A hybrid endovascular and open approach to rare thyrocervical trunk and subclavian pseudoaneurysms complicated by embolic brachial artery occlusion.

Subclavian and thyrocervical trunk pseudoaneurysms are rare pathologies and even more so when they occur simultaneously. Treatment of these vascular injuries can be done endovascularly or with open surgery. We present a novel two-stage, hybrid open and endovascular approach to the management of a healthy 41-year-old man with no personal or family history of connective tissue disorders, who presented with subclavian branch and thyrocervical trunk pseudoaneurysms complicated by brachial artery occlusion. The pseudoaneurysms were treated with microvascular plug deployment, followed by subclavian artery covered stenting, with treatment of the brachial occlusion via open thrombectomy with patch angioplasty. The patient recovered without any complications.

Single Center Outcomes of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization in Patients with End-Stage Peripheral Artery Disease.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) can present as chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) with ischemic pain and tissue loss. Progression of distal disease can lead to a "no option" or end-stage disease without traditional open or endovascular revascularization due to lack of pedal targets. Innovations in endovascular technology allow for the use of percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA) to treat patients with CLTI. Purpose: We describe our experience and technique for treating four patients with end-stage PAD with pDVA. Research Design: Four patients with end-stage PAD were followed during and after pDVA creation. Technical success, complications, wound healing, and freedom from major amputation were analyzed. Data Collection and Analysis: Patient data and outcomes were collected via chart review and at time of follow up appointments in vascular surgery clinic. Results: Technical success was 100%, without post-procedural complications, and patients were continued on antiplatelet and anticoagulation. Three patients (75%) had successful wound healing, with 2 patients healing after transmetatarsal amputation (TMA), and 1 healing a distal foot ulceration that did not require surgery. One patient had worsening ischemic breakdown of a TMA, despite re-intervention on the pDVA, which required a below knee amputation (BKA). Freedom from major amputation was 75% overall, with an average follow-up time of 410 days post-procedure (Range: 113-563 days). Conclusions: Percutaneous deep vein arterialization attempts to provide blood flow to the preserved venous bed in patients with end-stage PAD. Exploration and utilization of this technique continues to expand in the modern vascular era. This case series highlights 4 patients with end-stage PVD who underwent pDVA, with 100% procedural success, and 75% limb salvage rate.

Body Mass Index Impacts Indication But Not Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies looking at thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes in obese and overweight patients. Our objective was to determine the rate of complications, reintervention, and short-term mortality in normal weight, overweight, and obese patients undergoing TEVAR. METHODS: Patients undergoing TEVAR at a large tertiary hospital from October 2007 to January 2020 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts based on body mass index (BMI): normal (18.5-25 kg/m2), overweight (25-30 kg/m2), and obese (>30 kg/m2). Primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year survival. Intraoperative, in-hospital, and postdischarge complications were assessed as secondary outcomes using the Clavian-Dindo classification system. In addition, reinterventions associated with the index TEVAR procedure as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Among 204 patients fitting the study criteria, we identified 65 with normal BMI, 78 overweight, and 61 obese patients. Obese patients were younger than the overweight and normal BMI patients (mean age 62.2 vs. 66.7 vs. 70.7, respectively, P = 0.003). In terms of TEVAR indication, the obese cohort had the highest percentage of patients with type B aortic dissection (36.4%), while the normal BMI cohort had the higher proportion of patients undergoing TEVAR for isolated thoracic aortic aneurysm (63.9%). Intraoperative complications did not significantly differ between cohorts. Postoperatively, in-hospital complications, postdischarge complications and 30-day return to the operative room did not differ significantly between study cohorts. Odds of reintervention did not differ significantly between cohorts, both on univariate and multivariate analysis. Log-rank test of Kaplan Meier analysis revealed no difference in reintervention-free survival (P = 0.22). Thirty-day mortality and 1-year overall survival were similar across cohorts. Both univariate and multivariate logarithmic regression revealed no difference in likelihood of 30-day mortality between the obese and normal cohort. CONCLUSIONS: There were no measurable differences in complications, reinterventions, or mortality, suggesting that vascular surgeons can perform TEVAR across a spectrum of BMI without compromising outcomes.

