Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Methimazole versus Radioactive Iodine in the Treatment of Toxic Multinodular Goiter.

BACKGRUOUND: This study compared the degree of sustained control of hyperthyroidism in patients with toxic multinodular goiter (TMNG) treated with long-term methimazole (LT-MMI) or radioactive iodine (RAI). METHODS: In this clinical trial, 130 untreated patients with TMNG were randomized to either LT-MMI or RAI treatment. Both groups were followed for 108 to 148 months, with median follow-up durations of 120 and 132 months in the LT-MMI and RAI groups, respectively. Both groups of patients were followed every 1 to 3 months in the first year and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: After excluding patients in whom the treatment modality was changed and those who were lost to follow-up, 53 patients in the LT-MMI group and 54 in the RAI group completed the study. At the end of the study period, 50 (96%) and 25 (46%) patients were euthyroid, and two (4%) and 25 (46%) were hypothyroid in LT-MMI and RAI groups, respectively. In the RAI group, four (8%) patients had subclinical hyperthyroidism. The mean time to euthyroidism was 4.3±1.3 months in LT-MMI patients and 16.3± 15.0 months in RAI recipients (P<0.001). Patients treated with LT-MMI spent 95.8%±5.9% of the 12-year study period in a euthyroid state, whereas this proportion was 72.4%±14.8% in the RAI-treated patients (P<0.001). No major treatment-related adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: In patients with TMNG, LT-MMI therapy is superior to RAI treatment, as shown by the earlier achievement of euthyroidism and the longer duration of sustained normal serum thyrotropin.

Time to Normalization and Sustainable Normal Serum Thyrotropin Concentrations in Patients with Hyperthyroidism: Comparison of Methimazole and Radioactive Iodine Treatments.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the "time to euthyroidism" and "time spent in euthyroidism" following methimazole (MMI) and radioactive iodine (RAI) treatments. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-eight patients with hyperthyroidism, 178 who underwent long-term MMI treatment and 180 patients who underwent RAI treatment, were analyzed. The time to normalization of increased serum values of free thyroxine and triiodothyronine and suppressed serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) values as well as the percentage of time that the thyroid hormone levels remained within normal ranges during a mean follow-up time of 12 years were compared. RESULTS: The mean time to euthyroidism was 4.59 ± 2.63 months (range, 2-16 months) in the MMI group and 15.39 ± 12.11 months (range, 2-61 months) in the RAI group (P < .001). During follow-up, the percentage of time spent in euthyroidism was 94.5% ± 7.3% and 82.5% + 11.0% in the MMI and RAI groups, respectively (P < .001). Serum TSH values above and below the normal range were observed in 5.3% and 0.2% of patients, respectively, in the MMI group and 9.8% and 7.7% of patients, respectively, in the RAI group (P < .001). The time to euthyroidism and the percentage of time spent in euthyroidism in 40 RAI-treated patients with euthyroidism were similar to those in the MMI group and significantly shorter than those in the RAI-treated hypothyroid and relapsed subgroups. In patients who continued MMI therapy for >10 years, the percentage of time spent in euthyroidism was >99%. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of selected patients, MMI therapy was accompanied by faster achievement of the euthyroid state and more sustained normal serum TSH levels during long-term follow-up compared with RAI therapy.

Revascularisation later than 24h after popliteal artery trauma: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic popliteal artery injury carries heavy morbidity. Ischaemic time is an important factor affecting limb survival. In developing countries most patients present late for repair and there are no distinct guidelines in deciding for revascularisation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with popliteal artery trauma who had presented at least 24h after injury were included in the study. Individuals with dead foot were excluded; participants underwent either amputation or revascularisation. RESULTS: Among 30 patients entered in the study, 3 underwent amputation; of these, 2 had complete paralysis with partial sensory loss and 1 had complete sensory and motor loss. The rate of amputation was significantly higher among patients with motor deficit (p=0.008) but not among those with sensory deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularisation can be successful for patients who retain only one foot movement. We recommend revascularisation also for cases presenting late and with complete motor deficit below the knee, but without mottling.