Focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis both contribute to regional hypoperfusion assessed by post-processing quantitative-perfusion MRI techniques.

Introduction: Indications for stress-cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to assess myocardial ischemia and viability are growing. First pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have limited value in balanced ischemia and diffuse fibrosis. Quantitative perfusion (QP) to assess absolute pixelwise myocardial blood flow (MBF) and extracellular volume (ECV) as a measure of diffuse fibrosis can overcome these limitations. We investigated the use of post-processing techniques for quantifying both pixelwise MBF and diffuse fibrosis in patients with clinically indicated CMR stress exams. We then assessed if focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis and other features quantified during the CMR exam explain individual MBF findings. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 125 patients undergoing a clinically indicated stress-CMR scan. In addition to the clinical report, MBF during regadenoson-stress was quantified using a post-processing QP method and T1 maps were used to calculate ECV. Factors that were associated with poor MBF were investigated. Results: Of the 109 patients included (66 ± 11 years, 32% female), global and regional perfusion was quantified by QP analysis in both the presence and absence of visual first pass perfusion deficits. Similarly, ECV analysis identified diffuse fibrosis in myocardium beyond segments with LGE. Multivariable analysis showed both LGE (ß = -0.191, p = 0.001) and ECV (ß = -0.011, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of reduced MBF. In patients without clinically defined first pass perfusion deficits, the microvascular risk-factors of age and wall thickness further contributed to poor MBF (p < 0.001). Discussion: Quantitative analysis of MBF and diffuse fibrosis detected regional tissue abnormalities not identified by traditional visual assessment. Multi-parametric quantitative analysis may refine the work-up of the etiology of myocardial ischemia in patients referred for clinical CMR stress testing in the future and provide a deeper insight into ischemic heart disease.

Dual-Energy Low-keV or Single-Energy Low-kV CT for Endoleak Detection?: A 6-Reader Study in an Aortic Aneurysm Phantom.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare image quality, conspicuity, and endoleak detection between single-energy low-kV images (SEIs) and dual-energy low-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs+) in computed tomography angiography of the aorta after endovascular repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An abdominal aortic aneurysm phantom simulating 36 endoleaks (2 densities; diameters: 2, 4, and 6 mm) in a medium- and large-sized patient was used. Each size was scanned using single-energy at 80 kVp (A) and 100 kVp (B), and dual-energy at 80/Sn150kVp for the medium (C) and 90/Sn150kVp for the large size (D). VMIs+ at 40 keV and 50 keV were reconstructed from protocols C and D. Radiation dose was 3 mGy for the medium and 6 mGy for the large size. Objective image quality and normalized noise power spectrum were determined. Subjective image quality, conspicuity, and sensitivity for endoleaks were independently assessed by 6 radiologists. Sensitivity was compared using Marascuilo procedure and Fisher exact test. Conspicuities were compared using Wilcoxon-matched pairs test, analysis of variance, and Tukey test. RESULTS: The contrast-to-noise-ratio of the aorta was significantly higher for VMI+ compared with SEI (P < 0.001). Noise power spectrum showed a higher noise magnitude and coarser texture in VMI+. Subjective image quality and overall conspicuity was lower for VMI+ compared with SEI (P < 0.05). Sensitivity for endoleaks was overall higher in the medium phantom for SEI (60.9% for A, 62.2% for B) compared with VMI+ (54.2% for C, 49.3% for D) with significant differences between protocols B and D (P < 0.05). In the large phantom, there was no significant difference in sensitivity among protocols (P = 0.79), with highest rates for protocols B (31.4%) and C (31.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that low-keV VMI+ results in improved contrast-to-noise-ratio of the aorta, whereas noise properties, subjective image quality, conspicuity, and sensitivity for endoleaks were overall superior for SEI.

Dose-optimized computed tomography of the cervical spine in patients with shoulder pull-down: Is image quality comparable with a standard dose protocol in an emergency setting?