Use of Spinal Anesthesia during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes after spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing thoracic endograft placement and to evaluate the adjunctive use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) placement. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients that underwent thoracic endograft placement from 2001 to 2019 was performed. Patients were stratified based on the type of anesthesia they received: GA, SA or epidural, GA with CSFD, and SA with CSFD. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and length of stay (LOS). Baseline characteristics were analyzed with Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 30-day mortality and longer LOS. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients underwent thoracic endograft placement; 104 patients received SA, 180 patients received GA, 30 patients received GA and CSFD, and 19 patients received SA and CSFD. Of the total patients, 16.2% underwent thoracic endograft placement for type B aortic dissection, 3.3% for type A aortic dissection, and 12.3% for penetrating ulcer. The mean age of the study population was 68.7 years old. Patients undergoing SA were older with a mean age of 73.4 years versus 64.7 years for patients undergoing GA (P < 0.001). Spinal anesthesia (SA) was preferred in patients at high risk for GA (>75 years old: 52.9% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001; renal comorbidities: 20.6% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.03, and current smokers: 26.7% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001). Length of stay (LOS) was decreased in the SA group (4.29 days vs. 9.70 days, P < 0.001). There was a lower incidence of spinal cord ischemia in the SA group (1.0% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.44), as well as significantly decreased 30-day mortality (0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.01), reintervention (19.2% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.02), and return to the operating room (6.8% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.02). Of the 19 patients that had SA + CSFD, there were no signs and symptoms of spinal cord ischemia and decreased incidence of perioperative complications (0% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.01). There was no difference in the risk for intraoperative complications, neurologic complications, or 30-day mortality between GA + CSFD patients versus SA + CSFD patients. Age >75 (P = 0.002), intraoperative complications (P < 0.001), and perioperative complications (P = 0.02) were associated with increased mortality after thoracic endograft placement per multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia (SA) in select high-risk patients was associated with reduced 30-day mortality, neurologic complications, and LOS compared to GA. The concurrent use of spinal drainage and SA had satisfactory results compared to spinal drainage and GA.

Surgical External Iliac Artery Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Is a Safe, Suitable Alternative to Common Femoral Artery Access.

Background Many patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have peripheral artery disease necessitating surgical access. This study reviews the preoperative risk factors, procedural characteristics, and outcomes in patients undergoing surgical common femoral artery (CFA) and external iliac artery (EIA) access through a retro-inguinal groin incision for TAVR. Methods A single-center TAVR database was retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing surgical cutdown (January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2020). Access sites were evaluated on preoperative imaging. Data on demographics, imaging, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were collected. The vascular surgeon selected the cutdown site. Results A hundred and thirty TAVR patients had surgical cutdown. The choice of access site was either the common femoral artery (82 patients, 63%) or the iliac artery (48 patients, 37%). There was no difference in age, BMI, or medical risk factors. There was no difference in iliac diameter or circumferential iliac calcium. In the iliac group, there was a smaller mean CFA size and a higher incidence of circumferential CFA calcium. In the femoral group, there was: a lower mean sheath-to-CFA ratio, a trend toward increased unplanned endarterectomy, and a higher incidence of 30-day readmission. There was no difference in adjunct procedure use. Conclusion EIA surgical access had similar complication rates and length of stay with a reduced tendency for unplanned endarterectomy when compared to CFA access. The EIA is a suitable access site for TAVR in select patients.

The Venous Thrombectomy Armamentarium: An Expanding World.

Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common and important public health problem. It affects more than 350,000 people in the United States annually and has a substantial economic impact. Without adequate treatment, there is significant risk of development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) resulting in patient morbidity, worse quality of life, and costly long-term medical care. Over the past decade, the treatment algorithm for patients with acute DVT has significantly changed. Prior to 2008, the treatment recommendation for patients with acute DVT was limited to anticoagulation and conservative management. In 2008, national clinical practice guidelines were updated to include interventional strategies such as surgical- and catheter-based techniques for the treatment of acute DVT. Early strategies for debulking of extensive acute DVT primarily consisted of open surgical thrombectomy and administration of thrombolytics. In the intervening period, a plethora of advanced endovascular techniques and technologies have been developed which reduced the morbidity of operative intervention and risks of hemorrhage associated with thrombolysis. This review will focus on the novel technologies commercially available for management of acute DVT, denoting unique features inherent to each device. This expanded armamentarium gives vascular surgeons and proceduralists the opportunity to individualize their treatment approach to the specific patient's anatomy, lesion, and history.

Women are Not at Higher Risk for Reintervention or Major Amputation after Lower Extremity Atherectomy for Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to compare short-term and long-term differences in reintervention-free and major amputation-free survival between female and male patients undergoing lower extremity atherectomy for peripheral artery disease. METHODS: We analyzed lower extremity atherectomy procedures performed on 294 patients between January 2014 and September 2019. Reintervention was defined as either open bypass or endovascular procedure to the same region following the index operation. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was performed to compare reintervention-free and major amputation-free survival between sexes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the adjusted odds of reintervention and major amputation based on sex. We conducted subgroup analyses by anatomic region (femoropopliteal vs. tibial), indication (claudication vs. chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)), and balloon type (drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA)) across sexes. RESULTS: Of the 294 patients, 125 (42.5%) were female. Compared to men, women receiving atherectomy were more likely to be Black (28.0% vs. 16.6%; P = 0.018), a nonsmoker (44.8% vs. 21.3%; P < 0.001), and present with CLTI (55.2% vs. 43.2%; P = 0.042). There were no differences in atherectomy region, lesion type, or balloon type between sexes. KM analysis showed similar 4-year reintervention-free survival (68.8% vs. 75.1%; P = 0.88) and major amputation-free survival (97.6% vs. 97.6%; P = 0.41) between sexes. Women and men had similar reintervention-free survival when grouped by femoropopliteal (67.9% vs. 70.8%; P = 0.69) or tibial (76.2% vs. 83.9%; P = 0.68) atherectomy region. Indication (claudication versus CLTI) did not affect reintervention-free survival in either women (64.5% vs. 69.6%; P = 0.28) or men (68.5% vs. 76.7%; P = 0.84). KM curves for DCB versus POBA were also similar between sexes and showed an early benefit in reintervention rate favoring DCB, which dissipated in both women (65.4% vs. 72.7%; P = 0.61) and men (75.5% vs. 78.4%; P = 0.18) by 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to men, women demonstrate commensurate benefit from atherectomy for lower extremity revascularization. There were no differences seen in long-term reintervention or major amputation between sexes.

Gender Differences in Iliofemoral Vein Stenting for Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about gender's role in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gender on outcomes of iliac vein stenting(IVS) for CVI. METHODS: 866 patients who underwent vein stenting for CVI at one institution from August 2011 to June 2021 were analyzed via retrospective review. Patients were followed up to 5 years after initial stent placement. Presenting symptoms were quantified using Venous Clinical Severity Score(VCSS), Clinical Assessment Score(CAS), and Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) class. Reoperations after initial IVS were recorded. Major reoperations were defined as iliac interventions using venography. Minor reoperations were defined as thermal ablation. Multivariate logistic regression models were used determine odds of any and major reintervention. RESULTS: Compared to females, males pre-operatively presented with a higher mean CEAP class (3.6 vs .3.3; P < .001), VCSS composite (11.3 vs .9.9; P < .001), and smoking history (134 vs .49; P < .001). The 2 groups were similar in age (P = .125), BMI(P = .898), previous DVT (P = .085), diabetes (P = .386), hypertension (P = 1.0), and CAD (P = .499). Multivariate analyses revealed no association between gender and any reintervention (OR, 1.02; 95%CI, .71-1.46; P = .935) or gender and major reintervention (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, .86-2.23 P = .177). There were no differences in number of stents placed (P = .736) or symptomatic improvement at 1 month (P = .951), 3 months (P = .233), 6 months(P = .068), and greater than 1 year (P = .287). At the 1 year follow-up, the male cohort had higher CAS values than females P = .034). Males had larger reduction in composite VCSS than women at 1 year (5.1 vs. 3.8; P = .003) and 3 years (5.3 vs .3.7; P = .031) of follow-up and similar levels of improvement in post-op (4.0 vs .3.5; P = .059), 2 years (4.3 vs .3.8; P = .295), 4-years (5.1 vs .4.6; P = .529), 5 years (5.6 vs .4.2; P = .174), and 6 years (5.93vs.3.3 P = .089). CONCLUSIONS: In a single site study of IVS in patients with CVI, males tended to present worse symptoms than females. After surgery, however, both cohorts showed improvement, and both seemed to improve to the same degree of residual symptoms.

