Evidence-Based Assessment of Congenital Heart Disease Genes to Enable Returning Results in a Genomic Study.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common major congenital anomaly and causes significant morbidity and mortality. Epidemiologic evidence supports a role of genetics in the development of CHD. Genetic diagnoses can inform prognosis and clinical management. However, genetic testing is not standardized among individuals with CHD. We sought to develop a list of validated CHD genes using established methods and to evaluate the process of returning genetic results to research participants in a large genomic study. METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-five candidate CHD genes were evaluated using a ClinGen framework. Sequence and copy number variants involving genes in the CHD gene list were analyzed in Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium participants. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic results were confirmed on a new sample in a clinical laboratory improvement amendments-certified laboratory and disclosed to eligible participants. Adult probands and parents of probands who received results were asked to complete a post-disclosure survey. RESULTS: A total of 99 genes had a strong or definitive clinical validity classification. Diagnostic yields for copy number variants and exome sequencing were 1.8% and 3.8%, respectively. Thirty-one probands completed clinical laboratory improvement amendments-confirmation and received results. Participants who completed postdisclosure surveys reported high personal utility and no decision regret after receiving genetic results. CONCLUSIONS: The application of ClinGen criteria to CHD candidate genes yielded a list that can be used to interpret clinical genetic testing for CHD. Applying this gene list to one of the largest research cohorts of CHD participants provides a lower bound for the yield of genetic testing in CHD.

Enoxaparin Reduces Catheter-associated Venous Thrombosis After Infant Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC) related venous thrombosis (VT) after pediatric cardiac surgery increases morbidity and mortality. Although VT prevention using low-dose anticoagulation therapy has proven ineffective, anticoagulation therapy using high-dose enoxaparin to achieve a therapeutic anti-Xa level has not been studied. We hypothesized that high-dose enoxaparin would reduce VT after pediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: Enoxaparin was administered to infants aged less than 150 days when postoperative CVC duration was anticipated to extend beyond 5 days. The primary outcome was the rate of VT, reexploration for bleeding, and postoperative red blood cell transfusions per 1000 CVC days. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019, 157 infants were treated with enoxaparin. Infants were divided into two groups: (1) subtherapeutic (n = 51), in which therapeutic anti-Xa level (0.5 to 1.0 IU/mL) was not achieved; and (2) therapeutic (n = 106), in which therapeutic anti-Xa level was achieved. Baseline demographics demonstrated a lower age at operation in the therapeutic group. The subtherapeutic group had a higher VT rate per 1000 CVC days (8.2) compared with the therapeutic group (2.6; P = .005). Reexploration for bleeding was similar between groups. The number of postoperative red blood cell transfusions per 1000 CVC days was significantly greater in the subtherapeutic group (109.4 vs 81.6; P = .008). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher median anti-Xa levels reduced the risk of VT (odds ratio 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.001 to 0.63; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that enoxaparin treatment resulting in a therapeutic anti-Xa level reduces postoperative CVC-associated VT without increasing bleeding complications.

Nurses' Attitudes Toward Clinical Research: Experience of the Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To understand factors affecting nurses' attitudes toward the Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest trials and association with approach/consent rates. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of pediatric/cardiac intensive care nurses' perceptions of the trials. SETTING: Study was conducted at 16 of 38 self-selected study sites. SUBJECTS: Pediatric and cardiac intensive care nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of nurses with positive perceptions, as defined by agree or strongly agree with the statement "I am happy to take care of a Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest patient". Associations between perceptions and study approach/consent rates were also explored. Of 2,241 nurses invited, 1,387 (62%) completed the survey and 77% reported positive perceptions of the trials. Nurses, who felt positively about the scientific question, the study team, and training received, were more likely to have positive perceptions of the trials (p < 0.001). Nurses who had previously cared for a research patient had significantly more positive perceptions of Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest compared with those who had not (79% vs 54%; p < 0.001). Of the 754 nurses who cared for a Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest patient, 82% had positive perceptions, despite 86% reporting it required more work. Sixty-nine percent believed that hypothermia reduces brain injury and mortality; sites had lower consent rates when their nurses believed that hypothermia was beneficial. Institution-specific approach rates were positively correlated with nurses' perceptions of institutional support for the trial (r = 0.54; p = 0.04), ICU support (r = 0.61; p = 0.02), and the importance of conducting the trial in children (r = 0.61; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of nurses had positive perceptions of the Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest trials. Institutional, colleague, and study team support and training were contributing factors. Despite increased work, nurses remained enthusiastic demonstrating that studies with intensive bedside nursing procedures are feasible. Institutions whose nurses believed hypothermia was beneficial had lower consent rates, suggesting that educating nurses on study rationale and equipoise may enhance study participation.