PURPOSE: Superimposing soft tissue and bony structures in computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine (C-spine) is a limiting factor in optimizing radiation exposure maintaining an acceptable image quality. Therefore, we assessed image quality of dose-optimized (DO) C-spine CT in patients capable of shoulder pull-down in an emergency setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DO-CT (105mAs/120 kVp) of the C-spine in trauma settings was performed in patients with shoulder pull-down if C5 was not superimposed by soft tissue on the lateral topogram, otherwise standard-dose (SD)-CT (195 mAs/120 kVp) was performed. 34 DO (mean age, 68y ±â€¯21; BMI, 24.2 kg/m2 ±â€¯3.2) and 34 SD (mean age 70y ±â€¯19; BMI 25.7 kg/m2 ±â€¯4.4) iterative reconstructed CTs were evaluated at C2/3 and C6/7 by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Qualitative image noise and morphological characteristics of bony structures (cortex, trabeculae) were assessed on a Likert scale. Quantitative image noise was measured and effective dose (ED) was recorded. Parameters were compared using Mann-Whitney-U-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: At C2/3, DO-CT vs. SD-CT yielded comparable qualitative noise (mean, 1.3 vs. 1.0; p = 0.18) and morphological characteristics, but higher quantitative noise (27.2 ±â€¯8.8HU vs. 19.6 ±â€¯4.5HU; p < 0.001). At C6/7, DO-CT yielded lower subjective noise (1.9; SD-CT 2.2; p = 0.017) and better morphological characteristics with higher visibility scores for cortex (p = 0.001) and trabeculae (p = 0.03). Quantitative noise did not differ (p = 0.24). Radiation dose was 51% lower using DO-CT (EDDO-CT 0.80 ±â€¯0.1 mSv; EDSD-CT 1.63 ±â€¯0.2 mSv; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: C-spine CT with dose reduction of 51% showed no image quality impairment. Additional pull-down of both shoulders allowed better image quality at lower C-spine segments as compared to a standard protocol.

Over-scanning in chest CT: Comparison of practice among six hospitals and its impact on radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES: Compare incidence of over-scanning in chest CT among six hospitals and impact on effective and organ effective radiation dose. METHODS: Scout images of 600 chest CTs from six hospitals (A-F) were retrospectively reviewed using a radiation dose tracking software (RTS). Optimal scan range was determined and compared to the actual scan range. Incidence of cranial and caudal over-scanning was assessed and changes in total and organ effective dose were calculated. Descriptive statistics, Tukey- and Wilcoxon matched pairs test were applied. RESULTS: Simultaneous cranial and caudal over-scanning occurred in 29 of 600 scans (A = 0%, B = 1%, C = 12%, D = 3%, E = 11%, F = 2%). Effective radiation dose increased on average by 0.29 mSv (P < 0.001). Cranial over-scanning was observed in 45 of 600 scans (A = 0%, B = 8%, C = 2%, D = 15%, E = 17%, F = 3%) and increased organ effective dose by 0.35 mSv in the thyroid gland (P < 0.001). Caudal over-scanning occurred in 147 of 600 scans (A = 7%, B = 9%, C = 35%, D = 4%, E = 32%, F = 60%) and increased organ effective doses in the upper abdomen by up to 14% (P < 0.001 for all organs). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in the incidence of over-scanning in chest CT exist among different hospitals. These differences result in excessive effective radiation dose and increased individual organ effective doses in patients.

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT.

OBJECTIVES: To compare image quality and radiation dose of abdominal split-filter dual-energy CT (SF-DECT) combined with monoenergetic imaging to single-energy CT (SECT) with automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS). METHODS: Two-hundred single-source abdominal CT scans were performed as SECT with ATVS (n = 100) and SF-DECT (n = 100). SF-DECT scans were reconstructed and subdivided into composed images (SF-CI) and monoenergetic images at 55 keV (SF-MI). Objective and subjective image quality were compared among single-energy images (SEI), SF-CI and SF-MI. CNR and FOM were separately calculated for the liver (e.g. CNRliv) and the portal vein (CNRpv). Radiation dose was compared using size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Results of the three groups were compared using non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Image noise of SF-CI was 18% lower compared to SEI and 48% lower compared to SF-MI (p < 0.001). Composed images yielded higher CNRliv over single-energy images (23.4 vs. 20.9; p < 0.001), whereas CNRpv was significantly lower (3.5 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Monoenergetic images overcame this inferiority in CNRpv and achieved similar results compared to single-energy images (5.1 vs. 5.2; p > 0.628). Subjective sharpness was equal between single-energy and monoenergetic images and diagnostic confidence was equal between single-energy and composed images. FOMliv was highest for SF-CI. FOMpv was equal for SEI and SF-MI (p = 0.78). SSDE was significant lower for SF-DECT compared to SECT (p < 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of split-filter dual-energy CT images provides comparable objective and subjective image quality at lower radiation dose compared to single-energy CT with ATVS. KEY POINTS: • Split-filter dual-energy results in 18% lower noise compared to single-energy with ATVS. • Split-filter dual-energy results in 11% lower SSDE compared to single-energy with ATVS. • Spectral shaping of split-filter dual-energy leads to an increased dose-efficiency.