High Thoracic Tortuosity Is Associated With CT-Markers of Degeneration of the Descending Thoracic Aortic Wall.

OBJECTIVE/INTRODUCTION: Increased vascular tortuosity may be an independent marker of generalized aortic pathology. This study investigates the association between descending thoracic aortic tortuosity, aneurysm pathophysiology, and outcomes following EVAR in AAA patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective EVAR between 2004 and 2018 were reviewed. Thoracic tortuosity index (TTI) was measured using 3D reconstruction software. Patients were dichotomized across the median TTI into high tortuosity [HT] (TTI >1.27, Figure1(a)) and low tortuosity [LT] (TTI ≤1.27, Figure 1(b)) groups. Perioperative complications, postoperative outcomes, and CT-based features of thoracic aortic wall degeneration (Figure 1(c)-(e)) were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: 136 patients underwent treatment: 70 HT patients, including 54 males and 16 females (mean age: 77 years), and 66 LT patients, including 62 males and 4 females (mean age: 70 years) (age; P < .001). LT patients exhibited greater prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and diabetes (P = .045, P = .01). Presence of degenerative aortic wall markers was greater in HT patients (P = .045). HT patients had higher incidence of multiple aneurysms concurrently present in their aorta compared to LT (32.8% vs 11.3%; P = .002). Frequency of AAA rupture/dissection was 4.3% for HT and 1.5% for LT (P = .339). A trend was observed in all cause 30-day mortality in the HT group (P = .061). Other perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: High TTI was associated with older age at time of EVAR, greater prevalence of degenerative markers in the descending thoracic aortic wall, and widespread aorto-iliac dilation. While not predictive of EVAR outcomes, TTI can provide valuable information regarding aneurysm pathophysiology.

Spinal cord protection in open and endovascular approaches to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Despite advancements in surgical and postoperative management, spinal cord injury has been a persistent complication of both open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Spinal cord injury can be explained with an ischemia-infarction model which results in local edema of the spinal cord, damaging its structure and leading to reversible or irreversible loss of its function. Perfusion of the spinal cord during aortic procedures can be enhanced by several adjuncts which have been described with a broad variety of evidence in their support. These adjuncts include systemic hypothermia, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, extracorporeal circulation and distal aortic perfusion, segmental arteries reimplantation, left subclavian artery revascularization, and staged aortic repair. The Authors here reviewed and discussed the role of such adjuncts in preventing spinal cord injury from occurring, pinpointing current evidence and outlining future perspectives.

Double-barrel iliocaval reconstruction using closed-cell dedicated venous stents.

OBJECTIVE: Double-barrel iliocaval reconstruction is performed by deploying two stents simultaneously in a side-by-side, or "double-barrel," configuration in the inferior vena cava (IVC) with extension into the bilateral common iliac veins. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of double-barrel reconstruction using closed-cell dedicated venous stents for the treatment of iliocaval deep venous thrombosis and iliac vein compression syndrome. METHODS: All endovascular procedural reports comprising vascular surgery and interventional radiology operators from a single urban academic hospital between May 1, 2019, and April 30, 2021, were retrospectively searched. A cohort of 22 consecutive patients who underwent double-barrel iliocaval stenting with closed-cell dedicated venous stents for chronic or acute-on-chronic iliocaval venous disease without prior endovascular iliocaval repair was identified. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and patient outcomes were determined via a manual review of preprocedure clinical notes, diagnostic imaging studies, procedure notes and images, and follow-up clinical notes. RESULTS: The median (range) age was 59 (27-81) years, and the cohort consisted of 59.1% female. The most common presenting symptoms of venous disease were lower extremity swelling (90.9%) and pain (50.0%). CEAP clinical classification was C3 in 86.4% of patients, whereas the remainder had C4 disease. Most patients (72.7%) had post-thrombotic syndrome, 22.7% had a nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion, and one patient (4.5%) had the congenital absence of the infrarenal IVC. A total of 40.9% of patients had a pre-existing IVC filter at the time of treatment. Six of the 22 patients underwent concurrent pharmacomechanical thrombectomy during the index iliocaval reconstruction and stenting procedure. The number of stents placed ranged from 2 to 5. With a mean follow-up period of 7.1 months, ranging from 12 days to 16.7 months, the freedom from reintervention rate was 90.9%. Twenty of 22 patients achieved subjective improvement or resolution of symptoms. The major adverse event rate was 9.1%, as two patients had access site complications requiring intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Double-barrel iliocaval reconstruction with closed-cell dedicated venous stents for the treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome or iliac vein compression syndrome is technically feasible and clinically effective with a low reintervention rate.

Technological Advances to Address the Challenging Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Neck.

There have been significant technologic advances in endovascular aortic therapies since the introduction of conventional infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). These advances have sought to address the weaknesses of conventional EVAR- particularly the difficult or "hostile" infrarenal aortic aneurysm neck. We review anatomical features that create a hostile neck and the most recent advancements to overcome these limitations. EndoAnchors replicate open suture fixation to seal endograft to aortic tissue and have been shown to be useful as a prophylactic measure in short, angulated necks as well as therapeutic for type Ia endoleaks. Fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) devices such as the Z-fen (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) raises the seal zone to the suprarenal segment while maintaining renal perfusion. Finally, multibranch aortic grafts such as the Thoracoabdominal Branch Endoprosthesis (Tambe; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) raise the seal zone above the visceral segment and can be used off the shelf with promising results.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Disease and Repair: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 3.

Thoracoabdominal aortic disease is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires expert multidisciplinary collaborative management. Intervention is indicated in patients with symptomatic aneurysms or when an aneurysm reaches a certain threshold of diameter or rate of expansion. The strategies for spinal cord and end-organ protection have evolved over several decades, resulting in improved outcomes after repair. Open repair, although invasive, provides definitive and durable repair. Endovascular approaches are rapidly evolving, and the results with fenestrated and branched endografts are promising. Both open repair and endovascular repair require highly specialized expertise, and outcomes are best when repair is undertaken in an elective setting by a dedicated team. Patients with degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and chronic dissections should be followed up closely and referred for elective repair when indicated.

Treatment of a descending thoracic mycotic aneurysm secondary to disseminated aspergillosis infection with thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Mycotic aortic aneurysms are a rare and potentially fatal aortic pathology. Advancements in vascular technology have allowed endovascular repair to be a durable and less invasive option for the treatment of mycotic aortic aneurysms. We have presented the case of a 51-year-old man with a mycotic aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta secondary to chronic, disseminated aspergillosis infection after liver transplantation. The aneurysm was successfully treated with thoracic aortic stent graft deployment. No perioperative complications occurred, and follow-up computed tomography angiography showed no signs of an endoleak. The patient will continue with lifelong antifungal therapy and close follow-up with vascular surgery.

Patients with active venous leg ulcers at the time of iliac vein stenting require more reoperations.

