Statin treatment after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis is associated with better long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between statin use after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and long-term risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in a large population-based, nationwide cohort. METHODS: All patients who underwent isolated surgical aortic valve replacement due to aortic stenosis in Sweden 2006-2020 and survived 6 months after discharge were included. Individual patient data from 5 nationwide registries were merged. Primary outcome is MACE (defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke). Multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, valve type, operation year and secondary prevention medications is used to evaluate the association between time-updated dispense of statins and long-term outcome in the entire study population and in subgroups based on age, sex and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 11 894 patients were included. Statins were dispensed to 49.8% (5918/11894) of patients at baseline, and 51.0% (874/1713) after 10 years. At baseline, 3.6% of patients were dispensed low dose, 69.4% medium dose and 27.0% high-dose statins. After adjustments, ongoing statin treatment was associated with a reduced risk for MACE [adjusted hazard ratio 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.83). P < 0.001], mainly driven by a reduction in all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70 (0.64-0.76)], P < 0.001. The results were consistent in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that statin therapy might be beneficial for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish causality between statin treatment and improved outcome.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibition after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal medical therapy after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic stenosis remains unknown. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors could potentially improve cardiac remodelling and clinical outcomes after SAVR. METHODS: All patients undergoing SAVR due to aortic stenosis in Sweden 2006-2020 and surviving 6 months after surgery were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; all-cause mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction). Secondary endpoints included the individual components of MACE and cardiovascular mortality. Time-updated adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare patients with and without RAS inhibitors. Subgroup analyses were performed, as well as a comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). RESULTS: A total of 11 894 patients (mean age, 69.5 years, 40.4% women) were included. Median follow-up time was 5.4 (2.7-8.5) years. At baseline, 53.6% of patients were dispensed RAS inhibitors, this proportion remained stable during follow-up. RAS inhibition was associated with a lower risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93), p<0.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of all-cause death (aHR 0.79 (0.73 to 0.86), p<0.001). The lower MACE risk was consistent in all subgroups except for those with mechanical prostheses (aHR 1.07 (0.84 to 1.37), p for interaction=0.040). Both treatment with ACE inhibitors (aHR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.97)) and ARBs (0.87 (0.81 to 0.93)) were associated with lower risk of MACE. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that medical therapy with an RAS inhibitor after SAVR is associated with a 13% lower risk of MACE and a 21% lower risk of all-cause death.

Medical therapy after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: Current clinical guidelines have no specific recommendations regarding medical therapy after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR). We studied the association between medical therapy with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, statins and ß-blockers and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events. METHODS: All patients undergoing valve replacement due to AR between 2006 and 2017 in Sweden and alive 6 months after discharge were included. Time-dependent multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, patient characteristics, comorbidities, other medications and year of surgical aortic valve replacement were used. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. Subgroup analyses based on age, sex, heart failure, low ejection fraction, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2204 patients were included [median follow-up 5.0 years (range 0.0-11.5)]. At baseline, 68% of the patients were dispensed RAS inhibitors, 80% ß-blockers and 35% statins. Dispense of RAS inhibitors and ß-blockers declined over time, especially during the first year after baseline, while dispense of statins remained stable. Treatment with RAS inhibitors or statins was associated with a reduced risk of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.87 and aHR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, respectively]. The results were consistent in subgroups based on age, sex and comorbidities. ß-Blocker treatment was associated with an increased risk for the primary outcome (aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a potential beneficial association of RAS inhibitors and statins as part of a secondary preventive treatment regime after aortic valve replacement in patients with AR. The role of ß-blockers needs to be further investigated.

Associations between medical therapy after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and long-term mortality: a report from the SWEDEHEART registry.

AIMS: The association between the use of statins, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, and/or ß-blockers and long-term mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AS who underwent isolated first-time SAVR in Sweden from 2006 to 2017 and survived 6 months after discharge were included. Individual patient data from four mandatory nationwide registries were merged. Cox proportional hazards models, with time-updated data on medication status and adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, type of prosthesis, and year of surgery, were used to investigate associations between dispensed statins, RAS inhibitors, and ß-blockers and all-cause mortality. In total, 9553 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 4.9 years (range 0-11); 1738 patients (18.2%) died during follow-up. Statins were dispensed to 49.1% and 49.0% of the patients within 6 months of discharge from the hospital and after 10 years, respectively. Corresponding figures were 51.4% and 53.9% for RAS inhibitors and 79.3% and 60.7% for ß-blockers. Ongoing treatment was associated with lower mortality risk for statins {adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.67 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.60-0.74]; P < 0.001} and RAS inhibitors [aHR 0.84 (0.76-0.93); P < 0.001] but not for ß-blockers [aHR 1.17 (1.05-1.30); P = 0.004]. The associations were robust in subgroups based on age, sex, and comorbidities (P for interactions >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large population-based real-world study support the use of statins and RAS inhibitors for patients who underwent SAVR due to AS.

Individually-tailored, Internet-based treatment for anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial.

Previous studies on Internet-based treatment with minimal to moderate therapist guidance have shown promising results for a number of specific diagnoses. The aim of this study was to test a new approach to Internet treatment that involves tailoring the treatment according to the patient's unique characteristics and comorbidities. A total of 54 participants, regardless of specific anxiety diagnosis, were included after an in-person, semi-structured diagnostic interview and randomized to a 10 week treatment program or to a control group. Treatment consisted of a number of individually-prescribed modules in conjunction with online therapist guidance. Significant results were found for all dependent measures both immediately following treatment and at 1 and 2 year intervals. Mean between-group effect size including measures of anxiety, depression and quality of life was Cohen's d = 0.69 at post-treatment, while the mean within-group effect size was d = 1.15 at post-treatment and d = 1.13 and d = 1.04 at 1 and 2 year follow-up respectively. The tentative conclusion drawn from these results is that tailoring the Internet-based therapy can be a feasible approach in the treatment of anxiety in a homogeneous population.