Transatlantic Comparison of CT Radiation Doses in the Era of Radiation Dose-Tracking Software.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic reference levels from a local European CT dose registry, using radiation-tracking software from a large patient sample, with preexisting European and North American diagnostic reference levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data (n = 43,761 CT scans obtained over the course of 2 years) for the European local CT dose registry were obtained from eight CT scanners at six institutions. Means, medians, and interquartile ranges of volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), size-specific dose estimate, and effective dose values for CT examinations of the head, paranasal sinuses, thorax, pulmonary angiogram, abdomen-pelvis, renal-colic, thorax-abdomen-pelvis, and thoracoabdominal angiogram were obtained using radiation-tracking software. Metrics from this registry were compared with diagnostic reference levels from Canada and California (published in 2015), the American College of Radiology (ACR) dose index registry (2015), and national diagnostic reference levels from local CT dose registries in Switzerland (2010), the United Kingdom (2011), and Portugal (2015). RESULTS: Our local registry had a lower 75th percentile CTDIvol for all protocols than did the individual internationally sourced data. Compared with our study, the ACR dose index registry had higher 75th percentile CTDIvol values by 55% for head, 240% for thorax, 28% for abdomen-pelvis, 42% for thorax-abdomen-pelvis, 128% for pulmonary angiogram, 138% for renal-colic, and 58% for paranasal sinus studies. CONCLUSION: Our local registry had lower diagnostic reference level values than did existing European and North American diagnostic reference levels. Automated radiation-tracking software could be used to establish and update existing diagnostic reference levels because they are capable of analyzing large datasets meaningfully.

Scan time adapted contrast agent injection protocols with low volume for low-tube voltage CT angiography: An in vitro study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were twofold. First, we investigated the extent of changes in arterial peak enhancement and changes in the duration of a diagnostic arterial enhancement when small amounts of CA volumes (≤30mL) were administered at varying tube voltages. Second, we investigated how to optimize CA injection protocols for CT-angiography with long scan times at various tube voltages to achieve optimal vascular enhancement at the lowest reasonable CA dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed with a custom-made dynamic flow phantom. For CTA protocols with a short scan time, we investigated the effect of various tube voltages (70-120kVp) on the arterial enhancement profile with very small CA volumes (20 and 30mL of Iobitridol 350mg I/mL) at a flow rate of 5mL/s. For CTA protocols with a long scan time, we utilized an optimized multi-bolus technique switching rapidly between 13 "micro-boli" of CA (total, 60mL) and saline (total, 24mL) at a flow rate of 4mL/s. The peak arterial enhancement (PAE) and the time period of diagnostic aortic enhancement ≥200 HU (T200) were analyzed. RESULTS: For the short scan time protocols, a diagnostic peak enhancement was achieved using 20mL of CA at 70 and 80kVp (PAE: 327±10 and 255±15 HU, respectively) or 30mL of CA at 70, 80 and 100kVp (PAE 451±10, 367±9, and 253±15 HU). For the long scan time, the optimized multi-bolus injection protocol extended T200 at 100kVp by 6s (40%) compared to a linear injection protocol (21±1s and 15±1s, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Optimized CTA protocols comprising alternations of tube voltage and the CA injection protocol can save radiation doses and CA volumes at the same time.

