Immunoadsorption therapy in refractory heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a potential therapeutic option.

OBJECTIVE: Removal of cardiac autoantibodies by immunoadsorption might confer clinical improvement in dilated cardiomyopathy. In this pilot study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption therapy in refractory heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: This study consisted of 9 heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA III-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, unresponsive to heart failure therapy, and with cardiac autoantibodies. Patients underwent immunoadsorption therapy for five consecutive days using a tryptophan column. Changes in cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter), exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance), neurohormonal (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide), proinflammatory (high-sensitive C-reactive protein), and myocardial (cardiac troponin-I), biochemical, and hematological variables were obtained at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of immunoadsorption therapy. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and 6-minute walk distance significantly increased at 3 months (from 23.27±5.09 to 32.1±1.7%, p=0.01 for left ventricular ejection fraction and from 353±118 to 434±159 m, p=0.04 for 6-minute walk distance) and further increased at 6 months after immunoadsorption therapy (to 34.5±7.7%, p=0.02 for ejection fraction and to 441±136 m, p=0.04 for 6-minute walk distance). NT-proBNP level reduced from 1161(392.8-3034) to 385(116.1-656.5) ng/L (p=0.04), and high-sensitive C-reactive protein decreased from 9.74±0.96 to 4.3±5.8 mg/L (p=0.04) at 6 months. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (66.1±5.8 vs. 64.7±8.9 mm) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (56.1±8.6 vs. 52.3±10.8 mm) tended to decrease but did not reach statistical significance. No significant worsening was observed in creatinine, cardiac troponin-I, and hemoglobin levels after the immunoadsorption procedure. CONCLUSION: In dilated cardiomyopathy patients with refractory heart failure, immunoadsorption may be considered a potentially useful therapeutic option to improve a patient's clinical status.

Immunoadsorption therapy in refractory heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a potential therapeutic option

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Removal of cardiac autoantibodies by immunoadsorption might confer clinical improvement in dilated cardiomyopathy. In this pilot study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption therapy in refractory heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: This study consisted of 9 heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA III-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, unresponsive to heart failure therapy, and with cardiac autoantibodies. Patients underwent immunoadsorption therapy for five consecutive days using a tryptophan column. Changes in cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter), exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance), neurohormonal (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide), proinflammatory (high-sensitive C-reactive protein), and myocardial (cardiac troponin-I), biochemical, and hematological variables were obtained at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of immunoadsorption therapy. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and 6-minute walk distance significantly increased at 3 months (from 23.27±5.09 to 32.1±1.7%, p=0.01 for left ventricular ejection fraction and from 353±118 to 434±159 m, p=0.04 for 6-minute walk distance) and further increased at 6 months after immunoadsorption therapy (to 34.5±7.7%, p=0.02 for ejection fraction and to 441±136 m, p=0.04 for 6-minute walk distance). NT-proBNP level reduced from 1161(392.8-3034) to 385(116.1-656.5) ng/L (p=0.04), and high-sensitive C-reactive protein decreased from 9.74±0.96 to 4.3±5.8 mg/L (p=0.04) at 6 months. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (66.1±5.8 vs. 64.7±8.9 mm) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (56.1±8.6 vs. 52.3±10.8 mm) tended to decrease but did not reach statistical significance. No significant worsening was observed in creatinine, cardiac troponin-I, and hemoglobin levels after the immunoadsorption procedure. CONCLUSION: In dilated cardiomyopathy patients with refractory heart failure, immunoadsorption may be considered a potentially useful therapeutic option to improve a patient's clinical status.

Effects of ivabradine and beta-blocker therapy on dobutamine-induced ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Indirect evidences suggest that the If blocker ivabradine may exert an antiarrhythmic effect in ventricular myocardium in heart failure (HF) patients by inhibiting spontaneous depolarisations, but the clinical relevance of this mechanism is not known. Dobutamine (DOB) has been known to increase heart rate and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. AIM: In this study, we evaluated the effects of ivabradine on DOB-induced ventricular arrhythmias and compared them with those of beta-blocker (BB) therapy. METHODS: Patients with decompensated HF requiring inotropic support, left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%, and in sinus rhythm were included in the study (ivabradine group - 29 patients, control group - 29 patients, BB group - 15 patients). All patients underwent Holter recording for 6 h before the initiation of DOB infusion. Following baseline recording, DOB was administered at incremental doses of 5, 10, and 15 µg/kg/min, with 6-h steps. Holter monitoring was continued during 18 h of DOB infusion and analysed for the median number of ventricular premature contractions (VPC), ventricular couplets, episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and total ventricular arrhythmias in each step of the study protocol. RESULTS: The positive chronotropic effect of incremental DOB doses was blunted by beta-blockade and was totally abolished by ivabradine. The median number of VPCs, ventricular couplets, and total ventricular arrhythmias significantly increased with incremental doses of DOB in the control group (p = 0.018) and, to a lesser extent, in the ivabradine group (p = 0.015). In the BB group the absolute VPCs numbers were smaller than in the control or the ivabradine group, with the on-ivabradine VPCs numbers falling between those seen in control and BB groups. A numeric increase in VPCs with incremental DOB doses occurred in the BB group but did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), consistent with a protective effect of beta-blockade. Ivabradine reduced VPCs by 43% at 5 µg/kg/min DOB and by 38% at 10 µg/kg/min DOB against the control group (VPCs median 256 vs. 147 and 251 vs. 158) in the absence of significant differences at 15 µg/kg/min DOB between the control and ivabradine groups (overall p > 0.05). Thus, ivabradine administered without background beta-blockade attenuated the arrhythmogenic effect of increasing doses of DOB in the low and moderate DOB dose but not in the high DOB dose. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with decompensated HF, ivabradine appears to reduce the incidence of VPCs in response to low and medium DOB dose. Whether the anti-arrhythmic effect of ivabradine is additive to the anti-arrhythmic effect of beta-blockade requires further investigation; this should also determine the clinical significance of ventricular arrhythmia attenuation with ivabradine.

High-dose bolus tirofiban versus low-dose bolus in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of the present study was to determine effects of high-dose versus low-dose intravenous (IV) bolus tirofiban on angiographic measures, ST resolution, enzymatic infarct size, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received current pharmacoinvasive therapy. METHODS: Acute coronary syndrome patients (n=271, 85.6% male; mean age: 57.9±12.6 years) from between 2009 and 2015 who received IV tirofiban therapy following PCI were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had received maintenance tirofiban infusion (0.15 µg/kg/min) after bolus dose and 600 mg clopidogrel. Percentage of patients undergoing drug eluting stent implantation procedure was 33.5%. Tirofiban was administered to all patients in bailout situation or for thrombotic complication after PCI. RESULTS: High-dose IV bolus group (25 µg/kg; n=140) was associated with greater ST segment resolution (66% vs. 50%, p=0.013) and reduced peak troponin release [12.4 ng/dL (range: 6.5-21.5 ng/dL) vs. 16.4 ng/dL (range: 10.1-27.4 ng/dL), p=0.001] compared with low-dose bolus group (10 µg/kg, n=131). Cardiovascular event rates were similar between groups at in-hospital, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up (p=1.000, 1.000, and 0.287, respectively). Percentage of patients with post-procedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade III flow, major, and minor bleeding were similar (p=0.085, 1.000, and 0.965, respectively). CONCLUSION: Use of high-dose IV bolus tirofiban in addition to aspirin and high-dose clopidogrel improves ST segment resolution, reduces infarct size, and does not increase bleeding events in patients with ACS undergoing PCI compared with low-dose bolus. Angiographic measures and clinical endpoints were similar between groups.