Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 42(2): 114-120, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102054

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on cognitive performance (CP) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after 6 months of treatment with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicentre, open-label study of patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic or asymptomatic metastatic PCa scheduled to receive LHRH analogues for≥6 months. We assessed four CP domains at baseline and after 6 months of ADT: 1) Working memory: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (WAIS III) Digit Span Subtest (WAIS III-Digit); 2) Visual memory: ad hoc visual memory test; 3) Visuospatial ability: Judgement of Line Orientation (JLO) and Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects (3D-Rotation); and 4) Nonverbal analytical reasoning: WAIS III Matrix Reasoning Test (WAIS III-MRT). Changes outside the baseline 95% confidence intervals were considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients completed the study. Of these, 245 (79.6%) experienced no statistically significant changes on any test and 63 patients (20.4%) experienced significant changes in ≥1 test. Of these, most presented a change in only one test, distributed evenly between improvements (58 patients; 18.8%) and worsening (56 patients; 18.2%). For individual tests, most patients (87.8% to 91.8%) had no change from baseline; however, the significant changes (improvement vs. deterioration, respectively) were as follows: WAIS III-Digit (6.3% vs. 5.9%); visual memory (5.3% vs. 5.7%); JLO (5.3% vs. 4.5%); 3D-Rotation (4.1% vs. 4.1%); and WAIS III-MRT (4.8% vs. 5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: CP in patients with PCa does not appear to be adversely affected by 6 months of LHRH analogue administration.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Prospectivos , Memoria Espacial/efectos de los fármacos , Navegación Espacial/efectos de los fármacos , Escalas de Wechsler
2.
Br J Cancer ; 108(12): 2565-72, 2013 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23722472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Owing to the limited validity of clinical data on the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and bone metastases, biochemical markers are a promising tool for predicting survival, disease progression and skeletal-related events (SREs) in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive capacity of biochemical markers of bone turnover for mortality risk, disease progression and SREs in patients with PCa and bone metastases undergoing treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA). METHODS: This was an observational, prospective and multicenter study in which ninety-eight patients were included. Patients were treated with ZA (4 mg every 4 weeks for 18 months). Data were collected at baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months after the beginning of treatment. Serum levels of bone alkaline phosphtase (BALP), aminoterminal propeptide of procollagen type I (P1NP) and beta-isomer of carboxiterminal telopeptide of collagen I (ß-CTX) were analysed at all points in the study. Data on disease progression, SREs development and survival were recorded. RESULTS: Cox regression models with clinical data and bone markers showed that the levels of the three markers studied were predictive of survival time, with ß-CTX being especially powerful, in which a lack of normalisation in visit 1 (3 months after the beginning of treatment) showed a 6.3-times more risk for death than in normalised patients. Levels of these markers were also predictive for SREs, although in this case BALP and P1NP proved to be better predictors. We did not find any relationship between bone markers and disease progression. CONCLUSION: In patients with PCa and bone metastases treated with ZA, ß-CTX and P1NP can be considered suitable predictors for mortality risk, while BALP and P1NP are appropriate for SREs. The levels of these biomarkers 3 months after the beginning of treatment are especially important.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Remodelación Ósea , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Ácido Zoledrónico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA