Physical therapy for peripheral facial palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reveal the efficacy of physical therapy for patients with peripheral facial palsy. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Published randomized controlled trials comparing the physical therapy versus placebo/non-treatment for peripheral facial palsy such as Bell's palsy, Ramsay Hunt syndrome, and traumatic facial palsy were included for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was non-recovery at the end of the follow-up. Non-recovery was defined according to the authors' definition. The secondary outcomes were the composite score of the Sunnybrook facial grading system and sequelae (presence of synkinesis or hemifacial spasm) at the end of the follow-up. Data was analyzed using Review Manager software and pooled risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials met the eligible criteria. The data on non-recovery from four studies was obtained and included 418 participants in the meta-analysis. Physical therapy might reduce non-recovery (RR = 0.51 [95% CI = 0.31-0.83], low quality). Pooling the data of composite score of the Sunnybrook facial grading system from three studies (166 participants) revealed that physical therapy might increase the composite scores (MD = 12.1 [95% CI = 3.11-21.0], low quality). Moreover, we obtained data on sequelae from two articles (179 participants). The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of physical therapy on reduction of sequelae (RR = 0.64 [95% CI = 0.07-5.95], very low quality). CONCLUSION: The evidence suggested that physical therapy reduces non-recovery in patients with peripheral facial palsy and improves the composite score of the Sunnybrook facial grading system, whereas the efficacy of physical therapy in reducing sequelae remained uncertain. The included studies had high risk of bias, imprecision, or inconsistency; therefore, the certainty of evidence was low or very low. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its efficacy.

Effect of muscle strengthening on peripheral facial palsy: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of muscle strengthening intervention in peripheral facial palsy (PFP). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at five hospitals. Fifty-one subjects with PFP who showed a response of less than 20% on electroneurography (ENoG) were enrolled. Subjects in a muscle-strengthening-intervention group (MS Group) underwent a selective muscle contraction intervention (SMCI). Subjects in another group not receiving muscle strengthening intervention (Non-MS Group). Both groups underwent three interventions: Prohibition of maximum effort movements, Stretching of the affected facial muscles, and Mirror biofeedback therapy. The outcomes were measured by the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (FGS) at 6 months after onset (primary endpoint) and at 12 months after onset (secondary endpoint). The subjects in the MS Group and Non-MS Group were further divided into subgroups showing ENoG responses of 10% or less and ENoG responses of over 10%, as a sub-analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences between the MS Group and Non-MS Group at either the primary endpoint or secondary endpoint. Among the subjects in the treatment group with an ENoG response of over 10% at the primary endpoint, the FGS Composite Score and FGS Voluntary Movement score were both significantly higher in the MS Group than in Non-MS Group. Although the MS Group had a significantly lower FGS Resting Symmetry Score, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the FGS Synkinesis Score. CONCLUSIONS: SMCI improved paralysis in subjects exhibiting an ENoG response of over 10% within the 6 months from onset without any deterioration of synkinesis.