OBJECTIVE: An active venous leg ulcer (VLU) caused by lower extremity venous insufficiency is challenging to treat and will often recur after initially healing. In the present study, we compared the symptomatic outcomes and need for reoperation after iliac vein stenting (IVS) in patients with an active VLU (VLU+) and those without an active VLU (VLU-). METHODS: A single-institution database of patients with chronic venous outflow obstruction who underwent IVS from August 2011 to June 2021 was analyzed. Symptoms were quantified using the venous clinical severity score. The patients were divided into two cohorts: those with (VLU+) and without (VLU-) VLUs. RESULTS: A total of 872 patients (71 VLU+ and 801 VLU-) were identified. Many of the demographics and comorbidities differed between the two cohorts, and these variables were included in the multivariable analysis. On univariate analysis, the VLU+ cohort was more likely to need a major reoperation (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.52; P = .036). However, on multivariable analysis, the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-2.40; P = .667). Additionally, the VLU+ cohort required a significantly greater mean total of reoperations (1.4 vs 1.0; P = .006) than the VLU- cohort. Comparatively, for patients who underwent at least one reoperation, the difference in the mean total number of reoperations was even greater for the VLU+ cohort (2.6 vs 1.8; P = .001). The results from the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test revealed no differences in the reintervention-free survival time (P = .980). Both cohorts experienced a durable mean reduction in the venous clinical severity score. The ulcer healing rates for the VLU+ cohort at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 38%, 47%, 52%, and 59%, respectively. The ulcer recurrence rates for the VLU+ cohort were 4%, 10%, 19%, and 30% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, with a median time to recurrence of 1.2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with active VLUs who underwent a first reintervention after initial IVS, on average, required an additional reintervention.

Symptom Relief and Reintervention after Iliac Vein Stenting Stratified by CEAP Clinical Classification.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate long-term symptom relief and reintervention rates after iliac vein stenting (IVS) in patients with chronic venous outflow obstruction. METHODS: A single-institution database of patients undergoing IVS from August 2011 to June 2021 was analyzed. Patients were stratified into three cohorts based on the clinical component of the clinical, etiology, anatomical, and pathophysiology (CEAP) classification: C3, C4, and C5/6. Symptoms were quantified using the venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Reintervention was defined as any procedure using venography. Edema, pigmentation, and ulceration progression-free survival as well as reintervention-free survival were assessed with Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 737 total patients, there were 435 C3, 206 C4, and 96 C5/6 patients. The C5/6 cohort had the highest percentage of patients undergo reoperation (36.4%). C5/6 patients yielded the poorest ulceration progression-free survival (P < 0.001) while C3 patients had the poorest skin pigmentation progression-free survival (P = 0.009). On adjusted analysis there was no significant difference in odds of reintervention between study cohorts. Mean composite VCSS scores were significantly different at each yearly post-operative follow-up visit up to 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is one of the largest investigations of long-term outcomes in IVS patients. Most patients with long-term follow-up experienced an improvement in their composite VCSS. CEAP clinical classification at the time of IVS had a significant influence on the likelihood and quantity of reintervention.

Higher surgeon volume is associated with lower odds of complication following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients being treated for aortic dissection. METHODS: Patients undergoing TEVAR from January 2014 to March 2021 in the Vascular Quality Initiative database were analyzed. Patients with aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR were divided into quartiles based on the annual TEVAR volume of their vascular surgeon. The highest quartile, middle two quartiles, and lowest quartile were deemed high volume (HV), moderate volume (MV), and low volume (LV), respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare cohort outcomes in terms any postoperative complication, stroke, spinal cord ischemia, reintervention, and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the hazard of overall postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Among 1217 patients undergoing TEVAR, 321, 621, and 275 were performed by HV, MV, and LV surgeons, respectively. HV surgeons performed >19 annual TEVARs, MV surgeons between five and 18, and LV surgeons four or less. Adjusted odds of any postoperative complication revealed that HV and MV surgeons had lower odds of overall postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.85; P = .011 and OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87; P = .008, respectively) when compared with patients of LV surgeons. Patients of HV surgeons had lower odds of respiratory complications than those of LV surgeons (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-0.93; P = .039). Adjusted analysis of outcomes including spinal cord ischemia, stroke, myocardial infarction, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality did not reveal statistically significant differences between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon volume does not to impact 30-day mortality or long-term mortality after TEVAR for aortic dissection, but the odds of overall postoperative complications were lower for HV and MV surgeons when compared with LV surgeons.