Systematic radiation dose optimization of abdominal dual-energy CT on a second-generation dual-source CT scanner: assessment of the accuracy of iodine uptake measurement and image quality in an in vitro and in vivo investigations.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of iodine quantification in a phantom study at different radiation dose levels with dual-energy dual-source CT and to evaluate image quality and radiation doses in patients undergoing a single-energy and two dual-energy abdominal CT protocols. METHODS: In a phantom study, the accuracy of iodine quantification (4.5-23.5 mgI/mL) was evaluated using the manufacturer-recommended and three dose-optimized dual-energy protocols. In a patient study, 75 abdomino-pelvic CT examinations were acquired as follows: 25 CT scans with the manufacturer-recommended dual-energy protocol (protocol A); 25 CT scans with a dose-optimized dual-energy protocol (protocol B); and 25 CT scans with a single-energy CT protocol (protocol C). CTDIvol and objective noise were measured. Five readers scored each scan according to six subjective image quality parameters (noise, contrast, artifacts, visibility of small structures, sharpness, overall diagnostic confidence). RESULTS: In the phantom study, differences between the real and measured iodine concentrations ranged from -8.8% to 17.0% for the manufacturer-recommended protocol and from -1.6% to 20.5% for three dose-optimized protocols. In the patient study, the CTDIvol of protocol A, B, and C were 12.5 ± 1.9, 7.5 ± 1.2, and 6.5 ± 1.7 mGycm, respectively (p < 0.001), and the average image noise values were 6.6 ± 1.2, 7.8 ± 1.4, and 9.6 ± 2.2 HU, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the six subjective image quality parameters were observed between the dose-optimized dual-energy and the single-energy protocol. CONCLUSION: A dose reduction of 41% is feasible for the manufacturer-recommended, abdominal dual-energy CT protocol, as it maintained the accuracy of iodine measurements and subjective image quality compared to a single-energy protocol.

Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on low-contrast lesion detection and image quality in abdominal CT: a 12-reader-based comparative phantom study with filtered back projection at different tube voltages.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) on image quality and low-contrast lesion detection compared with filtered back projection (FBP) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) of simulated medium and large patients at different tube voltages. METHODS: A phantom with 45 hypoattenuating lesions was placed in two water containers and scanned at 70, 80, 100, and 120 kVp. The 120-kVp protocol served as reference, and the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was kept constant for all protocols. The datasets were reconstructed with MBIR and FBP. Image noise and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were assessed. Low-contrast lesion detectability was evaluated by 12 radiologists. RESULTS: MBIR decreased the image noise by 24% and 27%, and increased the CNR by 30% and 29% for the medium and large phantoms, respectively. Lower tube voltages increased the CNR by 58%, 46%, and 16% at 70, 80, and 100 kVp, respectively, compared with 120 kVp in the medium phantom and by 9%, 18% and 12% in the large phantom. No significant difference in lesion detection rate was observed (medium: 79-82%; large: 57-65%; P > 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Although MBIR improved quantitative image quality compared with FBP, it did not result in increased low-contrast lesion detection in abdominal CT at different tube voltages in simulated medium and large patients. KEY POINTS: • MBIR improved quantitative image quality but not lesion detection compared with FBP. • Increased CNR by low tube voltages did not improve lesion detection. • Changes in image noise and CNR do not directly influence diagnostic accuracy.

Bone subtraction radiography in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.

Background Bone subtraction radiography allows reading pulmonary changes of chest radiographs more accurately without superimposition of bones. Purpose To evaluate the value of bone subtraction chest radiography using dual energy (DE) bone subtracted lung images compared to conventional radiographs (CR) in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Material and Methods Forty-nine DE radiographs of 24 patients (16 men) with CF (mean age, 32 years; age range, 18-71 years) were included. Lung function tests were performed within 10 days of the radiographs. Two radiologists evaluated all CR, DE, and CR + DE radiographs using the modified Chrispin-Norman score (CNS) and a five-point score for the confidence. Findings were statistically evaluated by Friedman ANOVA and Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. Results There was significant difference of CNS between CR and DE ( P = 0.044) as well as CR and CR + DE ( P < 0.001). CNS of CR images showed moderate correlation with FEV1% (R = 0.287, P = 0.046) while DE and CR + DE correlated poorly with FEV1% (R = 0.023, P = 0.874 and R = 0.04, P = 0.785). A higher confidence was achieved with bone-subtracted radiographs compared to radiographs alone (median, CR 3.3, DE 3.9, CR + DE 4.1, for both P < 0.001). Conclusion DE radiographs are reliable for the evaluation of adult patients with CF in acute exacerbation. For yearly surveillance, CR and DE radiographs may play a limited role. However, in clinical routine, DE radiographs are useful for adult CF patients and may depict more accurately inflammatory changes than CR.

