[Factors Resulting Correlation and Differences in Renal Function Evaluation Index Using the Serum Cystatin C and Creatinine as Measured by an Enzymatic Method].

We previously reported the association of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcreat) calculated from the serum creatinine level (S-Cr) measured using the Jaffe method with the GFR (eGFRcys) estimated from the serum cystatin C level (CysC). However, few studies have compared the eGFRcreat using the enzymatic method with the eGFRcys. It is unclear whether there are differences in the results of renal function assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare the eGFRcreat calculated from the S-Cr with the eGFRcys calculated from the CysC in patients in whom the S-Cr and CysC were simultaneously measured using the enzymatic method, examine the correlations of respective parameters, and clarify physiological factors involved in differences among the parameters. The subjects were 1334 patients treated in 5 institutions. The mean values and correlation coefficient were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test and Pearson's test, respectively. Influential factors between formulae were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The mean eGFRcreat was 67.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, being significantly higher than the mean eGFRcys (63.2). Multiple regression analysis showed that factors influencing differences in the S-Cr and CysC included the sex, age, serum albumin, and blood urea nitrogen BUN/S-Cr. Furthermore, factors involved in the overestimation of the eGFRcreat in comparison with the eGFRcys included the serum albumin and BUN/S-Cr. The differences between the eGFRcreat calculated from the S-Cr and eGFRcys were less marked than when adopting the Jaffe method in our previous study. However, the eGFRcreat were higher than the eGFRcys in patients with malnutrition or dehydration.

[The Usefulness of a Pamphlet for Preventing Exposure to Antineoplastic Agents at Cancer Patients' Homes and an Awareness Survey for Pharmacists about Providing Information to Cancer Patients about Exposure to Antineoplastic Agents].

As the number of patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy has increased, there is concern that cancer patients' family members are unknowingly exposed to antineoplastic agents at home through cancer patients' excrement or other secreted materials. In this study, we created a pamphlet that introduces several methods to prevent exposure to antineoplastic agents at home and conducted a questionnaire survey to assess the usefulness of the pamphlet. The results indicated that more than 90% of patients believed that the pamphlet was "useful" or "very useful" for ensuring safety with respect to antineoplastic agents at home. Further, most patients responded that the pamphlet decreased their anxieties about their disease and/or treatment. In order to examine pharmacists' involvement in providing information to cancer patients about exposure to antineoplastic agents, we conducted another questionnaire survey, with pharmacists working at Sapporo-Higashi Tokushukai Hospital and Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital. The results indicated that 41 out of 46 pharmacists practiced medication counseling; however, 39 pharmacists did not provide patients with instructions on ways to prevent exposure to antineoplastic agents at home. Their primary reason was a lack of adequate information to do so. Accordingly, the pamphlet prepared in our study would be an effective way to provide guidance for preventing exposure to antineoplastic agents at home.

Correlations between Plasma Levels of Anionic Uremic Toxins and Clinical Parameters in Hemodialysis Patients.

When the kidney is seriously impaired, various uremic toxins (UTs) accumulate in the body, often exerting unfavorable effects on physiological functions and drug pharmacokinetics. To prevent this, it is important to determine plasma UT levels accurately in chronic kidney disease patients. Although attempts to predict plasma UT levels using biomarkers have been made, the correlation between UT levels and the markers is not yet fully understood. In this study, we assessed the correlations among plasma levels of indoxyl sulfate (IS), indoleacetic acid (IA), and 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF) in 20 hemodialysis patients and evaluated the relationship between the plasma levels of UTs and clinical parameters, such as serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with special focus on IS. There were no correlations among the plasma levels of the three UTs before and immediately after hemodialysis. However, a significant correlation was observed between plasma IS levels and Scr before hemodialysis (r=0.643, p=0.002), with the correlation becoming much stronger when using the data obtained immediately after hemodialysis (r=0.744, p<0.001). Further, plasma IS levels showed a significant negative correlation with eGFR (r=-0.558, p=0.011). However, no correlations were observed for IA or CMPF. The results obtained from this study suggest that plasma IS levels can be predicted from Scr values, although the precise mechanism behind the correlation remains to be clarified.

[Plasma concentrations of anionic uremic toxins in hemodialysis patients and their effects on protein binding of pravastatin].

Uremic toxins (UTs) accumulate in the body of hemodialysis patients. UTs often exert unfavorable effects on patients and cause significant interactions with clinically relevant drugs. In this study, we assayed plasma concentrations of three typical anionic UTs, indoxyl sulfate (IS), 3-indoleacetic acid (IA), and 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), in 20 hemodialysis patients and 5 healthy volunteers. Moreover, the effects of these anionic UTs on the binding of pravastatin to human serum albumin (HSA) were also evaluated. CMPF concentrations in the plasma of patients were unchanged before and after dialysis (63.0 ± 6.3 µM and 65.1 ± 6.7 µM, respectively), and these values were about 5-fold greater compared with those in healthy volunteers. Although dialysis decreased the plasma IS concentration from 157.9 ± 19.9 µM to 103.8 ± 13.3 µM, the value after hemodialysis was still ca. 27-fold greater than that in healthy volunteers. IA concentrations before and after hemodialysis were almost identical to those in healthy volunteers. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentrations of the three anionic UTs between male and female patients. The magnitude of protein binding was in the order CMPF>IS>IA, indicating that hemodialysis clearance of these anionic UTs was dependent on their protein binding capacities. The ability of IS to reduce pravastatin binding to HSA was much greater than that of CMPF. The present results suggest that statins bind to site II on HSA, and that their binding is modulated by IS when elevated in hemodialysis patients.