Collapsed endograft and lower limb ischemia from type B dissection repaired with thoracic endovascular aortic graft and iliac stenting: A case report and review of the literature.

The collapse of an abdominal aortic endograft is a rare event. We present the case of a 60-year-old man with an abdominal endograft who came to the emergency department with chest, back, abdominal, and lower extremity pain in addition to a cool left foot. On imaging, he was found to have a type B aortic dissection and a collapsed abdominal endograft. Subsequently, the patient was taken to the operating room and treated with a thoracic endovascular aortic repair, abdominal aortic cuff, and an iliac stent. Our study details this case and thoroughly reviews similar cases in the literature.

The Feasibility and Applicability of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) can often present with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), including ischemic rest pain and severe tissue loss. Progression of PAD can lead to "no option" or end-stage disease in which there are no traditional open or endovascular interventions available for revascularization. This cohort of patients have a poor prognosis, with a major amputation rate of 40% and mortality of up to 20% at six months. For this patient population, surgical deep vein arterialization (DVA) is offered as an attempt to provide blood flow to the distal preserved venous bed and reverse the ischemic process. Surgical DVA has traditionally been offered as an option and was pioneered by Herb Dardik. The evolution of endovascular technology has allowed for percutaneous DVA (pDVA). Using ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, an arteriovenous channel is created between a tibial artery and vein and reinforced with covered stent grafts to increase distal limb perfusion with the goals of improving wound healing and amputation-free survival. Lysis of venous valves with a valvulotome also aids with reversal of flow into the distal venous system. Investigations of percutaneous deep vein arterialization are underway with one device, the LimFlow System (LimFlow SA, Paris, France), which is undergoing feasibility trials. Here we present the current clinical indications, feasibility, results, and our institutional experience with the use of percutaneous deep vein arterialization.

Compression Stocking Compliance Does Not Impact Reintervention or Symptom Change after Iliac Vein Stenting in Patients with Moderate to Severe Lower Extremity Edema.

BACKGROUND: Medical compression stocking (MCS) therapy remains a core treatment for chronic venous disease, particularly in patients with lower extremity edema. This study investigated the impact of postoperative MCS adherence on patients with moderate to severe edema who underwent iliac vein stenting (IVS). METHODS: Patients at a large tertiary care center who underwent IVS from August 2011 to June 2021 were analyzed. Symptoms were quantified using the venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and clinical assessment score (CAS). The criterion for inclusion was moderate or severe lower extremity edema at the time of IVS. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: complete postoperative compression therapy compliance (MCS+) and no postoperative compression therapy use (MCS-). RESULTS: Among 376 patients fitting our study criteria, we identified 168 MCS+ and 208 MCS- patients. The VCSS edema score did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.179). Postoperatively, the mean changes in VCSS edema at the first postoperative visit, the one-year follow-up, and the two-year follow-up were not significantly different between the MCS+ and MCS- cohorts (P = 0.123, 0.296, and 0.534, respectively). An analysis of CAS for edema revealed that the MCS+ cohort had a modestly better improvement in edema at the 90-day follow-up visit versus the MCS- cohort (P = 0.018), but this difference was not observed in the 30-day (P = 0.834) or six-month follow-up visit (P = 0.755). A multivariate analysis revealed no difference in the need for major intervention (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.50, P = 0.504). A Kaplan-Meier analysis via log-rank test revealed no difference in reintervention-free survival between groups (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with moderate to severe lower extremity edema experience a reduction in their edema after IVS. In our study, compression stocking compliance after surgery had a little impact on edema relief in this population.