Initial Results of a Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Technique Using a Split-Filter: Assessment of Image Quality, Radiation Dose, and Accuracy of Dual-Energy Applications in an In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the image quality, radiation dose, and accuracy of virtual noncontrast images and iodine quantification of split-filter dual-energy computed tomography (CT) using a single x-ray source in a phantom and patient study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phantom study, objective image quality and accuracy of iodine quantification were evaluated for the split-filter dual-energy mode using a tin and gold filter. In a patient study, objective image quality and radiation dose were compared in thoracoabdominal CT of 50 patients between the standard single-energy and split-filter dual-energy mode. The radiation dose was estimated by size-specific dose estimate. To evaluate the accuracy of virtual noncontrast imaging, attenuation measurements in the liver, spleen, and muscle were compared between a true noncontrast premonitoring scan and the virtual noncontrast images of the dual-energy scans. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. RESULTS: In the phantom study, differences between the real and measured iodine concentration ranged from 2.2% to 21.4%. In the patient study, the single-energy and dual-energy protocols resulted in similar image noise (7.4 vs 7.1 HU, respectively; P = 0.43) and parenchymal contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values for the liver (29.2 vs 28.5, respectively; P = 0.88). However, the vascular CNR value for the single-energy protocol was significantly higher than for the dual-energy protocol (10.0 vs 7.1, respectively; P = 0.006). The difference in the measured attenuation between the true and the virtual noncontrast images ranged from 3.1 to 6.7 HU. The size-specific dose estimate of the dual-energy protocol was, on average, 17% lower than that of the single-energy protocol (11.7 vs 9.7 mGy, respectively; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Split-filter dual-energy compared with single-energy CT results in similar objective image noise in addition to dual-energy capabilities at 17% lower radiation dose. Because of beam hardening, split-filter dual-energy can lead to decreased CNR values of iodinated structures.

Feasibility of Dose Optimization in a Second-Generation Dual-Source CT Scanner for a Manufacturer-Recommended Urolithiasis Protocol for Imaging Renal Stones.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate the magnitude of dose optimization for a manufacturer-recommended urolithiasis protocol in a second-generation dual-source CT scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Custom renal phantoms with 24 stones were scanned using the manufacturer-provided dual-energy CT protocol (tube A, 100 kVp and 210 reference mAs; tube B, 140 kVp and 162 reference mAs) and seven dose-optimized protocols in which the reference tube current-time product setting of tube A was reduced stepwise by 20 mAs. Detection and characterization of the stones was assessed. In the patient study, 25 patients underwent the manufacturer-provided dual-energy protocol and 25 patients underwent imaging with a dose-optimized protocol (tube A, 100 kVp and 90 reference mAs; tube B, 140 kVp and 70 reference mAs). Dose-length product (DLP), image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed. Subjective image quality was analyzed by three independent radiologists. RESULTS: In the phantom study, the reference tube current-time product of tube A could be reduced from 210 to 90 mAs without losing the accuracy of detection or characterization of the calculi. In the patient study, the dose-optimized protocol resulted in a significant reduction of the average DLP by 51% compared with the standard protocol (219.4 vs 443.5 mGy·cm, respectively; p = 0.0001). The image noise was higher, and the CNR was lower, in the dose-optimized group than in the standard-dose group (p < 0.05). The subjective overall image quality of the dose-optimized CT examinations was rated as good, and that of the standard-dose CT examinations was rated as excellent (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The in vitro and in vivo assessment revealed a potential for a 51% dose reduction of the manufacturer-recommended dual-energy CT protocol for urolithiasis without compromising the accuracy.

Organ-based tube current modulation in a clinical context: Dose reduction may be largely overestimated in breast tissue.

OBJECTIVES: Organ-based tube current modulation aims to reduce exposure to radiosensitive organs like the breasts by considering their anatomical location and altering tube current during rotation. Former phantom studies demonstrated a dose reduction of 20-37 %. Our study aimed to estimate the potential of dose reduction with this technique in relation to the actual location of breast tissue in a large clinical cohort. METHODS: A 1-year cohort of chest CTs of females (N=1,263) was retrospectively evaluated. To estimate the relative dose effect, breast location was analysed by measuring the angle range of glandular tissue within the different dose zones. Relative exposure compared with constant tube current was calculated. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon-test were applied. RESULTS: Only 63 % of angle range of glandular breast tissue was found inside the reduced dose zone. The estimated mean relative dose reduction was lower than observed in former phantom studies(16 % vs. 20-37 %) but still significant compared to constant tube current (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although organ-based tube current modulation results in a significant reduction of breast exposure compared to non-modulated irradiation, the technique cannot unfold its full potential, because breast tissue is often located outside the reduced dose zone, resulting in significantly lower dose reduction than expected. KEY POINTS: • OBTCM results in significant dose reduction compared to constant tube current scans. • A substantial portion of glandular tissue lies outside the reduced dose zone. • Potential dose reduction using organ-based tube current modulation may be overestimated.

