Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(10): 4435-4444, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133303

RESUMEN

Chest radiography is a frequently used imaging modality in children. However, only fair to moderate inter-observer agreement has been reported between chest radiograph interpreters. Most studies were not performed in real-world clinical settings. Our aims were to examine the agreement between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists in a pediatric real-life setting and to identify clinical risk factors for the discrepancies. Included were children aged 3 months to 18 years who underwent chest radiography in the emergency department not during the regular hours of radiologist interpretation. Every case was reviewed by an expert panel. Inter-observer agreement between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists was assessed by Cohen's kappa; risk factors for disagreement were analyzed. Among 1373 cases, the level of agreement between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists was "moderate" (k = 0.505). For radiographs performed after midnight, agreement was only "fair" (k = 0.391). The expert panel identified clinically relevant disagreements in 260 (18.9%) of the radiographs. Over-treatment of antibiotics was identified in 121 (8.9%) of the cases and under-treatment in 79 (5.8%). In a multivariable logistic regression, the following parameters were found to be significantly associated with disagreements: neurological background (p = 0.046), fever (p = 0.001), dyspnea (p = 0.014), and radiographs performed after midnight (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists in interpreting chest radiographs. Neurological background, fever, dyspnea, and radiographs performed after midnight were identified as risk factors for disagreement. Implementing these findings could facilitate the use of radiologist expertise, save time and resources, and potentially improve patient care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Only fair to moderate inter-observer agreement has been reported between chest radiograph interpreters. • Most studies were not performed in real-world clinical settings. Clinical risk factors for disagreements have not been reported. WHAT IS NEW: • In this study, which included 1373 cases at the emergency department, the level of agreement between interpreters was only "moderate." • The major clinical parameters associated with interpretation discrepancies were neurological background, fever, dyspnea, and interpretations conducted during the night shift.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Radiografía Torácica , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Radiografía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 40(5): 386-389, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38227781

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Pigtail thoracostomy (PT) has become the mainstay technique for the drainage of pediatric pleuropneumonic effusions (PLPe). However, its efficacy and complication profile has been questioned when compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and larger bore traditional tube thoracostomy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and complications associated with PT. METHODS: A cross-sectional study at a freestanding tertiary children's hospital. We extracted the medical records of all children aged younger than 18 years treated with PT for PLPe from June 2016 to June 2020. The primary efficacy outcome was treatment failure defined as the need for a repeat drainage procedure, thoracostomy, or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Secondary efficacy outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS) and duration of in situ PT. The primary safety outcomes were adverse events during or after insertion. We also recorded any associated complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 55 children required PT. The median age was 25 months (interquartile range, 14-52) and 58.2% were boys. Eight (14.4%) were bacteremic or in septic shock. There were no adverse events related to insertion. Forty-two (76.3%) children were treated with fibrinolysis. There were 2 (3.6%) treatment failures. The median LOS and PT durations were 13 and 4 days (interquartile ranges, 10-14.8, 3-6.7), respectively. Eight (14.4%) children experienced complications that were nonoperatively managed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PT drainage offers a safe and highly effective option for managing PLPe and carries a very low failure rate.


Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Tiempo de Internación , Pleuroneumonía , Toracostomía , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Toracostomía/métodos , Toracostomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Preescolar , Lactante , Pleuroneumonía/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Drenaje/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Niño , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Adolescente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA