPs participated in semi-structured interviews from July 2021 to May 2022. We used thematic analysis approaches to code data and present four emergent themes and SC strategies at micro, meso and organizational levels. RESULTS: Four themes emerged specifically: 1) timing and knowledge, 2) building a relationship, 3) frequent asking with infrequent action, and 4) removing the barriers and tailoring the system. While HCPs discuss SC, there are variations in documentation and when conversations occur. Primarily, HCPs value the time to build therapeutic relationships with patients and thus may limit SC discussions in preference to treatment in clinical interactions. The role of structural barriers, including prescriptive authority for nurses, hinders active SC processes, as it is the lack of continuity and embedding of services supported by a clinical champion for SC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests re-evaluating the status quo in SC service, highlighting service gaps and suggesting opportunities at organizational levels to reduce structural barriers. IMPLICATIONS: Variations in smoking cessation services exist in designated cancer centres. The data from this study can be used to inform a real time health systems approach for SC services in oncology settings. Developing tailored smoking cessation services and interventions that are patient-centred and informed by their experiences are required. The data in this study suggests developing specialist education and training to upskill HCPs for equitable engagement if we are to meet EU and Moonshot goals for cancer reduction.

Smoking Cessation Support: A Marathon, Not a Sprint; The Perspectives of Cancer Patients Who Smoke.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the unfavorable outcomes associated with continued smoking, a substantial proportion of patients with cancer continue to smoke after diagnosis. However, limited use of smoking cessation (SC) interventions has been reported. This study explored the perceptions of patients with cancer who continue to smoke/recently quit regarding SC. DATA SOURCES: Semistructured phone/Zoom/Webex interviews were conducted with 25 participants attending four Irish cancer hospitals who were current smokers or had quit at/after their cancer diagnosis. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. CONCLUSION: A total of four key themes emerged: (1) Diagnosis was a shock and a cue to action. (2) Brief and variable SC support: most participants did not feel stigmatized and reported receiving verbal or written information from oncology healthcare providers (HCPs) on SC supports. However, use of SC services was limited and largely ineffective. Some participants reported that SC discussions occurred earlier in their treatment with limited/no discussion later. (3) Facilitators vs barriers: the presence or absence of willpower and motivation was perceived as important. Family and HCP support helped while stress hindered SC. (4) SC support is a "marathon," not a "sprint." Patients with cancer who continue to smoke or recently quit want a sustained, tailored, nonjudgmental approach to SC incorporating pharmacological and behavioral interventions that span hospital-/community-based settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: While consultants have been identified as the key HCP to initiate the SC discussion, oncology nurses can support patients with cancer who smoke/recently quit by advocating for comprehensive SC services and by using positive messaging and encouragement.

Specialist cancer hospital-based smoking cessation service provision in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: While much progress has been made in reducing tobacco use in many countries, both active and passive smoking remain challenges. The benefits of smoking cessation are universally recognized, and the hospital setting is an ideal setting where smokers can access smoking cessation services as hospital admission can be a cue to action. Consistent delivery of good quality smoking cessation care across health services is an important focus for reducing the harm of tobacco use, especially among continued smokers. AIMS: Our objective was to document the smoking cessation medication and support services provided by specialist adult cancer hospitals across Ireland, a country with a stated tobacco endgame goal. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey based on recent national clinical guidelines was used to determine smoking cessation care delivery across eight specialist adult cancer tertiary referral university hospitals and one specialist radiotherapy center. Survey responses were collected using Qualtrics, a secure online survey software tool. The data was grouped, anonymized, and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: All responding hospitals demonstrated either some level of smoking cessation information or a service available to patients. However, there is substantial variation in the type and level of smoking cessation information offered, making access to smoking cessation services inconsistent and inequitable. CONCLUSION: The recently launched National Clinical Guideline for smoking cessation provides the template for all hospitals to ensure health services are in a position to contribute to Ireland's tobacco endgame goal.

Core competencies in applied infectious disease epidemiology: a framework for countries in Europe.

In 2009, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) developed a competency framework to support European Union countries and the European Commission in ensuring a competent public health workforce for Europe. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic emphasised the importance of harmonised public health strategies and competencies across international boundaries, specifically for infectious diseases. This perspective presents the process to update the competency framework for applied infectious disease epidemiology, highlighting ECDC's efforts to support countries with using the framework. ECDC commissioned the Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER) to update the framework through publication and dissemination of a technical report and a self-assessment tool linked to training resources. A mixed methods approach to gather input from experts in relevant specialities included qualitative interviews with 42 experts, workshops with ECDC Technical Advisory Group and an online survey of 212 public health professionals across Europe and beyond. Modifications resulted in 157 core competencies in 23 domains, each mapping to one of six subject areas of importance in applied infectious disease epidemiology. The framework serves as a basis to update the curriculum of the ECDC Fellowship programme with two alternative paths: intervention epidemiology or public health microbiology.

Has the National Fall in Smoking Rates in Ireland Been Replicated in Cancer Patients? A 5-Year Report.

Smoking among cancer patients leads to poorer outcomes, yet many patients continue smoking. As part of a feasibility study of smoking cessation for cancer patients in Ireland, smoking rates were reviewed. Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) data on the smoking status of discharges with a cancer diagnosis (overall, breast, lung, cervical and head and neck cancer) were used (2014-2018). During 2014-2017, current smoking increased for overall (10.5-11.7%) and lung cancer (24.7-27.2%), then decreased to 11.4% and 24.1%, respectively, in 2018. Current smoking increased for cervical during 2014-2018 (11-19.8%) and initially (2014-2016) for head and neck (3-12.7%) cancer, decreasing to 7.6% in 2018; breast cancer was stable at 6 ± 0.6%. These rates are lower than the Irish (23-20%) and European (29% (average)) general population. During 2014-2017, past smoking increased among overall (15.2-21%) and specific cancers, which was lower than the Irish general population (23-28%). Current smoking was highest among 50-59-year-olds (14-16%), which contrasts with the Irish general population (24-35 years at 32-28%). HIPE data are subject to potential duplicate episodes of care and under-documentation of smoking. However, trend analysis is useful, as these limitations should be stable. Rates remain high; therefore, robust documentation and smoking cessation referrals for cancer patients are important.

COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in Workplace Settings: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.

Workplaces can be high-risk environments for SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and subsequent community transmission. Identifying, understanding, and implementing effective workplace SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention and control (IPC) measures is critical to protect workers, their families, and communities. A rapid review and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize evidence assessing the effectiveness of COVID-19 IPC measures implemented in global workplace settings through April 2021. Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies that quantitatively assessed the effectiveness of workplace COVID-19 IPC measures. The included studies comprised varying empirical designs and occupational settings. Measures of interest included surveillance measures, outbreak investigations, environmental adjustments, personal protective equipment (PPE), changes in work arrangements, and worker education. Sixty-one studies from healthcare, nursing home, meatpacking, manufacturing, and office settings were included, accounting for ~280,000 employees based in Europe, Asia, and North America. Meta-analyses showed that combined IPC measures resulted in lower employee COVID-19 positivity rates (0.2% positivity; 95% CI 0-0.4%) than single measures such as asymptomatic PCR testing (1.7%; 95% CI 0.9-2.9%) and universal masking (24%; 95% CI 3.4-55.5%). Modelling studies showed that combinations of (i) timely and widespread contact tracing and case isolation, (ii) facilitating smaller worker cohorts, and (iii) effective use of PPE can reduce workplace transmission. Comprehensive COVID-19 IPC measures incorporating swift contact tracing and case isolation, PPE, and facility zoning can effectively prevent workplace outbreaks. Masking alone should not be considered sufficient protection from SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in the workplace.