Accuracy of computed tomography angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with high body weight.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in detecting or excluding pulmonary embolism has not yet been assessed in patients with high body weight (BW). METHODS: This retrospective study involved CTPAs of 114 patients weighing 75-99 kg and those of 123 consecutive patients weighing 100-150 kg. Three independent blinded radiologists analyzed all examinations in randomized order. Readers' data on pulmonary emboli were compared with a composite reference standard, comprising clinical probability, reference CTPA result, additional imaging when performed and 90-day follow-up. Results in both BW groups and in two body mass index (BMI) groups (BMI <30 kg/m(2) and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2), i.e., non-obese and obese patients) were compared. RESULTS: The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was not significantly different in the BW groups (P=1.0). The reference CTPA result was positive in 23 of 114 patients in the 75-99 kg group and in 25 of 123 patients in the ≥ 100 kg group, respectively (odds ratio, 0.991; 95% confidence interval, 0.501 to 1.957; P=1.0). No pulmonary embolism-related death or venous thromboembolism occurred during follow-up. The mean accuracy of three readers was 91.5% in the 75-99 kg group and 89.9% in the ≥ 100 kg group (odds ratio, 1.207; 95% confidence interval, 0.451 to 3.255; P=0.495), and 89.9% in non-obese patients and 91.2% in obese patients (odds ratio, 0.853; 95% confidence interval, 0.317 to 2.319; P=0.816). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of CTPA in patients weighing 75-99 kg or 100-150 kg proved not to be significantly different.

Prospective randomised comparison of diagnostic confidence and image quality with normal-dose and low-dose CT pulmonary angiography at various body weights.

OBJECTIVES: To find a threshold body weight (BW) below 100 kg above which computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using reduced radiation and a reduced contrast material (CM) dose provides significantly impaired quality and diagnostic confidence compared with standard-dose CTPA. METHODS: In this prospectively randomised study of 501 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and BW <100 kg, 246 were allocated into the low-dose group (80 kVp, 75 ml CM) and 255 into the normal-dose group (100 kVp, 100 ml CM). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the pulmonary trunk was calculated. Two blinded chest radiologists independently evaluated subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence. Data were compared between the normal-dose and low-dose groups in five BW subgroups. RESULTS: Vessel attenuation did not differ between the normal-dose and low-dose groups within each BW subgroup (P = 1.0). The CNR was higher with the normal-dose compared with the low-dose protocol (P < 0.006) in all BW subgroups except for the 90-99 kg subgroup (P = 0.812). Subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence did not differ between CT protocols in all subgroups (P between 0.960 and 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence with 80 kVp CTPA is not different from normal-dose protocol in any BW group up to 100 kg. KEY POINTS: • 80 kVp CTPA is safe in patients weighing <100 kg • Reduced radiation and iodine dose still provide high vessel attenuation • Image quality and diagnostic confidence with low-dose CTPA is good • Diagnostic confidence does not deteriorate in obese patients weighing <100 kg.

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography pulmonary angiography with reduced radiation and contrast material dose: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) at peak tube voltage of 80 kVp with both reduced radiation and reduced contrast material (CM) dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, single-blinded prospective randomized trial, 501 patients with body weights of less than 100 kg with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) were assigned to normal-dose CTPA (100-kVp tube energy and 100-mL CM, 255 patients) and low-dose CTPA (80-kVp tube energy and 75-mL CM, 246 patients). Primary end points were evidence of PE in CTPA and accuracy of CTPA on a composite reference standard. Results were compared by calculating the odds ratio with the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The reference diagnosis was equivocal in 20 of the 501 patients. Diagnosis of CTPA was correct in 240 patients and incorrect in 5 in the normal-dose group. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography was correct in 230 patients and incorrect in 6 in the low-dose group (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-4.16; P = 0.77). Sensitivity was 96.9% and 100% and specificity was 98.1% and 97.1% in the normal-dose and low-dose groups, respectively. No PE or PE-related death occurred during the 90-day follow-up. The size-specific dose estimates were 30% lower at 80 kVp (4.8 ± 1.0 mGy) compared with that at 100 kVp (6.8 ± 1.2 mGy; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of low-dose CTPA at 80 kVp with a 30% reduced radiation dose and a 25% lower CM volume is not significantly different from that of normal-dose CTPA at 100 kVp in detecting acute PE in patients weighing less than 100 kg.

Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal CT protocols in obese patients: assessment of image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in a phantom.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a noise reduction technique on image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT for obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A liver phantom with 12 different tumors was designed, and fat rings were added to mimic intermediately sized and large patients. The intermediate and large phantoms were scanned with our standard abdominal CT protocol (image noise level of 15 HU and filtered back projection [FBP]). The large phantom was scanned with five different noise levels (10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, and 20 HU). All datasets for the large phantom were reconstructed with FBP and the noise reduction technique. The image noise and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed. Tumor detection was independently performed by three radiologists in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: The application of the noise reduction method to the large phantom decreased the measured image noise (range, -14.5% to -37.0%) and increased the CNR (range, 26.7-70.6%) compared with FBP at the same noise level (p < 0.001). However, noise reduction was unable to improve the sensitivity for tumor detection in the large phantom compared with FBP at the same noise level (p > 0.05). Applying a noise level of 15 HU, the overall sensitivity for tumor detection in the intermediate and large phantoms with FBP measured 75.5% and 87.7% and the radiation doses measured 42.0 and 23.7 mGy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although noise reduction significantly improved the quantitative image quality in simulated large patients undergoing abdominal CT compared with FBP, no improvement was observed for low-contrast detectability.

Combining automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction: a liver phantom study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of combined automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection and iterative reconstructions (IRs) for optimising computed tomography (CT) imaging of hypodense liver lesions. METHODS: A liver phantom containing hypodense lesions was imaged by CT with and without automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection (80, 100 and 120 kVp). Acquisitions were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed IR. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Two readers marked lesion localisation and rated confidence, sharpness, noise and image quality on a five-point scale (1 = worst, 5 = best). RESULTS: Image noise was lower (31-52%) and CNR higher (43-102%) on IR than on FBP images at all tube voltages. On 100-kVp and 80-kVp IR images, confidence and sharpness were higher than on 120-kVp FBP images. Scores for image quality score and noise as well as sensitivity for 100-kVp IR were similar or higher than for 120-kVp FBP and lower for 80-kVp IR. Radiation dose was reduced by 26% at 100 kVp and 56% at 80 kVp. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 120-kVp FBP images, the combination of automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection at 100 kVp and IR provides higher image quality and improved sensitivity for detecting hypodense liver lesions in vitro at a dose reduced by 26%. KEY POINTS: • Combining automated tube voltage selection/iterative CT reconstruction improves image quality. • Attenuation values remain stable on IR compared with FBP images. • Lesion detection was highest on 100-kVp IR images.

Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved?

PURPOSE: To compare the low-contrast detectability and image quality of computed tomography (CT) at different radiation dose levels reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A custom liver phantom with 12 simulated hypoattenuating tumors (diameters of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm; tumor-to-liver contrast values of -10, -20, and -40 HU) was designed. The phantom was scanned with a standard abdominal CT protocol with a volume CT dose index of 21.6 mGy (equivalent 100% dose) and four low-dose protocols (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of the standard protocol dose). CT data sets were reconstructed with IR and FBP. Image noise was measured, and the tumors' contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Tumor detection was independently assessed by three radiologists who were blinded to the CT technique used. A total of 840 simulated tumors were presented to the radiologists. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance. RESULTS: IR yielded an image noise reduction of 43.9%-63.9% and a CNR increase of 74.1%-180% compared with FBP at the same dose level (P < .001). The overall sensitivity for tumor detection was 64.7%-85.3% for IR and 66.3%-85.7% for FBP at the 20%-100% doses, respectively. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity for tumor detection between IR and FBP at the same dose level (P = .99). The sensitivity of the protocol at the 20% dose with FBP and IR was significantly lower than that of the protocol at the 100% dose with FBP and IR (P = .019). CONCLUSION: As the radiation dose at CT decreases, the IR algorithm does not preserve the low-contrast detectability. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.13122349/-/DC1.